Workshop on Cognitive Inertia Raj Echambadi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Workshop on Cognitive Inertia Raj Echambadi

Description:

Positioned to produce a digital camera in 1989, Polaroid came up with one in 1996. ... They conducted a test on dry ground and 'proved' that his idea was impossible. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ucf1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Workshop on Cognitive Inertia Raj Echambadi


1
Workshop on Cognitive InertiaRaj Echambadi
2
Key Beliefs in Polaroid
  • Success was attributable to long-term projects.
    See Lands writings in 1980.
  • Customers wanted a physical print.
  • Customers wanted photographic quality.
  • The razor / blade model was the guiding business
    model.
  • Instant digital camera with the printer and
    Helios.

3
Polaroid (contd.,)
  • Positioned to produce a digital camera in 1989,
    Polaroid came up with one in 1996.
  • Clash between the old guard and the new guard.
  • 1996. New CEO. Sold Helios. Shifted emphasis to
    marketing. Changed the dogma?
  • Belief systems that they are central to the
    companys identity and reinforced by early
    experiences can become as strong as an ideology.
    Cognitive Inertia. Can stifle innovation and
    learning.

4
Why are beliefs critical?
  • Strategic problems are complex. There is limited
    processing capacity. Hence managers use
    simplified representations of their complex
    reality.
  • Confirmation bias. Seeking evidence that confirms
    prior beliefs.
  • In familiar situations, these representations are
    often accurate. When dealing with the
    unfamiliar, these can become problematic. Will
    the simplified representation work for highly
    dissimilar problems? Framing lock-in.

5
(1) Framing lock-in in Polaroid?
  • Framing Money is in the software. Plus
    technological capabilities way ahead of the
    competition. Allocated resources in products
    that were consistent with their beliefs.
  • Confirmation bias Deeply ingrained
    representations are resistant to negative
    feedback. In the face of contradictory evidence,
    ignore or attribute to something else.
  • Why did they fail? Core capabilities became core
    rigidities. Beware of framing lock-ins.

6
(2) Analogical thinking in Polaroid?
  • Established steel mills and upstart mini-mills.
    Rebars. Andy Grove read about this disruption
    and called cheap PCs as digital rebars. Created
    Celeron.
  • Circuit City and Carmax. Called it an (analogous)
    market development strategy.
  • Enron and broadband. Notion of fragmented
    markets, capital-intensive distribution systems,
    and rapid change. Beware of the deep
    dissimilarities between the source and the
    target. Similarity mapping is a likely carrier of
    cognitive inertia.

7
(3) Emotional Traps
  • Emotionally attached to the razor / blade model
    despite evidence to the contrary. Hence they were
    unwilling to make Polaroid a hardware company.
  • Managers responses to emergent issues are
    emotionally charged. Information is viewed as
    threats.
  • Escalation of commitment.
  • Reduction in breadth of strategic alternatives
    considered.

8
How to avoid cognitive inertia?
  • What is the theory of the market? For Polaroid?
    Photography is about consumables. Technological
    prowess will deliver high margins /
    profitability. Technology will sell itself.
    Question mental models and assumptions.
  • Generate alternatives by talking to multiple
    people inside and outside your industry. What
    alternative models are others suggesting?
  • Analysis

9
How to avoid cognitive inertia?
  • Analysis
  • While considering my model and other models
    assumptions, is there merit to the other model?
    If not, why not?
  • While considering projections or speculative
    scenarios, have I always chosen parameters that
    favor my model? What happens when I change the
    parameters?

10
Gunfire At Sea
  • Pre-1898. Firing from ships on the sea during
    the Spanish-American War. 121 hits out of 9500
    shots at close range.
  • Enter Admiral Scott for the British Navy. Changes
    the continuous aim firing. Gear ratio change. Use
    existing telescopic sites correctly. 3000
    increase in accuracy.
  • Lieutenant Simms advocates this approach for the
    US Navy. Poor naval responses.

11
Gunfire at Sea (contd.,)
  • Finally the Bureau of Ordnance responded.
  • It stated that there was no problem with the US
    Navys accuracy.
  • It rationally walked through why it could not
    work the way Sims claimed it would. They
    conducted a test on dry ground and proved that
    his idea was impossible.
  • Simms last act was to document the entire case
    and send it to the then President Theodore
    Roosevelt who made him Inspector of Practice.
  • Today, Simms is widely acknowledged as the man
    who taught us how to shoot.

12
"Whoever desires constant success must change his
conduct with the times."
"There is nothing more difficult to take in hand,
more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in
its success, than to take the lead in the
introduction of a new order of things. Because
the innovator has for enemies all those who have
done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm
defenders in those who may do well under the new.
"
13
Organizing for Innovation
  • Thinking differently Willingness to cannibalize
  • Organizing differently
  • Future market focus through lead users and
    experimentation
  • Product champions
  • Internal markets

14
Strategic Renewal
  • Remember getting out of the inertial shackles is
    about a fundamental shift / renewal. It is not
    easy.
  • Only 2 firms in the top 10 firms in market
    capitalization from 1987 2000. GE and Exxon.
    Typical top 10 firm spends 4 years on the list.

15
Is being large better for innovation?
  • In 1940s, Schumpeter argued that large firms
    would be more effective innovators
  • Better able to obtain financing
  • Better able to spread costs of RD over large
    volumes
  • Large size may also enable
  • Greater economies of scale and learning effects
  • Taking on large scale or risky projects

16
Does smallness spell doom?
  • No. Large firms may be disadvantaged at
    innovation because
  • Large firms have more bureaucratic inertia
  • More strategic commitments tie firm to current
    technologies
  • Small firms are often more flexible and
    entrepreneurial
  • Many big firms have found ways of feeling small
  • Break overall firm into several subunits
  • Can utilize different culture and controls in
    different units
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com