Title: The NIOSH WorkLife Initiative
1 The NIOSH WorkLife Initiative
- Jane Roemer, J.D.
- The Corporate Environment Wellness Initiatives
- The NIOSH WorkLife Initiative
- June 24, 2008
2The WorkLife Initiative
- Was developed by NIOSH--the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health--and
interested partners - Seeks to understand and promote work environments
and policies that result in healthier, more
productive workers with reduced disease and
injury and lower health care needs and costs
3The Traditional NIOSH Approach
- Has been to address occupational exposures and
hazardous conditions arising at the workplace - Considerable success workers are much less
likely to become sick or injured on the job than
when NIOSH was created in 1970
4The Case for Change
- However, narrow focus on workplace risks alone is
no longer sufficient - Erosion in distinction between illness and injury
from work and non-work risks - Overall health of workers affected by factors
both inside and outside the workplace stress,
diet, exercise, smoking, pre-existing conditions,
chronic illness
5The Case for Change
- Workplace conditions can have an impact on a
persons health and well-being outside of work - Activities, conditions, and behaviors off the job
can influence health, productivity, and abilities
at work
6Trends Prompting a New Approach
- Aging workforce employers recognizing need to
maintain worker health and well-being to increase
work longevity - Increase in chronic diseases including
depression, heart disease, and chronic pulmonary
disease among workers and recognition of the
relationship between these conditions and work
7Trends Prompting a New Approach
- Employers concerned about productivity,
absenteeism, presenteeism - Health insurance costs outpacing wage and profit
growth, employers cutting back on health
benefits, and families paying more for health
care
8Trends Prompting a New Approach
- Corporate mergers, restructuring, and pressures
on the economy result in job insecurity,
increased work hours, greater job
responsibilities, and added health risks - Productivity losses related to personal and
family health problems cost US employers an
average of 1,685 per employee per year, or
225.8 billion total annually
9The WorkLife Initiative
- Launched by NIOSH in 2005 to lead efforts to
explore the benefits and limits of integrative
occupational health protection and health
promotion programs for improving worker health
and well-being - Reflects a growing appreciation of the
interaction between work-based and non-work-based
factors on health
10The WorkLife Initiative
- Looks at worker health and well-being in a more
comprehensive way, taking into account both the
work environment and individual risks,
conditions, and behaviors - The worksite provides an opportunity to address
both work-related risks and behavioral risks
11Why Coordinate Occupational Safety and Health
with Health Promotion?
- Growing evidence that integrative approaches to
workplace and worker health are more effective
than each program separately - World Health Organization guidelines support the
view that comprehensive approaches to work and
health should be integral to management practices
12Why Coordinate Occupational Safety and Health
with Health Promotion?
- Workers at highest risk for exposure to
work-related hazards are often those most likely
to engage in risk-related behaviors off the job - Studies show integrating OSH with HP may increase
HP program participation and effectiveness for
high-risk workers
13Occupational Safety and Health vs. Health
Promotion
- Longstanding separation in the public health and
employment communities between those who address
control of work-related risks and those who focus
on individual and behavioral risk reduction - Advancing knowledge and practice in workplace
health protection and health promotion involves
building bridges between the two communities
14Aims of the WorkLife Initiative
- Encourage and support rigorous evaluation of
integrative approaches to work and health - Identify proven and promising programs, policies,
and practices and promote adoption
15Aims of the WorkLife Initiative
- Motivate trans-disciplinary collaboration among
investigators focused on sustaining and improving
the health of people who work - Overcome the traditional separation of the
occupational health and health promotion
professional communities
16Implementation Supporting Research
- Establishing academic Centers of Excellence
UIowa UMass-Lowell/UConn Harvard U - Trans-disciplinary collaboration and worksite
pilot programs - Developing a WorkLife research agenda based on
industry sectors
17Implementation Disseminating Information
- 2007 WorkLife Symposium
- Communicating known best practices
- Engaging in productive partnerships with
employers, employee groups, other government
agencies, and non-governmental organizations
18Integrative Approaches to Work and Health Benefit
the Disability Workforce
- Better work-based programs to sustain and improve
workplace and worker health benefit all workers - Integrative approaches tend to improve work
organization and the physical work environment in
ways that benefit disabled workers and encourage
appropriate job accommodation
19Health Disparities
- Disease and injury from work-related and
non-work-related exposures are unevenly
distributed throughout the workforce - More comprehensive approaches to work and health
help fight health disparities - The WorkLife Initiative seeks to better
understand how workplace interventions reduce
risk of various health outcomes across the
workforce
20Conclusion
- The WorkLife Initiative creates an opportunity
for the occupational safety and health community
and the health promotion community to work
together to develop and implement workplace
programs, policies, and practices that prevent
workplace illness and injury, and sustain and
promote healthto assure the health of the US
workforce.
21Additional Information
NIOSH WorkLife Initiative Topic
Page www.cdc.gov/niosh/worklife/ NIOSH Web
Sitewww.cdc.gov/niosh