POLS 354 Welfare States in Comparison - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

POLS 354 Welfare States in Comparison

Description:

Like the conservative welfare state, it is designed to produce class solidarity; ... Despite recent conservative and neo-liberal criticism of Sweden's high social ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: cosmoh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: POLS 354 Welfare States in Comparison


1
POLS 354 Welfare States in Comparison
  • Lecture 8
  • Social Democratic States Sweden

2
Lecture outline
  • Introduction
  • Recap social democratic welfare states
  • The Peoples Home
  • The economic crisis and beyond
  • Summary

3
Introduction
  • Sweden is usually portrayed as the closest
    approximation of a social democratic welfare
    state
  • Like the conservative welfare state, it is
    designed to produce class solidarity but it also
    aims for equality
  • It uses expenditures to generate cross-class
    support and taxation to redistribute income
  • Despite recent conservative and neo-liberal
    criticism of Swedens high social expenditure,
    the countrys economic performance is equal to or
    better than many other developed nations, and
    retrenchment has been limited

4
2. Recap social democratic states
  • Equality, universalism
  • Socializing the costs of reproduction
  • Individual autonomy
  • Full employment
  • Dual breadwinner
  • Scandinavian countries Sweden, Norway, Denmark
  • High de-commodification
  • Low stratification

5
3. The Peoples Home
  • Protestantism, individualism and equality
  • Universalism and equality of outcome
  • Explaining Swedish welfare left hegemony vs.
    pluralist accounts
  • Cooption of middle and agrarian classes
  • Universalism and solidarity Goodin and Le Grand
  • The middle classes will be less likely to support
    welfare programs that do not directly benefit them

6
The high quality standardized solution
(Rothstein)
  • Public monopolies discouragement of and
    hostility to the private sector
  • Participation of middle classes in public
    services
  • Insignificant role of private provision and
    financing
  • High proportion of public sector employment,
    especially for women

7
Redistributive universalism
  • National social insurance schemes have high
    replacement rates
  • Social assistance is a municipal responsibility
  • Very high gross social expenditure
  • Highly regressive taxation claws back benefits
    to the better-off, reducing net social
    expenditure

8
Full employment and active labor market policy
  • Sweden enjoyed full employment until the late
    1980s
  • Highest spending on active labor market programs
    (ALMPs) in the OECD 2 of GDP
  • ALMPs have strong training orientation
  • ALMPs are popular amongst the unemployed
    contrast with liberal welfare states

9
  • Womens integration into the labor force as
    equals
  • Sex-role equality movement 1960s
  • Trade union support for gender equality to
    protect wage rates
  • Very high employment to population ratios for
    women, though they have lower hours

10
Supporting work and care
  • Extensive public child care
  • Generous public maternity leave 360 days at 80
    of pay for first 8 years
  • Sickness benefits
  • Lone parent benefits 1937
  • Comparatively generous
  • Low poverty among lone parents

11
Race, migration and welfare
  • Pro-natalism and eugenicism fear of population
    decline in the 1930s
  • Restricting migration to Nordic origin
  • Recent increases in migration
  • Generous treatment of asylum seekers rapid
    entitlement to benefits
  • Multiculturalism and integration

12
3. The economic crisis and beyond
  • Bad economic performance in the early 1990s
  • Unemployment
  • 1991 Conservative victory
  • Limited quantitative retrenchment
  • Social Democrats returned to power in 1994
  • Swedish response to recession increasing
    spending
  • Automatic stabilizers

13
The choice revolution
  • Criticisms of universality inability to cater
    for differences
  • Shift towards private provision and financing
  • Middle classes exiting the welfare state
  • The choice dynamic (Blomqvist)
  • Decentralization increasing local discretion,
    reducing universalism? (Cox)
  • Changes to Swedish welfare have been more
    qualitative than quantitative

14
The new patriarchy (Ginsburg)
  • Gendered-occupational segregation
  • Women are predominantly employed in the public
    sector
  • Shift to private provision threatens public
    service employment
  • As worker-parents, women depend on the welfare
    state for services
  • Retrenchment and privatization disproportionately
    affect women

15
OECD 2004
  • Swedens economic position is sound
  • Demographic shifts will be costly
  • Workforce growth supplied by migration
  • Problems with labor productivity
  • High proportion of those employed who are not at
    work
  • Working hours declining
  • Shift towards public sector employment
  • Falling retirement age
  • Weaker labor productivity of migrants

16
  • The problem of expectations pressure for
    increased spending
  • Interaction between leisure and taxation
  • Benefits from increased labor market integration
  • Swedens demographic problems may be smaller than
    other states

17
5. Summary
  • Sweden produces social solidarity without
    extensive institutionalized stratification
  • Swedens public welfare state has very different
    implications for race and gender than liberal and
    conservative models
  • Critics have questioned the sustainability of
    Swedish welfare and have criticized the
    ideological emphasis on universalism
  • Recent qualitative changes may have long-term
    implications for solidarity

18
Next weeks readings
  • Croissant (2004)
  • Jomo (2001)

19
Questions for discussion
  • In what ways can universalism promote middle
    class loyalty to the welfare state?
  • Critically evaluate the notion that Swedens
    welfare state is highly de-commodifying.
  • What does Ginsburg mean by the new patriarchy?
  • How might the choice revolution undermine the
    redistributive character of Swedish welfare?

20
OECD 2004
  • Why cant Sweden be complacent about its social
    policy?
  • What is effective dependency and why does the
    OECD think it is important for Sweden?
  • What problems does the OECD claim that increased
    leisure creates?
  • What are the likely effects of globalization on
    Swedish welfare?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com