Progressing LDP to draftstandard status - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Progressing LDP to draftstandard status

Description:

Errors in the pseudo-code. Premature bailout from the code path ... Changes to pseudo-code. Allow split horizon when doing ordered control ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: andyhef
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Progressing LDP to draftstandard status


1
Progressing LDPto draft-standard status
Loa AnderssonIna MineiBob Thomas

2
Work done since the last ietf
  • Produced first draft of the revised specification
  • Thanks to all the who participated both online
    and offline.
  • Please review the document, the changes are
    clearly marked in the body of the document.
  • Started the operator survey

3
Changes to the document samples
  • Purely editorial
  • Typos, removal of references to missing sections,
    splitting references into normative and
    non-normative
  • Mention of areas not covered in the document
  • Examples securing hellos, LDP MTU signaling,
    shutting down adjacencies, etc.

4
Changes (continued)
  • Clarifications corner cases
  • The use of the U bit in messages exchanged at
    session initialization time
  • Handling malformed TLVs case for TLV too short
  • Behavior when receiving re-advertisement of an
    address previously advertised, or withdrawal of
    an address from an LSR that has not previously
    advertised that address.

5
Changes (continued)
  • Errors in the pseudo-code
  • Premature bailout from the code path
  • Reference to wrong sections in the code from the
    notes
  • Clarification in the pseudo-code
  • If receiving a label release for an unknown FEC,
    just exit.
  • What to do with unknown attributes when preparing
    the label attributes.

6
Changes (continued)
  • Changes to pseudo-code
  • Allow split horizon when doing ordered control
  • Send notifications when detecting a loop before
    aborting processing (in receive label request and
    receive label mapping)
  • Disclaimer please see the draft for a complete
    list of changes.
  • Host address FEC not changed in the current
    version of the document.

7
Operator survey
  • Operator survey was compiled and sent to the
    list.
  • Thanks to all operators who sent their feedback!
  • Thank you to Scott Bradner for his help as a
    third party ensuring anonymity of replies.
  • Deadline for replies after this ietf.

8
Next steps
  • New version of the draft with feedback and
    corrections received from this document.
  • Please review the draft!
  • Summarize the operator experience
  • Start work on implementation survey

9
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com