Title: 7th PAPC CONFERENCE DJIBOUTI
17th PAPC CONFERENCE DJIBOUTI
- This presentation will probably involve audience
discussion, which will create action items. Use
PowerPoint to keep track of these action items
during your presentation - In Slide Show, click on the right mouse button
- Select Meeting Minder
- Select the Action Items tab
- Type in action items as they come up
- Click OK to dismiss this box
- This will automatically create an Action Item
slide at the end of your presentation with your
points entered.
PORT SECURITY - THE ISPS CODE Nancy
Karigithu DG, Kenya Maritime Authority 16/12/08
2Background
- Ports
- Ports provide major national interface between a
country and the outside world. - A vital element in the national economy.
- Ports operate within a legal framework
- - national maritime policy
- - foundation upon which the State addresses
matters of maritime safety, security, pollution
control and protection of the marine
environment.
3Background
- Two main areas of maritime policy for the
Governments concerns -
- (a) Safety, security and the marine environment.
- These areas are best suited to international
agreement in order to obtain a level of
uniformity. - b) Commercial issues.
- A port is a major national interface between a
country and the outside world and as such it is a
vital element in the national economy.
4Regulation
- Scope
- issues of maritime safety and security
- legal liability for maritime claims
- protection of the marine environment
- facilitation of trade and
- the control of maritime commerce itself.
-
- List is not exhaustive A common clause in IMO
conventions - all matters which are not expressly provided for
in the - present convention remain subject to the
legislation of the - contracting Governments.
5International Basis for Regulation
- a) The United Nations (UN)
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 - UNCLOS defines the rights and obligations of
States with regard to ships in various maritime
zones ports and inland waters, territorial
waters, straits, exclusive economic zones and the
high seas. - Lays the basis and foundation for coastal, port
and flag state control over ships. -
6Port Security Generally
- Ports attract industries, tourists and other
undesirable elements - Variety of unlawful acts - ranging from criminal
acts like robbery against ships, passengers and
crew, theft of cargo, to purposed political
acts or terrorist outrages such as hostage
taking, piracy, stowaways.
7Port Security
- The IMO International Ship and Port Facility
Security Code (ISPS Code) - Applies to
- Port facilities serving cargo ships including
high speed craft of 500 gross tonnage and above - Mobile off shore drilling units and such ships
engaged on international voyages. - Duty of Government to determine that port
facilities in - its territory Comply with the Code
- Port include any place where the ship/port
Interface takes place, including areas such as
anchorages, waiting berths and approaches from
seaward, as appropriate
8Port Security
- Requirement for Ports
- Appoint PFSO
- Undertake PFSA, draw PFSP for various security
levels - Requirements for Governments
- Ensure Ports comply
- -undertake review of measures in place
9Port Security - Legal Framework
- The effective implementation of the ISPS code
depends as much on the operational tasks as in
the legal framework laid down. As a minimum the
following should be in law - an obligation on the Port to take all measures
necessary to prevent unlawful acts against
vessels, persons and property within the area of
the ports jurisdiction - powers of the port to take appropriate measures
to discharge its obligations and the provision of
appropriate personnel for the prevention and
detection of various forms of unlawful activity
in the port area
10Port Security Legal Framework
-
- -Does the Port have to establish its own special
police force with full law enforcement powers
or, alternatively, the obligation to cooperate
with and facilitate the performance of security
functions by the national security agencies and
other law enforcement officers, with clear
provisions on the rights and obligations of the
port vis a vis such agencies -
- -Does the Port have power to establish
regulations and procedures for port security and
arrangements for ensuring the effective
implementation of these procedures including the
establishment of safety and security drills and
other procedures required by law or recommended
in relevant international regulations and
guidelines
11Port Security Legal Framework
-
- - does the port have powers to arrest and detain
vessels and persons attempting to commit offences
as defined by national law or applicable
international agreements, and to submit such
persons to the jurisdiction of the relevant law
of enforcement of judicial authorities? -
- -where the port State is a party to SUA
Convention the law should grant the necessary
jurisdiction to the courts to deal with persons
who commit unlawful acts, even if such acts were
committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of
the courts, such jurisdiction will apply only if
the State has jurisdiction under the terms of the
convention
12Port Security Legal Framework
- -are there penalties for failing to comply with
any regulations made by the port or other persons
duly authorized by law to make such regulations?
finally - - what about liabilities of the port for damage
or loss or resulting from such acts done or
directions given which turn out to be
unreasonable or improper, including any
exemptions or exclusions from liability, as may
be deemed appropriate?
13Matters not covered by the Code
- The ISPS Code is not a panacea - does not deal
with all - aspects of ships and port security
- security of ships and facilities not covered
under the Code and - the security of the cargo/ supply chain.
-
- Whilst it is the duty of the Government to
provide for these - matters port authorities must take a proactive
role in this - regard because of the potential for contamination
and - compromise to their own security arrangements
under the - ISPS Code.
-
14CONTAINER SECURITY
- To ensure complete maritime security, port
authorities must address themselves to the weak
links of the container transport chain. The
security of a laden container is only as good as
the procedures in place at locations it passes
through. - As gatekeeper to the freight transport market
via their regulatory and licensing oversight,
they should therefore introduce security criteria
in the licensing process of - vehicles, operators, personnel and facilities
and monitor whether licensees continue to meet
these security requirements. - Communicate to Customs information regarding
operators under their jurisdiction that might be
useful in the container screening process.
15CONTAINER SECURITY
- Screen employees according to security criteria
also check worker identification with other
operators in accordance with national laws and
develop protocols regarding access to containers
by high security-risk workers. - Confirm that operators given licences and permits
are bona fide operators without criminal records
pertinent to vehicle/freight crime. - Maintain information on persistent offenders and
withdraw licences or refuse to grant permits to
them
16CONTAINER SECURITY
- - Provide information and advice to operators on
theft avoidance, safe practices, recommended
routes, protected parking areas and appropriate
precautions. - - Encourage the setting up of secure and safe
parking areas and freight traffic centres for
trucks and loads (containers, trailers etc). - Standards of protection for such areas must be
defined to commonly agreed levels or criteria.
17CONTAINER SECURITY
- Addressing the security of the container
transport chain requires a comprehensive
inter-modal framework integrating measures across
the entire container transport chain. - The WCO ( cradle-to-grave container stuffing
and seal - management guidelines) signatory to WCO
container initiatives - -"Framework of Standards to Secure and
Facilitate Global Trade" -
18IMO/ILO CODE OF PRACTICE ON PORT SECURITY
- The 2002 security conference also invited IMO and
the ILO to establish a joint Working Group to
undertake more detailed work on comprehensive
port security requirements. - Code of Practice on Security in Ports
- extends the consideration of port security beyond
the area of the port facility into the whole
port and - applies security guidelines to all areas and
functions of the port, and those working in,
having business with and requiring access to the
port or transiting through the port i.e. port
workers and other port personnel, seafarers,
passengers and passengers baggage, cargo,
material and stores, vehicles and equipment
originating from within and outside the port area.
19Complementary Legislation
-
- The Convention for the Suppression of unlawful
Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation
(SUA) 1988. It was intended to improve measures
for dealing with incidents such as terrorists
attacks on commercial shipping. It entered into
force in March 1992.
20Commercial and Insurance Implications
- Non-compliance
- Port operators who are non-compliant may face
claims from ship operators who suffer losses as a
result of such non-compliance. A ship can be
delayed due to alleged non-compliance with the
ISPS Code for a variety of reasons and for
failures on the part of a variety of persons. - Section 14.1 of Part A of the ISPS Code provides
that Security measures and procedures shall be
applied at the port facility in such a manner as
to cause a minimum of interference with, or delay
to, passengers, ship, ships personnel and
visitors, goods and services. - A delicate balance
21Contracts of Carriage ISPS Code
- Maritime contracts for the carriage of goods by
sea accurately document the rights and duties of
each party - including clearly defining owners
and chatterers duties under the ISPS Code as well
as the fair apportionment of costs.
22Contracts of Carriage ISPS Code
- ISPS clause all delays, costs and expenses
which result from the ship not being ISPS
compliant will be for the owners account,
whereas delays, costs and expenses which result
from the port facility not being ISPS compliant
will be for the chatterers account, unless
caused by the owners negligence -
- All foreseeable costs are covered by the clause
delays, costs expenses imposed by a Port
Authority under the Code are for the Chatterers
account. The costs of preparing and complying
with the Ship Security Plan are for owners
account. The question that arises is who pays for
non-compliant ports?
23Insurance
- Marine insurance breach of an express warranty,
such as a failure to comply with national or
international regulations for example, could be a
reason for an insurer to reject a claim that has
resulted directly from a failure to comply with
the ISPS Code - unsafe ports clause may impact on the ships
calling at the next port after visiting a port
facility that is not compliant. - The declaration that a ship is unsafe for having
come from an un-compliant port may lead to the
no-compliant ship losing its insurance cover and
exposure to third party claims.
24Insurance
- Failure for a port to be compliant may constitute
prima facie proof of negligence and a chatterer
may have the recourse to sue the port for
negligence. - The presence of stowaways on a ship could also be
proof of something seriously wrong with security
in the port of origin and thus conclusive proof
of negligence.
25Conclusion
- Port authorities must acknowledge and observe
international maritime transport conventions. - Port authorities ensure that to the best of
their abilities that real compliance with the
ISPS code, rather than superficial paper
compliance, is achieved.
26Conclusion
- Ensure that many of the basic provisions of the
ISPS extend to those vessels and ports not
covered by the ISPS - They must lobby Governments to ensure that the
law keeps up to date with the international
requirements that have a bearing on port and
cargo operations.
27ANY QUESTIONS