7th PAPC CONFERENCE DJIBOUTI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

7th PAPC CONFERENCE DJIBOUTI

Description:

its territory Comply with the Code ... The effective implementation of the ISPS code depends as much on the operational ... IMO/ILO CODE OF PRACTICE ON PORT SECURITY ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: NAN293
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 7th PAPC CONFERENCE DJIBOUTI


1
7th PAPC CONFERENCE DJIBOUTI
  • This presentation will probably involve audience
    discussion, which will create action items. Use
    PowerPoint to keep track of these action items
    during your presentation
  • In Slide Show, click on the right mouse button
  • Select Meeting Minder
  • Select the Action Items tab
  • Type in action items as they come up
  • Click OK to dismiss this box
  • This will automatically create an Action Item
    slide at the end of your presentation with your
    points entered.

PORT SECURITY - THE ISPS CODE Nancy
Karigithu DG, Kenya Maritime Authority 16/12/08
2
Background
  • Ports
  • Ports provide major national interface between a
    country and the outside world.
  • A vital element in the national economy.
  • Ports operate within a legal framework
  • - national maritime policy
  • - foundation upon which the State addresses
    matters of maritime safety, security, pollution
    control and protection of the marine
    environment.

3
Background
  • Two main areas of maritime policy for the
    Governments concerns
  •  
  • (a) Safety, security and the marine environment.
  • These areas are best suited to international
    agreement in order to obtain a level of
    uniformity.
  • b) Commercial issues.
  • A port is a major national interface between a
    country and the outside world and as such it is a
    vital element in the national economy.

4
Regulation
  • Scope
  • issues of maritime safety and security
  • legal liability for maritime claims
  • protection of the marine environment
  • facilitation of trade and
  • the control of maritime commerce itself.
  •  
  • List is not exhaustive A common clause in IMO
    conventions
  • all matters which are not expressly provided for
    in the
  • present convention remain subject to the
    legislation of the
  • contracting Governments.

5
International Basis for Regulation
  • a) The United Nations (UN)
  • United Nations Convention on the Law of the
    Sea (UNCLOS) 1982
  • UNCLOS defines the rights and obligations of
    States with regard to ships in various maritime
    zones ports and inland waters, territorial
    waters, straits, exclusive economic zones and the
    high seas.
  • Lays the basis and foundation for coastal, port
    and flag state control over ships.

6
Port Security Generally
  • Ports attract industries, tourists and other
    undesirable elements
  • Variety of unlawful acts - ranging from criminal
    acts like robbery against ships, passengers and
    crew, theft of cargo, to purposed political
    acts or terrorist outrages such as hostage
    taking, piracy, stowaways.

7
Port Security
  • The IMO International Ship and Port Facility
    Security Code (ISPS Code)
  • Applies to
  • Port facilities serving cargo ships including
    high speed craft of 500 gross tonnage and above
  • Mobile off shore drilling units and such ships
    engaged on international voyages.
  • Duty of Government to determine that port
    facilities in
  • its territory Comply with the Code
  • Port include any place where the ship/port
    Interface takes place, including areas such as
    anchorages, waiting berths and approaches from
    seaward, as appropriate

8
Port Security
  • Requirement for Ports
  • Appoint PFSO
  • Undertake PFSA, draw PFSP for various security
    levels
  • Requirements for Governments
  • Ensure Ports comply
  • -undertake review of measures in place

9
Port Security - Legal Framework
  • The effective implementation of the ISPS code
    depends as much on the operational tasks as in
    the legal framework laid down. As a minimum the
    following should be in law
  • an obligation on the Port to take all measures
    necessary to prevent unlawful acts against
    vessels, persons and property within the area of
    the ports jurisdiction
  • powers of the port to take appropriate measures
    to discharge its obligations and the provision of
    appropriate personnel for the prevention and
    detection of various forms of unlawful activity
    in the port area

10
Port Security Legal Framework
  •  
  • -Does the Port have to establish its own special
    police force with full law enforcement powers
    or, alternatively, the obligation to cooperate
    with and facilitate the performance of security
    functions by the national security agencies and
    other law enforcement officers, with clear
    provisions on the rights and obligations of the
    port vis a vis such agencies
  •  
  • -Does the Port have power to establish
    regulations and procedures for port security and
    arrangements for ensuring the effective
    implementation of these procedures including the
    establishment of safety and security drills and
    other procedures required by law or recommended
    in relevant international regulations and
    guidelines

11
Port Security Legal Framework
  •  
  • - does the port have powers to arrest and detain
    vessels and persons attempting to commit offences
    as defined by national law or applicable
    international agreements, and to submit such
    persons to the jurisdiction of the relevant law
    of enforcement of judicial authorities?
  •  
  • -where the port State is a party to SUA
    Convention the law should grant the necessary
    jurisdiction to the courts to deal with persons
    who commit unlawful acts, even if such acts were
    committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of
    the courts, such jurisdiction will apply only if
    the State has jurisdiction under the terms of the
    convention

12
Port Security Legal Framework
  • -are there penalties for failing to comply with
    any regulations made by the port or other persons
    duly authorized by law to make such regulations?
    finally
  • - what about liabilities of the port for damage
    or loss or resulting from such acts done or
    directions given which turn out to be
    unreasonable or improper, including any
    exemptions or exclusions from liability, as may
    be deemed appropriate?

13
Matters not covered by the Code
  • The ISPS Code is not a panacea - does not deal
    with all
  • aspects of ships and port security
  • security of ships and facilities not covered
    under the Code and
  • the security of the cargo/ supply chain.
  •  
  • Whilst it is the duty of the Government to
    provide for these
  • matters port authorities must take a proactive
    role in this
  • regard because of the potential for contamination
    and
  • compromise to their own security arrangements
    under the
  • ISPS Code.
  •  

14
CONTAINER SECURITY
  • To ensure complete maritime security, port
    authorities must address themselves to the weak
    links of the container transport chain. The
    security of a laden container is only as good as
    the procedures in place at locations it passes
    through.
  • As gatekeeper to the freight transport market
    via their regulatory and licensing oversight,
    they should therefore introduce security criteria
    in the licensing process of
  • vehicles, operators, personnel and facilities
    and monitor whether licensees continue to meet
    these security requirements.
  • Communicate to Customs information regarding
    operators under their jurisdiction that might be
    useful in the container screening process.

15
CONTAINER SECURITY
  • Screen employees according to security criteria
    also check worker identification with other
    operators in accordance with national laws and
    develop protocols regarding access to containers
    by high security-risk workers.
  • Confirm that operators given licences and permits
    are bona fide operators without criminal records
    pertinent to vehicle/freight crime.
  • Maintain information on persistent offenders and
    withdraw licences or refuse to grant permits to
    them

16
CONTAINER SECURITY
  • - Provide information and advice to operators on
    theft avoidance, safe practices, recommended
    routes, protected parking areas and appropriate
    precautions.
  • - Encourage the setting up of secure and safe
    parking areas and freight traffic centres for
    trucks and loads (containers, trailers etc).
  • Standards of protection for such areas must be
    defined to commonly agreed levels or criteria.

17
CONTAINER SECURITY
  • Addressing the security of the container
    transport chain requires a comprehensive
    inter-modal framework integrating measures across
    the entire container transport chain.
  • The WCO ( cradle-to-grave container stuffing
    and seal
  • management guidelines) signatory to WCO
    container initiatives
  • -"Framework of Standards to Secure and
    Facilitate Global Trade"

18
IMO/ILO CODE OF PRACTICE ON PORT SECURITY
  • The 2002 security conference also invited IMO and
    the ILO to establish a joint Working Group to
    undertake more detailed work on comprehensive
    port security requirements.
  • Code of Practice on Security in Ports
  • extends the consideration of port security beyond
    the area of the port facility into the whole
    port and
  • applies security guidelines to all areas and
    functions of the port, and those working in,
    having business with and requiring access to the
    port or transiting through the port i.e. port
    workers and other port personnel, seafarers,
    passengers and passengers baggage, cargo,
    material and stores, vehicles and equipment
    originating from within and outside the port area.

19
Complementary Legislation
  • The Convention for the Suppression of unlawful
    Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation
    (SUA) 1988. It was intended to improve measures
    for dealing with incidents such as terrorists
    attacks on commercial shipping. It entered into
    force in March 1992.

20
Commercial and Insurance Implications
  • Non-compliance
  • Port operators who are non-compliant may face
    claims from ship operators who suffer losses as a
    result of such non-compliance. A ship can be
    delayed due to alleged non-compliance with the
    ISPS Code for a variety of reasons and for
    failures on the part of a variety of persons.
  • Section 14.1 of Part A of the ISPS Code provides
    that Security measures and procedures shall be
    applied at the port facility in such a manner as
    to cause a minimum of interference with, or delay
    to, passengers, ship, ships personnel and
    visitors, goods and services.
  • A delicate balance

21
Contracts of Carriage ISPS Code
  • Maritime contracts for the carriage of goods by
    sea accurately document the rights and duties of
    each party - including clearly defining owners
    and chatterers duties under the ISPS Code as well
    as the fair apportionment of costs.

22
Contracts of Carriage ISPS Code
  • ISPS clause all delays, costs and expenses
    which result from the ship not being ISPS
    compliant will be for the owners account,
    whereas delays, costs and expenses which result
    from the port facility not being ISPS compliant
    will be for the chatterers account, unless
    caused by the owners negligence
  • All foreseeable costs are covered by the clause
    delays, costs expenses imposed by a Port
    Authority under the Code are for the Chatterers
    account. The costs of preparing and complying
    with the Ship Security Plan are for owners
    account. The question that arises is who pays for
    non-compliant ports?

23
Insurance
  • Marine insurance breach of an express warranty,
    such as a failure to comply with national or
    international regulations for example, could be a
    reason for an insurer to reject a claim that has
    resulted directly from a failure to comply with
    the ISPS Code
  • unsafe ports clause may impact on the ships
    calling at the next port after visiting a port
    facility that is not compliant.
  • The declaration that a ship is unsafe for having
    come from an un-compliant port may lead to the
    no-compliant ship losing its insurance cover and
    exposure to third party claims.

24
Insurance
  • Failure for a port to be compliant may constitute
    prima facie proof of negligence and a chatterer
    may have the recourse to sue the port for
    negligence.
  • The presence of stowaways on a ship could also be
    proof of something seriously wrong with security
    in the port of origin and thus conclusive proof
    of negligence.

25
Conclusion
  • Port authorities must acknowledge and observe
    international maritime transport conventions.
  • Port authorities ensure that to the best of
    their abilities that real compliance with the
    ISPS code, rather than superficial paper
    compliance, is achieved.

26
Conclusion
  • Ensure that many of the basic provisions of the
    ISPS extend to those vessels and ports not
    covered by the ISPS
  • They must lobby Governments to ensure that the
    law keeps up to date with the international
    requirements that have a bearing on port and
    cargo operations.

27
ANY QUESTIONS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com