Hanse Passage Final Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Hanse Passage Final Conference

Description:

(Sheffield City Council) Youth Participation (Prov. Groningen) Waterframework. Directive ... Normandie) Youth Advisory Council ( Bremen) NeXt Party (Lower ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: gesawess
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hanse Passage Final Conference


1
Hanse Passage Final Conference
Cluster ANew Forms of Governance
  • Gesa Wessolowski
  • The Senator for Finances, Bremen
  • Tim Everette_at_SY connects, Yorkshire

2
Agenda
  • Goals and aims
  • Strategy
  • Subthemes and projects
  • Progress
  • Best practice(s)
  • What did we learn?

3
Goals and aims
  • to stimulate inter-regional co-operation with
    regard to issues related to new and innovative
    forms of governance and more efficient public
    administration at the regional and the local
    level

4
Strategy
5
Subthemes and Projects
from 14 regions in 6 countries
Participation and Transparency
48 in-stitutions
Youth Participation(Prov. Groningen)
WaterframeworkDirective (OOWV, LWK Weserems)
E-Participation(Sheffield City Council)
ParliamentariansProject (Prov.Flevoland)
Mobility Health (BFER Bremen)
E-Gov Hanse(Bremen online services)
Hanse Mirror(Prov. Groningen)
Enhance capabilitiesfor governments
Improve public services
1.62 mill.
6
Selected best practices
Stakeholder mapping in watershed management
(Lower Saxony) Debate Institute (Overijssel)
Citizens Jury in spacial planning (Flevoland)
Drenthe Europe Network RegNet E-Government
Bremen-Lower Saxony (Bremen) Fryslan House
(Fryslan) - Youth, region and parliaments
(Pomorskie) Social economic councils (Haute
Normandie) Enterprising Parliament (Groningen)
The citizens motion (Bremen) IBON (Bremen) -
Emergency Medical Information System (Haute
Normandie) Integrated spacial planning in
local public transport (Hannover) dial-a-bus
(Sheffield) e_at_sy connects (Yorkshire) Voting
in the 21st Century (Hanse Passage) Trend Team,
Youth Poll (Groningen) Future Games (Drenthe)
Safety on the bus (Flevoland) Frisian Youth
Parliament (Fryslan) Junior Association (Haute
Normandie) Youth Advisory Council ( Bremen)
NeXt Party (Lower Saxony) Digifarm
(Overijssel) Academy Zlota9 (Lublin) Helpline
(Riga)
7
Progress
  • more than 150 best practices discussed
  • more than 10 best practices successfully
    transferred
  • Intense knowledge transfer
  • Sustainable networks
  • Most synergies in E-Government and
    E-Participation

8
Best practice example e.Participation e_at_SY
Connects UK Tim Rivett (Chair e_at_SY Connects)
9
Evidence of Impact
  • a) Not just saying sharing but already
    implemented in the UK and Europe

b) Location and players involved South
Yorkshire
b) Location and players involved South
Yorkshire other UK towns/cities Flevoland
(Holland) City of Riga (Latvia) City of
Yangquan/Beijing
c) was in existence but limited functionality,
up-take and impact Inclusive, innovative
(multiple channel) Petitioning
d) Scale (e.g. geographical extent, categories of
beneficiaries targeted, number of
beneficiaries targeted) 1.4 Million in
South Yorkshire alone, across all groups
10
Sharing of Good Practice
  • 1. Openness
  • Process and change in process/deadlines published
  • Access via any channel
  • 2. Transparency Accountability
  • Whole active petition process reviewed by all
  • Responsible officers and respondents
    identified/contactable
  • 3. Participation
  • Total and intuitive
  • (a) Generic, multi-lingual solution implemented
    outside UK

11
Understanding of Multiple Channel Aspects
Innovation Management Efficiency
  • Three Key Efficiency Effectiveness Gains
  • 1. Reduction in administration burden Shared
    Service
  • 2. Value added customer satisfaction -
  • Not simply one way information flow or two
    way consultations
  • creates a partnership between civil society
    elected
  • representatives and/or government officers

  • A Community of Practice
  • 3. Public Service Inclusion larger number of
    participants, better decisions through use of
    Multiple Channels

12
Why is this different?
  • 1. Dynamic Impact
  • 2. Exemplar of Sharing on all levels
  • 3. Unsurpassed Multiple Channel Strategy
    Implementation
  • 4. Innovative with Inherent Efficient
    Effectiveness Gains

No citizen, or business needs to be left
behind, theyre empowered and can assist and
particpate to make better informed decisions
13
What did we learn?
  • Interregional knowledge transfer and networking
    are most important for improving governance
    arrangements
  • Citizen participation and improving public
    service delivery are most called for on the local
    and regional level
  • E - is an instrument to support and enhance the
    efficiency and innovation of input and output
    side of local and regional governance
    (E-Government)
  • Innovative public sector serves as a light house,
    attracting new and innovative businesses to the
    region

14
The faces behind
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com