Prof Marcus Ormerod - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Prof Marcus Ormerod

Description:

It is reasonably cheap to conduct, but can be time consuming ... covers just title, graphic designs (not photos) and thanks on the back with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: marcuso
Category:
Tags: marcus | ormerod | prof

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prof Marcus Ormerod


1
Prof Marcus Ormerod
  • Research Survey Methods

2
When to use a questionnaire
  • The main research technique for data gathering in
    your study
  • As a small part of some other research technique
    (triangulation, springboard)
  • Usually cross-sectional rather than longitudinal

3
Ways to collect questionnaire data
  • Face-to-face interviews
  • Self-administered questionnaires
  • By postage
  • Dropped off and collected later
  • Electronically
  • Telephone interviews

4
Advantages of face-to-face interviews
  • They can be used with groups of people who
    otherwise would not complete the questionnaire
  • If a respondent does not understand a question
    the interviewer can clarify
  • You can use techniques that cannot be used by
    post such as props, cue cards
  • Can allow more time than a person would give for
    a postal questionnaire
  • You give questions one at a time so they do not
    see what is coming up later
  • You know who answers the questions

5
Disadvantages of face-to-face interviews
  • Can be intrusive and interviewer can bias the
    answers
  • Costly to undertake interviews in both time and
    money
  • Interviewers can skew results by grabbing
    available respondents rather than the sample
    identified
  • The amount of interviews that can be done is less
    than a postal questionnaire
  • The time to conduct all the interviews can mean
    that events have changed dramatically

6
Advantages of self-administered questionnaires
  • Allows a single researcher to survey a large
    sample of respondents at a low cost
  • All respondents get the same questions
  • Long list questions/ matrices allow more
    complexity than in an interview situation
  • Response effects are minimised on sensitive
    questions. Can remain anonymous
  • Can be delivered in a variety of mediums to suit
    the respondents needs
  • People are generally familiar with the concept of
    self-administered questionnaires

7
Disadvantages of self-administered questionnaires
  • You have no control over how people interpret
    questions
  • You have to assume the person you targeted really
    did complete the answers
  • Response rates can be very low (20-30) which
    means you need a larger sample to compensate
  • Sampling strategies can be seriously flawed and
    will inevitably be flawed by a low return rate
  • You cannot hide questions from a respondent until
    they have completed previous questions
  • Certain groups of people are more likely to
    return it

8
Advantages of telephone interviews
  • They are more impersonal than face-to-face
    interviews
  • It is reasonably cheap to conduct, but can be
    time consuming
  • You can talk to people who would otherwise be
    inaccessible through location

9
Disadvantages of telephone interviews
  • Random sampling can be difficult
  • Time tends to be short before someone hangs up
    about 20 minutes
  • If using paid interviewers they can produce
    garbage data to meet quotas

10
Question wording
  • Be unambiguous
  • Use vocabulary that your respondents understand,
    but do not be condescending
  • Respondents must know enough to respond to the
    question asked
  • Make sure there is a clear purpose for every
    question and that the respondent understands the
    significance

11
Question wording
  • Be careful with contingencies and filter
    questions
  • Use clear scales that reflect the detail required
    and the medium used (telephone interviews usually
    3 point scale, self-administered questionnaires 5
    or 7 point scale

12
Open-ended versus closed questions
  • Open-ended questions allow the respondent free
    choice in their answer, but this can then leads
    to more difficulty in categorising and analysing
    answers
  • Closed (forced-choice) questions provide a series
    of possible answers for the respondent to choose
    from, although it is usual to include an other
    choice to allow the respondent to include their
    own if different from the selection provided.
    Easier to precode answers

13
  • Behaviour questions establish what people do
  • Belief questions ascertain what the respondent
    thinks is true
  • Attitude questions try to establish what they
    think is desirable
  • Attribute questions collect information about the
    respondents characteristics
  • (Vaus 1996, pp81-83)

14
Response rates
Number returned
Response rate
X 100
N in sample (ineligible unreachable)
15
Dillmans method (Bernard 2000, Vaus 1996)
  • Mailed questionnaires must look professional,
    research suggests light green paper gets the best
    response rate
  • Dont put any questions on the front or back
    covers just title, graphic designs (not photos)
    and thanks on the back with invitation for
    further comments
  • Question order is important. Start with a
    directly relevant question that is interesting,
    easy to answer and non-threatening.
    Socio-economic and demographic questions at the
    end

16
  • Never allow a question to break at the end of a
    page. Use plenty of paper. Standard convention is
    all capitals for instructions and mixed for
    questions
  • Package questions into logical sections in
    self-administered questionnaires and through
    lists, tables and matrices
  • If you need respondents to check just one box
    make sure the possible responses are exhaustive
    and mutually exclusive

17
  • Keep unthreatening questions short, but include
    preambles to lessen intimidation of threatening
    questions
  • Avoid loaded questions dont you agree that..
  • Do not use double barrelled questions
  • Do not assume always test the question to check
    that you have covered all the possibilities
  • Do not take emotional stands on questions
  • If conducting it in another language than your
    own use back translation to ensure concepts are
    kept

18
  • Keep mailed questionnaires down to 10 pages in
    length with no more than 125 questions
  • The cover letter should explain in the briefest
    terms the nature of the study, how the respondent
    was selected, who should complete it, guarantee
    of confidentiality and possibly anonymity, who is
    funding the survey and why it is important for
    the respondent to return the questionnaire
  • Personally sign the letters in blue ballpoint
  • Enclose prepaid return address envelopes

19
  • Consider how you will know if someone has
    responded if anonymous replies use a separate
    card with a number, or number the return
    envelopes
  • Package the questionnaire, cover letter, reply
    envelope and postcard in another envelope with a
    direct typed address rather than mailing label.
    Use first class stamps especially commemorative
  • Inducements can be taken in various ways and may
    dissuade respondents, if anything include a pen
    to complete the questionnaire

20
  • Contact people before sending out the
    questionnaire and have a follow-up procedure to
    chase non-responses. Each follow-up wave nets
    approximately 50 of the previous waves amount
    again
  • Establish that a questionnaire is the most
    appropriate method of data collection for what
    you are trying to study
  • Does it need to be representative? And if so can
    you identify the population?

21
Some points from experience
  • How will you analyse the data when you get it in?
  • How much time and money do you have?
  • Think of a time period to develop the
    questionnaire then double it
  • Timing and respondent interest
  • Pilot questions as much as possible
  • Range of answers rather than all at one end of
    the response range

22
Piloting questionnaires
  • Variation does the question produce spread
    Meaning do they understand the intended meaning
    of the question and you the answer?
  • Redundancy are you asking the same item in
    different questions? (But can be useful for
    checking consistency of answers)
  • Scalability if a set of questions forms a scale
    do they all fit?
  • Flow do the questions fit together?
  • Question skips and filters do they work?
  • (Vaus 1996, pp100-103)

23
Probability v non-probability
  • Individual-attribute data gathers data about the
    individuals within a population and requires
    probability sampling to be able to generalise
    back to the entire population
  • Cultural data requires experts who can offer
    explanations on how the group does things, or
    experiences of the group, and can use
    non-probability sampling as it is not generalised
    back to the whole population

24
Scales
  • Single indicator scales assign units of analysis
    to categories of variables
  • Composite measures or complex scales/indexes are
    made up of several items all of which count the
    same thing, such as IQ tests, Dow Jones index,
    life assurance tables (Bernard 2000, pp 287- 289)
  • Guttman scales (scalogram analysis)measure items
    which have a pattern which indicates that they
    are a unidimensional variable (Bernard 2000,
    pp289-293, Oppenheim 1992, pp201-205)

25
  • Likert scales are 5 point or 7 point scales based
    on polar opposites such as agree-disagree,
    excellent-bad (Bernard 2000, pp294-296 Oppenheim
    1992, pp 195-200 Vaus 1996, p88, p252-257)
  • Semantic differential scales differ from a true
    Likert scale in that they name the item, rather
    than ask a question about it, and ask the
    respondents to rate their feelings towards a set
    of variables, usually on a 7 point scale (Bernard
    2000, pp 303-304 Vaus 1996, p88)

26
Sampling
  • Probability sampling
  • Simple random
  • Systematic
  • Stratified
  • Multistage cluster
  • Non-probability sampling
  • Purposive
  • Quota
  • Convenience or Availability
  • Snowball
  • (Bernard 2000, pp144-180 Vaus 1996 pp 60-79)

27
References/Bibliography
  • Bernard, H.R. (2000). Social Research Methods.
    Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London
    Sage.
  • Lincoln, Y.S. Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic
    Inquiry. London Sage.
  • MacRae, S. (1994). Describing Interpreting
    Data. Leicester BPS Books
  • MacRae, S. (1994). Drawings Inferences from
    Statistical Data. Leicester BPS Books
  • MacRae, S. (1994). Models Methods for the
    Behavioural Sciences. Leicester BPS Books
  • Newton, R.R. Rudestam, K.R. (1999). Your
    Statistical Consultant. London Sage.
  • Oppenheim, A.N. (1992). Questionnaire Design,
    Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London
    Cassell.
  • Vaus, D.A. (1996). Surveys in Social Research.
    London UCL Press
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com