Table of contents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Table of contents

Description:

photos. Living application. Safety assessment ... 'quick&cheap': no need for pre-weighed vehicles. no need to close the traffic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:171
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 237
Provided by: steveph
Category:
Tags: contents | table

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Table of contents


1
(No Transcript)
2
Table of contents
  • M. McKenzie Guidelines on the selection of
    innovative techniques for the rehabilitation of
    concrete highway structures 3
  • A. Žnidaric Optimised assessment of bridges 31
  • E. Denarié Ultra High Performance Fibre
    Reinforced Concretes (UHPFRC) for rehabilitation
    1. Motivation and Background 69
  • M. Richardson Guidance on use of surface-applied
    corrosion inhibitors Context and Framework of
    Guidance 97
  • A. Žnidaric Optimised assessment of
    bridges Case study 1 - Medno bridge - Soft Load
    Testing 135
  • A. OConnor Optimised assessment of bridges
    Case study 2 Danish examples 149
  • JC. Putallaz Ultra High Performance Fibre
    Reinforced Composites (UHPFRC) for
    rehabilitation - 2. Case study first
    application 165
  • M. Richardson Guidance on use of surface-applied
    corrosion inhibitors Workshop on detailed
    guidance and Case Studies 197
  • E. Brühwiler Advances in rehabilitation of
    highway structures Discussion, Summary and
    Perspectives 233

3
(No Transcript)
4
Guidelines on the selection of innovative
techniques for the rehabilitation of concrete
highway structures
  • Malcolm McKenzie
  • TRL Ltd, UK

5
Development Team
  • Richard Woodward, TRL Ltd
  • Team
  • Ales Žnidaric ZAG
  • Mark Richardson UCD
  • Emmanuel Denarié EPFL
  • Tomasz Wierzbicki IBDIM
  • Alan OConnor TCD
  • Professor Joan Casas UPC
  • Ciaran McNally UCD
  • Malcolm McKenzie TRL
  • Bill McMahon TRL

6
Overview
  • Guidelines and innovation
  • Deteriorating concrete structures
  • Selecting the best rehabilitation option for a
    structure
  • Special procedures for innovative techniques
  • Ranking projects when budgets are limited
  • GUIDELINES NOT RULES

7
Guidelines and innovation
  • Innovation is an essential part of engineering
    development
  • Materials and techniques are always being
    improved
  • There are acknowledged problems with existing
    rehabilitation techniques
  • Cautious approach aimed at controlling risks and
    developing experience
  • Yesterdays innovation is todays tradition

8
Concrete bridge deterioration
9
Some deterioration mechanisms
  • Reinforcement corrosion
  • Alkali silica reaction
  • Freeze/thaw effects
  • Sulfate attack
  • Cracking (settlement, thermal)
  • Overloading
  • Impact damage

10
Identification of problem
  • Cause
  • Extent
  • Importance
  • based on
  • Inspection
  • Structural Assessment

11
MAINTENANCE OPTIONS
  • Do nothing
  • Monitor further deterioration
  • Carry out remedial treatment
  • Carry out strengthening
  • Replace element or structure

12
Procedure
13
Innovative techniques additional risk
  • Lack of a long established track record
  • Uncertainties in
  • Conditions under which they will be effective
  • Side effects
  • Long term durability
  • Implications for future maintenance
  • Monitoring effectiveness

14
Balance conflicting Issues
  • Technical aspects need to be considered along
    with other relevant factors to meet the needs of
    current and future customers.

COST
TIME
ENVIRONMENT
15
Wallet
Cost of repairs
Impact on local economy
Running costs
Cost of delays
Renewal costs
Affordability
16
Watch
Time of works
User delays
When
Life of repair
17
World
Aesthetics
Raw materials
User delays
Transport of materials
Energy usage
Noise
Pollution
18

Decision making - WWW
  • Rigorous
  • Engineering Judgement

19
Rigorous approach
  • Methodology
  • Convert everything to financial value
  • Minimise cost over life of structure
  • Problems
  • Conversion to money
  • Lack of data
  • Not practicable

20
Engineering Judgement
  • Advantages
  • Simple to use
  • Allows engineer to take all factors into
    consideration
  • Problems
  • Subjective
  • Decisions could vary

21
Structured Engineering Judgement
  • Formalise the decision making process
  • Justification of decisions at each stage
  • Best option for a structure
  • Rank individual projects
  • Independent review
  • eg via a Workshop

22
Decision criteria
  • Define objectives of the rehabilitation
  • Define factors to be considered
  • Define decision criteria
  • Basis of comparison eg whole life cost
  • Relative importance of each factor
  • Subjective or numerical approach

23
Select rehabilitation options
  • Identify potential options
  • Implications of using an innovative technique
  • Assessment of options in relation to decision
    criteria
  • taking account of any additional actions
    resulting from innovative procedure
  • Recommend option(s)

24
Assessing innovative techniques
  • Desk study of structure and environmental
    conditions relevant to technique
  • Laboratory testing
  • Feasibility trials
  • Cost/time implications

25
Select technique - 1
  • Example Reinforcement corrosion
  • Early Stages
  • Few visible defects
  • Low levels of chloride
  • Half-cell potentials mainly passive
  • Low corrosion currents
  • Preventative maintenance
  • Slow down chloride ingress eg surface treatment
  • Corrosion inhibitors to prevent corrosion?

26
Select technique - 2
  • Example Reinforced concrete
  • Visible defects
  • Higher chloride levels
  • More negative half cell potentials
  • Higher corrosion currents
  • Concrete repairs
  • Electrochemical techniques
  • Corrosion inhibitors to reduce corrosion rates??

27
Prioritise competing projects
  • Risk associated with not carrying out maintenance
  • What is the consequence of this occurring?
  • Safety
  • Functionality
  • Sustainability
  • Environment
  • What is the likelihood of this occurring?

28
Prioritisation Scoring
  • This comprises three parts
  • Risks averted
  • Added value
  • Timing
  • All ranked on a numerical basis

29
Procedure
Inspection Assessment
Identify need
Options Available
Select rank rehabilitation option
Decision
Is option innovative
N
Apply Technique
Innovative techniques
Y
User Experience
Control risks
30
Guidelines and innovation
  • It is wise to be cautious in the use of
    innovative techniques
  • It is foolish to be over-cautious
  • Engineers need to take controlled risks to grow
    confidence in new techniques
  • Todays innovation is tomorrows tradition

31
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
32
Optimised assessment of bridges
  • Aleš Žnidaric
  • Slovenian National Building and Civil
    Engineering Institute

33
Contents
  • General about bridge assessment
  • Load testing
  • Traffic loading
  • Static
  • Dynamic
  • Conclusions

34
Why optimised assessment?
35
Design vs. assessment
  • new bridges are designed conservatively
  • uncertainty about increased loading
  • inexpensive to add capacity
  • assessment should be less conservative
  • expensive to strengthen/replace or post a bridge
  • capacity and loading can be measured/monitored

36
Design vs. Assessment
  • New bridges
  • high uncertainties
  • conservative capacity
  • design loading schemes
  • design methods
  • ?
  • high safety factors
  • unnecessary
  • costly rehabilitation
  • load limits
  • Existing bridges
  • better defined inputs
  • realistic capacity
  • realistic loading
  • assessment methods
  • ?
  • lower safety factors
  • savings
  • cheaper rehabilitation
  • posting of bridges

37
Why optimised assessment?
  • to select optimal rehabilitation measures
  • do nothing
  • protect
  • repair
  • strengthen
  • replace

38
Assessment of existing bridges
  • Important factors
  • condition, level of damage
  • structural safety
  • carrying capacity
  • loading (dead, traffic, dynamic loading)
  • reliability of data
  • serviceability (clearances, traffic,
    obsoleteness)
  • service life, importance
  • What is the carrying capacity?
  • age, condition, drawings
  • What is the real behaviour?
  • influence lines
  • load distributions
  • What is the real loading?
  • in a country, type of road, on specific bridge
  • dynamic amplification

5-level assessment
39
Condition assessment
  • Objectives
  • Detect possible deterioration processes
  • Indication of the condition of
  • structure
  • its elements
  • highway structure stock
  • Ranking the structures
  • Optimisation of budget allocation

40
Condition assessment
  • Influencing factors affecting deterioration
  • Design stage
  • Detailing
  • Durability
  • Materials
  • Construction stage
  • Loadings
  • Maintenance

41
Condition assessment
  • D19. Report on assessment of structures in
    selected countries
  • condition rating
  • Cumulative
  • Highest value
  • 4 factors
  • Type of damage and its affect on the safety,
    serviceability and/or durability
  • Maximum intensity
  • Influence of the affected structural member on
    safety, serviceability and durability of the
    whole structure or its component
  • Extent and expected propagation

42
Condition assessment
  • Handbook of damages
  • http//defects.zag.si/
  • 10 types of damages
  • descriptions
  • affected bridge component
  • influencing factor design, material,
    construction, overloading, environment and
    maintenance
  • specific influencing factor
  • additional data or explanations
  • photos
  • Living application

43
Safety assessment
  • to verify that a structure has adequate capacity
    to safely carry or resist specific loading
    levels
  • RgtS
  • Load testing
  • Live load assessment (static and dynamic)
  • How to relate condition and capacity?

44
Load testing
  • on bridges that seem to carry out normal traffic
    satisfactorily, but fail to pass the assessment
    calculation
  • the available model of the bridge does not
    perfectly match with the real bridge itself
  • to supplement and check the assumptions and
    simplifications made in the theoretical
    assessment
  • To optimise bridge assessment by finding reserves
    in load carrying capacity

45
Load testing
  • benefits
  • less severe rehabilitation measures
  • less traffic delays
  • tremendous savings
  • drawbacks
  • very costly
  • danger of damaging the structure
  • best candidates
  • difficult structural modelling
  • lack of documentation (drawings, calculations,)
  • when savings are greater than the cost of load
    test

46
Load testing
  • Types of load test
  • proof
  • diagnostic
  • soft


47
Soft load testing - advantages
  • the lowest level of load application
  • uses bridge WIM to provide
  • normal traffic data
  • information about structural behaviour of the
    bridge
  • influence lines
  • statistical load distribution
  • impact factors from normal traffic.
  • quickcheap
  • no need for pre-weighed vehicles
  • no need to close the traffic
  • no risk of overloading and damaging of the
    structure

48
BWIM shema
49
Soft load testing
  • Theoretical vs. measured influence line

50
Soft load testing limitations
  • not intended to predict the ultimate state
    behaviour
  • validity of bridge assessment is often short-term
    and depends on the level of safety
  • if higher traffic loading is expected,
    measurements should be extended or replaced by a
    normal diagnostic load test
  • the soft load testing procedure has only been
    tested and used on bridges shorter than 40 m
  • requires an experienced engineer who can
    realistically evaluate situation

51
Traffic load modelling
  • calibrated notional load models (loading schemes)
    for
  • design
  • assessment (rating loading schemes)
  • site specific modelling based on traffic data
  • Monte Carlo simulation
  • simplified models (convolution)

52
Truck histograms from Europe
53
Truck histograms from Europe
  • There is an urgent need for effective overload
    enforcement better compliance with legal limits
    will greatly reduce traffic loading on bridges.

54
Comparison of sites in NL and SI
55
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • problem combining the extremes of dead load and
    dynamic effects gt very high DAF
  • options
  • codes conservative
  • modelling time-consuming and difficult due to
    many unknowns
  • measurements promising, but only possible since
    recent development of bridge WIM systems

56
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • Case Study
  • Calculating dynamic amplification for 1000-year
    extreme loading event
  • Mura River Bridge, Slovenia
  • 2 lanes, opposing directions
  • extensive Monte Carlo static load simulation 10
    years
  • identified 100 max-per-month static loading
    events

57
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • Case Study
  • FE model of bridge and 5-axle articulated
    vehicles
  • Calibrated by site measurement
  • Considered edge beam
  • Found total effect for each max-per-month event

58
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • Case Study
  • Max-per-month Data of static vs. total
  • Fit to bivariate extreme value distribution
  • Extrapolated the trend to the 1000-year
    situation
  • Dynamics was very small less than 6


59
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • SAMARIS experiment
  • 31-m long span
  • to assess influence of pavement unevenness
  • to evaluate DAF for 1000s of vehicles
  • upgraded SiWIM system

60
(No Transcript)
61
Dynamic Amplification Factor
62
Dynamic Amplification Factor
63
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • Before resurfacing

64
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • After resurfacing

65
Dynamic Amplification Factor
  • Average value
  • Coefficient of variation

66
Conclusions (1/2)
  • Design conservatively, assess optimally
  • Proper assessment (with monitoring) can
  • prove that many existing bridges are safe in
    their current condition for their current
    loading
  • ? factors from Eurocodes are too high for
    assessment of existing bridges
  • traffic patterns in EU, EEA and CEC are different
  • carrying capacity is higher than expected
  • justify optimal rehabilitation measures
  • save a lot of money

67
Conclusions (2/2)
  • soft load testing is proposed as a simpler way of
    defining real bridge behaviour
  • dynamic amplification factors for the extreme
    load cases are considerably lower than specified
    in the design codes
  • additional topics in the D30
  • factors required for efficient bridge inspection
  • specifications for diagnostic load test
  • several case studies

68
Acknowledgment
  • WP 15 team
  • ZAG Ljubljana Igor Lavric, Jan Kalin
  • UCD Dublin Prof. Eugene OBrien, Colin Caprani,
    Gavin OConnell, Abraham Getachew
  • TCD Dublin (now Rambøll) Alan OConnor
  • UPC Barcelona Prof. Joan Casas
  • IBDiM Warsaw Tomasz Wierzbicki

69
(No Transcript)
70
Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concretes
(UHPFRC) for rehabilitation 1. Motivation and
Background
  • Emmanuel Denarié
  • Laboratory for Maintenance and Safety of
    Structures (MCS)

71
OUTLINE
  1. Introduction
  2. UHPFRC materials
  3. What is proposed?
  4. Why?
  5. Validation
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgements

72
1. Introduction
? Road networks variety of structures, with a
variety of sizes, geometries, local conditions,
and common weak zones
73
? Exposures to environmental loads
? Most severe contact with liquid water - XD2,
XD3, XA2,3
? Reinforced concrete cannot withstand it for a
long time !
74
2. UHPFRC materials
  • Ultra compact cementitious matrix
  • Multilevel fibrous reinforcement
  • Outstanding mechanical and protective properties

Ductile as steel
Selfcompacting
CEMTECmultiscale developed by Rossi et al.
(2002)
75
UHPFRC composition
Matrix
  • Silica fume - SF/C 0.26 (mass)
  • Superplasticizer SP/C 1 (mass, dry extract)
  • Water/Binder 0.125 to 0.140
  • Cement 1051 to 1434 kg/m3

76
UHPFRC composition
Fibrous reinforcement
Microfibres Steel wool
Macrofibres L10 mm, D0.2 mm
  • Steel wool 10 mm/0.2 mm straight fibres
  • Total dosage 468 - 706 kg/m3 (6 to 9 Vol.)

CEMTECmultiscale developed by Rossi et al.
(2002)
77
Fractured surface of UHPFRC with pulled-out steel
fibres
10 mm
78
3. What is proposed ?
 Apply an everlasting winter coat on bridges 
? Long-lasting, targeted  hardening  of
critical zones subjected to severe mechanical and
environmental loads
79
Concept of application
 An everlasting wintercoat for bridges 
  • Cast in place waterproof UHPFRC overlay
  • No thermal treatment, moist curing 8 days
  • ? Pavement applied without waterproofing membrane

80
Concept of application
 An everlasting wintercoat for bridges 
  • Combine UHPFRC and rebars to reinforce structures

81
3. Why ?
  • Rehabilitation works are becoming the dominant
    activity in road construction
  • ? Consider impact on a network and society !
  • Rehabilitations are too often short lived !
  • Increase load carrying capacity without
    increasing deadweight
  • Limit duration and number of interventions during
    service life ? simplify and shorten !
  • Combine materials in efficient structures !

82
4. Validation
  • Method of concrete replacement
  • Study composite UHPFRC-concrete construction
  • Consider local conditions
  • Application on inclined substrates
  •  New material 
  • Test on a wide range of scales of time and
    dimensions
  • Provide guidelines for design and use
  • Validate use with existing facilities and tools

83
Replacement of existing concrete
  • Major issues
  • Processing
  • Monolithic behaviour
  • Protective function
  • ? Mechanical performance
  • ? Durability
  • ? Successful  Structural rehabilitations  are a
    major challenge

84
Restrained shrinkage
Silfwerbrand (1997)
Stress stiffness free strain degree of
restraint
Stiffness f(Emod, creep/relaxation) ? material
property, Free strain ? material
property Degree of restraint ? structural
property
Typical values
  • New layer on bridge deck slab 0.4 to 0.6
  • New layer on stiff beams 0.6 to 0.8
  • New kerb cast on bridge deck 0.75
  • Full restraint 1.00

? Study structural configurations with various
degrees of restraint
85
Summary of R D works
  • Ongoing studies at MCS-EPFL since 1999.
  • Early age and long term behaviour of composite
    members with UHPFRC
  • Composite structural members with UHPFRC, with
    various geometries beams, slabs, walls
  • Fatigue of composite members with UHPFRC
  • Tensile behaviour of UHPFRC
  • Effect of damage on permeability of UHPFRC
  • Time-dependent behaviour of UHPFRC (creep,
    shrinkage)
  • Combination of UHPFRC with reinforcement bars
  • Rheological behaviour at fresh state
  • Numerical modelling and design tools

86
Range of studies
Structural response
Creep, shrinkage, permeability
Resistance
87
Mechanical properties
Denarié et al. (2006)
General overview
UHPFRC NC
Compressive strength MPa 160-250 40
E modulus GPa 48-60 35
Tensile strength MPa 9-20 3
Strain hardening 0.05 - 0.2 0
First crack strength MPa 7-16 3

CEMTECmultiscale
  • Uniaxial tensile response strain hardening
  • ? Modulus of elasticity 30 higher than normal
    concretes
  • ? Tensile strength of matrix 3 to 4 x higher than
    normal concrete
  • Finely distributed multiple cracking during
    hardening phase
  • Similarity with yielding of metals (Luders
    strips)

NC Normal Concrete
88
Structural response
Flexural tests on composite beams with UHPFRC,
Habel (2004) ? Effect of new UHPFRC layer
thickness (hu) ? Effect of combination of
UHPFRC with rebars
89
Structural response
NL 10 cm

NL 5 cm
New layer UHPFRC rebars
New layer UHPFRC
  • Flexural tests on composite beams with UHPFRC,
    Habel (2004)
  • UHPFRC alone significant stiffening
  • UHPFRC rebars stiffening increase of load
    carrying capacity

90
Analytical modelling
UHPFRC
Reinforced Concrete
Tensile response of UHPFRC
Habel (2004)
Compression - UHPFRC
Tension UHPFRC
  • Composite UHPFRC-Concrete structures
    multi-layer systems
  • Tensile behaviour of UHPFRC can be taken into
    consideration
  • Take eigenstresses into consideration for design
    !

91
Main results of R D works - 1
  • UHPFRC and concrete behave monolithically in
    composite members, up tp ULS, Habel (2004).
  • Interface roughness of 5 mm with wavelength 15 mm
    is sufficient for monolithic behaviour, Wuest et
    al. (2005), Herwig et al. (2005)
  • UHPFRC exhibit moderate shrinkage (0.6 after 3
    month), and significant viscoelasticity, (creep
    coeff 0.8) Habel (2004), Kamen et al. (2005),
    AFGC (2002).

92
Main results of R D works - 2
  • Under full restraint (worst case), eigenstresses
    under shrinkage remain moderate ( 50 of
    tensile strength), Kamen et al. (2005)
  • Eigenstresses decrease the apparent tensile
    strength of UHPFRC in composite members, Habel
    (2004), Clevi (2005), Sadouki et al. (2005) ?
    consider for design
  • Anisotropic orientation of fibres, function of
    application ? consider impact on properties

93
Main results of R D works - 3
  • Very low transport properties for liquids
    (sorptivity) and gases, Charron et al. (2004).
  • Up to equivalent crack openings of 0.1 mm (strain
    of 0.1 ) permeability remains very low, Charron
    et al. (2004), and behaviour under fatigue
    loading is controlled, Herwig (2005).
  • Self-healing capacity for microcracks
  • Promissing combination of UHPFRC with rebars, for
    reinforcement of structures, with no increase of
    dead weight, Brühwiler et al. (2005), Habel
    (2004), Wuest et al. (2005).

94
Geometries of application
Habel et al. (2004)
  • P UHPFRC hu 15 to 30 mm Protection
  • ? PR UHPFRC replacement of corroded rebars
    (hu 50 mm) Reinforcement
  • R UHPFRC additional rebars (hugt50 mm)
    Reinforcement

95
Recommandation
UHPFRC
  • ? Apply UHPFRC where it is worth it!
  • For zones of severe exposure classes (XD2,3,
    evt. XA2,3)!
  • To improve existing or new structures!

96
7. Conclusions
  • Targeted local hardening of highway structures,
    in most critical zones, by using UHPFRC.
  • Simplification of the construction process.
  • Reduction of the dead loads (superstructure and
    pavement).
  • ? Increase of the performance of existing and new
    structures (protection and reinforcement).
  • Dramatic decrease of the number and severity of
    interventions during service life.
  • Concept has been technically validated on a wide
    range of scales and duration

97
Acknowledgements
  • UHPFRC team of MCS-EPFL Prof. Eugen Brühwiler,
    John Wuest, Aicha Kamen, Andrin Herwig, Dr.
    Katrin Habel, Prof. J.P. Charron, Roland
    Gysler, Sylvain Demierre,
  • Former collaborators of MCS-EPFL
  • Partners in Project SAMARIS
  • Dr. P. Rossi Dr. R. Woodward

98
Guidance on use of surface-applied corrosion
inhibitorsContext and Framework of Guidance
  • Mark Richardson
  • University College Dublin

99
Work Package Team
  • UCD M. Richardson (Team Leader),
  • C. McNally, T. A. Soylev.
  • E. Grimes
  • ZAG A. Legat
  • TRL M. McKenzie
  • Sika P. Mulligan, B. Marazzani, M. Donadio
  • Cardiff University B. Lark
  • C-Probe Systems Limited /
  • Structural Healthcare Associates G. Jones

100
Outline
  • Background
  • Methodology, Concept, Motivation
  • Objectives of SACI in a Maintenance Strategy
  • Reactive and Proactive Context
  • Primary Factors Influencing Effectiveness
  • Framework of Guidance for Specifiers of SACI

101
Background to SACI
  • Methodology
  • Concept
  • Motivation

102
Methodology
  • SACI are applied to mature concrete surfaces
    where they are absorbed.
  • Penetrate through the cover concrete by capillary
    action and diffusion.
  • Form a protective layer on the reinforcement.

103
(No Transcript)
104
Concept
After delay in onset and/or control of
corrosion rate
Before uncontrolled corrosion activity (existing
or future)
105
  • Evans Diagram
  • Potential (E)
  • anodic reaction
  • cathodic reaction
  • Current (I)

106
  • Potential (E)
  • E corr

  • I corr
  • Current (I)

107
  • After inhibitor application
  • Potential (E)
  • Current (I)

108
  • After inhibitor application
  • Potential (E)
  • E corr
  • I corr
  • Current (I)

109
Motivation
Benefit of SACI compared to traditional repair
option Reduce disruption to road users during
rehabilitation of structure by time and access
efficiency Sustainability aspect in preventative
maintenance Arrest deterioration before it
becomes significant and costly to repair
110
Objectives of SACI in Maintenance Strategy
  • Objectives related to overall maintenance
    strategy
  • Specifically consider objectives in Reactive
    and Proactive strategies

111
Reactive Maintenance Strategy
  • Inhibitor may be used to reduce (or at least
    prevent an increase) in the rate of corrosion,
    thus extending residual service life, unless
    extent of corrosion is too advanced.

112
(No Transcript)
113
  • However in a more general context note that
  • Repair occurs when deterioration is apparent and
    possibly significant
  • Residual capacity of existing structure may be
    significantly diminished at time of intervention

114
Proactive Maintenance Strategy
  • Inhibitor may be used to delay the onset of
    depassivation and thereafter positively influence
    the rate of corrosion, thus extending residual
    service life.

115
(No Transcript)
116
  • Also in a more general context note that
  • Measures for performance monitoring of the
    structure could be included at time of repair.
  • Inhibitor may be subsequently reapplied (e.g. a
    decade later) if performance monitoring indicates
    it is warranted, before deterioration becomes
    significant.

117
(No Transcript)
118
Primary Factors Influencing Effectiveness
  • Effectiveness is influenced by
  • Ability of surface to take up the inhibitor
  • Ability of inhibitor to penetrate the cover
    concrete
  • Ability of inhibitor to form a layer on the
    reinforcement
  • Ability of inhibitor to sustain the protective
    layer

119
Appropriateness of SACI
  • Appropriateness of SACI therefore depends on the
    following primary factors
  • Degree of saturation of concrete
  • Permeability characteristics of concrete
  • Corroded state of reinforcement at time of repair
  • Chloride levels

120
Degree of saturation of concrete
  • State of surface at time of application (initial
    take-up)
  • Surface condition immediately after application
    (wash out)
  • Influence on permeability

121
Permeability characteristics of concrete
  • Ease with which inhibitor may penetrate depends
    on intrinsic permeability characteristics and
    degree of saturation
  • Permeability also influences ease which other
    contaminants may enter post-repair (additional
    protection from suitable coating may be required)

122
Corroded state of reinforcement
  • Inhibitor must form mono-molecular layer on
    reinforcement
  • Ease of formation depends on surface state at
    time of repair
  • Clean or lightly corroded optimal state
  • Heavily corroded outside inhibitors
    effectiveness window

123
Chloride levels
  • Critical consideration is the relative inhibitor
    to chloride concentration
  • Inhibitor must form a mono-molecular protective
    layer and displace chloride ions from the
    reinforcement
  • Competitive surface adsorption reaction between
    inhibitors and chloride ions
  • Inhibitors most effective if applied before
    significant build up of chloride concentration

124
Framework of Guidance for Specifiers
  • Specifiers evaluating or developing a repair
    strategy based on surface applied corrosion
    inhibitors are encouraged to view it in the
    context of a structured approach to deciding on
    an optimum repair strategy.
  • Such a structured approach is presented in
    SAMARIS Report D31.

125
Context for Guidance SAMARIS D31
126
SAMARIS D31 Guidance
SAMARIS D25a Guidance
127
Framework of Guidance D25a
  • Reference
  • SAMARIS Report D25a
  • Summary Flowchart

128
  • Overview of guidance flowchart

129
  • Overview of guidance flowchart

130
  • Overview of guidance flowchart

131
Summary
  • Initial Assessment
  • Consider findings,
  • Balance constraints (funding, time, urgency,
    traffic disruption etc.) against control of risk
    to specifiers satisfaction,
  • Decide
  • Go? No go? Go to preview study?

132
Summary
  • Preview Study Assessment (if used)
  • Consider findings,
  • Modify proposed strategy if necessary (e.g.
    inhibitor coating rather than inhibitor only),
  • Balance constraints (funding, time, urgency,
    traffic disruption etc.) against control of risk
    to specifiers satisfaction,
  • Decide
  • Go? No go?

133
  • Post-repair monitoring
  • If Go consider also follow up monitoring as
    part of a proactive maintenance strategy

134
Further Information
  • Follow up presentation
  • (Guidance on use of surface-applied corrosion
    inhibitors Detailed Guidance and Case Studies)
  • SAMARIS Report D25a

135
(No Transcript)
136
Optimised assessment of bridges Case study 1 -
Medno bridgeSoft Load Testing
  • Aleš Žnidaric
  • Slovenian National Building and Civil
    Engineering Institute

137
Assessment of existing bridges
  • Important factors
  • condition, level of damage
  • structural safety
  • carrying capacity
  • loading (dead, traffic, dynamic loading)
  • reliability of data
  • serviceability (clearances, traffic,
    obsoleteness)
  • service life, importance
  • What is the carrying capacity?
  • age, condition, drawings
  • What is the real behaviour?
  • influence lines
  • load distributions
  • What is the real loading?
  • in a country, type of road, on specific bridge
  • dynamic amplification

5-level (step-by-step) assessment
138
Safety assessment
  • to verify that a structure has adequate capacity
    to safely carry or resist specific loading
    levels
  • RgtS
  • Rating factor

139
Case study Medno bridge
  • Structure from 1937
  • no drawings
  • refurbished in 1997
  • in very good condition
  • 11.95 m long span
  • total width 8.5 m
  • 5 RC beams 1.35 m apart
  • cross beams above abutments, at ¼, ½ and ¾ of the
    span
  • unknown fixity of supports
  • located on a road with 1150 heavy vehicles ADT
  • posted to 30 tonnes GVW

140
Carrying capacity
  • Assumed characteristics of concrete
  • fc 20 MPa
  • no information about steel reinforcement
  • 8 bars from profometer test
  • likely ?25 or 28 mm, assumed 8?22 mm bars of
    240/360 MPa steel
  • RM 867.4 kNm

141
Soft load testing
  • to check the assumptions made in the model
  • bridge WIM used to provide
  • normal traffic data (not in this case)
  • information about structural behaviour
  • influence lines
  • statistical load distribution
  • impact factors from normal traffic (not in this
    case)
  • only 1 pre-weighed vehicle for BWIM calibration
  • the bridge need not be closed to traffic

142
BWIM shema
143
Soft Load Testing
  • Soft load testing

Simply supported RF ltlt 1.0
144
Soft Load Testing
  • Soft load testing

Simply supported RF ltlt 1.0
Measured RF gtgt 1.0
Message Check, how bridges really behave.
145
Soft Load Testing
  • Load distribution
  • normally guestimation
  • bridge WIM evaluates it statistically

146
Selection of capacity reduction factor
  • Capacity reduction factor
  • F BR e -?.ßc.V
  • SI procedure accounts for
  • condition of the structure
  • reliability of data
  • redundancy of structure
  • method of calculation
  • Medno bridge
  • F 0.86

147
Selection of safety factors
  • Dimensions taken on site
  • Safety factor for traffic loading

?G 1.2
?Q 1.9
?Q 1.7
?Q 1.6
148
Structural safety of Medno bridge
  • Calibrated structural model
  • Loading scheme with 2 4-axle rigid 38-ton trucks,
    one in each lane
  1. Loading scheme with 81-ton 8-axle vehicle in one
    lane and rigid 38-ton truck in the other

Room for further optimisation of analysis
149
Conclusions
  • on Medno bridge soft load testing proved
    beneficial
  • 2004 assessments for special transports for the
    Slovene Road Administration
  • 13 posted bridges assessed
  • 11 proved safe even for a 165-tonnes special
    vehicle with 12 axles
  • for the rest missing data on carrying capacity
  • on shorter bridges normal traffic worse than
    special transports

150
Optimised assessment of bridges Case study 2
Danish examples
  • Alan OConnor
  • Rambøll

151
Problem, idea and motivation
  • Problem
  • 1) Lack of load carrying capacity or exceedance
    of structural/performance limit state due to
  • weak bridges
  • deteriorated/(ing) bridges
  • Increasing loads

2) Low budgets for strengthening and/or
rehabilitation where required Idea 1) Demonstrati
on of higher capacity through Probabilistic
safety assessments incorporating better
calculation/response models Principal
Motivation Cost saving through Budget
Optimisation
152
Safety approaches for assessment of existing
bridges
  • The general approach
  • Assessments based upon deterministic
  • codes for both (a) New bridges and (b) Existing
    bridges
  • Generalisation
  • Partial safety factor format
  • Deterministic Load specification
  • Many types of bridges

Benefit Efficient and easy to use Drawback Costly
in case of lack of capacity may result in
unnecessary repair/rehabilitation
153
The individual approach
  • Concept
  • Not necessarily have to fulfill the requirements
    of a general code rather the Overall requirement
    for the safety level must be satisfied on a
    individual basis
  • Purpose
  • Cut strengthening or rehabilitation costs without
    compromising safety level
  • Method Probabilistic-based assessment
  • Site specific modelling of specific
    conditions/structure
  • Traffic load
  • Capacities
  • Response Models

Bridge specific code is obtained
154
Decision Process
155
Case Studies
  • Practical experience The Danish Road
    Directorate has saved more than 50 million USD

156
Case Studies - Savings
Savings gt 4 mio.
Savings gt 20 ml.
Savings gt 0.5 ml.
Savings gt 15 ml.
Savings gt 2 ml.
157
Case Studies - Savings
Savings gt 0.3 ml.
Savings gt 0.5 ml.
Savings gt 1.0 ml.
Savings gt 2.0 ml.
Savings gt 2.0 ml.
158
Probability based Maintenance Management
159
Practical 10-phase procedure
0. Fact-finding 1. Formulation of problem
2. Safety requirements 3. Deterministic
models for failure 4. Probability-based
safety-model for critical failure modes. 5.
Stochastic variables 6. Safety of the
non-deteriorated bridge 7. Safety of
deteriorated bridge 8. Analysis of repair and
rehabilitation options 9. Requirements for the
visual appearance of the bridge 10. Cost-optimal
management plan using decision analysis
to determine optimal rehabilitation options
SAFETY
MANAGEMENT
160
Skovdiget Bridges Location / OverviewSAVING
20ml.
WestBridge
EastBridge
  • Post tensioned concrete
  • box-girder bridges
  • 12 spans, 220 m long
  • Carries a 4-lane highway

161
History
West Bridge East bridge 1965-1967
Construction Construction 1978
Major rehabilitation 1978-1999 Inspe
ction 4 times Principal Inspection a year.
Load testing every 5 years. every 5
years. Normal M R procedure. Bridge
in bad Bridge in good condition. condition
. 1998-2000 Implementation of probabilistic-ba
sed management plan.
162
Design, Deterioration Assessment
  • Poor workmanship during construction
  • un-injected or poorly injected post-tensioned
    cable ducts
  • insufficient and poor drainage
  • area around gulley poorly made
  • bad waterproofing
  • Modelling of stochastic variables
  • Modelling of strengths
  • concrete, reinforcement steel, cables
  • Modelling of loads
  • total traffic load
  • dynamic amplification factors
  • transverse distribution of vehicles
  • Model uncertainties
  • Prediction of the deterioration
  • Deterministic analysis of bridge failure modes
  • Main girders, moment and shear failure
  • Shear failure of transverse girders (above
    columns)
  • Transverse ribs between main girders 3 and 4
  • East and west cantilever wing
  • Identifying areas with most severe deterioration
  • Identifying critical combinations

Fast Slow Service
Emergency Bicycle lane lane
lane lane lane
footway
Gulley
Main girder 4
Main girder 3
163
Calculation of safety allowing for deterioration
Development of the safety index
  • Maintenance Management Options
  • Traffic, repair and information options
  • Traffic options
  • - Weight restrictions
  • Repair/strengthening - or replacement - options
  • - Minor / major repair - or - strengthening
  • - Preventive actions
  • - Replacement
  • Improvement of Information level
  • - Inspections to update estimate of current
    deterioration
  • - Test loading
  • - Determine actual weight the bridge
  • - Monitoring system
  • - More advanced analysis and response models
  • - Extended routine and special inspections
  • A Safety-based management plan is established and
    implemented for Skovdiget West
  • Extended lifetime gt 15 years Cost savings gt 20
    million
  • The Danish Road Directorate is now using the
    methodology for other bridges
  • The safety level is not compromised
  • A rational methodology is implemented for
    practical application
  • Probabilistic-based assessment of bridges cuts
    strengthening or rehabilitation costs. The cost
    savings can be significant

www.vd.dk
164
Conclusions
  • Reliability based assessment of bridges and
    Probability Based Maintenance Management cuts
    strengthening or rehabilitation costs
  • The safety level is not compromised
  • A well established methodology is implemented
    for practical application
  • The cost saving can be millions of per year

165
(No Transcript)
166
Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced
Composites (UHPFRC) for rehabilitation - 2. Case
study first application
  • Jean-Christophe Putallaz SRCE/VS
  • Emmanuel Denarié MCS/EPFL

167
OUTLINE
  1. Rehabilitation strategy
  2. First application
  3. Conclusions
  4. Acknowledgements

168
Rehabilitation strategy
  • Limit costs (construction and life-cycle)
  • Decrease number and duration of interventions
  • Provide sufficient durability

? Promote STRATEGY A
169
2. First application
Site application 1 - 2004
Structural response
Creep, shrinkage, permeability
Resistance
170
First application
  • Rehabilitation and widening of the Bridge over
    river La Morge - Switzerland

Execution October November 2004
171
GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION
  • ? Swiss alps, Valley nearby Sion, 480 m above s.l
  • Secondary road with sustained traffic
  • Heavy salt spraying in winter

172
Prior to rehabilitation
Downstream kerb
Upstream kerb
  • No waterproofing membrane,
  • Kerbs severely damaged by chloride induced
    corrosion

173
Concept of the intervention
Span 10 m
  • No waterproofing membrane
  • Protective function provided by UHPFRC
  • Widening of the bridge
  • Prefabricated UHPFRC kerb downstream
  • Thin UHPFRC overlay (3 cm) applied on deck
  • UHPFRC rehab. kerb usptream

Span 10 m
174
Construction joint for UHPFRC
175
Prefabricated downstream kerb
176
Prefabricated kerb in UHPFRC - joint
177
UHPFRC materials
  • Cement CEM I 52.5 (low C3A)
  • Fine quarz sand (Dmax lt 0.5 mm)
  • Silica fume - SF/C 0.26
  • Superplasticizer 1 dry extract
  • Steel wool 10/0.2 mm steel fibres
  • Total fibres 9 Vol. or 706 kg/m3)

Basis CEMTECmultiscale - Rossi et al. (2002) ?
No thermal curing ? Protection with plastic sheet
8 days moist curing
178
UHPFRC materials
Recipe Cement kg/m3 W/B -- W/C -- Application
CM22 1410 0.131 0.165 Rehabilitation Upstream kerb
CM23 1434 0.125 0.155 Downstream kerb overlays
  • CM 23 tolerates slope up to 2.5
  • Both recipes are selfcompacting
  • Slump flow 400 mm

179
Preparation of the UHPFRC
  • Concrete plant mixer with 500 to 750 litres
    capacity
  • 300 litres UHPFRC pro batch
  • 3 batches 900 litres in 45 minutes
  • 900 litres pro truck - 635 kg steel fibres per
    truck !

180
On the site
Application on ½ road downstream october 22,
2004
181
Processing of the UHPFRC
The thixotropic, selfcompacting UHPFRC, is
handled using simple tools (Photo A. Herzog)
182
In-situ air permeability testing
Air permeability tests after Torrent et al.
(1995) ? Extremely low kT values measured on
bridge
183
Comparative uniaxial tensile behaviour
Denarié et al. (2006)
184
Uniaxial tensile tests on UHPFRC
Denarié et al. (2006)
fct 13.5 MPa (mean) ehardening 1.5 (mean)
Test results on 5 specimens, at 28 days
185
Cost analysis
  • Comparison of three alternatives
  • Executed project with UHPFRC and no waterproofing
    membrane
  • Similar case with rehabilitation mortar and
    waterproofing membrane
  • Similar case with cheaper (- 30 ) UHPFRC and no
    waterproofing membrane

Case Relative construction costs
A 112
B 100
C 107
Realized
186
The bridge, after first winter
187
Detail of UHPFRC, after first winter
Prefabricated
UHPFRC cast on site
View of the surface of the prefabricated kerb
with UHPFRC, with superficial corrosion of steel
fibres tips near to the surface.
188
Conclusions of first application
  • UHPFRC CEMTECmultiscale was easy to produce and
    cast on site with standard equipments.
  • Quality of the UHPFRC was verified in-situ and in
    the laboratory. Excellent properties were
    achieved.
  • Waterproofing membrane not necessary with UHPFRC.
  • Bituminous layer can be applied after 8 days on
    UHPFRC, instead of several weeks for normal
    concrete.
  • Superficial corrosion of steel fibres on UHPFRC
    skin, is linked to processing.
  • Although a purely superficial concern, has to be
    mitigated by adapted processing techniques.

189
Owners point of view
  •  The main advantages of this technique are
  • ? Shortening of duration of works, quicker
    reopening of traffic lanes, and longer
    durability.
  • ? Significant savings in terms of reduced traffic
    disturbances and associated indirect costs.
  • ? Reduction of rehabilitation layer thickness and
    capacity to reinforce without increasing
    deadweight.
  • ? Prevent costly reinforcement of main parts of
    the structure.
  • ? Application by local contractors, with standard
    equipments. 

SRCE - DTEE CANTON DU VALAIS
190
7. Conclusions
  • Targeted local hardening of highway structures,
    in most critical zones, by using UHPFRC.
  • Simplification of the construction process.
  • Reduction of the dead loads (superstructure and
    pavement).
  • ? Increase of the performance of existing and new
    structures (protection and reinforcement).
  • Dramatic decrease of the number and severity of
    interventions during service life.
  • Concept has successfully demonstrated its
    technical maturity and economical feasibility in
    a first full scale application.

191
What is the future ?
Site application 2 - 2007
Site application 1 - 2004
Structural response
? Why not you ?
Creep, shrinkage, permeability
Resistance
192
Partners of the project
Owner Département des Travaux Publics du canton
du Valais, Sion, Suisse, Service des routes et
Cours d'eau, Section du Valais central/Sion,
Switzerland. Concept and supervision Laboratory
for Maintenance and Safety of Structures, Ecole
Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL),
Switzerland Advice for the UHPFRC recipes and
processing Dr. P. Rossi, Laboratoire Central des
Ponts et Chaussées (LCPC), Paris,
France. Execution plans and local direction of
works PRA ingénieurs conseil SA, rue de la
Majorie 9, CH-1950 Sion, Switzerland,
Production of UHPFRC, realisation of
prefabricated UHPFRC kerb and reinforced concrete
beam Proz Frères SA, matériaux de construction,
CH-1908 Riddes, Switzerland, Contractor
Evéquoz SA, rue des Peupliers 16, CH-1964
Conthey, Switzerland,
193
Acknowledgements
  • UHPFRC team of MCS-EPFL Prof. Eugen Brühwiler,
    John Wuest, Aicha Kamen, Andrin Herwig, Dr.
    Katrin Habel, Prof. J.P. Charron, Roland
    Gysler, Sylvain Demierre,
  • Former collaborators of MCS-EPFL
  • Partners in Project SAMARIS
  • Dr. P. Rossi Dr. R. Woodward
  • Service des Routes et Cours dEau DTEE SRCE
    Canton du Valais

194
Guidance on use of surface-applied corrosion
inhibitors
  • Workshop on detailed guidance and
  • Case Studies
  • M. Richardson
  • UCD

195
Outline
  • Initial Assessment
  • Preview Study option
  • Post-repair Monitoring option
  • Case Study Assessment and Monitoring
    Kingsway Bridge
  • Case Study Post-repair monitoring
  • Fleet Flood Span Bridge

196
  • Initial Assessment

197
Summary of Guidance - 1
198
Issues in Initial Assessment
  • Extremes of in-service environmental conditions
  • Degree of saturation of concrete
  • Chloride levels
  • Permeability and carbonation
  • Corroded state of reinforcement at time of repair
  • Ecological constraints

199
Issues in Initial Assessment
  • Extremes of in-service environmental conditions
  • Degree of saturation of concrete
  • Chloride levels
  • Permeability characteristics of concrete
  • Corroded state of reinforcement at time of repair
  • Ecological constraints

200
Issues in Initial Assessment
  • Extremes of in-service environmental conditions
  • Degree of saturation of concrete
  • Chloride levels
  • Permeability characteristics of concrete
  • Corroded state of reinforcement at time of repair
  • Ecological constraints

201
Extremes of environmental conditions
Environment Indicative Temperature Potential Consequence
Sustained low temperatures -5oC Alteration in the physical nature of the inhibitor, with implications for its mobility in concrete. Temperature limit of 5C is only applicable for the storage condition. Application to be carried out above 5C.
Frequent high temperatures 40oC Potential loss of volatile material to the atmosphere. Coating the concrete surface may be an option to reduce evaporation loss.
202
Degree of saturation of concrete
Moisture State Indicative Example Possible Consequence
Permanently saturated Elements of highway structures predominantly below the water level of a lake Inhibitor take up by absorption would be low. Subsequent penetration would not be assisted by capillary action. Note corrosion would be low in these areas if oxygen access is equally restricted.
Frequent and regular wetting cycles Elements of coastal highway structures within the tidal zone Potential washout of inhibitor immediately after application. Inadequate concentration at the reinforcement.
203
Chloride levels
Chloride State Indicative Free Chloride Ion at Level at Reinforcement Possible Consequence
Low 0.5 Chloride ion by mass of cement Corrosion inhibitor potentially viable as a preventive maintenance strategy before any significant active corrosion takes place.
Moderate 1 Chloride ion by mass of cement Corrosion inhibitor may be effective if a satisfactory inhibitor to chloride ion concentration ratio is achieved much depends on existing degree of corrosion. Protective measures to prevent further chloride build up are recommended in chloride-rich environments.
continued
204
Chloride levels
continued
Chloride State Indicative Free Chloride Ion at Level at Reinforcement Possible Consequence
High 1 2 Chloride ion by mass of cement Corrosion inhibitor dosage level may have to be increased beyond typical manufacturers recommendation and additional protective measures required. May take the technique beyond its recommended effectiveness window, introducing higher risk.
Very high gt 2 Chloride ion by mass of cement Corrosion inhibitor unlikely to be a successful component of the repair strategy.
205
Permeability and carbonation
Carbonation State Concrete Permeability Possible Consequence
Cover fully carbonated Moderate Inhibitor potentially effective.
Cover fully carbonated High Inhibitor potentially effective initially but reservoir may not be retained in concrete reducing effectiveness over time. May need additional measures such as a suitable coating.
206
Corroded state of reinforcement
Existing Corrosion Rate Indicative Corrosion Rate over a sustained period Possible Consequence
Low to Moderate lt 0.5 µA/cm2 lt 5 µm/year Best scenario possible with inhibitor used as part of a proactive preventive maintenance strategy.
Moderate to High 0.5 1.0 µA/cm2 5 - 10 µm/year State of reinforcement is potentially suitable for consideration of corrosion inhibitor treatment.
continued
207
Corroded state of reinforcement
continued
Existing Corrosion Rate Indicative Corrosion Rate over a sustained period Possible Consequence
High 1.0 - 10 µA/cm2 10 - 100 µm/year State of reinforcement will depend on corrosion rate lies - effectiveness of the inhibitor correspondingly influenced. Higher risk at higher corrosion rate. Corrosion monitoring recommended in case of higher corrosion rates.
Very High gt 10 µA/cm2 gt 100 µm/year Reinforcement may be heavily corroded - corrosion inhibitor is unlikely to be a successful component of the repair strategy.
208
Ecological constraints
  • Local environmental or
  • health and safety constraints?
  • Example work near drinking water supply source

209
  • Preview Study option

210
Summary of Guidance - 2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com