Preschool for All San Francisco - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Preschool for All San Francisco

Description:

Personal income tax. 3.3 million, but will increase up to 10 ... half day program, certified teachers (full bachelors degree by year 8), 3 hours per day, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: gordonga
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preschool for All San Francisco


1
Preschool for All San Francisco
  • A study exploring the programs current success
    and failures of implementation and how they
    compare to other universal preschool programs

2
Outline
  • Background Information
  • Research Question
  • Research Methodology
  • Findings
  • Analysis
  • Conclusion

3
Background
  • March 2004 voters passed Proposition H which
    established a Preschool for All Program in San
    Francisco
  • 3.3 million dollars 2005-2006 year with an
    increase up to 10 million
  • Program will build upon existing programs
  • Part day programs
  • Four priority neighborhoods Mission, Excelsior,
    Bayview, Visitacion Valley

4
Research Question
  • How has Preschool for All San Francisco been
    implemented?
  • Opinions on implementation
  • Framework of implementation
  • Comparison to other PFA programs
  • Affects of Proposition 82

5
Research Methodology
  • Key-informant interviews
  • Pre-scripted interviews
  • 8 interviews completed
  • First 5 San Francisco
  • Department of Children, Youth, and Families
  • Wu Yee Childrens Services
  • Gateway to Quality Childcare
  • Associate Professor, Child and Adolescent
    Development Program
  • Preschool Director
  • Preschool Teacher
  • Parent

6
Findings
  • Program goals
  • Prepare children to enter school (5 of 8)
  • Expand learning outcomes (2 of 8)
  • Expand access (8 of 8)
  • Support quality of early care (3 of 8)
  • Support needs of parents (4 of 8)
  • PFA in San Francisco has supported my needs as a
    parent because I know my child is receiving a
    better education because they have more
    regulations then the preschool did before.

7
Findings
  • Creating Partnerships
  • 5 of 8 interviews satisfied
  • Involving variety of backgrounds
  • Engage public opinion
  • Establishing relationships with Preschool
    Programs
  • Teachers working with families unsatisfactory (3
    of 7 approved of overall partnerships)
  • Teacher qualifications remain low because who
    wants to work and get paid so little? Why not
    try to continue to improve teacher relationships
    with families by providing more training? Why not
    empower this group of highly important people.

8
Findings
  • Resources
  • Increase in funding (4 of 8)
  • Transportation (8 of 8)
  • More city wide events (4 of 8)
  • Parents need to be able to get their children to
    and from school. There needs to be a plan to
    deal with the fact that many of the families do
    not live within walking distance of their PFA
    preschools.
  • By increasing the amount of funding yearly the
    program will be able to increase in number of
    children served, however it is looking as though
    we may have underestimated the amount of money
    that the program is going to cost.

9
Findings
  • Quality standards
  • Low quality care (4 of 8)
  • Need more training (5 of 8)
  • Teachers need more training and education. They
    have the opportunies but many of them are not
    taken them. In order to run quality programs
    there needs to be quality teachers who are
    passionate about their work.
  • Going to the PFA programs I have seen an
    increase of curriculum development, but there
    still remains to be a low quality of care in
    these preschools as compared to other preschools
    in the city.

10
Proposition 82
  • Positive responses
  • Increase in funding
  • Able to serve more children
  • Demand of quality care
  • Negative responses
  • Creates too many layers
  • County offices of Education (statewide, would
    not affect SF)
  • Parents needs
  • Overlap of services in SF

11
Universal Preschool Programs
12
Preschool for All Programs
13
Analysis
  • San Francisco Preschool for All Program currently
    is heading towards positive implementation.
  • Implementation is following a synthesis of both
    top-down implementation and bottom-up.
  • Compared to other programs the implementation
    phase is much more aggressive as well as
    standards for teachers.
  • The direct effects of Proposition 82 are unclear.

14
Conclusion
  • Limitations
  • Proposition 82 appears to have a relationship
    with people wanting to participate in study.
  • Key-informant interviews only provide a small
    sample of participants
  • Future research
  • City wide survey for all involved in PFA San
    Francisco to discover opinions
  • Continue to compare other programs to provide
    best model of implementation to universal
    preschool programs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com