Title: Chemicals of Emerging Concern in CWA Programs.
1Chemicals of Emerging Concern in CWA Programs.
- Brian Englert, PhD.
- Engineering Analytical Support Branch
- Office of Science and Technology (OST)
- October 17-19,2007
2Disclaimer
- This presentation was developed by the author,
and has not been subjected to the Agencys peer
and administrative review. Therefore, the
conclusions and opinions drawn are solely those
of the authors and may not reflect the views of
the Agency.
3Outline
- Introduction
- CECs - Current Federal Activities
- OW Activities
- Methods Development for Pesticides,
Pharmaceuticals, Steroids and Hormones.
4Introduction
5 CWA Methods Information
- WWW.EPA.GOV/WATERSCIENCE/METHODS/
- Facts Sheets, FAQs, Rule Text, EPA Methods
- Send an email to us at OSTCWAMETHODS _at_ EPA.GOV
- CWA Methods Team
- Ms. Meghan Hessenauer
- Dr. Brian Englert
- Mr. Lemuel Walker
- Dr. Robin Oshiro
- Ms. Marion Kelly
6CECs? Why are we concerned?
- Environmental concern due to known and unknown
concentrations and effects - As analytical methods overcome current
limitations detection of these chemicals will
increase as will public awareness - Some of these chemicals may impact the human
hormone system others are designed to. - Previous reports of intersex fish have generated
public interest
7Contaminants of Emerging Concern
PPCPs
PFOA
Prions
Endocrine Disrupting Compounds
Pesticides
Nanomaterials
PBDEs
Not an exhaustive list.
8CECs - Current Federal Activities
9PPCPs
EPAs PPCP web site http//www.epa.gov/ppcp/
10Interagency Workgroups related to CECs
- Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Workgroup
- Co-leads are EPA/FDA with CDC, NIEHS, NOAA, USDA,
USGS - Goals
- Develop two strategies by December 2007
- Research strategy for human and veterinary
pharmaceuticals in the environment - Research strategy for antibiotics in the
environment focusing on the question of
antibiotic resistance - Established from the White House OSTP Toxics and
Risks Subcommittee
11Interagency Workgroups related to CECs
- Endocrine Disruption in the Environment Workgroup
- Lead is EPA with NIEHS, DOI, NOAA, FDA, CDC, NSF,
ATSDR, NCI, DOE, DOD, USDA, The Smithsonian
Institution - Goals
- Develop a planning framework for Federal research
related to human health and ecological effects of
endocrine disrupting compounds - Identify research gaps and develop a coordinated
plan to address priority research needs - Established from the White House OSTP Toxics and
Risks Subcommittee
12Other Federal Efforts Related to CECs
- USGS work
- Flush and do not flush Policy- EPA/ONDCP/DHHS
http//www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/facts
ht/proper_disposal.html - Drug Take-Back Pilot Studies - Endocrine
Disruption in the Environment Workgroup - Lead is EPA with NIEHS, DOI, NOAA, FDA, CDC, NSF,
ATSDR, NCI, DOE, DOD, USDA, The Smithsonian
Institution - Universal Waste Rule-EPA/OSW
13Office of Research and Development.
- Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Grants
http//es.epa.gov/ncer/grants/ - Various research to develop new chemical analysis
methods, understand aquatic and health effects
and new approaches for prioritizing chemicals for
monitoring - Endocrine Disruptors Research Program
http//www.epa.gov/endocrine/
14Office of Water Activities
15Office of Water
- POTW Study EAD
- Health Services Industry Detailed Study - EAD
- Fish Tissue Study SHPD
- Biosolids Survey - HECD
16Office of Water
POTW Study
17POTW Study y
- ?Objectives
- -Develop analytical methods to identify and
measure contaminants of emerging concern (CECs)
in wastewater and sludge - -characterize occurrence of CECs in POTW
influent, effluent, and sludge - -Evaluate CEC removal effectiveness by POTW unit
operations
18POTW Study
- ?Scope
- We plan to characterize the occurrence of
various types of CECs - flame retardants
- hormones
- pharmaceuticals
- steroids
- nonylphenols
- pesticides
19POTW Study
- Characterization and Treatment Effectiveness
- Over the next few years, we plan one-day screener
sampling at POTWs to characterize the
presence/absence of CECs. - We have completed screeners at four POTWs
- Based on those findings and available resources,
we will select POTWs for treatment effectiveness
performance sampling. - These more extensive multi-day samplings will
help us identify design and operational practices
that could optimize removal of emerging
contaminants.
20POTW Study
- POTW Study
- Brian DAmico, 202-566-1069, damico.brian_at_epa.gov
(POTW operations) - Brian Englert, 202.566.0754, englert.brian_at_epa.gov
, (analytical methods) -
21Office of Water
Health Services Industry Detailed Study
22Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- Rationale and Background for Detailed Study
- The Health Services Industry includes
establishments engaged in various aspects of
human health (e.g. hospitals, dentists,
medical/dental laboratories) and animal health
(e.g. veterinarians). - According to the 2002 Census, there are over
475,000 facilities in the health services
industry. - The vast majority of establishments in the health
services industries are not subject to
categorical limitations and standards (ELGs). - EPA received comments urging it to consider
studying this industry. In particular,
commenters raised concern about endocrine
disruptor compounds (EDCs) and mercury discharges
from dentists
23Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- Scope of Detailed Study
- Mercury discharges from dentists
- NACWA found that dental facilities discharge more
mercury to POTWs than any other sector - Based on a NAQWA study, dental offices account
for 35 to 80 of mercury entering POTWs - Un-used or expired pharmaceutical discharges to
POTWs from hospitals, long-term care facilities,
and veterinarians - Recent studies indicate the presence of
phamaceuticals in waters of the U.S. - Need for obtaining quantitative information about
the amount entering POTWs from the Health Care
Sector
24Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- What Information Are We Collecting?
- ?Current Industry Practices and Discharges
- What are the current industry practices and
discharges? - To what extent are each of these practices
applied? - What factors drive current practices?
- ?Existing requirements
- Are there federal, state, or local requirements
or guidance for disposal of spent pharmaceuticals
and/or mercury? - What are these requirements?
- What records, if any, do facilities keep of what
is disposed to the sink, drain, or sewer?
25Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- What Information Are We Collecting?
- ?Control Technologies and Best Management
Practices - What technologies and BMPs are available for
health care facilities to implement (1) as
alternatives to wastewater disposal and (2) to
control discharges. - Is there any qualitative or quantitative
information on the efficiency of these
technologies and BMPs? - Is there any quantitative or qualitative
information on the costs associated with
identified technologies and/or BMPs?
26Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- What Information Are We Collecting?
- ?Impacts on POTWs
- Do POTWs experience interference problems related
to spent pharmaceuticals or mercury discharges? - Are mercury or pharmaceuticals passing through
the POTW?
27Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- Dental Mercury
- Current practices
- Most dental offices currently use some type of
basic filtration system to reduce the amount of
mercury solids passing into the sewer system. - Existing requirements
- No federal requirements
- Some states, localities and regions have enacted
requirements or provided guidance - NAQWA and ADA guidance
- Control Technologies
- Amalgam separators (99 removal)
- BMPs
28Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- Pharmaceuticals
- Current practices
- Based on information collected to date, long term
health care facilities primarily dispose of spent
pharmaceuticals via sewering - Hospitals have more alternatives (e.g. returns
program) - Existing requirements
- Many existing disposal practices are driven by
Federal requirements. - Control Technologies
- Best management practices and alternatives to
flushing
29Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- Schedule
- CY2007 Complete data collection for identifying
current industry practices, existing
guidance/requirements, and possible control
practices and technologies -
- CY2008 Estimate pollutant loadings, identify
best practices and technologies for controlling
pollutant discharges and associated costs, and
final report
30Health Services Industry Detailed Study
- EPA Contacts
- Health Services
- Meghan Hessenauer (202) 566-1040,
hessenauer.meghan_at_epa.gov -
31Office of Water
Fish Tissue Study
32SHPD
- National Pilot Study of PPCPs in Fish Tissue
- Sampling for 37 PPCPs in fish tissue from
- effluent-dominated streams at five locations in
various parts - of the U.S.
- Analysis expected to be completed by December
2007 -
33Office of Water
Biosolids Survey
34HECD
- National Targeted Biosolids Survey
- Sampling for presence and concentration of
metals, - priority pollutants, PPCPs and flame
retardants - Draft report expected December 2007
35Office of Water
Analytical Method Development and Validation
36Development, Validation Use of EPA Methods
- Develop
- Publish, Post and Peer Review
- Multi-lab Study several matrices
- Revise, WebPost and Peer Review
- Propose and Take Comment
- Promulgate Available for Compliance
37PPCPs by LC/MS/MS
- Method Overview
- Method currently under peer review
- Technology-High Precision Liquid
Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry
(HPLC/MS-MS) positive and negative ESI. - Chemistry-Acidic and basic extraction using using
a Hydrophilic-Lipophilic-Balance (HLB) cartridge.
Optional sonication step for high solids content
matrices. - Number and types of analytes-75 analytes,
combination of antibiotics, OTC and prescription
drugs.
38List subject to change.
39List subject to change.
40List subject to change.
41Steroids Hormones GC/HRMS
- Method Overview
- Method currently under peer review
- Technology-Gas Chromatography/High Resolution
Mass Spectrometry (GC/HRMS). - Chemistry Used-Separatory funnel or CLLE
extraction with dichloromethane. ASE or Soxhlet
extraction for high solids content. - Number and types of analytes-27 steroids and
hormones found in prescription drugs and CAFOs.
42List subject to change.
43Pesticides Metabolites GC/HRMS
- Method Overview
- Method currently under peer review
- Technology-Gas Chromatography/High Resolution
Mass Spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS). - Chemistry-separatory extraction at neutral pH or
continuous LE, Soxhlet extraction for high solids
content. - Number and types of analytes-60 Organochlorine
Pesticides, Organophosphate Pesticides, Triazine
Pesticides and Pyrethroid Pesticides or pesticide
metabolites.
44List subject to change.
45Development and Validation of EPA 1614
- Method 1614 GC/Hi Res MS for PBDEs - brominated
flame retardants published August 2003. Not
yet promulgated. - Developed at Axys Analytical
- 8 PBDEs of primary concern measured by isotope
dilution - 36 other PBDE congeners measured by internal
standard with recovery correction - Multiple laboratory validation of Method 1614
completed in 2005 - Showed that a temperature-programmed injector and
short (15-m) column would be required to prevent
decomposition of BDE 209 in the injector
46Office of Water
- Analytical Methods Development and Validation
- Brian Englert, 202.566.0754, englert.brian_at_epa.gov
, (analytical methods) -
47Office of Water
Work with Partners!!!! Region 5.
48D7065-06 ASTM Method for NP and APEs
- Nonylphenol (NP) and alkylphenol ethoxylates
(APEs) are surfactants - Developed by EPA Region 5 laboratory in
collaboration with ASTM International - Status
- Holding time study by EPA Region 5 showed sample
holding time can be 28 days when samples are
preserved with acid - Interlab validation study started June 2006
- ASTM published D7065-06 in 2007 Vol. 11.02
- Available for monitoring
49LC/MS/MS Standard for APEs and NPs
- Nonylphenol, Nonylphenol Monoethoxylate,
Nonylphenol Diethoxylate and Octylphenol in
Environmental Waters - Robust LC/MS/MS Method with SPE Extraction
- Save Money
- Save Solvents
- Environmentally Greener
- Solid Phase Extraction
- Meet Saltwater Criteria
- MDL Study on Reagent Water (100 ppt)
- Monitor Levels Relative to Endocrine Disruptor
Effects - Surrogates
- ESI Negative - 2-Bromo-4(tert-octyl)phenol
(Br-OP) - ESI Positive - n-NP2EO
50Region 5
- APEs and NPs
- Lawrence B. Zintek, 312-886-2925,
Zintek.Lawrence_at_epamail.epa.gov -
51 Thank you!