20082009 Cal Poly Budget Presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

20082009 Cal Poly Budget Presentation

Description:

Summary of Budget Reductions prior to Governor's Compact Agreement with the CSU ... Office Report to the Joint Convention of the California Legislature ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: dbro6
Learn more at: https://afd.calpoly.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 20082009 Cal Poly Budget Presentation


1
2008-2009Cal Poly Budget Presentation
  • UPBAC
  • January 2009

2
Summary of Budget Reductions prior to Governors
Compact Agreement with the CSU (in Millions)
net of fee increases
3
Review of Compact for Higher Education2004-05
  • Covers six years 2005/06 through 2010/11
  • Adjustments to the base budget
  • 3 annual increase for 2005/06 2006/07
  • 4 annual increase for 2007/08 2010/11
  • An additional 1 annual increase to the base
    budget for 2008/09 2010/11 for equipment,
    technology, libraries
  • State will cover annuitant dental benefits,
    retirement contributions and debt service
  • Identifies importance of restoring more
    competitive salaries for CSU employees
  • 2.5 growth per year through 2010 8,000
    FTES/10,000Headcount per year for CSU

4
2005-2006 Final Budget Allocations First Year of
Governors Compact
  • 3 Increase in Operating Funds
  • Compensation
  • Technology
  • Deferred Maintenance
  • 2.5 Enrollment Growth Funding
  • Fee Increase for undergraduate and teacher
    credential students (8) and graduate students
    (10)

5
2006-2007 Final Budget Allocations
  • 3 Increase in Operating Funds
  • Compensation
  • Technology
  • Deferred Maintenance
  • 2.5 Enrollment Growth Funding Fee
  • Increase buy-out for undergraduate and teacher
    credential students (8) and graduate students
    (10)

6
2007-2008 Final Budget Allocations
  • 4 Increase in Operating Funds
  • Compensation
  • Technology
  • Deferred Maintenance
  • 2.5 Enrollment Growth Funding
  • Fee Increase for undergraduate, teacher
    credential and graduate (10)

7
CSU Compensation Funding Shortfall for 2006-2007
and 2007-2008
CSU
Cal Poly
Note Bargaining commitments exceeded funding
with or without the compact. A portion of the
2007-2008 shortfall was effective June 30, 2008
8
2008-2009 CSU Budget Negotiations
  • Trustees Request
  • Based on Governors Compact
  • 2.5 for Enrollment Growth 68.9M
  • 4 for General Operations 116.9M
  • 1 for Core Academic Support 29.2M
  • 10 Fee Revenue Augmentation 73.1M
  • Governors Budget
  • 10 Fee Revenue Increase 73.1M
  • Budget Reduction (99.3)M
  • Final Budget September 2008
  • 10 Fee Revenue Increase 73.1M

9
2008-2009 Cal Poly Operating Budget
  • The net of the fee increase and the unfunded
    mandatory cost resulted in a funding shortfall
    for Cal Poly of 3,002,082

10
Since the 2008-2009 Final Budget.
  • October, 2008
  • Department of Finance directed state agencies and
    departments of the need to cut 390 million
    statewide.
  • For the CSU this amount was 31.3million
  • For Cal Poly this amount was 1,653,400
  • November, 2008
  • Governor proposes an additional 66.3M reduction
    to CSU
  • Estimated cut to Cal Poly will be 3,500,000
  • Note Cumulative reduction very close to the
    original reduction proposed in the 2008-2009
    Governors Budget (97.6M vs 99.3M)

11
Summary of 2008-2009 Budget Reductions
12
Situation continues to worsen..
13
Legislative Analyst's Office Report to the Joint
Convention of the California Legislature
  • December 8, 2008
  • 2008-2009 Budget Package (September)
  • Flat General Fund spending from 2007-08 to
    2008-09 (103 billion)
  • Reliance on one-time solutions
  • Assumed 2009-10 operating shortfall of 6 billion
  • Updated November Projections
  • 28 billion problem
  • 9 billion current-year problem
  • 19 billion operating deficit in 2009-10

14
Governors Special Session Proposals
  • Comes close to addressing shortfalls through
    2010-2011

15
Legislative Analyst's Office Report to the Joint
Convention of the California Legislature
  • If Gap was solved through Tax Increases alone
  • 2 cent sales tax increase
  • 15 personal income tax surcharge
  • 2 percentage point corporate tax rate increase
  • If Gap solved through spending reductions alone
  • Eliminate funding for UC and CSU
  • Eliminate funding for welfare payments
  • Eliminate funding for developmental services,
    mental health, and in-home supportive services

16
2009-2010 Governors Budget CSU(in millions)
  • 10 Fee Revenue Increase 131.6
  • Special Session Reductions -66.3
  • BSN Nursing Program Increase 3.6
  • Mandatory Costs -84.6
  • Health, New Space, Energy, Financial Aid
  • Total Surplus/Deficit (15.7)

17
Cal Poly Funding vs. National Average
18
Cal Poly SUF vs. State Appropriation
19
2005-06 of High Cost Program SCUs to Campus
Total
20
Fee Revenue of Budget
  • National Average excluding California is 42.5
  • California's Average is 30.3
  • California would have to increase student fees by
    approximately 69 to equal the national average

21
Undergraduate Resident Student Fees at
Comparison Universities
22
Cal Poly Budget Goals and Principles
  • Goals
  • Structurally balanced budget supporting
  • High quality academic programs.
  • High quality faculty, students, and staff.
  • Academic programs consistent with polytechnic
    mission and the needs of the State of California.
  • Student success demonstrated by high retention
    and completion of degrees in a timely manner.
  • Support services that demonstrate an adherence to
    professional and ethical standards.
  • Exemplary care of grounds and facilities.
  • Compliance with laws, policies, and quality
    service practices.

23
Cal Poly Budget Goals and Principles
  • Principles
  • The Cal Poly budget is decentralized.
  • Program decisions and budget management are the
    responsibilities of those assigned with the
    management and leadership of their campus
    operating units.
  • Funding for program priorities is to be addressed
    first within the vice presidential divisions and,
    if needed, then through the campus Sources and
    Uses process.
  • The President, in consultation with the vice
    presidents, approves new funding priorities or
    funding reductions in the Sources and Uses
    process.
  • Budget and enrollment decisions are made with the
    entire campus in mind, including the impact on
    auxiliaries.
  • Enrollment must be consistent with available
    resources, including the campus-based fee
    revenue.
  • The University should adhere to an enrollment
    policy that stabilizes enrollments and minimizes
    enrollment oscillations.
  • The University budgetary process should be open
    and include all constituencies.
  • Faculty, students, and staff are entitled to
    timely budget, financial, and enrollment
    information.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com