Title: 20082009 Cal Poly Budget Presentation
12008-2009Cal Poly Budget Presentation
2Summary of Budget Reductions prior to Governors
Compact Agreement with the CSU (in Millions)
net of fee increases
3Review of Compact for Higher Education2004-05
- Covers six years 2005/06 through 2010/11
- Adjustments to the base budget
- 3 annual increase for 2005/06 2006/07
- 4 annual increase for 2007/08 2010/11
- An additional 1 annual increase to the base
budget for 2008/09 2010/11 for equipment,
technology, libraries - State will cover annuitant dental benefits,
retirement contributions and debt service - Identifies importance of restoring more
competitive salaries for CSU employees - 2.5 growth per year through 2010 8,000
FTES/10,000Headcount per year for CSU
42005-2006 Final Budget Allocations First Year of
Governors Compact
- 3 Increase in Operating Funds
- Compensation
- Technology
- Deferred Maintenance
- 2.5 Enrollment Growth Funding
- Fee Increase for undergraduate and teacher
credential students (8) and graduate students
(10)
52006-2007 Final Budget Allocations
- 3 Increase in Operating Funds
- Compensation
- Technology
- Deferred Maintenance
- 2.5 Enrollment Growth Funding Fee
- Increase buy-out for undergraduate and teacher
credential students (8) and graduate students
(10)
62007-2008 Final Budget Allocations
- 4 Increase in Operating Funds
- Compensation
- Technology
- Deferred Maintenance
- 2.5 Enrollment Growth Funding
- Fee Increase for undergraduate, teacher
credential and graduate (10)
7CSU Compensation Funding Shortfall for 2006-2007
and 2007-2008
CSU
Cal Poly
Note Bargaining commitments exceeded funding
with or without the compact. A portion of the
2007-2008 shortfall was effective June 30, 2008
82008-2009 CSU Budget Negotiations
- Trustees Request
- Based on Governors Compact
- 2.5 for Enrollment Growth 68.9M
- 4 for General Operations 116.9M
- 1 for Core Academic Support 29.2M
- 10 Fee Revenue Augmentation 73.1M
- Governors Budget
- 10 Fee Revenue Increase 73.1M
- Budget Reduction (99.3)M
- Final Budget September 2008
- 10 Fee Revenue Increase 73.1M
92008-2009 Cal Poly Operating Budget
- The net of the fee increase and the unfunded
mandatory cost resulted in a funding shortfall
for Cal Poly of 3,002,082
10Since the 2008-2009 Final Budget.
- October, 2008
- Department of Finance directed state agencies and
departments of the need to cut 390 million
statewide. - For the CSU this amount was 31.3million
- For Cal Poly this amount was 1,653,400
- November, 2008
- Governor proposes an additional 66.3M reduction
to CSU - Estimated cut to Cal Poly will be 3,500,000
- Note Cumulative reduction very close to the
original reduction proposed in the 2008-2009
Governors Budget (97.6M vs 99.3M)
11Summary of 2008-2009 Budget Reductions
12Situation continues to worsen..
13Legislative Analyst's Office Report to the Joint
Convention of the California Legislature
- December 8, 2008
- 2008-2009 Budget Package (September)
- Flat General Fund spending from 2007-08 to
2008-09 (103 billion) - Reliance on one-time solutions
- Assumed 2009-10 operating shortfall of 6 billion
- Updated November Projections
- 28 billion problem
- 9 billion current-year problem
- 19 billion operating deficit in 2009-10
14Governors Special Session Proposals
- Comes close to addressing shortfalls through
2010-2011
15Legislative Analyst's Office Report to the Joint
Convention of the California Legislature
- If Gap was solved through Tax Increases alone
- 2 cent sales tax increase
- 15 personal income tax surcharge
- 2 percentage point corporate tax rate increase
- If Gap solved through spending reductions alone
- Eliminate funding for UC and CSU
- Eliminate funding for welfare payments
- Eliminate funding for developmental services,
mental health, and in-home supportive services
162009-2010 Governors Budget CSU(in millions)
- 10 Fee Revenue Increase 131.6
- Special Session Reductions -66.3
- BSN Nursing Program Increase 3.6
- Mandatory Costs -84.6
- Health, New Space, Energy, Financial Aid
- Total Surplus/Deficit (15.7)
17Cal Poly Funding vs. National Average
18Cal Poly SUF vs. State Appropriation
192005-06 of High Cost Program SCUs to Campus
Total
20Fee Revenue of Budget
- National Average excluding California is 42.5
- California's Average is 30.3
- California would have to increase student fees by
approximately 69 to equal the national average
21Undergraduate Resident Student Fees at
Comparison Universities
22Cal Poly Budget Goals and Principles
- Goals
- Structurally balanced budget supporting
- High quality academic programs.
- High quality faculty, students, and staff.
- Academic programs consistent with polytechnic
mission and the needs of the State of California. - Student success demonstrated by high retention
and completion of degrees in a timely manner. - Support services that demonstrate an adherence to
professional and ethical standards. - Exemplary care of grounds and facilities.
- Compliance with laws, policies, and quality
service practices.
23Cal Poly Budget Goals and Principles
- Principles
- The Cal Poly budget is decentralized.
- Program decisions and budget management are the
responsibilities of those assigned with the
management and leadership of their campus
operating units. - Funding for program priorities is to be addressed
first within the vice presidential divisions and,
if needed, then through the campus Sources and
Uses process. - The President, in consultation with the vice
presidents, approves new funding priorities or
funding reductions in the Sources and Uses
process. - Budget and enrollment decisions are made with the
entire campus in mind, including the impact on
auxiliaries. - Enrollment must be consistent with available
resources, including the campus-based fee
revenue. - The University should adhere to an enrollment
policy that stabilizes enrollments and minimizes
enrollment oscillations. - The University budgetary process should be open
and include all constituencies. - Faculty, students, and staff are entitled to
timely budget, financial, and enrollment
information.