Title: CSLI Service Learning Exit Meeting
1CSLI Service Learning Exit Meeting
- Review the process
- Review the findings
- Analyze - Hypotheses
2Review the process
- Public has need to express its policy preferences
- CSLI serves community provides feedback about
policies and issues - Students serve vital role
3Review the process 1
- Evaluate the CSLI process
- Review what exactly did CSLI do?
- Generate questionnaire
- Orient students in intro meeting
- Review questionnaire with students
- Review nature of surveys/sampling
- Train students in telephone/marking instructions
- Conducted telephone interviews
- Target 400-500 completions
- Accomplished 419 completions
- Issue Press Release
- Expect coverage in media Baltimore Sun,
Baltimore Examiner, Capital, WNAV - Web site press release posted
4Review the process -2
- Questionnaire issues
- Did any specific questions give you more problems
than others? - Clarity
- Public constantly asked for restatement
- Vagueness of what is being asked
- Did the respondents seem to think that the
questions were generally interesting? - Did the respondents think that the survey was too
long or short? - Suggestions?
5Review the process - 3
- Public receptivity
- Were you surprised by how easy/hard it was to
obtain a completion? - Problems with phone numbers?
- Bias among respondents?
- Bias among interviewers?
- Partial completions?
- Introductory script needs any modification?
- Other suggestions
6Findings Most Important Problem
7Findings Perceptions of Economic Conditions
8Findings Economic Conditions
9Findings County Right/Wrong Direction
10Findings County Issues
11Findings County Issues Pay Raises
12Findings State issues Slots and Cell Phones
13Findings National Issues - Immigration
14Findings Attitudes toward Immigrants
15Findings Attitudes toward Immigrants by
Benefited from Services by Illegal Immigrants
16Findings President Bushs Job Approval
17Findings - 15
Bush Job Approval by Party
18Findings President Bushs Job Approval by
Perception of the Economy
19Findings 16
Iraq Policy by Party Ideology
20Findings Presidential Voting Preferences
21Findings - 18
Candidate Traits Percentage Citing
22Analyze Develop Hypotheses
- Identify a dependent variable attitude,
preference - Identify an independent variable a
social/demographic characteristic - Specify a likely relationship between the two
based on a theory or hunch - you have about people and attitudes
- Example
- Theoretical assumption (hunch)
- Democrats tend to be more liberal regarding
domestic and foreign policy - Hypotheses
- 1. Democrats will be more favorable than
Republicans to diplomatic approaches - 2. Democrats will be more favorable to
stormwater management fees
23Analyze - 2
Test Hypotheses using SPSS
- Login
- Go to CSLI Web site http//www2.aacc.edu/csli
- Double click on CSLI Spring 2008 Data
- Weight the dataset /data/weight cases/weight
cases by Gender Weighting - Cross-tabs - /Analyze/Descriptive
Statistics/Crosstabs - Find v11 Party click once on it to select it
then use arrow to place in columns box - Find v13.2 Favor military strength or diplomatic
approaches click once to selectit then use
arrow to place in rows box - Click on cells and then click on Percentages
columns then OK - Click on statistics and then click on Nominal
Phi and Cramers V OK - Click on OK in main crosstabs dialog box
- Check results Did a higher percentage of
Democrats agree with diplomatic approach than
did Republicans? Were the results
statistically significant were the Phi and
Cramers V values under the column Approx. Sig
under .05? - If the answer is yes to both these questions,
then it is possible that - your hypothesis is correct you have
disproved the null hypothesis - 13. Try it again with the stormwater management
variable - 14. Continue with other hypotheses
- 15. In the last 10 minutes, we will go around the
room asking you to tell - us your most interesting finding