Title: Evaluation of Hospital Drills: Using the Tool
1Evaluation of Hospital Drills Using the Tool
- Amy Kaji, MD, MPH
- November 16th, 2005
- Acute Care College Medical Student Seminar
2Hospital Disaster Drills
- Why are drills necessary?
- Hospitals will be called upon to provide care to
the ill, injured, exposed, and concerned - Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations (JCAHO) Requirement - May help train employees
- Tests aspects of hospital response
3Hospital Disaster Drills
- Types
- Computer simulation
- Tabletop exercises
- Operationalized drills involving specific victim
scenarios - Evaluations
- Can help maximize the value of the drill
- Based on accurate observation
- Benefit of standardization
4Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice
Center (JHU EPC)
- Developed an evaluation tool for hospital drills
- Assess impact of drill as hospital response
progresses and develops - Presents topics for evaluation in a systematic
manner - Identify strengths and weaknesses in hospital
disaster preparedness - Promotes targeted efforts to strengthen
preparedness - NOT intended to be used to determine whether a
hospital passes or fails in its planning endeavors
5The Evaluation Modules
- Developed by a multi-disciplinary team of experts
at JHU EPC - Based upon systematic review of published reports
on hospital disaster drills and literature
relevant to bioterrorism preparedness - Had expert input from federal, state, and local
agencies - Piloted the modules in two multi-hospital
regional disaster drills in the summer of 2003
6Guiding Principles in Developing Evaluation
Modules
- Need for observing multiple hospital zones
- Evaluation of a disaster drill requires an
understanding of drill activities in all areas of
the hospital - Four zones identified include
- Incident Command
- Decontamination
- Triage
- Treatment
- Addendum if Biological or Radiological Scenario
- Decontamination Zone Module needed for radiation
chemical drills not recommended in biological
drill
7Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
- Need for documentation of time points
- Recording time points of drill activities is a
widely accepted method of evaluation - Labor-intensive if excessive number of time
points and may detract from overall evaluation - Limited, specific time points thus predetermined
8Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
- Need for documenting clinical care outcomes
- Track the volume of victims in each zone and
adequacy of provisions made for them, including
space, staff, supplies, etc. - Modules are not intended to collect individual
victim level data - Modules monitor the zone and outcome for the zone
as a whole, not for each victim
9Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
- Need for debriefing (after-action review)
- Obtain feedback from participants, including
organizers, staff, and victims - Allows for discussion of issues that span more
than one zone - Evaluate and integrate cross-zone issues at a
post-drill debriefing session
10Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
- Need for ease and flexibility of care
- Designed to be readily understood, easy to use,
and applicable to many different drill scenarios - Items on form are arranged by subject, and this
is the same across all modules to facilitate
analysis - Decision to include a module is dependent upon
the specific scenario and drill
11Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
- Need for safety and security
- Consider planned drill activities i.e., use of
unfamiliar equipment - Protect actual patients on the premises
- Safety of drill victims and healthcare workers
- Contingency plan to stop the drill in case of an
actual emergency - Consider designating a safety officer to monitor
the drill and its participants
12Recommended Use of Evaluation Modules and Addenda
( X USE IT!)
13Internal Structure of Evaluation Modules
- Zone forms for Incident Command, Decontamination,
Triage, and Treatment have same structure and
subject headers - Time points
- Zone description
- Personnel
- Zone operations
- Communications
- Information flow
- Security
- Victim decontamination and tracking
- Victim flow
- Personal protective equipment (PPE) and Safety
- Equipment and Supplies
- Rotation of Staff
- Zone disruption
14Internal Structure of Evaluation Modules
- Numbering of questions on the forms
- C denotes questions that are common to several
zones - Questions that are zone-specific are identified
by a unique letter code - 120 questions per module
- Coding on the forms and use of comment boxes
- Yes Y No N Unclear U Not applicable NA
- NA is not a substitute for missing information,
negative information, or to avoid writing a
comment - Color coding for the modules and addenda
- Assists in organizing and tracking modules and
addenda before and after a drill
15Common Sample Questions from an Evaluation Module
(Time Points)
- C1. Time the drill began ___AM/PM/U
- C2. Time the hospital disaster plan was initiated
in this zone ___AM/PM/U/Not initiated - C3. Time this zone was ready to accept
victims ___AM/PM/U - C4. Time when this zone was notified that
incident command was operational___AM/PM/U/Not
notified - C5. Time the drill ended in this zone ___AM/PM/U
16Common Sample Questions from an Evaluation Module
(Zone Description)
- C8. Was the boundary for this zone defined? Y/N/U
- C9. If this zone had a defined boundary, how was
it defined? (Check all that apply) - Barricade
- Security personnel
- Sign
- Tape
- Vehicle
- Wall (permanent or temporary)
- No boundary
- Other (specify) __________________
17Common Sample Questions from an Evaluation Module
(Personnel)
- C11. Did someone take charge of this zone?
YÂ /Â NÂ /Â UÂ Â Â - C12. If someone took charge of this zone, how
many minutes after the drill activities in this
zone began did this person take charge? (Check
one) Â - O lt 10 min
- O 10 - 29 min
- O 30 - 59 minÂ
- O 1 - 2 hrs
- O gt 2 hrs
- O NAÂ Â Â
- C13. If someone took charge of this zone, was it
the officially designated person? - YÂ /Â NÂ /Â UÂ /Â NA
18Common Sample Question from an Evaluation Module
(Personnel)
- C14. How was the person in charge of the zone
identified? (Check all that apply) - a. Â Â Arm band
- b. Â Â Hat
- c. Â Â Name tagÂ
- d. Â Â Verbal statement
- e. Â Â Vest
- f.    Not identifiedÂ
- g. Â Â Other physical identification (specify)
__________________________________________
19Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Zone Operations)
- C29. Was the space allocated for the zone
adequate? Y/N/U - C30. If not enough space for the zone, where did
zone activities overflow to? (Check all that
apply) - Adequate space allotted
- Conference room
- Hallways
- Outside hospital
- Treatment/victim care areas
- Waiting rooms
- No overflow
- NA
- Other (specify) ______________________________
- C31. Was this zone used for the same functions
during non-drill operations? Y/N/U
20Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Zone Operations)
- C33. Did clinical staff interact directly with
families of victims? Y/N/U/NA - C34. Were families of victims referred to
specially designated staff? Y/N/U/NA - C35. How was victims privacy ensured? (Check all
that apply) - Curtains
- Individual areas
- Privacy screens
- Not ensured
- Other (specify) ____________________________
21Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Communications)
- Communication device (s) If device not present ,
circle N in column a and go to the next line.
- A. Was device present? Y/N/U
- B. If present, available
- C. If present, was it used in drill? Y/N/U
- D. Comments (note problems)
- C36. 2 way radio/phones
- C37. Direct line
- C42. Numeric paging
- C44. Text paging
- C45. E-mail and internet access
- C47. Intercom
- C49. Runner
22Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Information Flow)
- C54. How was this zone notified of the event?
(Check all that apply) - FAX
- Runner
- Telephone
- Not notified
- Other (Specify)__________
- C55. Who notified this zone of the event?
- Drill organizer
- Incident command center
- Media
- Other hospital staff
- Outside source
- Victims arriving
- Not notified
- Other (specify)____________
23Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Security)
- C60. Were security present in this zone? Y/N/U
- C62. If security personnel were present, what
type of security? (Check all that apply and
provide approximate numbers) - FBI ___
- Hospital Security ___
- Local Police ___
- State Police ___
- NA
- Other (specify) ______________
24Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Victim Documentation and Tracking)
- C74. Were all incoming victims registered and
given a unique identification or medical record
number? (check one) - Yes, before entering this zone
- Yes, on entering this zone
- No, not while in this zone
- Unclear
- C76. Was a central list of victims generated for
this zone? Y/N/U - C77. Were the triage markers on the victims
clearly visible? Y/N/U
25Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Victim Flow)
- C81. Did a bottleneck develop in this zone?
Y/N/U - C84. Were the paths leading to the next zone
marked? Y/N/U - C86. Were the lowest acuity victims directed by
staff to an area separate from higher acuity
victims? Y/N/U - C87. What proportion of victims had treatment
delayed because of zone staffing shortage? (Check
one) - None
- Less than half
- At least half (but not all)
- All
- Unclear
26Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Personal Protective Equipment and Safety)
- If needed, were these items for standard
precautions available for the healthcare workers?
Y/N/U - Used by staff? Y/N/U
- Adequate supply? Y/N/U
- Eye protection
- Waterproof gowns
- Isolation gowns
- Gloves
27Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Equipment and supplies)
- TX15. Were medications needed for the treatment
of victims available within the
hospital? Y/N/U/NA - TX16. Were medications requested from and outside
source? Y/N/U - Were needed medical supplies available?
- TX19. Bandages Y/N/U/NA
- TX20. Basic airway equipment Y/N/U/NA
- TX22. Blood drawing supplies Y/N/U/NA
- TX23. Burn Packs Y/N/U/NA
- TX24. Cleaning supplies for contaminated
equipment - Y/N/U/NA
- TX25. Crash carts Y/N/U/NA
- TX26. Intravenous fluids Y/N/U/NA
28Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Rotation of staff)
- C98. Was there a staff rotation /shift
change? Y/N/U - C99. If there was a staff rotation, did the
officially designated person in charge of the
zone change? Y/N/U/NA - C101. What method of shift changing was used?
(Check one) - Group shift change
- Staggered shift change
- NA
- Other (specify) _____________
- C102. How were incoming staff updated? (Check all
that apply) - Group briefing
- Individual briefing
- Written notes
- Not updated
- NA
- Other (Specify)_____________
29Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Zone disruption)
- C103. Was there a plan to relocate this zone if
necessary? Y/N/U - C104. Did this zone close at any time during the
drill? Y/N/U - If no, disregard the remainder of this section.
STOP. This zone module is complete - C105. If the zone closed during the drill, what
was the reason for closing? (Check all that
apply) - Contamination
- Other safety concerns
- Space
- Other (Specify) ________________
30Description of Modules and Objectives
- Pre-drill Module
- Incident Command Center Zone Module
- Decontamination Zone Module
- Triage Zone Module
- Treatment Zone Module
- Group Debriefing Module
31Pre-drill Module
- Should be used in all disaster drills during the
planning stages - Form is designed to collect the following
- Goals and objectives for the scope of evaluation
- Background information
- Information on areas that hospital wishes to
evaluate - Resources required
- If multi-hospital or regional drill, each site
must work closely with overall coordinators
32Incident Command Center Zone Module
- Designed to reliably collect information about
operations of the incident command system (ICS) - Should be used in all disaster drills when
evaluating the ICS - Form is designed to assess the following
- Command structure in the zone
- Adequacy of staffing in the ICS
- Communication and information flow from hospital
areas to the ICS - Communication with outside agencies
- Adequacy of security, safety provisions, and
physical space
33Decontamination Zone Module
- Designed to collect information re functioning
of decontamination area - Used if scenario involves radiation or chemical
exposure and decontamination is needed - Form assesses the following
- Command structure in the zone
- Communication and information flow in the zone
- Victim and staff safety in the zone
- Adequacy of staffing and physical space in the
zone - Appropriateness of equipment and PPE
- Victim flow in the zone
34Triage Zone Module
- Designed to collect information re functioning
of treatment areas - Should be used whenever drill objectives include
evaluation of patient care activities beyond
triage - Appropriate for use in emergency department-based
treatment areas or in other clinical areas
35Triage Zone Module
- Form designed to assess the following
- Command structure in the zone
- Communication and information flow in the zone
- Victim and staff safety in the zone
- Relation of physical characteristics of zone to
treatment activities - Efficacy of treatment operations
- Adequacy of materials and supplies in the zone
- Victim flow in the zone
36Debriefing
- Debriefing is integral part of drill process
- Main objective of debriefing is to identify
issues not captured by evaluation modules - Facilitators should create an open,
non-judgmental atmosphere - Should occur in all drills to obtain feedback
from participants and observers
37Debriefing
- Different approaches to debriefing exist
- One method conduct a session with all
participants and observers present and ask a
series of general questions about the drill - Another method conduct a group debriefing
session with the participants from that zone
38Group Debriefing Module
- Contains open-ended questions designed to
facilitate discussion after completion of drill - Questions may be added or deleted
- Designed to cover all issues, including incident
command structure, communications, security,
decontamination, triage, and treatment - Documenting the debriefing
- A scribe should be assigned to record
- Videotaping / audiotaping debriefing may help
capture comments but should not hinder open
exchange
39Group Debriefing Module Questions
- Did you feel you were notified of the disaster in
a timely fashion? - Did the incident command center work effectively?
- Did anyone receive incorrect information from the
incident command center? If not correct, what
specifics do you recall about incorrect
information? - Was the information from the incident command
center received by other zones in a timely way?
40Group Debriefing Module Questions
- Were there problems with information flow within
the hospital? - Were memorandums of understanding with outside
agencies (e.g., police) activated? - Did nurses and physicians respond quickly to the
disaster call? - Was the zone set up when the first mock victim
arrived? - Was security in place before the first mock
victim arrived?
41Group Debriefing Module Questions
- Did people have a good understanding of their
roles, as defined in the disaster plan? - Did the decontamination system work effectively?
- Did you have any problems with the
decontamination equipment? Functioning properly?
Adequate number of units? Participants used
correctly? - Were there delays in decontamination? If so, what
triggered those delays?
42Description of Addenda
- Four addenda are part of the hospital disaster
drill evaluation - Biological Incident Addendum
- Radiation Incident Addendum
- General observation and documentation addendum
- Victim tracking addendum.
- Used to supplement the zone forms
- Example for a radiation exposure drill, the
Radiation Incident Addendum is added to Incident
Command Center, Decontamination, Triage, and
Treatment Zone Modules
43Biological Incident Addendum
- Designed to collect additional information that
address response to a biological incident - Should be added to end of each Incident Command,
Triage, and Treatment Zone modules - Should be used in all drills that address a
biological incident
44Biological Incident Addendum
- Form is designed to assess the following
- Awareness that biological agent cause of illness
- Whether appropriate personnel were contacted
- Whether health and safety needs of staff were met
- Whether health and safety needs of existing
patients were met - Whether health and safety needs of victims were
met - Availability of special medications and supplies
45Biological Incident Addendum
- BA11. Was the Center for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) informed that a biological
illness was present? - BA14. Was occupational health informed that a
biological illness was present? - BA22. If the cause of the illness was not known
prior to victim arrival, how long after the first
victim arrived was the cause of the illness
identified? (Check one) - lt1 hour
- 1-4 hours
- 5-8 hours
- gt8 hours
- Never identified
- NA
46Biological Incident Addendum
- BA24. What resources were used to make the
diagnosis? (Check all that apply) - Consultation with an in-hospital expert
- Consultation with an expert from another hospital
- Consultation with an expert from local health
department - Consultation with an expert from state health
department - Consultation with the CDC
- History and physical exam by the treating
physician - Microbiological data
- Radiological data
- NA
- Other (specify) ______________
47Biological Incident Addendum
- BA26. Was isolation required for the suspected
biological illness involved? Y/N/U (Isolation is
required for smallpox, plague, viral hemorrhagic
fever, certain pneumonias or rashes, and other
symptoms suggestive of a contagious infectious
outbreak) - BA27. If isolation was required, were victims
transported into an isolation room? Y/N/U - BA28. If they were transported to an isolation
room, was the room under negative
pressure? Y/N/U/NA
48Biological Incident Addendum
- BA29. Were there enough isolation rooms?
- BA30. If not enough isolation rooms, how were
victims isolated? (Check all that apply) - Conversion of other rooms/area (specify)_________
__ - Existing isolation room in other area
(specify)__________ - Overflow victims not isolated
- Victims with the same suspected biological
illness placed in the same isolation room - NA
- Other
49Radiation Incident Addendum
- Designed to gather information in response to
radiation-related incident - Should be added to end of each zone module
- Should be used in all drills that address
radiation exposure
50Radiation Incident Addendum
- Form is designed to assess the following
- Awareness that radiation was cause of illness
- Whether appropriate monitoring personnel were
contacted - Whether health and safety needs of staff were met
- Whether health and safety needs of existing
patients were met - Whether health and safety needs of victims were
met - Availability of special supplies
51General Observation and Documentation Addendum
- Designed for use by an additional observer to
document detailed activities in a single unit - Example
- During a chemical drill, an additional observer
could be assigned to area where PPE is donned to
document time required to dress, appropriateness
of dress, etc. - Has a front page and a continuation page, which
may be copied as necessary
52General Observation and Documentation Addendum
- Instructions Enter time and describe any
activities in this zone related to drill.
Include - Response to patients
- Information received
- Any activities (such as real emergencies) that
may delay or prevent drill activities in this
zone
53Victim Tracking Addendum
- Designed for use by an additional observer to
track victims through the drill - May be used within one zone for a large group of
victims, OR - Observer can follow victims across zones from
beginning to end of drill disposition from
medical perspective - Useful if there is victim descriptions and
emergency medical procedures are well delineated - Has front page continuation page
54Victim Tracking Addendum
55Observers
- Value and success of drill, depend on observers,
who must be able to understand and record events - Observer selection is therefore critically
important - Observers must be trained to use evaluation
modules - Documentation by observers provides information
for evaluation - Record the type and number of victims, as well as
the care given or not given to victims - May record personal views but should note it as
opinion
56Role of Observer
- Observers must not have any role other than that
of evaluating the drill - Individual who normally works in zone may
function as an observer, but during the drill,
he/she may not assist with any activities - Must not respond to questions from drill
participants about the drill - To qualify as observers, volunteers drawn from
outside the hospital must have knowledge of
hospital functions
57Observers
- Background knowledge required
- General knowledge of operations of zone
- Specific medical knowledge not required
58Observers
- Number of observers needed in each zone
- One observer should be present in each zone
continuously - Additional observers may be needed to observe
numerous staff or victims - Should use victim tracking or general observation
and documentation addendum
59Observers
- Number of observers needed in each zone
- If extensive time point data collection is
needed, an additional observer should be assigned
to this task - Specific time points and reasons for collection
should be outlined before drill - If clinical process or outcome data is needed,
additional observers will be needed - Observers must have sufficient clinical knowledge
to report on decision making
60Observer Training
- Training session
- Receive zone assignments
- Review relevant zone modules
- Achieve familiarity with content of evaluation
modules and zone configuration - Explain all questions and response sets
- Address questions about forms
- Instruct how to be an effective observer
61Final Observer Training Points
- All observations are confidential
- Observer should evaluate drill without
obstructing flow of drill - Observers may ask participants questions to
clarify observations - Questions should be asked in an unobtrusive
manner - Observers should refrain from asking questions
that may alter drill actions
62Final Observer Training Points
- Observers must not participate in drill
activities - If questioned about a drill issue by a drill
participant, the observer should state that they
are evaluating and unable to answer - Each question on each module should have a
response - The response NA should be indicated only when the
question does not apply
63References
- Cosgrove SE, Jenckes MW, Kohri D, Hsu EB, Green
G, Feuerstein CJ, Catlett CL, Robinson KA, Bass
EB. Evaluation of Hospital Disaster Drills A
Module-Based Approach. Prepared by Johns Hopkins
University Evidence-based Practice Center under
Contract No. 290-02-0018. AHRQ Publication No.
04-0032. Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality. April 2004.