Implementing Strategy in Companies That Compete Across Industries and Countries

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Implementing Strategy in Companies That Compete Across Industries and Countries

Description:

Functional or product structures are not sufficient when a company ... Exercises ... to start an international teaching arm teaching law and business courses in ... –

Number of Views:425
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: wind487
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementing Strategy in Companies That Compete Across Industries and Countries


1
13
  • Implementing Strategy in Companies That Compete
    Across Industries and Countries

2
Managing Corporate Strategy Through the
Multidivisional Structure
  • Functional or product structures are not
    sufficient when a company enters new industries
  • Multidivisional structure innovations
  • Divisions (operating responsibility)
  • Corporate headquarters staff to monitor divisions
    (strategic responsibility)
  • Each division may be organized differently

3
Multidivisional Structure
4
Advantages of a Multidivisional Structure
  • Enhanced corporate financial control
  • Profitability of each division clearly visible
  • Enhanced strategic control
  • Headquarters can focus on corporate strategy
    while divisions focus on business strategy
  • Growth
  • Reduces information overload on top management
  • Communication problems are reduced via
    standardization
  • Management by exception
  • Stronger pursuit of internal efficiency
  • In theory, divisions have no excuse for poor
    performance and thus use resources more
    efficiently

5
Problems in Implementing a Multidivisional
Structure
  • Establishing the divisional-corporate authority
    relationship
  • How many decisions should be centralized at HQ
    and how much at division?
  • Distortion of information
  • Manipulating divisional performance
  • Competition for resources
  • Little incentive to fund cross-divisional
    activities
  • Battles over transfer pricing
  • Short-term RD focus
  • cut to stimulate ROIC
  • Duplication of functional resources

6
Structure, Control, Culture, and Corporate-Level
Strategy
  • Unrelated diversification
  • Easiest and cheapest strategy to manage
  • Allows corporate managers to evaluate divisional
    performance easily and accurately
  • Divisions have considerable autonomy
  • No integration among divisions is necessary

7
Structure, Control, Culture, and Corporate-Level
Strategy (contd)
  • Vertical integration
  • More expensive than unrelated diversification
  • Multidivisional structure provides necessary
    controls to achieve benefits from the control of
    resource transfers
  • Must strike balance between centralized and
    decentralized control
  • Divisions must have input regarding resource
    transfer
  • Managed through a combination of corporate and
    divisional controls

8
Structure, Control, Culture, and Corporate-Level
Strategy (contd)
  • Related diversification
  • Multidivisional structure allows gains from the
    transfer, sharing, or leveraging of RD
    knowledge, industry information, and customer
    bases across divisions
  • Difficult to measure performance of individual
    divisions
  • High bureaucratic costs
  • Integration and control at divisional level is
    required
  • Incentives and rewards for cooperation are
    necessary

9
Corporate Strategy and Structure and Control
10
The Role of Information Technology
  • IT provides a common software platform that can
    make it less problematic for divisions to share
    information
  • IT facilitates output and financial control
  • IT helps corporate managers react more quickly
    because of higher-quality, more timely
    information
  • IT makes it easier to decentralize control to
    divisional managers, but react quickly if
    necessary
  • IT makes it difficult to distort information
    because of standardized information
  • IT eases the transfer pricing problem

11
Implementing Strategy Across Countries
  • Multidomestic strategy
  • Local responsiveness decentralized control
  • International strategy
  • Centralized RD and marketing other functions
    are decentralized
  • Global strategy
  • Cost reductions centralized functions
  • Transnational strategy
  • Local responsiveness and cost reduction

12
Global Strategy/Structure Relationships
13
Global-Area Structure
14
Implementing a Multidomestic Strategy
  • Global-area structure
  • All value creation activities duplicated and
    overseas division established in every country of
    operation
  • Decentralized authority
  • Managers at global headquarters evaluate
    performance of overseas divisions
  • No integrating mechanisms needed
  • No global organizational culture
  • Duplication of specialist activities raises costs

15
International Division Structure
16
Implementing International Strategy
  • International division structure
  • Used when a company sells domestically made
    products in markets abroad
  • Foreign sales organization added to existing
    structure same control system
  • Customization is minimal
  • Subsidiary handles local sales and distribution
  • Behavior controls keep the home office informed
  • International division coordinates flow of
    different products across different countries
  • Domestic and overseas managers may compete for
    control of strategy making

17
Global Product-Division Structure
18
Implementing Global Strategy
  • Global product-division structure
  • All value chain activities located to allow
    efficiency, quality, and innovation
  • Problems of coordinating and integrating global
    activities
  • Structure must lower bureaucratic costs and
    provide central control
  • Product division headquarters coordinates
    activities

19
Global Matrix Structure
20
Implementing Transnational Strategy
  • Global Matrix Structure
  • Lower cost structures and differentiate
    activities
  • Decentralized control provides flexibility for
    local issues, but product and corporate managers
    at headquarters have centralized control to
    coordinate company activities on global level
  • Knowledge and experience can be transferred
  • Global corporate culture
  • IT integration mechanisms provide coordination
  • Bureaucratic costs are high

21
Entry Mode and Implementation
  • Internal new venturing
  • Structure, control, and culture must encourage
    creativity and give intrapreneurs autonomy and
    freedom to develop and champion new products and
    allow corporate managers to monitor profitability
    and fit
  • Organization-wide new venturing vs. separate
    new-venture division

22
Entry Mode and Implementation (contd)
  • Joint venturing
  • Managing culture differences
  • Allocating authority and responsibility
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Must establish new lines of authority
  • Must streamline operations
  • In unrelated acquisitions, managers must
    understand the new industry
  • Must standardize control systems
  • Must recognize culture differences

23
IT, the Internet, and Outsourcing
  • IT and strategy implementation
  • Knowledge leveraging through IT to achieve low
    costs and differentiation
  • Flattening the organization, moving toward
    decentralization and increased integration
    through IT
  • Virtual organization
  • Knowledge management system

24
IT, the Internet, and Outsourcing
  • Strategic outsourcing and network structure
  • IT increases the efficiency of interorganizational
    relationships
  • Business-to-business (B2B) networks
  • Network structure
  • Li Fung example

25
Exercises
  • The university wants to start an international
    teaching arm teaching law and business courses in
    several Asian countries how should this be
    structured?
  • Hughes Aircraft
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com