New Developments in Venous Thromboembolic Disease - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

New Developments in Venous Thromboembolic Disease

Description:

48 year old woman presents with 2 weeks right LE pain, 2 days 'trouble ... Avoids angiogram. 71% vs. 29% require angio (Stein, Arch Intern Med, 1995) Caution: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:214
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: karen164
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Developments in Venous Thromboembolic Disease


1
New Developments in Venous Thromboembolic Disease
  • Karen Hauer, MD
  • University of California,
  • San Francisco

2
Outline
  • Diagnosis
  • VQ, Ultrasound, Helical CT, D-dimer
  • Risk factors
  • Treatment
  • Heparins
  • Warfarin duration of treatment
  • New agents
  • Prophylaxis
  • IVC filters

3
  • 48 year old woman presents with 2 weeks right LE
    pain, 2 days trouble catching my breath.
  • PMH dysfunctional uterine bleeding due to
    fibroids, recently treated with OCPs.
  • PE afebrile. BP 120/70, HR 110, RR 20,
  • O2 95 RA. Normal chest CV exam, CXR.

What is your clinical suspicion of PE? What is
your next diagnostic step?
4
Clinical probability of PEWells, Ann Intern Med
2001
  • Leg swelling, tenderness 3
  • Pulse gt 100 1.5
  • Immobilization, surgery 1.5
  • Prior DVT/PE 1.5
  • Hemoptysis 1
  • Cancer 1
  • No other more likely Dx 3

lt 2 Low probability 2-6 Moderate gt 6 High
5
VQ scan for PEPIOPED, 1990
Clinical Suspicion
VQ
Non-diagnostic in 640/887 (72) patients
6
Lower Extremity Veins
Iliac
Deep (Common) Femoral
Internal Saphenous
(Superficial) Femoral
Popliteal
External Saphenous
7
Lower Extremity Ultrasound for PE
  • 90 PEs originate in lower extremity DVT
  • 1st symptomatic DVT
  • Sensitivity 95, specificity 96
  • Increased sensitivity
  • serial US at 5-7 days
  • combining with clinical suspicion

8
Ultrasound after Non-diagnostic VQ
  • After non-diagnostic lung scan, serial US has NPV
    of 99.5 (Wells, Ann Intern Med, 1998)
  • Avoids angiogram
  • 71 vs. 29 require angio (Stein, Arch Intern
    Med, 1995)
  • Caution
  • Recurrent DVT 50 US still abnormal at 1 year
  • Asymptomatic DVT lower sensitivity
  • Isolated calf DVT lower sensitivity
  • Serial US not for high cardiopulmonary risk

9
D-dimers what is the role?
  • D-dimer degradation product of cross-linked
    fibrin
  • The appeal a simple blood test
  • High sensitivity, low specificity
  • Quantitative D-dimer lt 500 ng/ml makes PE less
    likely
  • Elevated d-dimer common w/o clot - especially
  • Cancer
  • Post-op
  • Pregnancy
  • Inpatients
  • Prior DVT

10
D-dimers use selectively
  • Multiple assays
  • Cant generalize from one to another
  • Goal high negative predictive value
  • To rule out clot
  • Use D-dimers with clinical suspicion or other
    testing
  • In outpatients, ED

11
D-dimers
  • Pretest probability (930 ED patients)
  • Low n527 (57) Not low n403 (43)
  • D-dimer D-dimer VQ
  • (-) ()
  • N437 (47)
  • No PE VQ
  • Wells, Ann Intern Med, 2001

12
The Role of Helical CT in Diagnosing PE

Where does Helical CT fit into the algorithm?
13
Helical CT Reviewing the EvidenceRathbun, Ann
Intern Med 2000 Mullins, Arch Intern Med 2000
  • Rathbun Mullins
  • Sensitivity 53 - 100 64 - 93
  • Specificity 81 - 100 89 - 100
  • Limitations
  • Include subsegmental PE?
  • Sensitivity for central PE 83 - 100, PPV
    95
  • Sensitivity for subsegmental PE 29
  • Variations in quality of technology, reader

14
CT the Primary Diagnostic Test?van Strijen, Ann
Intern Med 2003
  • 510 patients with suspected PE
  • Helical CT
  • PE alternate Dx normal
  • 124 (24) 130 (26) 248 (49)
  • 2 DVT on US

15
Helical CT Evidence-based Practice
  • Does a normal helical CT rule out PE?
  • Enough to withhold anticoagulation? Stop workup?
  • Yes.
  • Does a positive helical CT rule in PE?
  • Yes, no need for further testing.
  • At centers with CT experience - radiology,
    scanner

16
The Role of Helical CT in Diagnosing PE

--gtUnstable patient Helical CT
Stable patient Equivocal V/Q lt-- Helical CT
17
(No Transcript)
18
A 48 year old Caucasian woman recently started on
OCPs presents with symptoms of acute DVT and PE.
V/Q scan is high probability for PE, LE
ultrasound is diagnostic of DVT, and helical CT
shows a saddle PE. You initiate anticoagulation,
stop the OCPs, and consider whether she has a
hypercoagulable state. Do you. . .
A. Send protein C, protein S, antithrombin III
levels B. Pan scan for malignancyC. Test for
Factor V Leiden, prothrombin mutationD. All of
the aboveE. None of the above
19
Clues to Inherited Hypercoagulability
  • Age lt 50
  • Unusual location or severity
  • Idiopathic thrombosis
  • BUT, inherited disorders augment other risks -
    i.e. surgery, pregnancy
  • Recurrent thrombosis
  • Family history

20
Inherited Hypercoagulability
Antiphospholipid antibody ACLA, PTT or other
twice over 6 weeks
21
Acquired risk factors oral contraceptives

22
Screening for hypercoagulability before oral
contraceptives
  • Pro
  • Thrombophilia common
  • PE high morbidity, mortality
  • Con
  • Cost
  • Risk of clot low
  • Difficulty predicting who will clot
  • H/o DVT/PE already a contraindication
  • May still miss thrombophilia

23
Acquired risk factors - cancer
  • Cancer in patients with DVT/PE
  • Higher risk of metastases, worse prognosis
  • Recommendation careful H P, routine cancer
    screening
  • Sorensen, NEJM 2000

Relative risk
24
A healthy 48 year old with acute DVT and PE is
treated with warfarin and heparin. Potential
benefits of LMWH for this patient include all of
the following except
A. Fewer lab tests B. Potential for home
therapy C. Reduced mortality risk D. Easier
reversal of anticoagulation in case of
bleeding E. Lower risk of heparin
induced-thrombocytopenia
25
LMWH
  • Advantages
  • Longer half life
  • No need to monitor PTT
  • Better bioavailability after SQ injection
  • Less heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
  • Less osteoporosis
  • Better outcomes with cancer
  • Disadvantages
  • Incompletely reversed by protamine
  • Unpredictable response with renal failure, obesity

26
LMWH vs. UFH 13 Studies Dolovich, Arch Int Med
2000
DVT/PE
PE
Major bleeding
Minor bleeding
Total mortality
Thrombocytopenia
1.00
0.50
1.50
LMWH better
UFH better
Pooled Relative Risk
27
Treating to preventPost thrombotic syndrome
  • Venous insufficiency after DVT
  • Risk factors
  • Elderly
  • Recurrent DVT
  • Obesity
  • Proximal thrombosis
  • Chronic pain, edema, ulcers, skin discoloration

28
Compression hose prevent post thrombotic
syndrome
  • 1st proximal DVT, anticoagulated gt 3 months
  • Intervention
  • Below-knee elastic stocking on affected leg for 2
    years, started 5-10 days after DVT diagnosis
  • Stockings reduced post thrombotic syndrome
  • 49 vs. 26 (NNT 4 to prevent 1 case)
  • Compression hose well tolerated
  • No difference in rate of recurrent DVT
  • Prandoni, Ann Intern Med 2004

29
Duration of Treatment VTE as a Chronic Disease
Recurrence rate
1st VTE
Recurrent VTE
Warfarin 6 mo
Warfarin- extended
Kearon, NEJM, 1999 Schulman, NEJM 1997
30
Warfarin for Secondary Prevention after
Idiopathic DVT/PE
  • Recurrence/year Bleeding/year
  • Placebo 7
  • INR 1.5-2 2-2.6 1
  • INR 2-3 0.6 1
  • PREVENT, NEJM 2003
  • ELATE, Blood 2003

31
Duration of Treatment Guidelines
32
The Decision to Stop Warfarin
  • Risk factors for clot recurrence
  • Initial clot burden
  • Modifiable vs. persistent, major vs. minor
  • Thrombophilia
  • Indicators of increased risk
  • Elevated d-dimers 1 mo after stopping anticoag
  • Residual thrombosis on ultrasound after anticoag
  • Other markers of coagulation activity
  • ACCP 2004
  • Hron, JAMA 2006
  • Young, J Thromb Haemost 2006

33
Inherited risk factors and recurrent venous
thromboembolism
  • Meta-analysis of 10 studies evaluating risk of
    recurrent clot in 3000 patients after
    anticoagulation stopped - with or without genetic
    mutation
  • Factor V Leiden Prothrombin G20212A
  • 21 of patients 10 of patients
  • Odds of recurrence 1.4 Odds of recurrence 1.7
  • Elevated risk, but not enough to warrant lifelong
    anticoagulation
  • Ho, Arch Intern Med, 2006

34
Treatment of Thromboembolism with Cancer LMWH
Superior
  • Lee. NEJM 2003

35
Thrombosis in Pregnancy
  • A 34 year old woman G1 who is 35 weeks pregnant
    presents with left leg swelling, dyspnea, and
    right sided pleuritic chest pain.
  • How do you proceed?
  • Reassure her - these are common symptoms in
    pregnancy
  • MRI of the lower extremities
  • D-dimer
  • V/Q scan
  • IV Heparin

36
Thrombosis in Pregnancy
  • Challenges in diagnosis
  • Edema, tachypnea, dyspnea common
  • D-dimer levels rise during pregnancy
  • Test as you would for non-pregnant patient
  • Ultrasound for DVT, PE
  • Consider MRI
  • V/Q or CT for PE
  • Treat with LMWH, heparin, fondaparinux

37
On the horizon. . . New therapies
  • Fondaparinux
  • Synthetic Factor Xa inhibitor
  • FDA approved for prophylaxis, treatment
  • Prophylaxis 2.5/d SQ
  • Treatment weight based 5, 7.5 or 10/d SQ
  • Start warfarin simultaneously, continue 5-7 days
    as with heparin
  • Avoid with GFR lt 30

38
Off the horizon 2006. . . Ximelagatran
  • Direct thrombin inhibitors
  • Alternative to warfarin
  • Oral - fixed dose
  • Acute clot or orthopedic prophylaxis 36 mg bid
  • Secondary prevention 24 mg bid
  • No monitoring, no initial heparin
  • Safety questions
  • No antidote
  • Can elevate LFTs

39
Preparing for surgery
  • Deemed no longer a candidate for estrogens, the
    patient is scheduled for hysterectomy due to
    menorrhagia worsened on anticoagulation. What
    DVT prophylaxis do you recommend?

A. Ted hose, early ambulation B. IV heparin C.
UFH 5000 u SQ bid D. Enoxaparin 30 mg SQ bid
ted hose, early ambulation
40
DVT prophylaxis Surgery
  • Low risk
  • Age lt 40 AND surgery lt30 min
  • Moderate risk
  • Non major surgery or age 40-60 or other risks
  • High risk
  • Age gt60, LE ortho or cancer surgery, other risks
  • e.g. thrombophilia, CHF, malignancy

41
DVT prophylaxis Surgery
  • Low risk
  • Early ambulation
  • Moderate risk
  • UFH 5000 u SQ bid or LMWH, IPC, ted hose
  • High risk
  • LMWH - may combine with IPC, ted hose

42
LMWH in Medical Patients at Moderate Risk for
DVTSamama, NEJM. 1999
  • 866 patients respiratory failure, infection,
    CHF, treated 6-14 days
  • DVT at day 14
  • enoxaparin 40 mg/dy 5.5
  • enoxaparin 20 mg/dy, placebo 15(p 0.001)
  • Similar mortality, side effects
  • BUT. . . mostly asymptomatic, distal DVT
  • no UFH comparison group

43
Preventing DVT in Medical Patients
  • UFH or LMWH effective
  • 60 risk reduction in DVT, PE
  • Borderline decrease in hemorrhage with LMWH
  • Target high risk patients
  • CHF
  • Severe respiratory disease
  • Bedridden plus additional risk factor
  • Consider compression hose for low risk patients

44
Case
  • A 30 year old woman with ulcerative colitis is
    admitted with bloody diarrhea. On day 3 she
    develops dyspnea and hypoxia. Helical CT reveals
    PE. What is the best management strategy
  • Unfractionated heparin, goal aPTT 50-60, followed
    by LMWH
  • IVC filter, avoid anticoagulation
  • IVC filter, initiate anticoagulation when
    bleeding controlled
  • Unfractionated heparin, warfarin with goal INR
    1.5-2

45
Indications for IVC filter
  • Clot with active bleeding
  • Clot despite anticoagulation
  • Massive PE with chronically compromised pulmonary
    vasculature?
  • Prevention?

46
IVC filters benefits and risks Decousus, NEJM
1998
  • 400 patients with proximal DVT, 50 with PE
  • Filter No filter p
  • PE at day 12 1 5 0.03
  • PE at 2 years 3 6 NS
  • DVT at 2 years 21 12 0.02
  • Death 22 21 NS
  • Major bleed 9 12 NS

47
Retrievable IVC filters
  • FDA approved
  • Ideal for young patients with reversible PE risk
    factors
  • Left in, they become permanent
  • Current duration lt 2 weeks

48
Summary
  • Diagnosis
  • Combine clinical suspicion, test results
  • Risk factors
  • Higher yield for inherited thrombophilia
  • Treatment
  • LMWH as good, possibly superior to UFH
  • Warfarin Longer treatment course
  • Prophylaxis
  • Risk stratify
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com