DGH management of acute coronary syndromes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

DGH management of acute coronary syndromes

Description:

In-patient Angiogram Desirable. Invasive vs Conservative ... The move to angiogram based risk stratification and treatment is irresistible and preferable ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: cmur4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DGH management of acute coronary syndromes


1
DGH management of acute coronary syndromes
  • Who can be discharged without angiography ?
  • Dr Conrad Murphy
  • St Richards Hospital Chichester

2
Prognosis of ACS
Terkelsen EHJ 2005
3
(No Transcript)
4
Who is likely to benefit from pre-discharge
angiography ?
Risk of Early Ischaemic Event
Low Moderate
High
5
Invasive vs Conservative Strategy for UA/NSTEMI
ISAR-COOL
RITA-3
VANQWISH
ICTUS
VINO
MATE
TRUCS
TIMI IIIB
TACTICS-TIMI 18
FRISC II
Conservative
Invasive
UA indicates unstable angina, NSTEMI,
nonST-segment myocardial infarction ISAR,
Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombic Regimen
Trial RITA, Randomized Intervention Treatment of
Angina VANQWISH, Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave
Infarction Strategies in Hospital study MATE,
Medicine vs Angioplasty for Thrombolytic
Exclusions trial TACTICS-TIMI18, Treat Angina
with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy
with Invasive or Conservative Strategy and
FRISC, Fragmin during InStability in Coronary
artery disease.
6
The benefits of pre-discharge angiography
intervention
  • Other benefits
  • Investigation upfront
  • Simplify follow up
  • Back to work
  • Happy patient
  • On-Guideline
  • The trial evidence
  • Readmissions
  • Non-fatal MI
  • Mortality
  • QOL

7
The downside of pre-discharge angiography
intervention (UK)
  • May destabilise otherwise stable patient
  • Other procedural and therapy complications
  • Bed blocking while waiting for transfer

Beds Blocked Each Day
2003 2004
8
Who is likely to benefit from pre-discharge
angiography ?
Risk of Early Ischaemic Event
Low Moderate
High
Angiography
Most cases ESC 2002
9
Who to transfer Grace data
Age 0-100
CCF 24
Previous MI 14
Heart Rate 0-43
BP 0-24
ST depression 11
CRF 1-20
Enzymes up 15
No in-hosp PCI 14
Eagle et al JAMA 2004
10
Who to transfer TIMI score (Non-STEMI)
of MI population
Event rate at 14 days
Event Rate Post MI
TIMI scoring Age CAD risk Factors Known
CAD Aspirin use Recent severe AP Elevated
Markers ST deviation Score 0-7
TIMI score
11
Exercise testing in risk stratification
12
(No Transcript)
13
Who does not need pre-discharge angiography after
ACS ?
  • Not candidate for intervention
  • Completed MI
  • Lower risk non-Q MI
  • Stable
  • No high risk features
  • Good Ex Test other risk stratification
  • Not disadvantaged by delayed investigation
  • Regional centre lead

14
Conclusion
  • The move to angiogram based risk stratification
    and treatment is irresistible and preferable
  • Cost effectiveness will be lost if long transfer
    times persist
  • limitations of a lesion based approach

15
What to do next
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com