Testing CsI photocathodes in Liquid Xenon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Testing CsI photocathodes in Liquid Xenon

Description:

Testing CsI photocathodes in Liquid Xenon – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: lxe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Testing CsI photocathodes in Liquid Xenon


1
Testing CsI photocathodes in Liquid Xenon
  • Marsela Jorgolli
  • XENON Project
  • Summer REU 2005

2
Outline of the talk
  • The dark matter problem
  • Searching for WIMPs
  • The XENON experiment
  • Using CsI photocathodes in a Liquid Xenon chamber
  • Testing and results

3
What is the Universe made of?
  • Various cosmological observations point to a
    Concordance Model of the Universe. We know that
  • Only 5 of the Universe is known.
  • 95 stays hidden from view. Of this 22 is an
    exotic form of matter we call Dark Matter

4
Evidence for dark matter comes from astronomical
studies Rotational curves of spiral galaxies
Bergstrom/hep-ph/0002126
5
Estimating masses of clusters using gravitational
lensing
http//hubblesite.org
6
What is Dark Matter?
  • Two different types of dark matter are predicted
  • Baryonic dark matter
  • Black Holes
  • Brown Dwarfs
  • Non-baryonic dark matter
  • Hot Dark Matter ? Particles traveling at
    relativistic velocities (neutrino)
  • Cold Dark Matter ? Particles traveling at
    sub-relativistic velocities (WIMPs)

7
Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) in a
galactic halo (artistic representation)
8
  • A SuperSymmetric solution?
  • SuperSymmetry offers a candidate in the lightest
    SuperSymmetric particle ? the neutralino. The
    neutralino has favorable characteristics such as
  • Stable and neutral.
  • Weakly interacting not star-forming.
  • Massive 20 1000 GeV/c2
  • ? Candidate WIMP
  • WIMPs may make up most of the dark matter in the
    Universe

9
How is Dark Matter detected?
  • Two complimentary methods are used for detection
    of dark matter
  • Indirect detection ? detecting the annihilation
    products of dark matter
  • Direct detection ? measuring the energy deposited
    by elastic scattering of a WIMP in a terrestrial
    target

WIMP-Nucleus Scattering
10
Various Direct Detection Techniques
  • DRIFT
  • CDMS
  • EDELWEISS

  100 detected energy relatively slow
requires cryogenic detectors
  • XENON
  • DAMA/LIBRA
  • ZEPLIN

  few  detected energy usually fast no
surface effects ?
  • CRESST
  • ROSEBUD

11
XENON
  • A next generation Dark Matter Direct Detection
    experiment
  • Dual phase Liquid/Gas Xenon Time Projection
    Chamber
  • Currently a 10 kg module is being tested and
    will be placed at Gran Sasso Underground
    Laboratory in Italy
  • Proposed to be scaled to 1 tone active mass

The LXeTPC module for XENON the 100kg fiducial
target is surrounded by an active LXe shield
enclosed in the Cu vessel.
12
Why Liquid XENON?
  • It is available in large quantities at a
    reasonable cost (1k/kg)
  • Its high density (3g/cm3) and high atomic number
    (Z 54, A 131) allow for a compact and
    self-shielded detector geometry.
  • As a detector material LXe has excellent
    ionization and scintillation properties
  • High photon yield
  • Fast time response
  • Good stopping time
  • It can be purified to achieve long distance drift
    of ionization electrons.
  • Additional processing can reduce the traces of
    radioactive elements 85Kr, 42Ar, Ra to the low
    level required.

13
Signal Detection and Discrimination between
Nuclear and Electron recoils with LXe
  • Two signals are detected from each event
  • Prompt Scintillation ? S1
  • Proportional Scintillation from direct ionization
    ? S2
  • Nuclear Recoils ? Slow, i.e. strong columnar
    recombination
  • WIMPs, Neutrons
  • Scintillation, weak ionization
  • Electron Recoils ? Fast, i.e. weak columnar
    recombination
  • ?,e-,?
  • Scintillation, substantial ionization

High (99.5) event by event discrimination for e
/ n recoils possible by the distinct S2/S1 ratio
14
Adding the CsI Photocathode
  • The addition of CsI photocathode at the bottom of
    the chamber will generate a new signal since a
    substantial amount of light travels downward due
    to TIR in the gas/liquid interface
  • ? from absorbing primary photons
  • drifting the produced photoelectrons into the gXe
  • ? detecting the proportional scintillation as a
    tertiary signal

15
CsI Photocathode vs. other light detectors (PMT,
PD)
  • Uniform response
  • Reflective CsI photocathodes work well in the
    liquid rare gases
  • Very low intrinsic radiation
  • Can be made in large sizes at a low cost
  • High sensitivity in Vacuum Ultra Violet photon
    detection
  • Efficient electron extraction at
  • Room temperature
  • One atmosphere or low-pressure gas media

16
My Summer Projectwith Dr. Singh and C. Macanka
17
Making a photocathode
  • High Vacuum
  • Deposition
  • Chamber for
  • the
  • Production of
  • Photocathodes

18
Steps of Making a photocathode
  • CsI is placed inside the boat (Molybdenum)
  • A polished stainless steel plate of the wanted
    dimensions is placed inside the deposition
    chamber
  • The Chamber is tightly sealed
  • Out gassing of the chamber is made by applying a
    current of 50Amps making sure not to boil the
    CsI
  • The Chamber is left under high vaccum (10-6) for
    3 days for baking (out gassing is very
    important)
  • The chamber and the plate are ready for deposition

19
Making a photocathode
  • Parameters controlled during deposition
  • Temperature inside the chamber
  • Vacuum
  • Rate of Deposition (should be kept as constant
    as possible of uniform deposition)
  • Thickness of CsI on the SS plate
  • Current Applied

Data from July, 8th
Vacuum of the chamber Rate of Deposition Current Applied Evaporation Temperature Thickness of CsI on the plate
3.3 x 10-6 torr 0.5 1 Nm / sec 90 100 Amps 62 67 C 600 nm
20
Testing a Photocathode
  • Parallel plate Ionization Chamber
  • ? - source (5.5 MeV) from anode (241Am)
  • 3.5 mm between plates
  • Reflective CsI photocathode placed on the bottom
    (facing up) connected to the Charge Sensitive
    Amplifier
  • ?-particles collide with the Xe molecules ?
    scintillation and ionization
  • Photons hit the CsI photocathode ? Photoelectrons
    are emitted through photoemission
  • Signal collection by applying High Voltage
    connected to the anode
  • () H.V. ? Light Collection
  • (-) H.V. ? Charge Collection

21
Better photoelectron extraction
  • The electron affinities of LXe has been measured
    to be negative V0(LXe) -0.67 eV V0(CsI) -
    0.1 ev ? the CsI photocathode has a positive
    electron affinity in Lxe ? Photoelectrons will
    see a potential well ? photoelectron extraction
    is greatly enhanced
  • The strong E-Field bends the the band structure
    of the CsI favoring the transport of conduction
    electrons in the CsI film towards the CsI-liquid
    interface
  • Strong electric field also prevents the back
    diffusion of the electrons

22
Testing Chamber while being cooled with LN2 ?
liquefying gXe
23
Experimental Setup
24
Experimental Techniques
  • Photocathodes of two different sizes and of two
    different thickness were tested
  • Size
  • 6 cm in diameter
  • 12 cm in diameter
  • Thickness
  • 5000 C
  • 6000 C
  • Test Chamber baked externally at
  • 150 C
  • for more than 24hrs
  • 10-6 10-7 torr vacuum
  • Xenon was purified once through getter and
    constantly afterwards

25
Xenon Purification System
26
Charge Calibration
  • Charge calibration done by sending a test pulse
    coupled with a known capacitor to the input
  • Typical offset pulse height
  • (4 different offsets are used for calibration)

27
Results with ?-particles
  • Electronic noise determined by the test-pulse
    peak
  • Typical pulse height spectra of the scintillation
    light from 241Am 5.5MeV ?-particles
  • (07/22/2005)

28
Results with ?-particles
  • Photoelectron Yield and Direct Ionization Yield
    vs. Electric Field
  • As the E-field increases the yield of both
    photoelectrons and ionization electrons increases

29
Formulas used to do the calculations
  • QE L / L0
  • L ? Photoelectrons extracted from the
    photocathode
  • L0 ? Photons hitting the photocathode
  • Q / Q0 Charge collection
  • Q ? Ionization charge that reaches the
    photocathode
  • Q0 ? Ionization charge from the collisions
  • Q or L (a peak) offset (test voltage) /
    (test peak) C / e
  • Q0 Ea / Wcharge
  • 5.5 MeV / 15.6 eV
  • 3.74 x 105
  • L0 Ea / Wlight LQ O/4p
  • 1.35 x 105
  • C 1 fC e 1.6 x 10-19 C LQ (Light Quench)
    0.9-1.0 O/4p 0.4

30
Results with ?-particles
  • Quantum
  • Efficiency (QE)
  • Increases with
  • increasing
  • Electric Field
  • July 22, 2005

31
Results with ?-particles
  • Summary of tests from different dates and setups

32
Comparison with published results
33
Goals for the future
  • Achieve optimal conditions for the production of
    CsI photocathodes on-site
  • Make CsI photocathodes with high Quantum
    Efficiencies.
  • Further testing to match published results of QEs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com