Comparing Windows NT and Netware 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparing Windows NT and Netware 4

Description:

Access to standard office-type applications. What IT Staff Need. A system that is standard, and off-the shelf ... Y2K issues? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: typey50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparing Windows NT and Netware 4


1
Comparing Windows NT and Netware 4
  • Tony Brett
  • IT Systems Manager
  • Corpus Christi College
  • Tel. 76695,
  • e-mail tony.brett_at_ccc.ox.ac.uk
  • O.U.C.S. 25 26 November 1998

2
Why this talk?
  • Corpus Christi College
  • Currently NT 4.0/3.51 system
  • 2 domains
  • Moving to Netware 4.11

3
What Users Need
  • A way to receive and send E-mail
  • A way to Print
  • Somewhere to keep files safe
  • Access to the internet
  • Access to standard office-type applications

4
What IT Staff Need
  • A system that is standard, and off-the shelf
  • A system that can continue to be supported if
    staff change
  • Public machines configured so they dont need
    constant reconfiguration
  • Reduced cost of ownership

5
Why are we moving ? (1)
  • Many Institutions moving from Netware to NT.
  • Microsoft Marketing.
  • Who buys NT for Domains?
  • Domains are not scalable, not hierarchical, not
    distributed.
  • More sensible filing system - shares are archaic!

6
Why are we moving ? (2)
  • Novell only produce Network software.
  • NT Server almost identical to NT workstation.
    Minor changes.
  • No quota in NT!
  • Trust relationships rapidly become unmanageable.
  • Directory Services is the answer!

7
Novell Directory Services.
  • Heirarchical, reflecting College Structure.
  • NDS based on X500 standard
  • No one server is any more the boss than
    another.
  • Database is distributed and replicated.
  • Objects can exist for every entity on the
    network.
  • Single point of management - NWAdmin.

8
Novell Directory Services
  • Established since early 90s
  • Solid and reliable
  • No downtime in Medical School since late 1995

9
Microsofts Current Offering Domains
  • Flat structure
  • Four object types
  • User
  • Global and local groups
  • Computer
  • Non-extensible
  • Cannot define new object types or attributes
  • SQL server, post office, application
  • E-mail address, phone number

10
Domain Administration
  • Administration by object type, not individual
    objects or attributes
  • Account operators
  • Manage all users of the domain
  • Print operators
  • Manage all printers of the domain
  • Server operators
  • Manage all servers of the domain
  • Cannot assign individual administrative rights

11
Trust Relationships
12
Microsofts Offering sometime in the future MAD
  • Moves some way towards NDS
  • MAD O.U.s cannot
  • Grant rights to other MAD objects
  • Users, other organizational units, groups
  • Grant rights to resources
  • Printers
  • File system, Shares
  • Inherit services based on OU
  • Applications (NAL)

13
When will it Appear?
  • Sometime 1999?
  • Rename to Windows2000
  • Y2K issues?
  • Is it wise to move production servers to a
    completely re-written OS before one or two
    service packs?
  • All workstations will have to upgrade to Win2000
    to take advantage

14
Analyst ReportsWindows NT
I think Microsoft has a lot of work left. I
wouldnt be surprised to see the Windows NT 5.0
deliverable list go from a dictionary to a
pamphlet. Jon Oltsik, Forrester Research (As
quoted in LAN Times, Windows NT 5.0 stakeout,
R. Schott Raynovich, March 2, 1998) If people
are looking to reduce costs they shouldnt be
waiting for Windows NT 5.0 Mike Silver,
Gartner Group Inc., (As quoted in LAN Times,
Microsoft must sharpen ZAW, R. Scott Raynovich,
March 2, 1998)
15
Other Issues (1)
  • Workstation restrictions

NT - only 8 PC workstations
Netware - properly configurable
16
Other Issues (2)
  • Shares
  • LAN Manager relic because no space in FAT file
    system for permissions.
  • Access to files depends on which share you go
    through.
  • E.g. c\winnt\system32\repl\import\scripts vs.
    NETLOGON
  • Novell File system has no concept of shares -
    permissions are on files.

17
Managing desktop MS Operating systems
18
Where NT is useful
  • NT is brilliant as a desktop operating system
  • Secure
  • Manageable
  • Fast
  • Stable
  • True 32-bit
  • Novell ZEN works makes running all workstations
    simple

19
Features of ZEN works
  • Novell Application Launcher

20
Novell Application Launcher
  • Network - centric applications
  • Automatic install and repair of applications

21
Workstation User Policies
  • For Win 3.1, 95, 98 and NT
  • Held in NDS - no more config.pol files!

22
Workstation inventory
23
Remote Control
  • Can take over workstations, with or without users
    knowledge or permission
  • Enables easy remote support
  • Can log in and out of NT workstation

24
Dynamic User Accounts
25
snAppShot
26
snAppShot
  • Installing an Application
  • What changed?
  • Files added, removed, changed
  • registry settings
  • text file changes
  • All data stored in NDS
  • Variables can be used to customise
  • Use normall install program. snAppShot works out
    what changed.

27
Microsofts Offering
  • Systems Management Server
  • Offers hardware inventory and remote control
  • Used to offer Program Group Control for
    delivering applications but

It should be noted that shortly after the
development of CCCDesk, Microsoft announced that
Program Group Control would not be continued in
the next version of SMS. -Matthew Dovey, Corpus
Christi College Computer Network, Installation
and Maintenance Manual, Volume 1, page 43
28
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com