Title: The South Wests 200811 Affordable Housing Programme
1The South Wests 2008/11 Affordable Housing
Programme
22007/08 Outcome
- Start of Delivered
- year Target
- Expenditure 155.018m 176.554m
- Start on Sites
- Rent 1,675 3,297
- LCHO 600 1,441
- Total 2,275 4,738
- Completions
- Rent 2,781 3,036
- LCHO 1,025 1,670
- Total 3,806 4,706
- Allocation 143.5m 190.6m
- Rent 155.1m (81) (3,673 homes 63))
- LCHO 34.3m (17) (2,068 homes (37))
- Average grant per home
- Rent 42,251
33,000 ? 4,000 ? 7,500 ? 10,000
- Question
- Are we the HC/HCA, Local Authorities,
Providers up for, up to, creating seizing the
opportunities for a step-change? - Answer
- Too soon to tell .
- .. but NOW would be good
4The four over-arching criteria
- Deliverability
- Fit with national/regional/local policies
- Quality
- Value for money (HC grant per home)
5 AHP resources
- 711m cash (86 of the Regional Housing Pot)
- Generating an overall programme of 760m
- Remaining to be allocated (Est.)
- 08/09 236m 154m
- 09/10 274m 241m
- 10/11 250m 238m
6Efficiency targets (annual) aka reductions in
grant-per-home(inc nil-grant schemes)
7 Key targets
- Overall outputs from new programme A minimum of
70 rent - 15,400 Rent homes 1,989 (13) allocated
- 6,000 LCHO homes 1,513 (25) allocated
- Allocated to date 127m (16) for 16 of output
- But ratio is not right
- Completions in 08/11 Allocated (est.)
- 12,900 Rent completions 5,700 (44)
- 5,700 LCHO (Intermediate) 3,100 (54)
- Immediate challenge of 08/09 3,429 rent and 1,794
low cost home ownership - Supported and Older People 10 of rent homes
Allocated 12 - Larger dwellings (3B Plus) -
- Rent 25 - Allocated 29
- Homebuy 20 - Allocated 19
-
8 Spatial Distribution targets
- Distribution between settlement types
- Strategically significant cities and towns 60-70
of AHP only 45 allocated (1,319 homes) - Overall rural (lt 10,000) 4,500 homes
- Small rural (lt3,000) 2,200 homes
- Allocated 437 (15) but will have to increase
- Market towns (3-10,000) 2,300 homes
- Allocated 538 (18)
- (Other Urban Areas 648 homes)
- Distribution between sub-regions
- North 42 35 allocated
- South East 18 15 allocated
- Peninsula 40 50 allocated
9Specific messages (1)
- Tenure balance Rent, Intermediate Rent, Homebuy
72/28 ratio needed to meet outputs. Met in the
first round But - Supported housing/older people
- On track but a lot to do
- Costs
- Older people accommodation size
- Move-on accommodation
10Specific messages (1) cont
- Larger dwellings targets - exceeded rent,
marginally behind on Homebuy - Lifetime homes a disappointing 9
- Small flats (1B 1P, lt40m 2 ) - justification
- CSH Level 3 Delivered. Remember very limited
transition terms - 2,436 homes allocated to
Level 3 or higher
11Specific messages (2)Homebuy
- New Build Homebuy incomes
- 60 lt25k
- 40 gt 25k
- Measures Average rent on unsold equity is 2.39
compared to national standard of 2.75 and
average first tranche sale is 43 compared to 50
previously - Keyworkers
- Priority group (after social renters)
- Not a quota
- Marketing
- Standardised definition (KWL)
12Specific messages (3)
- Completions 08/09
- Still very significant numbers to achieve targets
- Committed programme slippage
- In year delivery challenge to deliver 08/09
targets. But theres more to come in 09/10 and
10/11 - Grant per home
- Rent ok for 3 years (42.3K) but 08/09 a major
challenge (48.1k) - Homebuy (15.9k) a better picture but a little
tight for 08/09 (19.5k) - Impacted on the scale of programme we were able
to allocate to
13Why?
- Nil grant
- Low proportion of nil grant bids
- Bidders holding back?
- Changes to partnership terms
- S106 schemes
- Strategic sites where are they?
- Cost efficiencies and HA contributions need to
improve on - OPS reasonably proportionate to levels
allocated but need to maximise potential in
future rounds. Ditto RCGF/DPF
14Specific messages (4)
- Development pipeline
- engaging between RMEs
- particularly S106 sites
- Impact on spatial distribution
- Growth Support (Affordable Housing) Fund
15Planninga long way to go, to a changing
destination
- Key to our deliverability assessment
- Key to our s106 VFM assessment HC grant is for
additionality to the nil-grant position - consistent with local policy,
- validated by economic appraisal
- (demanding but not choking)
- a fair share between Affordable Housing and
Infrastructure (draws on other funds, not
gold-plated) - Thresholds gradients not cliffs
16- For large/significant schemes
- twin-track S106 HC grant discussions
- Advance signal of HC grant
- Schemes
- Wider area?
17Housing growth is needed, is coming
- Work with us (our money, our expertise) to
deliver better Affordable Housing outcomes - Work with us in particular by deploying resources
in value-adding combinations with ours - Planning
-
- Land
- Or well go where the opportunities are
18Next steps
- Held Seminars and had 11 feedback/dialogue with
major providers and some LAs. - Next RME formally opens 14 April and closes 9
May. Announcements w/c 24 June. Quarterly
thereafter. - Regions will set RME priorities in Investment
Statement. - Supplementary guidance coming out but NAHP
prospectus continues to provide framework System
changes to simplify bidding - Will continue to seek LA view on proposals
19Issues Risks
- 633m (83) remains to be allocated
- 502m (71) of spend
- 87 of new homes for rent and 75 of homes for
sale remain to be allocated - 69 rent and 46 of homes for sale required to
meet 08/11 completion targets - Efficiency targets and outputs
- S106 bids
- Zero grant bids
- Major strategic sites
- Other sources of subsidy
- SSCTs and development pipeline
- Significance of next two RME rounds
20Some questions to consider
- Are we ready for the step change?
- What do we need to do to improve delivery?
- How do we speed up the delivery of the regions
major strategic sites/growth point numbers? - Can we cost effectively increase our rural
delivery (lt3000 population) to deliver our share
of the 10,300 homes target? - How can we help?