Site Operations Committee Issue Forum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Site Operations Committee Issue Forum

Description:

Tours and presentations. Site Preparedness. EEI. Safety. PMC. Site Administration. Staffing ... Reduced travel expenses for routine tests. EOT ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: cliffr3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Site Operations Committee Issue Forum


1
Site Operations Committee Issue Forum
  • Marc Eberhard
  • Chair, Site Operations Committee
  • Professor, University of Washington

2
Outline
  • Introduction to SOC
  • ISSUE 1. What is (or should be) User-Sharing?
  • ISSUE 2. What defines success at a NEES
    facility, and how should success be evaluated?
  • ISSUE 3. Expanding the NEES community. How can
    laboratories currently outside the NEES network
    contribute capacity/data? What would be the
    possible impacts on NEES equipment sites?

3
SOC Membership
  • Ian Aiken, SIE Corp
  • Tarek Abdoun, RPI
  • Ross Boulanger, UCD
  • Gregory Deierlien, Stanford
  • Marc Eberhard, Washington
  • Daniel Kuchma, Ilinois
  • Glenn Ricks, Georgia IT
  • David Sanders
  • Benson Shing, UCSD
  • David Simpson
  • Jim Wight, Michigan
  • Solomon Yim, OSU
  • Roberto Leon, Georgia IT (BOD Liaison)
  • Jay Berger, NEESinc (Staff Liaison)

4
SOC Reponsibilities
  • Strategies/Policies for Site Operations
  • User-Sharing Policy
  • Major Equipment Repair
  • Advise NEESinc on Issues of Community Interest
  • SOC Issue Forum
  • Annual Review of ES Operations
  • Annual Recommendation of ES Budgets
  • Annual Review of ES Maintenance and Metrology
    Practices
  • When Requested, Assist NEESinc or BOD in
    Resolving Disputes
  • Consider Other Issues at Request of BOD

5
Issue 1
  • What is (or should be) User-Sharing?

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Issue 2
  • What defines success at a NEES facility, and how
    should success be evaluated?

9
(No Transcript)
10
Evaluation Criteria
  • Fixed-Scope Research
  • Demand for site
  • of proposal requests (not available yet from
    NSF information collected by sites?)
  • of projects funded/scheduled (local and remote
    PI)
  • tests/runs planned/time needed (vary with level
    of test complexity, metrics being developed)
  • Throughput
  • tests/runs planned (vary with level of test
    complexity and available budget, metrics not yet
    available)
  • datasets (joint responsibility with research PIs)
  • User satisfaction
  • Surveys (fragmentary, so far)
  • Budget allocation for fixed scope (subjective)

11
Evaluation Criteria
  • Flexible-Scope Research
  • EOT
  • Workshops and training courses
  • Website
  • K-12
  • Tours and presentations
  • Site Preparedness
  • EEI
  • Safety
  • PMC
  • Site Administration
  • Staffing
  • Responsiveness to NEESinc and NEESit
  • Budget Management

12
Issue 3
  • Expanding the NEES community. How can
    laboratories currently outside the NEES network
    contribute capacity/data? What would be the
    possible impacts on NEES equipment sites?

13
Connecting Labs to Network
  • What are we talking about?
  • Limited IT (website, cameras, point of
    presence)
  • Contributing data to repository
  • Very limited funding
  • Why consider this?
  • Expanding the NEES community (even at sites)
  • Tests already going on at labs outside of
    network.
  • Capture much more data
  • Reduced travel expenses for routine tests
  • EOT

14
SOC Issue Forum
  • What is (or should be) User-Sharing?
  • What defines success at a NEES facility, and how
    should success be evaluated?
  • Expanding the NEES community. How can
    laboratories currently outside the NEES network
    contribute capacity/data? What would be the
    possible impacts on NEES equipment sites?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com