Title: Lois C. Steinfeldt
1Strategies for Managing Complex Coding
Situations Food Coding in a National Survey
Lois C. Steinfeldt Linda A. Ingwersen Randy P.
LaComb Food Surveys Research Group Beltsville
Human Nutrition Research Center Agricultural
Research Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
Association for Survey Computing Third
International Conference September 23, 1999
2Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals
10th nationwide food survey
16,000 individuals
2 days
24-hour dietary recall
76 for 2 days
80 for Day 1
31994-96 What We Eat in America
16,000 Individuals
31,000 Days
440,000 foods reported
41994-96 What We Eat in America
Food and nutrient intakes for individuals of all
ages in a nationally representative sample
51994-96 What We Eat in America
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
- Food and nutrient intakes representing all
seasons and across all days of the week
6Uses of the CSFII Data
- Monitor the nutritional adequacy of American
diets - Measure the impact of food fortification on
nutrient intakes - Develop dietary guidance and related programs
- Estimate exposure of population groups to
food contaminants
7Uses of the CSFII Data
- Evaluate the nutritional impact of food
assistance programs - Evaluate the impact of food labeling on
nutrient intakes - Assess the demand for agricultural products
8Food Intake Survey Processing
Descriptions of foods and amounts eaten as
reported
1 cup of whole milk
Food Coding, Recipe and Nutrient Databases
11111000 Milk, cows, fluid, whole
8.15 gm of fat 291.34 mg of calcium
Survey results
9Coding process
1) Translation 2) Categorization 3) Process
improvement learning
10Food Coding -Text translation
PBJ
translates to
Peanut butter and jelly sandwich
11Food Coding - Categorization
- Coding guidelines incorporated into the Food
coding database as part of the food description
Peas, green, from fresh, fat not added in
cooking Peas, green, from frozen, fat added in
cooking Peas, green, not specified as to form,
not specified as to fat added in cooking
Milk, not further specified Milk, whole, Milk, 2
12Food Coding - Categorization
- General Coding guideline
- no specific information available
- more detailed information is available
13Food Coding - Categorization
- Example Peanut butter and jelly sandwich
- No specific information about type of peanut
butter, jelly, or bread - coder selects the
default sandwich in the codebook
Peanut butter and jelly sandwich
14Food Coding - Categorization
- Example reduced fat peanut butter with
marmalade on whole wheat bread - Specific information about any of the components
- coder will select 3 separate foods
Bread, whole wheat, 100 Peanut butter, reduced
fat Marmalade, all flavors
15Food Coding - Databases
16Food Coding
- over 7,300 foods
- Exact text matches rare
- Exact food matches are common
17Food Coding
Codebook
Respondent reports
- Database contains
- Apple, raw
- Apple, cooked
- Food coder selects Apple, raw
- using categorization (guidelines)
- for apples, raw is assumed if cooked is not
specified
18Food Coding
- Codebook foods were modified for selected
characteristics - type of fat used in preparation
- type of milk used in preparation
- amount of liquid used in dilution
- Created 3,368 Modified foods
19Food Coding
Respondent reports
- Database contains
- Peas cooked in margarine
- Food coder changes margarine to butter creating a
modified food - Peas cooked in butter
20Food Coding
- Foods new to the market
- Cereals
- Snack foods
- Frozen and prepared foods
- Unusual foods
- Regional and ethnic specialties
- Mixtures of common foods
21Food Coding
Respondent reports Chocolate Marshmallow Bears
cereal
- Food coder creates a new unknown food
- Food coder enters Chocolate Marshmallow Bears
cereal - Food coder selects an existing unknown food
22Food Coding Management
- Status codes kept track of Modified and Unknown
Foods - Feedback to coders on problems
- choice of Codebook Food
- creation or use of Modified Food
- creation or use of Unknown Food
23Type of Foods Reported
24Unique Food Codes
25Average Number of Foods Per Code
26Conclusions
- 1994-96 CSFII released within 1 year of
completion of interviewing - less than half the time of previous surveys
- processing unknown foods had been a major reason
for previous delays
27Conclusions
- Shared use of database
- reduced overall number of reports
- improved tracking of unknowns and resolutions
- resolve unknowns sooner
- update food coding database 1000 changes in
94-96 - improve coding guidelines
28Food Surveys Research Group home page internet
address
http//www.barc.usda.gov/bhnrc/foodsurvey/home.htm