Nationwide Review of Graduated Driver Licensing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Nationwide Review of Graduated Driver Licensing

Description:

The teen crash problem. Motor vehicle crashes are the #1 cause of death for teens ... Nearly 2 other fatalities per teen driver fatality. Passengers of teen ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: bct4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nationwide Review of Graduated Driver Licensing


1
Nationwide Review of Graduated Driver Licensing
Research conducted by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
School of Public Health
2
AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
  • Established in 1947
  • 501 (c)(3) Not-For-Profit
  • Research affiliate of AAA/CAA
  • North American Focus

3
Mission
  • Identify traffic safety problems
  • Foster research that seeks solutions
  • Disseminate information and educational materials

4
Funded through the generosity of and its
members
5
Published February 2007 Prepared by Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health Available online at www.aaafoundation.
org
6
The teen crash problem
  • Motor vehicle crashes are the 1 cause of death
    for teens
  • Roughly 1,000 16-year-old drivers involved in
    fatal crashes each year
  • 400 16-year-old drivers killed annually
  • Nearly 2 other fatalities per teen driver
    fatality
  • Passengers of teen
  • Drivers and passengers in other vehicles
  • Pedestrians, bicyclists, etc.
  • Nearly 100,000 involved in injury crashes
    (10,000 resulting in incapacitating injuries)

7
Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL)
  • Typical three-stage GDL program involves
  • Learner stage all driving must be supervised by
    adult (usually parent)
  • Intermediate (or Provisional) stage allows
    unsupervised driving but only under certain
    conditions (e.g., during the day, no passengers)
  • Full License requires successful completion of
    first two stages

8
Purpose of study
  • Analyze overall (nationwide) crash reduction of
    having any three-stage GDL program
  • Distinguish between effectiveness of the most
    comprehensive programs and relatively weaker
    programs
  • Assess how much better we could be doing if all
    states had the most comprehensive programs

9
The Study - Data
  • GDL Laws (1994-2004, all states, from AAA, IIHS,
    and individual states)
  • Fatal crashes (1994-2004, 43 states, from
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration)
  • Injury Crashes (1994-2003, 35 states, obtained
    with permission from individual states)
  • Population estimates (all states and years
    studied, from U.S. Census Bureau) states)

10
The Study Analysis
  • State-quarter crash rates and laws in one state
    for one quarter-year
  • e.g., Alabamas crash rates and Alabamas laws
    between January 1, 2000 and March 31, 2000 is
    one state-state quarter
  • Combined state-quarters with the same laws to
    estimate overall impact of laws (1 national
    study, not separate study in each state)

11
The Study Analysis
  • Statistical methods (negative binomial
    regression) to control for differences unrelated
    to GDL (state-to-state differences, time trends,
    seasonal variation)
  • Also looked at crash rates of older drivers (ages
    20-24, 25-29, 30-54) these should not have been
    impacted by GDL

12
Overall impact of 3-stage GDL programs
  • Rate of fatal crashes of 16-year-olds reduced by
    11 (per capita) in states with 3-stage GDL
    programs
  • Rate of injury crashes reduced by 19
  • Reductions much smaller (and not statistically
    significant) for older drivers
  • Results adjusted for state-to-state differences,
    seasonal differences, and time trends
  • These results include strong and weak programs,
    so not representative of effectiveness of the
    best programs

13
Percentage difference in crash rates in relation
driver age and presence of 3-stage GDL program
Columns represent estimated differences in crash
rates, vertical lines represent 95 confidence
intervals (Negative means crash rate lower with
3-state GDL program than without)
14
Program comprehensiveness
  • Studied seven key components, grouped states by
    how many they had
  • Minimum age of 16 for learners permit
  • Requires at least 6 months with learners permit
    before intermediate or full license
  • Requires at least 30 hours supervised driving
    during learner stage
  • Minimum age of 16 years 6 months for intermediate
    license
  • No driving allowed after 10 PM during
    intermediate stage
  • No more than 1 passenger allowed during
    intermediate stage
  • Minimum age of 17 for full license

15
Program comprehensiveness
  • No state had more than 5 of the 7 during the
    study
  • Fatal crashes of 16-year-olds reduced by 38,
    injury crashes by 40, in states with 5 of the 7
    components
  • Reductions of 21 (fatal crashes) and 36 (injury
    crashes) in states with 4 of 7
  • Smaller reductions with fewer components

16
Percentage difference in fatal crash rates in
relation to driver age and number of program
components
Columns represent estimated differences in crash
rates, vertical lines represent 95 confidence
intervals (Negative means crash rate lower with
number of components shown than with none)
17
Percentage difference in injury crash rates in
relation to driver age and number of program
components
Columns represent estimated differences in crash
rates, vertical lines represent 95 confidence
intervals (Negative means crash rate lower with
number of components shown than with none)
18
Recommendations
  • States that do not yet have 3-stage GDL programs
    (learner permit, intermediate license, full
    license) should adopt 3-stage programs
  • associated with 11 reduction in fatal crashes,
    19 reduction in injury crashes of 16-year-olds
  • States should move toward implementing a full
    complement of meaningful GDL program components
  • Programs with 5 components have much greater
    impact than average 3-stage programs

19
Limitations of the Study
  • GDL components studied were compromise between
    existing recommendations (from AAA, IIHS, and
    others) and statistical requirementsthis study
    does not prove that they are optimal
  • Statistical model couldnt control for
    everything, some other factors could have
    influenced results
  • Cant tell how apparently effective programs work
    (safer driving? less driving? both? other
    ways?)
  • Didnt look at older teens

20
  • For more information,
  • please go to
  • www.aaafoundation.org

21
The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety is a
501(c)(3) public charity located in Washington,
DC that is dedicated to saving lives and reducing
injuries. It is supported by donations from
AAA/CAA Clubs, AAA/CAA members, and other
organizations associated with AAA/CAA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com