Title: Leptree fossil project: when Lepidopterists meet Paleontologists
1Leptree fossil project when Lepidopterists
meet Paleontologists
- Jae-Cheon SOHN1, Conrad LABANDEIRA2, and the
LepTree Consorsium3
- Department of Entomology, University of Maryland,
- College Park, MD 20742
- 2) Department of Paleontology, Smithsonian
Institution - National Museum of Natural History,
Washington, DC 20560 - 3) Charles Mitter, Don Davis, John Brown, Susan
Weller, - Cynthia Parr, Akito Kawahara, Andreas Zwick,
Jerry Regier, - Michael Cummings, Soowon Cho and external
contributors.
Lepidopterist
Paleontologist
Lepidopterists
Paleontologists
2Fossils in Phylogeny inference- Why are they
important
- Morphological phylogenetics
- 1) bridging problematic morphological gaps
subdividing long branches - (Gauthier et al., 1988)
- 2) offering morphological snapshot close to
the splitting of lineages (Novacek, 1992) - 3) assessing the direction of character
evolution (Hennig, 1966)
Molecular Phylogenetics (critical for LepTree
project) Calibration (relaxed) molecular clock,
allowing all major lineages to be
dated using molecular tree
3Difficulties of using fossils for evolutionary
study
- Limited taxon availability
- - the record is sparse
- Incomplete preservation or visibility of
characters - Taxomomic misinterpretation/ uncertainty of
Phylogenetic placement - - synapomorphies not known, or not
- observable
- Geological uncertainty
4Types of Lepidopteran Fossils
- Preservation type
- 1) Permineralization
- - amber/copal
- - silification
- 2) Compression/impression
- 3) Sieved residue
- Forms of fossils
- 1) Body fossil (egg/larva/pupa/adult)
- 2) Trace fossil (feeding damage/coprolite/gut
contents)
Prodryas persephone (Florrisant, Late Eocene)
From Meyer (2003)
A moth inclusion in Baltic amber (Eocene)
www.harunyahya.com
A fossil bat Palaeochiropteryx tupaiodon (Eocene)
from Richter Storch (1980)
A leaf-mine fossil (Eocene) From Grimaldi
Engel (2005)
5Previous reviews of Fossil Lepidoptera
- Taxonomic reviews
- Scudder (1875) Fossil butterflies
- Kusnezov (1941), Skalski (1976), Poinar (1992)
Lepidoptera inclusions in ambers - Bachofen-Echt (1949) Lepidoptera in Baltic amber
- Leestmans (1983) Lepidoptera fossils found in
France - Kozlov (1988) all known Lepidoptera fossils
- Danilevsky Martynova (1991) Fossil records of
the Lepidopterous families - Carpenter (1992) Generic review of the known
fossil Lepidoptera - Petrulevicius Martins-Neto (2000) South
American Cenozoic Lepidoptera - Rasnitsyn Ross (2000) Lepidoptera in the
Burmese amber collection at BMNH - Meyer (2003) Lepidoptera from the Florissant
fossil beds - Grimaldi Engel (2005) Review of lepidopteran
fossil record
Numerical estimation Kristensen Skalski
(1998) about 600-700 specimens known
(ca. 500
preserved in resin)
6Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 1) Limited taxon availability
- Why are compression fossils of Lepidoptera rare?
- fragility
- buoyancy
ltTaphonomy of Lepidopteragt Fast decay
in water Ant
consumption -gt few remains (Duncan, 1997)
(Smith, 1998)
4 weeks
7Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- Biased sampling of Lepidoptera in Amber
- - taxonomic composition of Microlepidoptera
trapped in mordern pine resin differs from
actual composition of fauna (Skalski, 1976)
Actual microlepidoptera fauna in the forest
Microlepidoptera fauna trapped in the pine resin
After Skalski (1976)
8Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 2) taxonomic misinterpretation
- - misidentification by external analogy
- ex) Palaeontinidae (Homoptera)
www.fossilmuseum.net
Palaeontina oolitica (after Butler, 1873)
9Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 2) taxonomic misinterpretation
- - wrongly characterized by the distorted images
of fossils
Borkhausenites bachofeni Rebel (Oecophoridae) Balt
ic amber (Eocene) from Skalski (1977)
Original drawing by Rebel (1934)
A photograph of holotype
Wing venation redrawn by Skalski (1977)
10Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 2) taxonomic misinterpretation
- - confusion between plant material and
Lepidoptera
misidentified as a lepidopteran ex) Daudet
(1876) Satyrites incertus coniferous
male cone (Nel Nel, 1985)
misidentified as plants Reid (1915) Aralia
fruits Chandler (1961) Zelkova fruits
caterpillar coprolite (Lancucka-Srodoniowa,
1964)
www.mntca.org
11Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 3) geological uncertainty
- - often absolute age estimation unavailable
- - a fossil bed possible combination of
- variously aged layers
- - reworked fossil-bearing bed (ex. Burmese amber)
www.amberworkshop.com
Zherikhin Ross (2000) the fossil beds
reworked
(Late Cretaceous)
12Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 4) incomplete preservation
- - Fossil taxa rarely displaying diagnostic
characters (Kristensen Skalski, 1998)
Protolepis cuprealata (Late Jurassic) After
Kozlov (1989)
Lepidopteran groundplan autapomorphies Modifed
from Kristensen Skalski (1998)
13Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 4) incomplete preservation
- - Fossils causing lots of missing data and
negatively affecting phylogenetic study - - decreasing the resolution of tree
- (Gauthier et al., 1988)
- - lowering support values over whole
tree - (Wilkinson Benton, 1996)
- - bad influence on otherwise
well-supported clades - (Wilkinson, 1995)
14Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
- 4) incomplete preservation
- - contamination
- new techniques
- ex) Micro-tomography (ESRF synchrotron
Lak et al., 2008)
After http//www.esrf.eu/news/general/amber
X-ray image
Micro-tomographic image
15So, how to overcome these problems?
Incomplete Taxon Sampling
Taxonomic Misinterpretation
Lepidopterists
Paleontologists
New Technologies
Incomplete Preservation
Geological Uncertainty
16Molecular Phylogeny Resolve backbone of
lepidopteran relationships
Training Workshops Develop and share molecular
markers protocols
Lepidoptera Fossil Database Compilation and
review of fossils for dating and hypothesis
testing
- LepInformatics project
- Provide the community with an interactive website
and tools to present, discuss and expand our
collective knowledge
Morphology Initiative Develop a comprehensive
illustrated glossary of descriptive terms based
on homologies
AToL (Alcohol Tubes of Lepidoptera) Build a
frozen tissue collection for all to use
17Molecular backbone phylogeny and dating 26
nuclear genes 127 families
Twig Leaders
Morphology Projects
- Compile current knowledge relevant to phylogeny
character descriptions images, data matrices,
trees, literature, primers, availability of
material - Compile morphological homologies glossary
- with reconciled terminologies, providing
characters for future higher phylogeny studies
Lepidoptera fossil database
AToLep Tissue Collection
Training Workshops
18How does Fossil Project progress?
19Launched Website
Family Name
Species Name
http//www.leptree.net/fossil
20Synopsis of Leptree fossil data base entries
Superfamily composition (439 specimens)
Composition by identification category
Composition by preservation type (526 specimens)
Composition by geological age
21Species information sheet
- 1) Body fossil
- - Taxonomic information
- rank
- - Specimen information
- preservation depository
- - Geologic information
- age locality
- - Diagnostic character by authors
- - References
- - Image Description
- 2) Trace fossil (leaf mines)
- - host plant information
To be in future
22Interaction in Fossil Project
- comments section in each sheet
- - To find new evidence of the known fossil
- ex) Axel Hausmanns reevaluation of
Hydriomena(?) protrita - Cockerell, 1922 (Florissant, Late
Eocene) - - To find erroneously placed taxa and new
position for them - - To place the fossil taxa remaining unsettled
Hydriomena (?) protrita (Florissant, Late
Eocene) After Cockerell (1922)
23Acknowledgements
LepTree Twig leaders LepTree Collaborators
Axel Hausmann Joaquin Baixeras LepTree
Informatics Staff John Park Giho
Kim Technician Erika Koenig Helper for
Translation Kim Mitter Ada Szczepaniec
Smithsonian Paleontology Finnegan Marsh
Wenying Wu