Parameters: Definitions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Parameters: Definitions

Description:

Section 1 (discuss in final session of the day) ... They are all speech characteristics/deviations that can be seen in speakers ... Exceeds regional speech HN ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: drjudithet
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Parameters: Definitions


1
Parameters Definitions Guidelines
  • Debbie Sell PhD, FRCSLT
  • Head, Speech Language Therapy Department
  • Great Ormond Street NHS Trust
  • Honorary Senior Lecturer University of London
  • Judith Trost-Cardamone, PhD, FASHA
  • Professor, California State University Northridge
  • Department of Communication Disorders Sciences

2
Parameters Primary Secondary
  • Primary Parameters speech parameters most
  • directly related to the cleftpalate/velopharyngea
    l condition
  • Secondary Parameters speech parameters less
  • directly related or not related to the cleft
  • palate/velopharyngeal condition but which are
  • frequently observed in speakers with cleft
    palate

3
Guidelines
  • Aim of guidelines is to provide a set of
    definitions to accompany the parameters, to
    ensure their appropriate application and
    interpretation
  • Section 1 (discuss in final session of the day)
  • Section 2 System is for reporting speech outcomes
    based on perceptual speech analysis they are not
    intended to explain the outcome

4
Primary Parameters Speech parameters most
directly related to the cleft palate/velopharyngea
l condition
5
Hypernasality (HN)
  • 0-3 rating scale
  • 0 WNL does not exceed HN
  • heard in regional speech
  • 1 Mild
  • 2 Moderate
  • 3 Severe

6
Hypernasality
  • Increased or excessive nasal resonance heard on
    vowels and vocalic consonants of a language.
  • Rated using a 4 point scale that reflects
    increasing severity from 0-3

7
Hyponasality HypoN
  • Binary judgment
  • 0 WNL/None
  • 1 Present

8
Hyponasality
  • Decreased or insufficient nasal resonance heard
    on nasal consonants and vocalic segments of a
    language.
  • Rating based on a binary judgement of within
    normal limits or present.
  • Cul-de-sac resonance is reflected in hyponasality
  • Mixed resonance is accounted for by the combined
    ratings of hypernasality and hyponasality

9
Audible Nasal Air Emission and/or Turbulence
  • Binary judgment
  • 0 WNL/None
  • 1 Present indicate pattern
  • intermittent and variable nasal emission and/or
    turbulence
  • phoneme specific nasal emission and/or turbulence
  • frequent/pervasive nasal emission and/or
    turbulence
  • Weighted scoring for patterns

10
Audible Nasal Air Emission and/or Turbulence
  • def. Nasal air emission /turbulence that
    accompanies/is co-produced with and distorts any
    or all (oral) high pressure consonants in a
    language
  • Rating based on a binary judgement of within
    normal limits or present
  • Second rating is given to reflect severity/impact
    on speech acceptability/understandability based
    on the frequency and pattern of the nasal air
    emission/turbulence

11
  • Intermittent and variable nasal air emission
    and/or turbulence heard occasionally with various
    oral pressure consonants with no obvious pattern
    of occurrence
  • Phoneme specific nasal emission and/or
    turbulence heard consistently but only with
    selected oral pressure consonants e.g. sibilant
    fricatives and/or affricates
  • Frequent/pervasive nasal emission and/or
    turbulence heard with most/all high pressure
    consonants in the inventory

Phoneme specific is this correctly placed
here?
12
Oral Pressures
  • Binary judgment
  • 0 WNL perceptually adequate for pressure
    consonants
  • 1 Weak perceptually inadequate for
    pressure consonants

13
Substitution Errors
  • Binary judgment
  • 0 WNL/None
  • 1 Present indicate type and frequency
  • Six categories
  • Weighted scoring for frequency

14
Substitution Errors
  • Def maladaptive compensatory misarticulations
    of high pressure consonants as a result of the
    cleft palate/velopharyngeal inadequacy condition.
  • Second rating based on type and frequency of
    occurrence for glottal stop, pharyngeal
    fricative/stop/affricate, palatal stop, palatal
    fricative, nasal fricative, atypical backing of
    targets to velar

15
Substitution Errors glottal and pharyngeal
  • Glottal stop
  • Pharyngeal fricative, stop, affricate
  • or any combination

16
Substitution Errors mid-dorsum palatal
  • Mid-dorsum palatal stop
  • Mid-dorsum palatal fricative

17
Substitution Errorsbacking but targets remain
oral
  • Backing of dental, alveolar and/or palatal
    targets to velar

18
Substitution Errors continued
  • Atypical backing of dental and alveolar targets.
    It includes a consonant target that is backed
    from its more anterior target place but is still
    made within the oral cavity.

19
Substitution Errors nasal fricative
  • Nasal fricative with or without turbulence
  • ___ phoneme specific pattern
  • Is this necessary, informative?

20
Substitution Errors continued
  • Nasal fricative def used as a
    substitution/replacement for oral stops,
    fricatives and affricates. It is articulatory
    substitution that frequently takes the form of an
    unvoiced (bilabial, alveolar or velar) nasal

21
Secondary Parameters Speech parameters less
directly related or not related to the cleft
palate/velopharyngeal condition but which are
frequently observed in speakers with cleft
palate. They are all speech characteristics/dev
iations that can be seen in speakers without
cleft palate.
22
Secondary Parameters
  • Binary judgment
  • 0 WNL/None
  • 1 Present
  • Includes errors related to
  • Dentition, Occlusion, palatal vault
  • Developmental delay, other articulation/phonologic
    al errors
  • Voice/laryngeal disorders

23
Secondary Speech Parameters cont.
  • Errors related to Dentition, Occlusion, Palatal
    Vault Configuration such as lateralized
    sibilants, palatalized alveolars,
    dentalized/linguadental alveolar fricatives and
    stops
  • Inverted labiodentals, etc.

24
Secondary Speech Parameters cont.
  • Developmental delay, other articulation/phonologic
    errors and voice/laryngeal disorders are self -
    explanatory

25
X Missing Data
  • Could not test (e.g. child was not cooperative,
    inadequate speech sample)
  • Did not test (e.g. time constraints)

26
Discussion Time
27
Parameters Scales Scoring
  • Judith Trost-Cardamone, PhD, FASHA
  • Professor, California State University Northridge
  • Department of Communication Disorders Sciences
  • Triona Sweeney, PhD
  • Specialist Speech Language Therapist
  • The Childrens Hospital Temple Street, Dublin
  • Adjunct Professor, University of Limerick

28
Hypernasality HN
  • 1 Mild Hypernasality
  • Exceeds regional speech HN
  • Assimilation nasality primarily heard on high
    vowels primarily or both inconsistent
  • Socially acceptable in most circles
  • Patient age 10 gt or parent age 5 mostly
    satisfied
  • Would probably not recommend physical management
    at this time

29
Hypernasality HN
  • 2 Moderate Hypernasality
  • Pervasive and draws attention to itself and away
    from the message
  • Most vowels retain identity
  • Socially unacceptable
  • Would probably recommend physical management
    after instrumental assessment

30
Hypernasality HN
  • 3 Severe Hypernasality
  • Pervasive and interferes with speech
    understandability
  • Many vowels lose identity
  • Socially very unacceptable
  • Would definitely recommend physical management
    after instrumental assessment

31
Audible Nasal Air Emission and/or Turbulence
  • Binary judgment
  • 0 WNL/None
  • 1 Impaired indicate pattern
  • intermittent and variable nasal emission and/or
    turbulence 1
  • phoneme specific nasal emission and/or turbulence
    2
  • frequent/pervasive nasal emission and/or
    turbulence 3
  • Weighted scoring for patterns

32
Weighted scores
  • intermittent and variable is nasal emission with
    or without turbulence that is heard occasionally
    with various oral pressure consonants with no
    obvious pattern of occurrence 1
  • phoneme specific is nasal emission and/or
    turbulence that is heard consistently but only
    with selected oral pressure consonants e.g.,
    sibilant fricatives and/or affricates 2
  • frequent/pervasive is nasal emission and/or
    turbulence that is heard with most/all high
    pressure consonants in the inventory 3

33
Issues
  • Nasal emission and/or nasal turbulence as 1
    parameter!!
  • - perceptually different nasal airflow errors
    BUT
  • - similar impact in terms of speech outcome
  • Raters ability to distinguish between nasal
    emission and/or nasal turbulence AND nasal
    fricatives

34
Substitution Errors
  • Binary judgment
  • 0 WNL/None
  • 1 Present indicate type and frequency
  • Six categories
  • Weighted scoring for frequency

35
Substitution Errors glottal and pharyngeal
  • Glottal stop 1
  • Frequent 3
  • Infrequent 1
  • Pharyngeal fricative, stop, affricate
  • or any combination 1
  • Frequent 3
  • Infrequent 1

36
Substitution Errors mid-dorsum palatal
  • Mid-dorsum palatal stop 1
  • Frequent 2
  • Infrequent 1
  • Mid-dorsum palatal fricative 1
  • Frequent 2
  • Infrequent 1

37
Substitution Errorsbacking but targets remain
oral
  • Backing of dental, alveolar and/or palatal
    targets to velar 1
  • Frequent 2
  • Infrequent 1

38
Substitution Errors nasal fricative
  • Nasal fricative with or without turbulence 1
  • Frequent 3
  • Infrequent 1
  • ___ phoneme specific pattern 2
  • Is this necessary, informative?

39
Nasal Emission/Nasal Turbulence
  • accompanies/is co-produced with and distorts any
    or all oral high pressure consonants in a
    language
  • need to distinguish from Nasal Fricative which is
    used as a substitution/replacement for oral
    fricatives and affricates
  • Nasal fricative frication generated in nose
  • Velopharyngeal fricative/posterior nasal
    fricative

40
Substitution Errors
  • Frequent 2
  • Infrequent 1
  • How do we define frequency?
  • Is it necessary to document this?

41
Discussion Time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com