Title: Production
1Production
2Exchange Economies (revisited)
- No production, only endowments, so no description
of how resources are converted to consumables. - General equilibrium all markets clear
simultaneously.
3Now Add Production ...
- Add input markets, output markets, describe
firms technologies, the distributions of firms
outputs and profits Thats not easy!
4Robinson Crusoes Economy
- One agent, Robinson Crusoe (RC)
- Endowed with a fixed quantity of one resource --
24 hours. - Use time for labor (production) or leisure
(consumption). - Labor time L. Leisure time 24 - L.
- What will RC choose?
5Robinson Crusoes Technology
- Technology Labor produces output (coconuts)
according to a concave production function.
6Robinson Crusoes Technology
Coconuts
Production function
Feasible productionplans
24
0
Labor (hours)
7Robinson Crusoes Preferences
- RCs preferences
- coconut is a good
- leisure is a good
8Robinson Crusoes Preferences
Coconuts
More preferred
24
0
Leisure (hours)
9Robinson Crusoes Choice
Coconuts
More preferred
Production function
Feasible productionplans
24
0
Labor (hours)
Leisure (hours)
24
0
10Robinson Crusoes Choice
Coconuts
Production function
C
24
L
0
Labor (hours)
Leisure (hours)
24
0
11Robinson Crusoe as a Firm
- Now suppose RC is both a utility-maximizing
consumer and a profit-maximizing firm. - Use coconuts as the numeraire good i.e. price of
a coconut 1. - RCs wage rate is w.
- Coconut output level is C.
12Robinson Crusoe as a Firm
- RCs firms profit is ? C - wL.
- ? C - wL ? .., the equation of an
isoprofit line. - Slope w .
- Intercept ? .
13Isoprofit Lines
Coconuts
Higher profit
Slopes w
24
0
Labor (hours)
14Profit-Maximization
Coconuts
Production function
C
24
L
0
Labor (hours)
15Utility-Maximization
- Now consider RC as a consumer endowed with ?
who can work for w per hour. - What is RCs most preferred consumption bundle?
- Budget constraint is
16Utility-Maximization
Coconuts
Budget constraint
slope w Intercept
24
0
Labor (hours)
17Utility-Maximization
Coconuts
More preferred
24
0
Labor (hours)
18Utility-Maximization
Coconuts
Budget constraint slope w
C
24
L
0
Labor (hours)
19Utility-Maximization Profit-Maximization
- Profit-maximization
- w MPL
- quantity of output supplied C
- quantity of labor demanded L
- Utility-maximization
- w MRS
- quantity of output demanded C
- quantity of labor supplied L
Coconut and labor markets both clear.
20Utility-Maximization Profit-Maximization
Coconuts
MRS w MPL
Given w, RCs quantity supplied of labor
quantity demanded of labor L and output
quantity demanded output quantity supplied C.
C
24
L
0
Labor (hours)
21Pareto Efficiency
Coconuts
24
0
Labor (hours)
- MRS ? MPL, not Pareto efficient
22Pareto Efficiency
- To achieve Pareto Efficiency
- must have MRS MPL.
23Pareto Efficiency
Coconuts
MRS MPL. The common slope ? relative
wage rate w that implements
the Pareto
efficient plan by
decentralized pricing.
24
0
Labor (hours)
24First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
- A competitive market equilibrium is Pareto
efficient if - consumers preferences are ..
- there are .. in consumption or
production.
25Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
- Any Pareto efficient economic state can be
achieved as a competitive market equilibrium if - consumers preferences are .
- firms technologies are .
- there are . in consumption or
production.
26Non-Convex Technologies
- Do the Welfare Theorems hold if firms have
non-convex technologies? - The 1st Theorem does not rely upon firms
technologies being convex.
27Non-Convex Technologies
Coconuts
MRS MPL The common slope ? relative
wage rate w that
implements the Pareto
efficient plan by
decentralized pricing.
24
0
Labor (hours)
28Non-Convex Technologies
- Do the Welfare Theorems hold if firms have
non-convex technologies? - The 2nd Theorem does require that firms
technologies be convex.
29Non-Convex Technologies
Coconuts
MRS MPL. The Pareto optimal allocation
be implemented by
a competitive
equilibrium.
24
0
Labor (hours)
30Production Possibilities
- Resource and technological limitations restrict
what an economy can produce. - The set of all feasible output bundles is the
economys ... - The sets outer boundary is the ...
31Production Possibilities
Coconuts
Production possibility frontier (PPF)
Production possibility set
Fish
32Production Possibilities
Coconuts
Infeasible
Feasible but inefficient
Fish
33Production Possibilities
Coconuts
PPFs slope is the
Increasingly negative MRPT ? increasing
opportunity cost to specialization.
Fish
34Production Possibilities
- If there are no production externalities then a
PPF will be concave w.r.t. the origin. - Why?
- Because efficient production requires
exploitation of comparative advantages.
35Comparative Advantage
C
RC
MRPT -2/3 coconuts/fish so opp. cost of
one more fish is foregone coconuts.
20
RC has the comparative opp. cost advantage
in producing fish.
30
F
C
MF
50
MRPT -2 coconuts/fish so opp. cost of one more
fish is foregone coconuts.
25
F
36Comparative Advantage
C
RC
MRPT -2/3 coconuts/fish so opp. cost of
one more coconut is foregone fish.
20
30
F
C
MF
50
MRPT -2 coconuts/fish so opp. cost of one more
coconut is foregone fish.
MF has the comparative opp. cost advantage
in producing coconuts.
25
F
37Comparative Advantage
C
RC
Economy
C
20
Use .. to produce fish before using
70
30
F
C
MF
50
Use .. to produce coconuts before using ..
50
55
30
F
25
F
38Comparative Advantage
Economy
C
Using low opp. cost producers first results in a
ppf that is concave w.r.t the origin.
More producers with different opp. costs smooth
out the ppf.
F
39Coordinating Production Consumption
- The PPF contains many technically efficient
output bundles. - Which are Pareto efficient for consumers?
40Coordinating Production Consumption
Coconuts
Output bundle is and is the
aggregate endowment for distribution to
consumers RC and MF.
Fish
41Coordinating Production Consumption
Coconuts
OMF
Contract Curve
ORC
Fish
42Coordinating Production Consumption
Coconuts
However, .
OMF
RCs indifferent curve
MFs indifferent curve
ORC
Fish
43Coordinating Production Consumption
Coconuts
If instead produce and give MF same
allocation as before. ? MFs utility is
..
OMF
ORC
Fish
44Coordinating Production Consumption
Coconuts
MFs utility is unchanged, But RCs utility is
... Pareto improvement
OMF
OMF
ORC
Fish
45Coordinating Production Consumption
- MRS ? MRPT ? inefficient coordination of
production and consumption. - Hence, MRS MRPT is necessary for a Pareto
optimal economic state.
46Coordinating Production Consumption
Coconuts
OMF
ORC
Fish
47Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
- The above Pareto optimal production and
consumption can be achieved by decentralized
behaviours of firms and consumers - Competitive markets, profit-maximization, and
utility maximization all together can result in a
Pareto optimal economic state
48Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
- RC and MF jointly run a firm producing coconuts
and fish. - RC and MF are also consumers who can sell labor.
- Price of coconut pC.
- Price of fish pF.
- RCs wage rate wRC.
- MFs wage rate wMF.
49Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
- LRC, LMF are amounts of labor purchased from RC
and MF. - Firms profit-maximization problem is choose
- C, F, LRC and LMF to
50Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
Equation for Isoprofit line is
which rearranges to
51Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
Coconuts
Higher profit
The firms production possibility set.
Fish
52Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
Coconuts
Profit-max. plan
Competitive markets and profit-maximization ?
Fish
53Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
- So competitive markets, profit-maximization, and
utility maximization all together causethe
condition necessary for a Pareto optimal economic
state.
54Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
Coconuts
Competitive markets and utility-maximization
?
OMF
ORC
Fish
55Decentralized Coordination of Production
Consumption
Coconuts
Competitive markets, utility- maximization and
profit- maximization ?
OMF
ORC
Fish