Title: Rainfall estimation by BMRC CPol radar
1Rainfall estimation by BMRC C-Pol radar
- 1Lei Feng and 1,2Ben Jong-Dao Jou
- (??) (???) .
- 1National ST Center for Disaster Reduction
- 2National Taiwan University
ICMCS-V 2006.11.03
2Objectives
- To illustrate the ability of rainfall estimation
using Areal R(FDP) and R(KDP) by BMRC C-Pol
radar. Radar-Raingauge comparisons in three
different sizes of area - Multi-beam (Area 100 km2) Areal R(FDP)
- Single-beam (Area 25 km2) Areal R(FDP)
- Point (Area 2 km2) R(KDP)
- Try to correct the wind drift effect when
comparing with single raingauge.
3Two Areal Rainfall schemes
Notice the difference Gate area ? with range ?
but NSSL scheme without area weighting
Keep the area weighting, but need FDP information
at each range gate
4BMRC C-Pol
rain gauge network
5 single-beams, the area of each beam is 25 km2
1 multi-beam, the area of each beam is 100 km2
18 raingauges, the radar coverage of each gauge
is 2 km2 (radius 0.8 km)
RD-69
In Darwin 18 rain gauges in the 10 x 10 km2 area
C-Pol radar at (0,0)
5Case A - 15 Jan 1999
Case A, Time series plot (100 km2)
6Case B - 01 Mar 1999
Case B, Time series plot (100 km2)
7Case C - 17 Mar 1999
Case C, Time series plot (100 km2)
8Multi-beam results
- Area size 100 km2
- Very high correlation coefficient 0.97
- Small standard deviation 1.99 mm/hr
- Little underestimate
- Sample number 108
case (ABC)
9Single-beam results
- Area size 25 km2
- High correlation coefficient 0.94
- Small standard deviation 3.43 mm/hr
- Little underestimate
- Sample number 590
case (ABC)
10Point results
- Area size 2 km2
- Low correlation coefficient 0.86
- Large standard deviation 6.38 mm/hr
- Under estimation
- Sample number 1091
case (ABC)
- The result is getting worse as the verification
area getting smaller. Why ?
11Point Comparison Problems
- Inherence difference of the measurements Rain
gauge accumulates continuously rainfall on a
point while radar samples almost instantaneously
a volume averaged rainfall rate.
12Can we correct the wind drift effect ?
Strong horizontal wind Overestimate or
Underestimate ?
from DLOC
How about the wind drift effect ?
13Optimal offset vector
- An area of radar data which covering all surface
rain gauges is moved around the original point in
a square window (8km x 8km) with 200 m interval
in X and Y direction. - The cross-correlation coefficient is calculated
between the time lagged (1.5 minute) surface rain
rates of the gauges and the space shifted radar
rain rates. - A two-dimensional correlation field is produced.
The distance from the point of the maximum
correlation to the original point was defined as
optimal offset of the horizontal displacement.
14Optimal offset vector
152 km
Only 39/89 volumes can be easily found out the
offset vectors, most of them are convective type
rain.
16Checking the optimal vector far from system
moving velocity case
17No wind drift correction
After wind drift correction
Case B
Case A
18after wind drift correctionBut significant
underestimation
No wind drift correction
If the coefficient of R(KDP) estimator increase
50, it look better. Can we do this change for
this case ?
19Rainfall with smaller raindrops need to use
higher coefficient in R(KDP) estimator
small Zdr small Do
big Zdr big Do
Adopted from L. D. Carey ATMO 689
20In case C, D0 is significant lower than case A
and B
21Storm motion
22Disdrometer observation
Volume median diameter D0 estimation
Radar estimation
Note the comparison here is not the same case,
but are similar squall line type precipitation in
Darwin.
23No wind drift correction
After wind drift correction
24summary (1)
- Its very important to consider the wind drift
effect when doing single point radar-gauge
comparison. In this study, the normalized error
has 17 improvement.
Correlation Coefficient of radar-raingauge
comparison
25summary (2)
- Use the BMRC C-Pol radar phase base estimator to
estimate rain rate is very accurate , especially
on convective rainfall. - For accurate rain rate estimation, it needs to
consider the DSD variability such as stratiform
rainfall, orographic rainfall, shallow convective
warm rain and so on when using R(KDP) estimator.
Thanks !
26Optimal vector Finding, 0640 15-Jan-1999
(C-Pol at Darwin)
Lag 0 min
Lag 1 min
Lag 2 min
Lag 3 min
Lag 4 min
Lag 5 min