Rainfall estimation by BMRC CPol radar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Rainfall estimation by BMRC CPol radar

Description:

Time lag effect. National S&T Center for Disaster Reduction ... rainrate B. rainrate A. Correlation Coefficient of radar-raingauge comparison ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: C322
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rainfall estimation by BMRC CPol radar


1
Rainfall estimation by BMRC C-Pol radar
  • 1Lei Feng and 1,2Ben Jong-Dao Jou
  • (??) (???) .
  • 1National ST Center for Disaster Reduction
  • 2National Taiwan University

ICMCS-V 2006.11.03
2
Objectives
  • To illustrate the ability of rainfall estimation
    using Areal R(FDP) and R(KDP) by BMRC C-Pol
    radar. Radar-Raingauge comparisons in three
    different sizes of area
  • Multi-beam (Area 100 km2) Areal R(FDP)
  • Single-beam (Area 25 km2) Areal R(FDP)
  • Point (Area 2 km2) R(KDP)
  • Try to correct the wind drift effect when
    comparing with single raingauge.

3
Two Areal Rainfall schemes
Notice the difference Gate area ? with range ?
but NSSL scheme without area weighting
Keep the area weighting, but need FDP information
at each range gate
4
BMRC C-Pol
rain gauge network
5 single-beams, the area of each beam is 25 km2
1 multi-beam, the area of each beam is 100 km2
18 raingauges, the radar coverage of each gauge
is 2 km2 (radius 0.8 km)
RD-69
In Darwin 18 rain gauges in the 10 x 10 km2 area
C-Pol radar at (0,0)
5
Case A - 15 Jan 1999
Case A, Time series plot (100 km2)
6
Case B - 01 Mar 1999
Case B, Time series plot (100 km2)
7
Case C - 17 Mar 1999
Case C, Time series plot (100 km2)
8
Multi-beam results
  • Area size 100 km2
  • Very high correlation coefficient 0.97
  • Small standard deviation 1.99 mm/hr
  • Little underestimate
  • Sample number 108

case (ABC)
9
Single-beam results
  • Area size 25 km2
  • High correlation coefficient 0.94
  • Small standard deviation 3.43 mm/hr
  • Little underestimate
  • Sample number 590

case (ABC)
10
Point results
  • Area size 2 km2
  • Low correlation coefficient 0.86
  • Large standard deviation 6.38 mm/hr
  • Under estimation
  • Sample number 1091

case (ABC)
  • The result is getting worse as the verification
    area getting smaller. Why ?

11
Point Comparison Problems
  • Inherence difference of the measurements Rain
    gauge accumulates continuously rainfall on a
    point while radar samples almost instantaneously
    a volume averaged rainfall rate.

12
Can we correct the wind drift effect ?
Strong horizontal wind Overestimate or
Underestimate ?
from DLOC
How about the wind drift effect ?
13
Optimal offset vector
  • An area of radar data which covering all surface
    rain gauges is moved around the original point in
    a square window (8km x 8km) with 200 m interval
    in X and Y direction.
  • The cross-correlation coefficient is calculated
    between the time lagged (1.5 minute) surface rain
    rates of the gauges and the space shifted radar
    rain rates.
  • A two-dimensional correlation field is produced.
    The distance from the point of the maximum
    correlation to the original point was defined as
    optimal offset of the horizontal displacement.

14
Optimal offset vector
15
2 km
Only 39/89 volumes can be easily found out the
offset vectors, most of them are convective type
rain.
16
Checking the optimal vector far from system
moving velocity case
17
No wind drift correction
After wind drift correction
Case B
Case A
18
after wind drift correctionBut significant
underestimation
No wind drift correction
If the coefficient of R(KDP) estimator increase
50, it look better. Can we do this change for
this case ?
19
Rainfall with smaller raindrops need to use
higher coefficient in R(KDP) estimator
small Zdr small Do
big Zdr big Do
Adopted from L. D. Carey ATMO 689
20
In case C, D0 is significant lower than case A
and B
21
Storm motion
22
Disdrometer observation
Volume median diameter D0 estimation
Radar estimation
Note the comparison here is not the same case,
but are similar squall line type precipitation in
Darwin.
23
No wind drift correction
After wind drift correction
24
summary (1)
  • Its very important to consider the wind drift
    effect when doing single point radar-gauge
    comparison. In this study, the normalized error
    has 17 improvement.

Correlation Coefficient of radar-raingauge
comparison
25
summary (2)
  • Use the BMRC C-Pol radar phase base estimator to
    estimate rain rate is very accurate , especially
    on convective rainfall.
  • For accurate rain rate estimation, it needs to
    consider the DSD variability such as stratiform
    rainfall, orographic rainfall, shallow convective
    warm rain and so on when using R(KDP) estimator.

Thanks !
26
Optimal vector Finding, 0640 15-Jan-1999
(C-Pol at Darwin)
Lag 0 min
Lag 1 min
Lag 2 min
Lag 3 min
Lag 4 min
Lag 5 min
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com