Title: Main Arguments Learning objects (LOs) and learning design (LD)
1Main ArgumentsLearning objects (LOs) and
learning design (LD)
- Vehicles for discovering, sharing and developing
pedagogic strategies and designs. - Introduction reveals and highlights underlying
obstacles to their adoption - including existing
pedagogic practice and values. - Makes staff development almost inevitable?
- But what about organisational development?
2A Cry from The Heart
- Why is it so difficult to share learning
materials? (UNFOLD Glasgow meeting) - The learning object dream has failed - long live
Learning Design? (CETIS Pedagogy Forum) - Are we missing something?
3Systemic Issues
- education is a social and political system, and
the checks and balances that keep the system
working may not be shifted by any technology - Mayes (Groundhog Day)
4Understanding Your SystemFunctional or
Dysfunctional?
Senior Management
Operational Management
Operations
From Littlejohn Carey, 2005 in Prep after
Collis and Moonen 2005
5Reality Therapy.
- Where teachers are in reality - embedded (Koper),
contextualised, individual, (sometimes isolated
competitive) non-transferable. - Many teachers do not possess a vocabulary for
articulating and sharing their pedagogic
strategies and designs with others, particularly
beyond their cognate discipline areas X4L
seminar on LD
6Mediating LD
Abstract
Contextualised
Embedded Practice
Intermediate Descriptions
Learning Design
7An LD Continuum
- Formal Semi-StructuredPrimitives/Artefact
s
8Our Experience
- better to work outwards from teachers existing
conceptions and terminologies towards new
concepts and terms, rather than to expect them to
adopt new frameworks - Back to
- Prepare
- Teach
- Review
9 10Some Systemic Issues
- Lack of an ID Tradition? (hostility?)
- Shuell would be a useful bridge to ID
- Strongly implicit organisational model in LD
LOs - Industrial approach is implicit in LO LD
- Division of Labour
- Design Intensive
- Design once run many
- Change of roles
11Fundamental Systemic Issues
- Learning Technology especially LD and LO has an
implicit organisational model at odds with the
status quo (Pollock, N. Cornford, J. 2000,
http//www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/virtual-universit
ies/) - This is the real barrier to sharing learning
materials (c.f. Twigg, C, at Alt-C 2005
http//www.alt.ac.uk/altc2005/ altc2005_documents/
caroltwigg_qa.pdf When Worlds Collide - JISC
2004) - This dialectic is the driver - how quick do we
want to go?
12What Would a New System Look Like?
- Teaching as the primary business (the baleful and
distorting effect of the RAE is dumped) - Courses are designed, developed and delivered by
multidisciplinary teams - Course content/syllabus is not changed (apart
from maintenance) for between 3-7 years - All course materials are created and shared
before the course begins i.e. no teaching from
your own notes - The staff who teach and tutor on a course are
probably not the staff who designed and developed
the course - Staff teaching and tutoring on a course are
likely to be on different employment contracts to
traditional lecturers who are primarily subject
specialists
13What a Learning Design Technologist Sees
The Learning Design Continuum A
B
C LD Levels A - Basics and
Sequence B- Properties and Conditions C -
Notifications
14What a Teacher Sees
Many Continuums
15Implications for the Future
- LD and LOs as Boundary Objects (Wenger) for CoPs.
- They Need to Carry some Context and offer
possible Generalisations (Toshiba) - Lessons from AI Knowledge Elicitation for LD?
16Getting from Here to ThereThe Bigger Picture
Where Teachers Are Operating at Levels 1, 2 3
of Ramsdens Model of HE teaching
Craft Style Communication with Artefacts and
Primitives
Organisational Tools?
Semi - Structured Narrative
LD Tools
Structured Narrative
A(1) B (2) C(2.5)
3
17Conclusions
- We may indeed find that learning objects and
learning design do help in transforming teaching
in higher education it just might not happen
the way we though it would - End