Title: Public Broadcasting 2.0
1Public Broadcasting 2.0
- Alaska Public Telecommunications Inc
- September 23, 2005
2Public broadcasting 1.0
- Characteristics
- One-to-many
- Real-time
- Scarcity rules content time is dear
- Rewards average use at any one time
- Brands are at the aggregator level
- Programmers are tacticians.
- Finding hits and competing with other hit-makers
- We schedule what we think you want when we think
you will want it more than whats on the
competition.
3Public broadcasting 1.0
- Contact hours per year
- 12-Bn radio
- 6-Bn TV
- Revenue per contact hour
- Radio 5.4
- Television 29.0
4Changes in media usage
- People are taking control over their media usage.
- My time (non-real time) is the fastest growing
segment of media usage. - I want what I want, when I want it, the way I
want it. - So the important media divide is not audio vs.
video or print vs. electronic, its my time vs.
real-time.
5Changes in media usage
- My time media usage increased from 375 to 500
hrs/yr from 97-02. - Broadcast TV use declined from 904 to 786 hrs/yr
in the same time. - My time share of audio/video usage is
increasing from one in five hours in 1997 to one
in three in 2007.
Source Veronis Suhler Stevenson
6Who does my time serve?
- People who have already left linear programming
for other reasons - Career
- Chores
- Community
- Family
- People who cant get enough of what they like on
your stations.
7CPB TV primetime study
- PTV viewing was small in two segments compatible
with PTV - Innovative Inclined
- Distracted Unavailable
- Together, they are 26 of viewers
- Limited free time
- Frequent users of technology
- Medium-to-high users of public radio
8CPB TV primetime study
9Rich media delivery landscape
- Worldwide broadband users hit 160M
- Mass market video creation tools
- Low cost digital video cameras, PC based editing
apps - Majority of PCs now rigged for sound and video
- BitTorrent adoption 20M users
- Weblogs 31M, rapid growth after 5 years
- RSS feeds more than 5 million on Internet
- De facto standard for content syndication
- Being widely used for news/info updates
- RSS feeds transitioning to Rich Media Content
- Podcasting RSS MP3 audio iPod synch
- Video blogs right behind RSS 2.0 and RSS Media
10Public broadcasting 2.0
- Characteristics
- Many-to-many
- On-demand for use in my time
- Abundance rules content limited only by storage
- Content is branded
- Rewards cumulative access over time
- Programmers and users are curators.
- Provide huge choice.
- Make content personalized and accessible.
11Strategic investment scenarios
- Sustaining investments
- Sustain the legacy business
- Best practices improvements
- Collaborations to lower costs and gain scale
12Strategic investment scenarios
- Repositioning investments
- Often disruptive innovations (Ã la Clayton
Christensen) - Reposition in new directions consistent with
original mission
13Broadcasters must adapt to
- A multi-platform future,
- A multi-choice future,
- And to three über trends
- Digitization
- Personalization
- Democratization
14A multi-platform future
- Were evolving from distribution over one
platform to distribution over multiple platforms - Over-the-air transmitters
- Internet and broadband
- Cable and satellite
- Physical media
- Mobile and portable devices
From Dave MacCarn, WGBH
15A multi-choice future
- The number of channels through which users will
be able to access our content will continue to
grow. - Increasingly, users want control over when and
where they use our content. - Increasingly, users want choice and
personalization. - Successful public broadcasters are morphing into
digital libraries.
From Dave MacCarn, WGBH
16Ãœber trends digitization
- Content meets mathematics
- Noiseless generations for production
distribution - Metadata data about data
- Find, manipulate and distribute content with
great granularity and flexibility - Repurpose content
- Extend the life and value ofmedia assets
- PBCore metadata standard
- Search
17Ãœber trends personalization
- Content meets self-organization
- Tagging (folksonomies)
- XML syndication (RSS, Atom)
- Attention (metadata that tracks to what people
are paying attention) - Communities of interest more important than
aggregator brands
18Example Tagging at flickr
Tags / norway
Sample photos from the RSS feed of the tag
norway from flickr.com
19Example Web 2.0 A/V sites
- Brightcove.com
- Odeo.com
- OMN.org
- Ourmedia.org
- YouTube.com
20Example
- Really Simple Syndication (better Really Simple
Subscriptions) - Its very easy to implement.
- It aggregates in one place whats new in web
content to which you subscribe. - Combined with personalization, it will provide a
powerful distribution platform for pubcasters
(or, a powerful competitor). - Open a Bloglines.com account and try it.
21Ãœber Trends democratization
- Content freed from gatekeepers
- Inexpensive but powerful production tools are in
the hands of consumers - Low barriers to effective distribution
- Search and referral serves as marketing
- Rip. Mix. Burn.
22Example Podcasting
- Works with any portable media players, PCs, Macs,
and most news aggregators. - Means adding an enclosure to an RSS 2.0 item (can
link to any file MP3, WMV, etc.). - Specialized aggregators can automatically sync
your files with the player. - Implications for how we do journalism and
production.
23The long tail meme
- From Wired editor Chris Anderson
- The future of entertainment is in the millions
of niche markets at the shallow end of the
bitstream. - Real time is hits oriented. For NRT long-tail
distribution, success can come with much smaller
numbers.
24The long tail meme
- Amazon, iTunes, Netflix, et al. have much larger
inventories than corre-sponding brick-and-mortar
stores. - The average record store has 40,000 tracks, but
Rhapsody has 735,000. - The average Barnes Noble carries 130,000
titles..., but more than half of Amazons book
sales come from outside its top 130,000 titles.
25The long tail meme
26Public Service Publisher
- A bootstrap my time, long tail, PB 2.0
repositioning initiative - Started by public broadcasting stations and
independent producers - Broadcasters can serve as enablers for community
public service content - Design focused on PB 2.0 business models
27Public Service Publisher
- Partnering with Open Media Network
- Multi-platform content delivery from a common
user interface via - Internet (Kontiki P2P grid)
- TiVo
- Cable VOD
- DTV broadcast data caching
- Physical media (DVD, CD)
- Station-supplied
- Amazon, Netflix, et al.
- Free, subscription, or pay per use
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33New revenue sources
- Member benefits (more content, convenient times)
- New audience revenue (relationship building,
underwriting) - User compensation for access to niche, premium or
hard-to-find programming
34New revenue sources
- Assets in permanent distribution build record of
community value, important for tax-based,
foundation and philanthropic funding - B2B revenues (rights to distribute, marketing
content for derivative works) - Distribution services (datacasting, load
balancing, my time traffic)
35Pull urgencies
- Opportunities
- My time use growing rapidly.
- PBCore, broadband, off-the-shelf core
technologies are in place. - Long-tail businesses are succeeding.
- Pubcasters and partners have great and deep
content assets. - There is substantial interest in use of my time
electronic media by other public service
organizations.
36Push urgencies
- Threats
- Competition for pubcasters is coming from the
for-profit sector. - Its no longer a one-platform world. If we cling
to one platform, we risk our mission. - XML-based syndication to portable devices is
growing and presents a real bypass to linear
programmers. - Barriers to entry are low. If we dont do it,
someone else will.
37Change and cow paths
38Contact information
Dennis L. Haarsager, Associate VP
GMEducational Telecommunications TechnologyPO
Box 642530Washington State UniversityPullman,
WA 99164-22530Contact info haarsager.org/contac
tWeblog technology360.comResources
technology360.orgPublic Service Publisher
weblog pspblog.org