Title: The Importance of Thinking Big:
1The Importance of Thinking Big
- Addressing large-scale and global change issues
through marine and fisheries biological research
Daniel Pauly Fisheries Centre University of
British Columbia Vancouver, Canada
A presentation originally created for
presentation at Woods Hole, Mass., Feb. 2, 2001
2This contribution
- Was originally created for an event connected
with Black History Month (February), over a year
ago - Thus, it is both dated, and has a very personal
feel - Nevertheless, it may appeal to Aqualink members
in that it describes how a young scientist (yes,
I was once young!) broadened his vision, and
ended up leading a project (see
www.fisheries.ubc.ca/project/saup) with a global
scope - The slides have not been updated visit our web
site for the follow up to this presentation. - So here we go
-
3 This also being a report of how one scientist
grew with age
- The object of my first paper (1973) had a length
of 30 cm
4A benthos washing machine
5 This also being a report of how one scientist
grew with age
- The object of my first paper (1973) had a length
of 30 cm - The study area of my Ms thesis (1974) was a one
km2 lagoon in Ghana, West Africa
6On the ecology of a small West-African lagoon
7 This also being a report of how one scientist
grew with age
- The object of my first paper (1973) had a length
of 30 cm - The study area of my Ms thesis (1974) was a one
km2 lagoon in Ghana, West Africa - The survey area during my first job, in
Indonesia, (1975-1976) was 106 km2 -
8The Sunda Shelf, Indonesia
9 This also being a report of how one scientist
grew with age
- The object of my first paper (1973) had a length
of 30 cm - The study area of my Ms thesis (1974) was a one
km2 lagoon in Ghana, West Africa - The survey area during my first job, in
Indonesia, (1975-1976) was 106 km2 - And I now work on the global ocean (3.6108 km2).
- Definitely a change of scale.
10But why such broadening of scale?
- In the 1970s, the idea was that the fisheries of
developing countries should well develop, and
then be managed using analytic models such as
were then applied to the management of North
Atlantic fisheries
11Developing Fisheries in Developing Countries?
12But why such broadening of scale?
- In the 1970s, the idea was that the fisheries of
developing countries should well develop, and
then be managed using analytic models such as
were then applied to the management of North
Atlantic fisheries - Hence, one needed to know the growth and natural
mortality of key species
13Moreover, hundreds of species were showing up in
catches, and they could not be aged and sampled
as can be done, e.g. in New England
- Hence the need to develop length-based method for
the estimation of growth - And the need to develop a predictive model for
estimating natural mortality from easy-to
estimate parameters - And, as well, the need to ensure that available
estimates of these parameters did not disappear
in the gray literature. - These then led to the development of.
14Electronic Length-Frequency Analysis (ELEFAN),
widely used in developing countries
(see www.fisat2000.org for updates)
15A widely-used empirical model for estimating M
(natural mortality) from growth parameters and
mean environmental temperature
16See www.fishbase.org to learn why
We get over 750,000 hits permonth.
17One neat aspect of FishBase, incidentally, is
that its high quality standards generate equality
among its contributors, wherever they are from.
18But then, all of this assumes single-species
management works.
- Yet every species the fisheries exploit is
embedded in an ecosystem, both as predator and
prey, - and thus the mutual impacts of fisheries
exploiting different species must be considered. - Hence the need for ecosystem-based management.
No fish is an island
19Fisheries form part of complex ecosystems
20Fortunately, the franchise for a neat ecosystem
modeling approach (Ecopath) was available.
- And so Ecopath was made accessible ( taught) to
a vast number of colleagues (2300 registered
users in 120 countries, see www.ecopath.org) - Which resulted not only in a better understanding
of the concept of trophic levels (TL), but also
in many estimates of TL
21Trophic level the concept
4
Top predators
? 10
Prey fish
3
Trophic level
? 10
Zooplankton
2
? 10
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Phytoplankton
1
.
.
22So it became possible to estimate TLs for the
worlds fisheries, using two sources of data
- The TL for species of species groups in FishBase
- And the global FAO database of fisheries catches.
- The equation used TLi1 DCij? TLj for
(groups of) species i with prey j and - ?TLk Yik ? TLi / Yi given catches (Y) by year
(k) - simple stuff.
23This led to two rather visible contributions on
- Primary production required to sustain global
fisheries (Pauly and Christensen, Nature, 1995)
- Fishing down marine food webs (Pauly et al.,
Science, 1998)
24PPR to Sustain Global Fisheries
Non-tropical shelves 35
Tropical shelves 35
Rivers/ lakes 24
Terrestrial average 35-40
Open ocean 2
Coastal/reefs 8
Upwelling 25
Nature 1995, 374
25Global fishing down the food web
Marine
Freshwater
Science March 1998, 279
26(No Transcript)
27And, because one shouldnt quit when on a roll,
we are working on
- Harmonizing global ecosystem classifications, to
accelerate the transition to ecosystem-based
management - Mapping the world catch, using rule-based
approaches (not coloring crayons!) - Comparing the present state of ecosystem on
ocean-wide scale with their state 50 years ago.
28This, for example isimportant, but lacks finesse
29But then, catches by FAO area are not much
better..
30Here are catches by half degree squares. Better.
31And this will allow us to start
- Evaluating the cost of rebuilding some or our
depleted marine ecosystems, or of not doing so - Inferring where changing fisheries operations
will conflict with conservation of biodiversity - Interfacing with predicted scenarios from global
circulation models, and hence join the community
that attempts to deal with the changes that
global warming will cause.
32I will stop here any more growth would be too
much
- Thanks to Ambrose Jearld, for having me invited
to speak here, and to all those who helped me
have something to say Villy Christensen, Reg
Watson and my other friends at UBC, Prof. G.
Hempel in Germany (for supporting me as an unruly
student), Jack Marr for hiring me as an ICLARM
postdoc (against sound contrary advice) and all
these wonderful colleagues on five continents - My recent research is supported by the Pew
Charitable Trusts, Philadelphia, and National
Science and Engineering Council of Canada.