PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy

Description:

Faith that God exists vs. Justified Belief that God exists ... The conception that interests Blackburn is shared by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: andrew349
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy


1
PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy
  • March 25th
  • Chapter Five, God

2
Overview
  • Faith that God exists vs. Justified Belief that
    God exists
  • The concept of God
  • The Ontological Argument
  • The First-Cause Argument
  • The Argument from Design
  • The Evidence of Miracles
  • The Utility of Belief in God
  • The Problem of Evil

3
Faith that God exists vs. Justified Belief that
God exists
  • Should religious claims (e.g. There is a God)
    be assessed in terms of truth and falsehood?
  • Can we find some reason to believe that God
    exists?
  • Fideism The view that religious belief is based
    on faith, not on reason

4
The Concept of God
  • Different cultures and religions offer quite
    different conceptions of God or Gods
  • The conception that interests Blackburn is shared
    by Judaism, Christianity, and Islam
  • Gods principal attributes (perfections) are
  • -Omnipotence (all-powerful)
  • -Omniscience (all-knowing)
  • - Goodness (all-good)

5
The Ontological Argument
  • In his Meditations, Descartes offers several
    arguments for the existence of God
  • The Trademark Argument
  • A version of The Ontological Argument
  • All perfections are properties of the Supreme
    Being.
  • Existence is a perfection.
  • Therefore,
  • The Supreme Being has existence i.e. God
    exists.

6
The Ontological Argument
  • A version of Descartes argument was offered by
    an earlier philosopher/theologian, St. Anselm
    (1033-1109). The argument has 2 parts.
  • Part 1
  • The concept of God (the being with ALL
    perfections) is understood.
  • Whatever is understood exists in our minds.
  • Therefore,
  • God exists in our minds.

7
  • Part 2
  • Suppose God exists only in our minds, and not in
    reality.
  • Then we can conceive of a being greater than God
    one that really exists.
  • But God is defined as that being than which
    nothing greater can be conceived.
  • So, no greater being can be conceived.
  • But this contradicts our supposition (4) that God
    exists only in our minds.
  • Therefore,
  • Our supposition that God exists only in our minds
    is false i.e. God exists outside of our minds.

8
  • Is this a sound argument?
  • Some things to wonder about
  • Is existence really a predicate?
  • Is existence a perfection?
  • Does the argument allow us to prove too much?
  • - The Proof that Dreamboat exists
    (Think, p.156)
  • Does it make sense to compare things that exist
    in reality with things that exist in the mind?
    (Think, pp. 157-158)

9
The First-Cause Argument
  • There are now things changing and causing change.
  • Something causes change only if it is caused to
    change by something else.
  • If something causes change only if it is caused
    to change by something else, then its causal
    chain is infinitely long.
  • But no causal chain is infinitely long.
  • Therefore,
  • There is something that causes change, but is not
    caused to change by something else i.e. there
    is a first-cause and it is God.

10
  • Is this a sound argument?
  • Some things to wonder about
  • Why cant there be an infinitely long series of
    causes and effects?
  • Why think that the first-cause, if there was one,
    must still exist?
  • Why think that the first-cause, if there was one,
    is God?
  • If God requires no cause in order to change or
    cause change, then why not just stop with the
    physical world?

11
The Argument from Design
  • Based on an analogy The universe, as an ordered
    structure, resembles (or is analogous to) a
    mechanism (e.g. a watch)
  • The universe is like a mechanism.
  • Like effects have like causes.
  • The cause of a mechanism is an intelligent being.
  • Therefore, probably
  • The cause of the universe is an intelligent
    being.
  • This cause is God (The Wise Architect)

12
  • Is this a cogent argument?
  • Some things to wonder about
  • Is the analogy a good one?
  • Why think that the designer, if there was one,
    must still exist?
  • Why think that the designer, if there was one, is
    God?
  • Are there other hypotheses that would explain the
    existence of order in the universe?

13
The Evidence of Miracles
  • Some people report having witnessed or
    experienced miracles.
  • Miracles, if they exist, are violations of
    natural regularities and natural laws.
  • If miracles occur, then probably there is a God.
  • Therefore,
  • There is some evidence (i.e. the testimony of
    those who report miracles) that probably there is
    a God.

14
  • Is this a cogent argument?
  • David Humes Objection
  • Suppose Jones offers a report, R, that a miracle
    occurred.
  • R is, of course, very improbable (because
    miracles are very improbable).
  • Considering the following 2 possibilities, we
    should reject the one that is least probable
  • (a) Jones reports R, but R did not actually
    happen.
  • (b) Jones reports R, and R actually occurred.
  • But, clearly, the least likely of these options
    is the (b). So we should believe (a). (see
    Think, pp. 179-180)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com