Public Purposes, Academic Autonomy, Accountability And Governance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Purposes, Academic Autonomy, Accountability And Governance

Description:

The Higher Education Workplace Relations Requirements (HEWRRs) Voluntary Student ... that have the potential to affect the financial viability of the provider; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: Walt175
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Purposes, Academic Autonomy, Accountability And Governance


1
Public Purposes, Academic Autonomy,
Accountability And Governance
  • Colin Walters
  • Australia

2
Public Purposes, Academic Autonomy,
Accountability And Governance
  • The National Governance Protocols
  • The Higher Education Workplace Relations
    Requirements (HEWRRs)
  • Voluntary Student Unionism (VSU)
  • The National Protocols for Higher Education
    Approval Processes

3
National Governance Protocols
  • The Protocols deal with
  • responsibilities of governing bodies
  • duties of members and sanctions for their breach
  • Election and nomination of members
  • maximum size and composition of the governing
    body
  • induction and professional development for
    members
  • codified grievance procedures and annual
    reporting and
  • set minimum standards for the oversight of
    controlled and associated entities.

4
Areas for Improvement
  • 1. Require governing body members to inform
    themselves fully on matters they are determining
  • 2. Require the governing body in approving the
    mission and strategic direction, annual budget
    and business plan to take into account the
    distinctive role of the particular provider
  • 3. Require the governing body to approve a
    strategic asset management plan
  • 4. Require the governing body to produce an
    annual report which must include reporting on
    performance indicators that have been set by the
    governing body

5
Areas for Improvement
  • 5. Require the governing body to consider
    information on the performance and comparative
    performance of the institution produced by DEST
  • 6. Prohibit delegation from the governing body of
    responsibility for financial decisions that have
    the potential to affect the financial viability
    of the provider
  • 7. Reduce the maximum number of governing body
    members from 22 to 14
  • 8. Limit the terms of governing body members to
    12 years and require a majority decision by a
    governing body for any term to exceed 8 years
    (and require explicit consideration of the
    continuing capacity of the proposed appointee to
    discharge their responsibilities)

6
Areas for Improvement
  • 9. Require appointment by the governing body of a
    Secretary (who is not the Vice-Chancellor/CEO) to
    provide a direct source of advice on governing
    body responsibilities and legal issues
  • 10. Make more explicit the qualifications and
    experience requirements for the minimum number
    of members (2) that must have financial
    expertise
  • 11. Strengthen the fiduciary responsibilities of
    governing body members to include a prohibition
    on improper use of information and disclosure of
    confidential information
  • 12. Require grievance procedures to be easily
    located on a providers web site and
  • 13. Require further improvement in the oversight
    of controlled entities.

7
Higher Education Workplace Relations Requirements
(HEWRRs)
  • HEWRR 1 Choice in agreement making
  • HEWRR 2 Direct relationships with employees
  • HEWRR 3 Workplace flexibility
  • HEWRR 4 Productivity and performance
  • HEWRR 5 Freedom of association

8
Voluntary Student Unionism (VSU)
  • No compulsory student union membership for
    students
  • No compulsory fees for non academic services

9
National Protocols for Higher Education Approval
Processes
  • Protocols served as effective gatekeeper and
    protected quality in the sector
  • May also have shaped characteristics of providers
  • Need for greater diversity
  • Increased interest from overseas providers
  • Dramatic growth of private higher education market

10
Drivers for change
  • Protocols served as effective gatekeeper and
    protected quality in the sector
  • May also have shaped characteristics of providers
  • Need for greater diversity
  • Increased interest from overseas providers
  • Dramatic growth of private higher education market

11
Key changes to National Protocols
  • New specialist universities
  • New University Colleges
  • New pathways for self-accrediting status for
    institutions other than universities
  • Clearer rules for overseas institutions
  • Apply to all new and existing institutions
  • Compliance assessed through AUQA audits
  • Current and new Protocols available on MCEETYA
    website at www.mceetya.edu.au/mceetya
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com