Peat in horticulture: a synthesis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Peat in horticulture: a synthesis

Description:

Utilisation of peat is in principle allowed, ... In case of utilisation humans use the energy, in case of decomposition microbes/fungi ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: Joos3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Peat in horticulture: a synthesis


1
Peat in horticulture a synthesis
  • Hans Joosten
  • Greifswald University
  • International Mire Conservation Group

2
Horticulture
  • Population growth, increased urbanisation
  • High quality mass products
  • Increasingly intensive higher yields per m2
  • ? High quality substrates that guarantee such
    yields

3
Substrates
  • Properties are essential
  • Reliability, adjustability, availibility
  • ? Sphagnum peat has become the number one
    substrate

4
(No Transcript)
5
peat
6
Sphagnum peat is 'nothing'
  • From merely rain
  • and dew of heaven
  • has it grown
  • it is not fed from Earth (Dau 1823)
  • The 'nothing' enables storage of water and air
  • The 'nothing' enables easy adjustment of adequate
    pH and nutrient conditions
  • ? 'Nothing' is everything!

7
'Nothing' grows
  • Peat grows in living peatlands (mires)
  • Peat grows very slowly
  • How to replace 'nothing?

8
Peat extraction destroys mires
9
Augstumal (Litauen, C.A. Weber 1902 )
10
Augstumal (Litauen) 2002
1 km
11
Wise Use
  • International Peat Society (IPS)
  • International Mire Conservation Group (IMCG)
  • Global Guidelines for Wise Use of peatlands
  • Joosten, H. Clarke, D. (2002) Wise use of
    mires and peatland Background and principles
    including a framework for decision-making. 304 S.

12
IPS/IMCG Wise Use book
  • Includes detailled questionaries to judge the
    wisdom of peat extraction for horticulture
  • But also states
  • it is not possible to reduce all complexities to
    simple principles or single measures
  • Wise Use is not simple or simplistic and cannot
    be reduced to formulae

13
Wise Use definition
  • those uses of mires and peatlands for which
    reasonable people now and in the future will not
    attribute blame
  • No blame for decisions taken after due reflection

14
IPS/IMCG Wise Use
  • The wisdom of a decision is judged on how it
    balances
  • The benefits and disadvantages
  • The (direct and indirect) effects on
  • all (present and future) people.

15
IPS/IMCG basis criterion I
  • Utilisation of peat is in principle allowed,
  • When the use is not substitutable and vital for
    human survival OR
  • As long as the good/service is abundantly
    available.
  • In the latter case the side effects have to be
    taken into account.

16
IPS/IMCG basiscriterion I
  • With respect to peat
  • Peat is not vital
  • Is peat abundant?

17
Availability
  • West- and central Europe are almost empty
  • No good overview how much Sphagnum peat is still
    available

18
From Joosten 2003
  • Mires left
  • lt 10
  • 10-50
  • gt 50
  • of original area
  • Total left
  • 48
  • (33 excl. Russia)

Europe is the continent with the largest losses
19
Availability
  • Most of the million km2 of peatlands on Earth do
    not contain slightly humified Sphagnum peat
  • That peat is only won in a narrow zone (north
    temperate/ south boreal zone)
  • Estimates are too optimistic
  • Better inventories necessary

20
The mire zones of Eurasia and Africa
21
IPS/IMCG basiscriterion II
  • With respect to side effects, peat use is in
    principle allowed when
  • No negative side effects occur OR
  • The affected goods/services remain abundant or
    are easily (and completely) substitutable OR
  • The intervention is easily reversible.

22
IPS/IMCG basiscriterion II
  • With respect to side effects, peat use is in
    principle allowed when
  • No negative side effects occur OR
  • The affected goods/services remain abundant or
    are easily (and completely) substitutable OR
  • The intervention is easily reversible.

23
Side-effects
  • The question is whether the affected
    goods/services remain abundant or are easily
    substitutable
  • Then IPS/IMCG basiscriterion II
  • In all other cases a complete cost-benefit-analys
    is is necessary.

24
Irreversibly affected
  • Carbon store of the peat
  • Palaeo-ecological archive value
  • Cultural archive value
  • Long-term natural phenomena (macro- and
    microrelief/-pattern, rare species)
  • Option-function (future)
  • Individual human appraisal

25
Reversibly affected
  • CO2 sequestration
  • Regulation of hydrology and chemistry
  • Plants, animals, landscape
  • Their indication values
  • Recreation, esthetics, spirituality

26
While covering only 3 of the Worlds land area,
peatlands contain 550 Gt of carbon in their peat.
27
Finland
This is equivalent to 75 of all C in the air,
equal to all terrestrial biomass, and 2 times the
carbon stock in the total forest biomass of the
world.
28
Sichuan, China
This makes peatlands the top long-term carbon
stock in the terrestrial biosphere.
29
Globally, degraded peatlands emit 3 Gtons CO2 a-1
30
0.6 of the land surface is responsible for 10
of the total global anthropogenic CO2 emissions
31
Annual peat losses
32
Is peat renewable?
  • Popular question
  • Relation to finiteness of the resource
  • Relation to effect of peat combustion on climate

33
Is peat renewable?
  • Ancient question
  • Asked since man has been using peat
  • First comprehensive discussion in the first book
    on peat by Schoockius (1658, Groningen)

34
Is peat renewable?
35
Is peat renewable?
1658
Chapter 14 Whether excavated sod material can
over time be restored?
36
Is peat renewable?
  • To burn a peat moss does twenty times as much
    damage, as a forest can twenty times grow up
    before a new and equally good peat moss matures.
  • It may seem to be a good invention to use the
    mires for fuel and thus spare the wood but a
    forest can grow several times in a seculum,
    whereas a mire is not filled with peat in several
    secula.
  • Carl von Linné (1707-1778) "Skånska resa" 1749

37
Is peat renewable?
  • 17th 19th century Peat renewability important
    for long term energy security
  • Since 1850 economic interest disappeared because
    of the emergence of coal and oil
  • Since 1960 peatland restoration again interesting
    from a conservation point of view

38
Biomass fossil peat
  • Peat extraction mobilises carbon from a long-term
    store where it would otherwise remain
    indefinetely
  • This is the fundamental difference between
    biomass (wood, straw) and fossil carbon
    resources (peat, coal)

39
Biomass fossil peat
  • In case of biomass, organic material is oxidised
    that soon would have oxidised (by decomposition)
    anyhow
  • In case of utilisation humans use the energy, in
    case of decomposition microbes/fungi
  • In both cases the same amount of CO2 ends up in
    the atmosphere
  • In case of peat material is oxidised that
    otherwise would have remained unaltered
    indefinitely
  • As opposed to biomass, peat whether 10, 1000 or
    10 000 years old would without human use not
    end up in the atmosphere as CO2

40
Green peat extraction?
  • ? There is no green peat extraction
  • Peat extraction is unsustainable, destructive,
    environmentally damaging, ugly

41
Wise Use of peat?
  • But peat extraction takes place with an aim that
    can be good.
  • Whether the balance is wise ist, depends how
    good the aim of peat extraction is and how
    bad the alternatives are.

42
Wise Use of peat?
  • It always concerns a balancing between the loss
    of peat, peatland and their values on the one
    side, and societal advantages on the other side.
  • If a small evil helps to prevent a big evil or to
    achieve a big good, the smaller evil might be
    allowed.

43
Wise Use of peat?
  • Such judgement can only take place in the
    framework of a complete life-cycle-analysis, from
    extraction up to disposal.
  • It means that use of peat for a specific purpose
    can be wise, but for another purpose not.

44
  • For the wise use of non-renewable resources some
    simple rules can apply (Hartwick 1977)
  • A non-renewable resource should not be squandered
    on low-grade applications
  • The profits from non-renewable resources should
    be invested in the development of renewable
    substitutes.

45
Future
  • The industry has to focus stronger on preparing
    growing media from renewable resources, including
    wastes and cultivated plant material.
  • Only then she can address the societal demands
    for
  • sustainable development,
  • conservation of biodiversity, and
  • decrease in Carbon-emissions.

46
Future
  • The Stone Age has not ended because of lack of
    stone.
  • And so it will also be with peat
  • Reidar Petterson IPS-President 1992 -1996

47
Conclusions
  • Peat extraction for growing media must be
    concentrated on already degraded peatlands (50
    million ha!)
  • Don squander high quality peat for low-quality
    applications (amateur gardening)
  • Sustainability requires the substitution of
    fossil resources by renewable resources
  • Restoration can combine conservation and
    exploitation

48
Nov 2004
Mai 2004
Aug 2005
Peatmoss cultivation to replace peat in
horticulture
Aug 2006
49
Cultivation of peatmoss (Sphagnum) for
horticultural substrates (alternative for peat).
50
Visions of Leo Lesquereux 1844
51
  • Quelles soient rejetées par un grand nombre de
    propriétaires dont lunique vouloir est le profit
    du moment, je le comprends. Mais il se trouvera
    peut-être quelque homme de coeur, ami de son
    pays, qui emploiera une parcelle de sa fortune à
    des expériences que le riche seul peut faire.
  • that these (ideas) are rejected by a large
    number of (peatland) proprietors whose only wish
    is short-term profit, I can understand. But maybe
    some man of honour, a friend of his country, can
    be found, who will devote a parcel of his fortune
    to experiments, as only the rich can do.

52
  • Puissent les résultats obtenus emmener enfin mes
    concitoyens à cette conviction, qui se fortifie
    toujours plus en moi, cest que les marais
    tourbeux sont, non point un bien mort, mais une
    fortune active, non point une chose profitable
    pour le présent seul, mais nécessaire à lavenir,
    non point enfin un sol inutile et quil faut se
    hâter de détruire, mais un de ces bienfaits de la
    sage nature que lhomme doit reconnaître et
    étudier un de ces trésor dont il peut profiter
    pour luimême, mais dont il doit compte à ses
    descendants.
  • May the results obtained bring my fellow
    citizens to the conviction, that increasingly
    becomes stronger in me that the peat mires are
    not dead goods but an active fortune, not
    profitable only for the present, but necessary
    for the future, finally not a useless soil that
    we must rapidly destroy, but one of the benefits
    of the wise nature that man has to acknowledge
    and study one of these treasures of which he may
    benefit for himself, but for which he has to
    render account to his descendants.

53
www.imcg.net
JOIN!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com