Title: Peat in horticulture: a synthesis
1Peat in horticulture a synthesis
- Hans Joosten
- Greifswald University
- International Mire Conservation Group
2Horticulture
- Population growth, increased urbanisation
- High quality mass products
- Increasingly intensive higher yields per m2
- ? High quality substrates that guarantee such
yields
3Substrates
- Properties are essential
- Reliability, adjustability, availibility
- ? Sphagnum peat has become the number one
substrate
4(No Transcript)
5peat
6Sphagnum peat is 'nothing'
- From merely rain
- and dew of heaven
- has it grown
- it is not fed from Earth (Dau 1823)
- The 'nothing' enables storage of water and air
- The 'nothing' enables easy adjustment of adequate
pH and nutrient conditions - ? 'Nothing' is everything!
7'Nothing' grows
- Peat grows in living peatlands (mires)
- Peat grows very slowly
- How to replace 'nothing?
8Peat extraction destroys mires
9Augstumal (Litauen, C.A. Weber 1902 )
10Augstumal (Litauen) 2002
1 km
11Wise Use
- International Peat Society (IPS)
- International Mire Conservation Group (IMCG)
- Global Guidelines for Wise Use of peatlands
- Joosten, H. Clarke, D. (2002) Wise use of
mires and peatland Background and principles
including a framework for decision-making. 304 S.
12IPS/IMCG Wise Use book
- Includes detailled questionaries to judge the
wisdom of peat extraction for horticulture - But also states
- it is not possible to reduce all complexities to
simple principles or single measures - Wise Use is not simple or simplistic and cannot
be reduced to formulae
13Wise Use definition
- those uses of mires and peatlands for which
reasonable people now and in the future will not
attribute blame - No blame for decisions taken after due reflection
14IPS/IMCG Wise Use
- The wisdom of a decision is judged on how it
balances - The benefits and disadvantages
- The (direct and indirect) effects on
- all (present and future) people.
15IPS/IMCG basis criterion I
- Utilisation of peat is in principle allowed,
- When the use is not substitutable and vital for
human survival OR - As long as the good/service is abundantly
available. - In the latter case the side effects have to be
taken into account.
16IPS/IMCG basiscriterion I
- With respect to peat
- Peat is not vital
- Is peat abundant?
17Availability
- West- and central Europe are almost empty
- No good overview how much Sphagnum peat is still
available
18From Joosten 2003
- Mires left
- lt 10
-
- 10-50
- gt 50
- of original area
- Total left
- 48
- (33 excl. Russia)
Europe is the continent with the largest losses
19Availability
- Most of the million km2 of peatlands on Earth do
not contain slightly humified Sphagnum peat - That peat is only won in a narrow zone (north
temperate/ south boreal zone) - Estimates are too optimistic
- Better inventories necessary
20The mire zones of Eurasia and Africa
21IPS/IMCG basiscriterion II
- With respect to side effects, peat use is in
principle allowed when - No negative side effects occur OR
- The affected goods/services remain abundant or
are easily (and completely) substitutable OR - The intervention is easily reversible.
22IPS/IMCG basiscriterion II
- With respect to side effects, peat use is in
principle allowed when - No negative side effects occur OR
- The affected goods/services remain abundant or
are easily (and completely) substitutable OR - The intervention is easily reversible.
23Side-effects
- The question is whether the affected
goods/services remain abundant or are easily
substitutable - Then IPS/IMCG basiscriterion II
- In all other cases a complete cost-benefit-analys
is is necessary.
24Irreversibly affected
- Carbon store of the peat
- Palaeo-ecological archive value
- Cultural archive value
- Long-term natural phenomena (macro- and
microrelief/-pattern, rare species) - Option-function (future)
- Individual human appraisal
25Reversibly affected
- CO2 sequestration
- Regulation of hydrology and chemistry
- Plants, animals, landscape
- Their indication values
- Recreation, esthetics, spirituality
26While covering only 3 of the Worlds land area,
peatlands contain 550 Gt of carbon in their peat.
27Finland
This is equivalent to 75 of all C in the air,
equal to all terrestrial biomass, and 2 times the
carbon stock in the total forest biomass of the
world.
28Sichuan, China
This makes peatlands the top long-term carbon
stock in the terrestrial biosphere.
29Globally, degraded peatlands emit 3 Gtons CO2 a-1
300.6 of the land surface is responsible for 10
of the total global anthropogenic CO2 emissions
31Annual peat losses
32Is peat renewable?
- Popular question
- Relation to finiteness of the resource
- Relation to effect of peat combustion on climate
33Is peat renewable?
- Ancient question
- Asked since man has been using peat
- First comprehensive discussion in the first book
on peat by Schoockius (1658, Groningen)
34Is peat renewable?
35Is peat renewable?
1658
Chapter 14 Whether excavated sod material can
over time be restored?
36Is peat renewable?
- To burn a peat moss does twenty times as much
damage, as a forest can twenty times grow up
before a new and equally good peat moss matures. - It may seem to be a good invention to use the
mires for fuel and thus spare the wood but a
forest can grow several times in a seculum,
whereas a mire is not filled with peat in several
secula. - Carl von Linné (1707-1778) "Skånska resa" 1749
37Is peat renewable?
- 17th 19th century Peat renewability important
for long term energy security - Since 1850 economic interest disappeared because
of the emergence of coal and oil - Since 1960 peatland restoration again interesting
from a conservation point of view
38Biomass fossil peat
- Peat extraction mobilises carbon from a long-term
store where it would otherwise remain
indefinetely - This is the fundamental difference between
biomass (wood, straw) and fossil carbon
resources (peat, coal)
39Biomass fossil peat
- In case of biomass, organic material is oxidised
that soon would have oxidised (by decomposition)
anyhow - In case of utilisation humans use the energy, in
case of decomposition microbes/fungi - In both cases the same amount of CO2 ends up in
the atmosphere - In case of peat material is oxidised that
otherwise would have remained unaltered
indefinitely - As opposed to biomass, peat whether 10, 1000 or
10 000 years old would without human use not
end up in the atmosphere as CO2
40Green peat extraction?
- ? There is no green peat extraction
- Peat extraction is unsustainable, destructive,
environmentally damaging, ugly
41Wise Use of peat?
- But peat extraction takes place with an aim that
can be good. - Whether the balance is wise ist, depends how
good the aim of peat extraction is and how
bad the alternatives are.
42Wise Use of peat?
- It always concerns a balancing between the loss
of peat, peatland and their values on the one
side, and societal advantages on the other side. - If a small evil helps to prevent a big evil or to
achieve a big good, the smaller evil might be
allowed.
43Wise Use of peat?
- Such judgement can only take place in the
framework of a complete life-cycle-analysis, from
extraction up to disposal. - It means that use of peat for a specific purpose
can be wise, but for another purpose not.
44- For the wise use of non-renewable resources some
simple rules can apply (Hartwick 1977) - A non-renewable resource should not be squandered
on low-grade applications - The profits from non-renewable resources should
be invested in the development of renewable
substitutes.
45Future
- The industry has to focus stronger on preparing
growing media from renewable resources, including
wastes and cultivated plant material. - Only then she can address the societal demands
for - sustainable development,
- conservation of biodiversity, and
- decrease in Carbon-emissions.
46Future
- The Stone Age has not ended because of lack of
stone. - And so it will also be with peat
- Reidar Petterson IPS-President 1992 -1996
47Conclusions
- Peat extraction for growing media must be
concentrated on already degraded peatlands (50
million ha!) - Don squander high quality peat for low-quality
applications (amateur gardening) - Sustainability requires the substitution of
fossil resources by renewable resources - Restoration can combine conservation and
exploitation
48Nov 2004
Mai 2004
Aug 2005
Peatmoss cultivation to replace peat in
horticulture
Aug 2006
49Cultivation of peatmoss (Sphagnum) for
horticultural substrates (alternative for peat).
50Visions of Leo Lesquereux 1844
51- Quelles soient rejetées par un grand nombre de
propriétaires dont lunique vouloir est le profit
du moment, je le comprends. Mais il se trouvera
peut-être quelque homme de coeur, ami de son
pays, qui emploiera une parcelle de sa fortune à
des expériences que le riche seul peut faire. - that these (ideas) are rejected by a large
number of (peatland) proprietors whose only wish
is short-term profit, I can understand. But maybe
some man of honour, a friend of his country, can
be found, who will devote a parcel of his fortune
to experiments, as only the rich can do.
52- Puissent les résultats obtenus emmener enfin mes
concitoyens à cette conviction, qui se fortifie
toujours plus en moi, cest que les marais
tourbeux sont, non point un bien mort, mais une
fortune active, non point une chose profitable
pour le présent seul, mais nécessaire à lavenir,
non point enfin un sol inutile et quil faut se
hâter de détruire, mais un de ces bienfaits de la
sage nature que lhomme doit reconnaître et
étudier un de ces trésor dont il peut profiter
pour luimême, mais dont il doit compte à ses
descendants. - May the results obtained bring my fellow
citizens to the conviction, that increasingly
becomes stronger in me that the peat mires are
not dead goods but an active fortune, not
profitable only for the present, but necessary
for the future, finally not a useless soil that
we must rapidly destroy, but one of the benefits
of the wise nature that man has to acknowledge
and study one of these treasures of which he may
benefit for himself, but for which he has to
render account to his descendants.
53www.imcg.net
JOIN!