Survey: Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Survey: Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks

Description:

Survey: Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: csU73
Learn more at: http://www.cs.ucf.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Survey: Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks


1
Survey Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor
Networks
  • By Tim St. John

2
Introduction
  • Applications
  • Military
  • Golf courses
  • Endangered Species Research
  • Research
  • Algorithm Optimization
  • Sensor Deployments

3
Overview
  • Power Conservation related to Quality of Service
  • Classification Algorithms
  • Deployment Strategies in a Real-Time Target
    Tracking System.

4
Power Conservation
  • 2004 Research in Power Conservation
  • University of California
  • Sleeping Protocols
  • RIS
  • PEAS
  • GAF
  • Mesh

5
New sleeping Protocol
  • PEAS
  • (Probing Environment and Adaptive Sleeping)
  • Stay awake until energy is depleted
  • PECAS Derived From PEAS
  • (Probing Environment and Collaboration Adaptive
    Sleeping)
  • Remains working for more than 1 sec.

6
Experiment
  • GloMoSim
  • 400x400
  • Target moves at a rate of 10 m/s
  • 800 nodes
  • Transition Radius range from 20 m to56 m.
  • Work times range from 1, 4 and 10 sec

7
Experimental Results
8
Classification Algorithms
  • 2003 Pennsylvania State University and the
    University of Wisconsin
  • Different forms of CSP in Sensor Networks
  • Single Node Multiple Modality
  • Multiple Node Single Modality
  • Multiple Node Multiple Modality
  • Decision Fusion
  • Data fusion

9
Test Conditions
  • Conducted Small scale Simulation in the DARPA
    SenselT Program.
  • Tests conducted on 3 types of Vehicles
  • Humvee
  • Amphibious Assault Vehicle
  • Dragon Wagon
  • Compare the performance of 2 types of Algorithms.
  • Data Fusion Classifiers
  • Decision Fusion Classifiers

10
Test Results
  • Test 1 Confusion Matrix for Single Node
    Classifiers
  • For both cases Average PD .72
  • Test 2 Confusion Matrix for Data Fusion
    Classifiers
  • Average PD of .81
  • Test 3 Confusion Matrix for Decision Fusion
    Classifiers
  • Average PD of .78

11
Real Time Target Tracking Deployment Strategies
  • 2007 Paper by University of Virginia, Minnesota,
    Illinois
  • VigilNet System
  • Tested the system in 2 tests
  • 200 XSM motes 10 meters apart.
  • Large Scale Simulations 10000 nodes within a
    100,000 m2 rectangle.

12
Target Detection Phases
13
Node Deployment
14
Detection Strategies
  • Higher Density of sensor deployment for slow
    moving targets.
  • Detection Strategies concentrated on the
    perimeter.
  • Power Savings
  • Reduced Communications
  • Honeycomb deployment Simulation Results.

15
Conclusion
  • Power Conservation related to Quality of Service
  • Classification Algorithms
  • Deployment Strategies in a Real-Time Target
    Tracking System.

16
Questions?
  • tdstjohn_at_gmail.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com