Studies on 13C Deposition in ASDEX Upgrade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Studies on 13C Deposition in ASDEX Upgrade

Description:

( 2 of 4) SIMS depth profiles of 13C normalised to 12C signal and natural 13C background ... SIMS spectrum at s=1.51 m (tile 3) different sputtering rates: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: karinra
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Studies on 13C Deposition in ASDEX Upgrade


1
Studies on 13C Deposition in ASDEX Upgrade
E. Vainonen-Ahlgren1, J. Likonen1, T. Renvall1,
V. Rohde2, R. Neu2, M. Mayer2, R. Pugno2, K.
Krieger2 and the ASDEX Upgrade Team
  • 1Technical Research Centre of Finland
  • 2Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Germany

2
Why did we do this?
  • Carbon is considered as divertor target material
    for ITER (good neutrons and heat load resistance,
    low plasma energy loss due to impurities,
    thermodynamically efficient)
  • Formation of aC-H layers takes place in tokamaks
    (mechanism is partly unclear)
  • In/out assymetry of carbon deposition at the
    divertor
  • gt

experimental investigation of material transport
in SOL and divertor deposition was performed
3
How did we do this in practice?
  • full poloidal set of marker tiles (3-7 µm of C
    on top of 100 nm Re)
  • AUG IIb divertor, 13CH4 puffed from
  • outer mid-plane, 13 bottom single null H-mode
    (ELM type I) shots, integrated puff time 37s,
    total amount of 13C injected 9x1021 atoms
  • main plasma Ip1.0 MA, Bt-2.0T,
    ne8.5x1019m-3, Paux6.5MW
  • RBS 1.6 2.5 MeV H beam, SIMS 5 keV O2 beam

4
Some points to be kept in mind
  • regardless of the only one puffing location,
    toroidal distribution of 13C can be considered
    symmetrical (earlier experiments by R. Neu and A.
    Kallenbach)
  • results of the present study represent the
    effect of the main chamber only

5
What experimental results did we obtain? (1 of 4)
  • total amount of 13C measured was 1x1021 at. (vs.
    9x1021 at. puffed, i.e. 11)
  • reason deposition of 13C on central column,
    protection limiter, top area (upper limiter and
    divertor) and underneath the roof baffle

6
What experimental results did we obtain? (2 of 4)
  • SIMS depth profiles of 13C normalised to 12C
    signal and natural 13C background subtracted.
    Presented profiles are for tiles 1B and 9A
  • 13C at the surface region and decrease within
    the bulk

7
What experimental results did we obtain? (3 of 4)
  • strike points were at the centre in the inner
    divertor tile 4 and the outer divertor tile 1B
  • 13C peaks below the strike point are shifted
    toward the roof baffle
  • a peak at s1.15 m (top of 1B) might be
    attributed with shadowing by 1A

8
What experimental results did we obtain? (4 of 4)
  • High peak of 13C on 6A (top inner div.)
  • no similar effect at the outer div.
  • reason edge SOL particles 13C travels along
    the fieldlines
  • small bump of 13C on 9A due to redeposition of
    eroded material from 1B

9
What have we learned? (i.e. conclusions)
  • Transport by the SOL plasma (and the influence of
    the main chamber only) might be the reason for
  • quite high deposition at the top of the inner
    divertor
  • smaller total 13C deposition at the inner
    divertor compared with the one at the outer
    divertor by a factor of 1.5

10
Long term data
  • different sputtering rates
  • plasma deposited film 2.50 nm/s
  • original Diarc film 0.99 nm/s

SIMS spectrum at s1.51 m (tile 3)
11
Long Term Data
  • areas with both original and deposited films
    present
  • erosion observed on tiles 4 (concave area), 9B
    and 1A

12
SIMS RBS
  • general trend is similar
  • difference at tiles 4 (concave area), 9A and 1A

13
We are grateful to
  • Association Euratom-Tekes
  • DIARC-Technology Inc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com