Hail in the Gray ME County Warning Area - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Hail in the Gray ME County Warning Area

Description:

Sufficient supercooled water near the hailstone to enable growth as it travels ... severe and non-severe hail events using the Daily Average NCEP NARR Composites ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: apollo6
Category:
Tags: area | county | gray | hail | warning

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hail in the Gray ME County Warning Area


1
Hail in the Gray ME County Warning Area
  • Jim Hayes
  • NOAA/NWS Gray ME

2
Outline
  • Provide an overview of hail days in the Gray
    (GYX) ME County Warning Area (CWA)
  • Develop a synoptic climatology of hail days
  • Evaluate traditional thermodynamic parameters
    used for hail forecasting

3
Will Hail Occur?
  • What is needed for hail to form, given Deep Moist
    Convection (DMC)?
  • Adequate updraft to keep the hailstone aloft for
    an appropriate amount of time.
  • Sufficient supercooled water near the hailstone
    to enable growth as it travels through an
    updraft.
  • A piece of ice or snow for it to grow upon

4
Hail Reports in the GYX CWA
  • All hail reports for the GYX CWA (severe and
    non-severe) were collected
  • For 1998 through 2006, inclusive
  • 287 reports in all
  • 134 severe hail reports
  • Largest was tennis ball sized hail in Tamworth
    New Hampshire August 24th 1998

A hail day was any calendar day for a verified
hail report was received there were 75 hail
days for this study
5
From 1998 through 2004, the average was about 6
hail days per year. The numbers increased
dramatically in 2005 and 2006, with MANY more
events, and a more aggressive approach for
acquiring severe weather reports
6
Not unexpectedly, the peak months for hail are
June through August
June - 1.7 hail days July 2.6 hail days August
2.0 hail days
7
Locations of hail reports in the GYX CWA
8
Creating A Synoptic Climatology
  • Computed for severe and non-severe hail events
    using the Daily Average NCEP NARR Composites Web
    page at the Climate Analysis Branch Composites
    computed using NARR Reanalysis

http//www.cdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/NARR/plotday.pl
9
Mean Sea Level Pressure Composite
Cold front
Pre frontal trough
10
925 mb mean meridional flow
Indicates a more southerly flow that climatology
925 mb meridional flow anomaly
11
850 mb total wind composite (m/s).
Depicts a west southwest flow
850 mb total wind anomaly (m/s).
12
500 mb height composite (m).
500 mb height anomaly. The maximum anomaly just
to the northwest is about 40 meters
13
250 mb wind composite (m/s).
Note the implied jet coupling
250 mb wind anomaly (m/s).
14
Precipitable Water composite
Precipitable Water anomaly. Note the maximum
anomaly is just to the east of the CWA
15
Calculating Thermodynamic Parameters
  • Thermodynamic parameters were calculated from
    proximity soundings for each hail event
  • RUC native resolution BUFR data was used to
    construct a sounding closest to the hail report
    in time and space was used
  • The surface conditions were interpolated from
    available surface observations

16
Calculating Thermodynamic Parameters
  • Proximity soundings were analyzed using the
    RAOB program
  • To utilize parameters that forecasters would use
    in an operational setting
  • Familiar software
  • No thermodynamic parameters for hail reports
    before 2002
  • Due to limited availability of RUC native
    resolution BUFR data

17
Thermodynamic Parameters from RAOB
  • Parameters collected from the RAOB soundings

Parameters were computed for all hail events
2002-2006 from proximity RUC soundings
18
Which CAPE?
  • For this study, Surface-Based CAPE (SBCAPE) was
    used
  • Forecasters computed SBCAPE in the RAOB program
    while assessing convective potential
  • This can be problematic in the case of elevated
    convection
  • Resulted in a few ZERO CAPE values with severe
    hail

19
CAPE
0.288
All half-dollar sized or greater hail coincided
with RUC CAPE values greater than 1200 J/kg
20
Severe
Non-severe
4420
4243
1715
1464
1353
934
1009
279
0
0
There is MUCH less spread in the CAPE values for
severe hail reports than non-severe
21
Shear
0-6 km shear value of 40 knots is generally
accepted as necessary for supercell development
22
Severe
Non-severe
83
83
37
38
34
31
28
27
8
8
0-6 km shear value of 40 knots is generally
accepted as necessary for supercell development
23
CAPE vs. Shear
-0.247
24
All golf ball or large hail events occurred with
WBZ gt 9000 feet
Wet bulb zero values between 7000 and 9000 feet
generally considered prime for hail
25
Severe
Non-severe
13275
13514
11036
10474
10369
9360
9043
5915
3999
2954
Wet bulb zero values between 7000 and 9000 feet
generally considered prime for hail
26
Hail in the GYX CWA
  • Typically, 6 hail days per year
  • Increased to 22 in 2006
  • Busier convective season, and better verification
    efforts
  • Occurs mainly June through August
  • Peak in July
  • Occurs mainly in the mid to late afternoon
  • On a pre frontal surface trough
  • In a low level southwest flow
  • Ahead of a mid level trough
  • In an airmass with precipitable water values
    above climatology

27
Assessing thermodynamic parameters
  • Results appear to indicate instability (CAPE) is
    more important for discerning severe hail from
    non-severe hail than shear
  • Most unexpected result in the higher Wet Bulb
    Zero values for severe hail events
  • Limited dataset may have some effect here

28
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com