Two types of Work Analysis

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Two types of Work Analysis

Description:

Fewer assumptions about the properties of the devices. Greater variability in action ... Distributed spatially. Individuals. artifacts. Distributed temporally ... –

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: markl
Category:
Tags: analysis | two | types | work

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Two types of Work Analysis


1
Two types of Work Analysis
  • Normative and Descriptive approaches to Work
    Analysis from Chapters 3 4
  • Vincente 1999
  • Mark Little
  • 9/26/07

2
Work Analysis
  • Normative
  • Prescribe how a system should behave
  • Descriptive
  • Describe how a system actually behaves in
    practice
  • Formative
  • Specify the requirements that must be satisfied
    so that the system can behave in a new, desired
    way.
  • Also called Predictive

3
Normative Approaches
  • First generation
  • Provide a benchmark for how workers should behave
    in different situations
  • Examples
  • Tayloristic work methods analyses (Taylor, 1911)
  • Tradition Human Factors task analysis (R.B.
    Miller, 1953)
  • Early GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection
    Rules) analyses (Card, Moran, A. Newell, 1983)

4
Task Analysis
  • The point of doing any kind of work analysis is
    to derive implications for systems design
  • Task analysis The study of what an operator(or
    team of operators) is required to do, in terms of
    actions and/or cognitive processes to achieve
    system goal.

5
Levels of Task Analysis
  • Levels are based on the desired precision
  • 1. Input Output
  • 2. Sequential Flow
  • 3. Timeline

6
Level 1. Input-Output
  • Inputs that are required to perform a task
  • Outputs that are achieved after it is completed
  • Constraints that must taken into account

7
Level 2. Sequential Flow
  • More specific
  • A goal state with a sequence of actions for
    getting to the goal
  • The temporally ordered sequence of actions that
    is required to complete the task.
  • Read odometer
  • Read odometer at last fill up
  • Calculate difference

8
Level 3. Timeline
  • More specific still
  • A sequence of actions, each with a particular
    duration
  • Identify a temporally ordered sequence of actions
    that is required to achieve the task, with
    duration estimates for each action.
  • 0-1s read odometer
  • 1-2s read odometer value at last fill up
  • 2-3s calculate the difference

9
Levels and Approaches
  • Level 1
  • Based on constraints
  • Level 2
  • Level 3
  • Based on instructions

10
Task Analysis
  • 2 Types
  • Constraint based
  • Weakness not well suited to the demands
    associated with unanticipated events.
  • Instruction based
  • Weakness limited in their ability to identify
    comprehensively the information requirements in
    complex sociotechnical systems.
  • Instruction is more prevalent

11
What this means for the worker
  • Instruction based approaches
  • More detailed Less decision making for the
    worker
  • Simply follow the work flow
  • Constraint based approaches
  • More decisions are made by the workers
  • Less decisions about work flow are made by the
    analyst
  • Decision making seems to be a key factor in
    worker health

12
What else this means for the worker
  • Instruction based approaches
  • Very little variability in worker action
  • Perhaps only one way of doing something
  • Constraint based approaches
  • Great deal of variability in worker action

13
What this means for the work
  • Instruction based approaches
  • More detailed guidance
  • Less human error
  • Constraint based approaches
  • Minimal guidance
  • More likely to lead to human error

14
What this means for devices
  • Instruction based approaches
  • Device-dependent
  • Content and form of analyses change as a function
    of the interface and automation that workers have
    available to perform the task
  • Constraint based approaches
  • Device-independent
  • Describe properties of the task, rather than
    properties of how to do the task with a
    particular device.

15
Advantages of each approach
  • Instruction based approaches
  • More guidance
  • Less chance of human error
  • Constraint based approaches
  • More discretion to workers
  • Fewer assumptions about the properties of the
    devices
  • Greater variability in action
  • More chances to learn and better chances of
    coping with unusual circumstances

16
Types of Systems
  • Work happens within systems
  • 2 types of systems
  • Open system
  • Subject to unpredictable influences that are
    external to the system
  • Closed system
  • Completely isolated from the environment

17
Task Analysis within Systems
  • Within a closed system
  • The more a system is closed, the more it is
    conducive to Instruction based approaches
  • Within an open system
  • Because of the unpredictable external
    disturbances acting on the system it will not be
    possible to accurately preidentify the different
    flow sequences or timelines that lead to the
    satisfaction of a goal.
  • In a situation like this Constraint based
    approaches allow workers to better adapt to the
    disturbances.

18
Instruction based Approach
  • Open System Example
  • Fast food computer system for cooks

19
Conclusion Instruction vs. Constraint
  • Our conclusion was that instruction based
    analyses are not very useful for systems that are
    substantially open to unpredictable disturbances.
    Complex sociotechnical systems clearly fall into
    this category, as do many other simpler work
    environments

20
Constraint based approaches
  • Not perfect though
  • There are some situations in which even the
    specific goal is not identified before hand
  • Task analysis
  • Event-dependent

21
Need something more
  • Work Domain Analysis
  • Represents the structure of the controlled system
  • Not what workers do, rather what they do it on

22
Comparisons between Procedural Survey
Knowledge
23
Comparisons BetweenTask Analysis Work Domain
Analysis
24
Work Domain Analysis
  • Disadvantage
  • They don't tell workers what to do
  • Advantage
  • Flexible because they provide information that
    can be used to generate an appropriate response
    to a novel situation
  • They have a broader scope
  • What the system is capable of

25
The Answer
  • ...because they have complimentary strengths and
    weaknesses, it would be useful to include both
    work domain analysis and constraint based task
    analysis techniques in a single, integrated
    framework for work analysis.

26
Descriptive Approaches
  • Descriptive Approaches seek to understand how
    workers behave in practice.
  • Field studies
  • Practical challenges workers face
  • Practices workers have developed to cope

27
Descriptive Approach examples
28
Situated Action
  • purposeful actions are inevitably situated
    actions that are responding to local
    interactions contingent on the actor's particular
    circumstances
  • Actual behavior may be quite different than the
    rationalized ideal set forth by normative methods

29
Recognition-Primed decision making
  • Using ones experience to recognize situations and
    associate that situation with a relevant action
  • Efficient
  • Timely

30
Activity Theory
  • Goal Directed Activity
  • Characteristics
  • Influence of tools
  • How people interact and learn from each other
  • How practices have changed over time
  • Understanding human skill and expertise
  • Actions are situated

31
Distributed Cognition
  • Knowledge and information processing are not
    confined to the brain
  • Distributed spatially
  • Individuals
  • artifacts
  • Distributed temporally
  • History of a culture

32
Problem
  • From Descriptive Analysis to Design Implications

If we conduct a descriptive work analysis to
understand workers' current tasks, we will
identify requirements that could be used to
design a new artifact. However, once this
artifact is introduced into the workplace, new
possibilities for work practices are created,
thereby shaping workers' practices
33
Two ways to get around the Task-Artifact cycle
  • Rapid Prototyping and Iterative User Testing
  • Prototype
  • Evaluate
  • Iterate
  • Scenario-Based Design
  • Envision what it might be like to interact with a
    device that has not yet been designed

34
Conclusion Work Analysis
  • Work Domain Analysis
  • Information requirements
  • Unfamiliar / Unanticipated events
  • Constraint-based task Analysis
  • Information requirements
  • Achieve anticipated goals with flexibility
  • Strategies
  • Historical Practices
  • Social Organizational Factors
  • Work across individuals Teams
  • Worker's Competencies
  • Expertise
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com