Smart growth, real estate trends, and the economy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Smart growth, real estate trends, and the economy

Description:

Source: Dr. Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP, Va. Tech. ... Expanding & improving bus, rail & other public transportat'n 31 ... Centers at rail. transit stations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: joemol6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Smart growth, real estate trends, and the economy


1
Smart growth, real estate trends,and the economy
  • Joe Molinaro
  • National Association of REALTORS
  • Smart Growth Partnership
  • Fort Lauderdale, Florida
  • January 30, 2009

2
Residential Sales
  • December 2008
  • UP 6.5 over Nov. 2008
  • DOWN 3.5 compared to Dec. 2007
  • In many markets, condos and townhouses doing
    better than detached homes furthest suburbs
    suffering highest foreclosure rates and greatest
    decreases in value.

3
March 2008
4
Commercial Real Estate
  • Retail Vacancy Rate
  • 4th Q 2008 10.8
  • 4t Q 2009 (projection) 12.7
  • Health of retail chains the biggest factor in
    2009.

5
Future Growth and Housing Needs
  • High Growth Rate in U.S.
  • 200 Million in 1968
  • 300 Million in 2006
  • 400 Million in 2035

6
Residential Development
  • US 2000 to 2040
  • Growth-Related Units 50 million
  • Replaced Units 39 million
  • Total Units 89 million
  • Loss rate 6 per decade compounded.
  • Source Dr. Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP, Virginia
    Tech.

7
New Construction 2000-2040
  • Construction
  • Residential 24 Trillion
  • Nonresidential 22 Trillion
  • Infrastructure 9 Trillion
  • Total 55 Trillion
  • Source Dr. Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP, Virginia
    Tech

8
Where will Growth Occur?
  • Northeast 6.5 South 56
  • Midwest 8.2 West 29.4

9
Toward Megapolitan America
Source Metropolitan Institute at Virginia
Tech, 2005
10
Traditional Households on the Wane Household
Type 1960 2000 2040 HH with
Children 48 33 27
Single-Person HH 13 26 30
11
People Turning 65 Each Year
In thousands. Source US Census Bureau 65 in
the United States 2005 Wan He, Manisha
Sengupta, Victoria A. Velkoff, Kimberly A
DeBarros. December 2005
12
Share of Growth 2000-2040
  • HH Type Share of Growth
  • With children 13
  • Without children 87
  • Single-person 38
  • Source Dr. Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP, Va. Tech.
    Adapted and extrapolated from Martha Farnsworth
    Riche, How Changes in the Nation's Age and
    Household Structure Will Reshape Housing Demand
    in the 21st
  • Century, HUD (2003).

13
Future Housing Shares
  • Housing Type 2003 2040
  • Apartment 24 30
  • Owner Attached 11 20
  • Small Lot 15 30
  • Large Lot 51 20
  • Source Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP, from 2003 data
    from American Housing Survey 2003. 2040 figures
    derived from preference surveys. There is no
    warranty or guarantee, express or implied, of the
    accuracy of the data or information contained
    herein.

14
NAR-Smart Growth America 2004 Survey
  • When features of smart growth communities and
    suburban sprawl communities were described,
    people preferred smart growth 55 to 45.

15
Neighborhood Feature Preferences
Source National Association of Realtors Smart
Growth America, Survey 2004.
16
Housing Unit Preference by Type, Surveys
  • Unit Type Share
  • Attached 38
  • Apartments 14 36
  • Condos, Coops 9 24
  • Townhouses 15 40
  • Detached 62
  • Small Lot (lt7,000 sf) 37 60
  • Large Lot (gt7,000 sf) 25 40
  • Source Low range of surveys reviewed by Arthur
    C. Nelson, Planning for a New Era, Journal of
    the American Planning Association, Fall 2006.

17
Looming Large-Lot Oversupply, 2005-2030
  • Supply Preference Split the
  • Unit Type 2005 Change Difference
  • Attached 39M 15M 13M
  • Small Lot 12M 40M 22M
  • Large Lot 58M - 23M - 3M
  • Source Dr. Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP, Virginia
    Tech. Figures in millions of units.
  • Preference change based on low-range of
    preference survey averages.
  • Mid-point is mid-percentage distribution between
    2005 and low-range estimate of preference surveys
    and supply of occupied units in 2005.

18
Fundamental shift in the structure of the built
environment - Chris Leinberger, Brookings
Institution
  • From driveable suburban to walkable urban

19
Unmet Demand for Urbanism
  • Market share for Walkable Urbanism 35 to 50
  • Supply in most markets 5
  • Source Chris Leinberger, Brookings Institution

20
Transportation
21
Transit Use Up
  • 2007 Americans took 10.3 billion trips on
    public transportation, the highest level in 50
    years.
  • 2006 to 2007 transit use increased 2.1
  • Transit use up 32 since 1995.

22
New Rail Transit Systems
  • Denver
  • Dallas
  • Houston
  • Phoenix
  • Salt Lake City
  • Charlotte
  • Minneapolis

23
Growth in driving is slowing(Vehicle Miles
Traveled)
  • 1982- 2000 average growth rate was 3.2
  • 2001-2005 average growth rate was 1.6
  • 2006 growth rate was 0.6
  • 2007 0.3 decline

Source Brookings Institution
24
VMT declining in Florida too
  • 1991 2002 5.22 annual growth rate
  • 2002 - 2006 3.55
  • Dec. 2006 - Sept. 2008 - 2.5

Sources Brookings Institution and Bureau of
Transportation Statistics
25
Amtrak ridership up
  • Six years of consecutive growth
  • 2008 ridership at all-time high, 28.7 million

26
Voters Supporting Transit
  • 2005 to 2008 nationwide over 70 of transit
    ballot initiatives have passed.

27
2007 Growth Transportation SurveyNAR and Smart
Growth America
  • Which of the following is the best long-term
    solution to reducing traffic in your area?
  • Build new roads -- 21
  • Improve public transportation -- 49
  • Develop communities where people do not have
    to drive as much -- 26
  • Telephone survey of 1,000 adults, October 2007

28
NAR Idaho Association of Realtors
  • Which of the following is the best long-term
    solution to reducing traffic in your area?
  • Build new roads -- 25
  • Improve public transportation -- 49
  • Build communities where people do not have to
    drive as much -- 19
  • Telephone survey of 500 registered voters in
    Idaho, February 2008.

29
New NAR poll, Jan. 2009
  • Overwhelming support for transit
  • I am going to ready you two statements about
    traffic congestion and Id like you to tell me
    which of these is closer to your view?
  •  
  • A Some people say that we need to build more
    roads and expand existing roads to help reduce
    traffic congestion 27
  •  
  • B Some people say that we need to improve
    public transportation, including trains and
    buses, and make it easier to walk and bike to
    help reduce traffic congestion 67
  •  
  •  

30
Maintaining and repairing roads preferred over
expanding roads by a 3-to-1 margin
  • As the federal government makes its plans for
    transportation funding in 2009, which one of the
    following should be the top priority?
  •  
  • Expanding improving roads, highways, freeways
    bridges 16
  • Maintaining repairing roads, highways, freeway
    bridges 50
  • Expanding improving bus, rail other public
    transportatn 31

31
In a straight-up choice between travel modes,
building transit is a huge favorite.
  • Given that the U.S. population will increase by
    100 million people by 2050, which of the
    following approaches do you prefer to accommodate
    this growth?
  • Build and improve rail systems, such as commuter
    rail, light rail, and subways 75
  • Build new highways and freeways 20
  •  

32
Climate Change
33
Transportation Greenhouse Gases 3 Legs of a
Stool
  • Vehicle Efficiency (mpg)
  • Fuel Greenhouse Gas content (Fuel GHG)
  • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
  • Need progress on all 3 legs, but climate policy
    discussions have ignored VMT

34
Questions Answered inGrowing Cooler (Urban Land
Institute, 2008)
  • What reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is
    possible in the United States with compact
    development rather than continuing urban sprawl?
  • What reduction in CO2 emissions will accompany
    such a reduction in VMT?

35
US VMT Growth Projected to Outpace Vehicle Fuel
Improvements (Fig 2-3)
From Reid Ewing, et al, Growing Cooler
36
  • Compact development can reduce VMT 20 - 40
  • 7 - 10 reduction in CO2 due to
    location/density/transportation

37
Climate Change
  • Half the states have climate change legislation
  • King County, WA calculates carbon footprint of
    new development

38
National Political Environment
  • President Obama and Smart Growth.
  • Economic Recovery Legislation has been a
    disappointment to Smart Growth advocates

39
Economic Stimulus
  • House version 825 Billion
  • 42 Billion for roads and transit
  • 30 billion for roads
  • 12 billion for transit
  • The U.S. does not have a national transportation
    policy.

40
Shovel-Ready Approach to Stimulus Not Supported
by Public
  • Transportation spending should only include
    projects that can be started right away, such as
    traditional highway and bridge construction, to
    create new jobs and provide an immediate boost to
    the economy. 15
  •  
  • Transportation spending should be targeted
    specifically to projects that achieve multiple
    goals, including creating new jobs, reducing
    dependence on foreign oil, improving the
    environment, and increasing transportation
    choices, even if the jobs are created over a
    longer period of time. 80

41
What will growth look like?
Urban redevelopment and brownfields redevelopment
Atlantic Station, Atlanta
42
Urban centers in First-ring suburbs
Bethesda, Maryland
43
Neighborhood Centers at rail transit stations
Columbia Heights, Washington, DC
44
Development at light rail stations
Minneapolis Light Rail
Salt Lake City Light Rail
45
Opportunity!
Hundreds of old shopping centers can be
redeveloped as mixed-use neighborhoods
www.deadmalls.com
46
Impediments
  • Zoning
  • Financing
  • Transportation Investment
  • Supply Side Building urbanism is more difficult
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com