Title: 17:LongTerm Economic Growth
117Long-TermEconomic Growth
- What are the long-term growth trends in the
United States and other countries? - What are the main factors that influence
long-term growth? - What policies might be used to speed up economic
growth?
2Economic Miracles
- U.S. real GDP per person almost doubled between
1960 and 1995. - However, this growth has been uneven with periods
of recession and expansion. - Incomes in Asian economics have grown eightfold
between 1960 and 1995.
3Long-Term Growth Trends
- Long-term growth is the trend growth rate of
potential GDP. - Potential GDP grows for two reasons
- Population growth
- Growth in potential GDP per person
- Only the second brings rising living standards.
4Growth in the U.S. Economy
- U.S. economic growth averaged 1.7 percent per
year between 1895 and 1995. - During the 1960s growth was 2.5 percent per year.
- Since 1973 growth has slowed to 1.4 percent per
year due to the slowing of productivity growth.
5A Hundred Years of Economic Growth in the United
States
6Two Extraordinary Events
- The Great Depression of the 1930s saw a fall in
real GDP unlike anything else in the past 100
years. - The boom created by World War II was a major
expansion of real GDP. - However, between 1929 and 1953, growth averaged
1.8 percent a year.
7Real GDP Growth inthe World Economy
- Among the richest countries, the United States
and Canada have had the highest real GDP per
person since 1960. - However, Japan has been growing the fastest -
until recently. - Africa and Central and South America grew at a
slower rate.
8Figure 10.2 page 215
9Figure 10.2 page 215
10Catch-Up in Asia
- Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan are
catching up with the United States. - China has a high growth rate, but started very
far behind the United States and still has a long
way to go. - Continued growth of Chinas economy is important
for - world gdp for 21st century
11Note the rate of growth here has slowed in 97.98
12The Sources ofEconomic Growth
- Societies that do not experience economic growth
lack some fundamental social institutions and
arrangements that are essential preconditions for
economic growth - Markets
- Property rights
- Monetary exchange
13Markets
- Markets enable buyers and sellers to get
information and to do business with each other. - Market prices send signals to buyers and sellers
that create incentives to increase or decrease
the quantities demanded and supplied. - Markets encourage specialization and trade.
14Property Rights
- Property rights are the social arrangements that
govern the ownership, use, and disposal of
factors of production such as - physical property (land, buildings)
- financial property (claims by one person against
another) - intellectual property (inventions)
15Monetary Exchange
- Monetary exchange facilitates transactions of all
kinds, including the orderly transfer of private
property from one person to another. - Property rights and monetary exchange create
incentives for people to specialize and trade, to
save and invest, and to invent new technologies.
16Specialization and Growth
- Specialization leads to growth, improving the
standard of living. - For growth to continue, people must have
incentives to pursue three activities - Saving and investment in new capital
- Investment in human capital
- Discovery of new technologies
17Saving and Investmentin New Capital
- Saving and investment in new capital increase the
amount of capital per worker and increase human
productivity. - Production methods that use large amounts of
capital per worker (such as assembly lines) are
much more productive than using hand tools.
18Investment inHuman Capital
- Human capital is the accumulated skill and
knowledge of human beings. - Investment in human capital is a source of both
increased productivity and technological advance.
19Discovery of New Technologies
- Technological change makes an enormous
contribution to our increased productivity. - It arises from research and development as well
as trial and error. - Most technologies must be embodied in physical
capital.
20Growth Accounting
- Labor Productivity
- Labor productivity is real GDP per hour of work.
- Equals real GDP divided by aggregate labor hours
- Determines how much income an hour of labor
generates
21Growth Accounting
22Growth Accounting
- Growth accounting divides growth into two
components. - 1) Growth in capital per hour of labor
- 2) Technological change
- Includes everything that contributes to labor
productivity growth that is not included in
growth in capital per hour
23Growth Accounting
- The Productivity Function
- A relationship that shows how real GDP per hour
of labor changes as the amount of capital per
hour of labor changes with a given state of
technology.
24Growth Accounting
- The Productivity Function
- The shape of the productivity function reflects
the law of diminishing returns. - The law of diminishing returns states that as the
quantity of one input increases with the
quantities of all other inputs remaining the
same, output increases but by ever smaller
increments.
25How Productivity Grows
32
25
Real GDP per hour of work (1992 dollars)
20
0
30
60
Capital per hour of work (1992 dollars)
26How Productivity Grows
32
PF0
25
Real GDP per hour of work (1992 dollars)
20
GDP/HWAF(CAP/HW)
0
30
60
Capital per hour of work (1992 dollars)
27How Productivity Grows
32
PF0
25
Real GDP per hour of work (1992 dollars)
20
0
30
60
Capital per hour of work (1992 dollars)
28How Productivity Grows
PF0
32
PF0
25
Real GDP per hour of work (1992 dollars)
Effect of technological change
20
Effect of increase in capital stock
0
30
60
Capital per hour of work (1992 dollars)
29Growth Accounting
- The Productivity Function
- Applying the law of diminishing returns to
capital, the law states that if a given number of
hours of labor use more capital, the additional
output that results from the additional capital
gets smaller as the amount of capital increases. - The one third rule explains how much less.
30Growth Accounting
- The One Third Rule
- Robert Solow of MIT discovered that on average,
with no change in technology, a 1 percent
increase in capital per hour of labor brings a
one third of a 1 percent increase in real GDP per
hour of labor.
31Growth Accounting
- Accounting for the Productivity Growth Slowdown
and Speedup - We can use the one third rule to study U.S.
productivity growth and the productivity growth
slowdown.
32Growth Accounting
- Accounting for the Productivity Growth Slowdown
and Speedup - 1960 to 1973
- The economy grew due to rapid technological
changes. - Real GDP per hour expanded by 39
- Capital per hour increased by 24
- With no change in technology, the economy would
have expanded by only 8 (1/3 of 24)
33Growth Accounting
- Accounting for the Productivity Growth Slowdown
and Speedup - 1973 to 1983
- Predominantly, the reason for the productivity
growth slowdown can be attributed to a decline in
the rate of technological change. - Real GDP per hour expanded by 8
- Capital per hour increased by 15
- With no change in technology, the economy would
have expanded by 5 (1/3 of 15)
34Growth Accounting
- Accounting for the Productivity Growth Slowdown
and Speedup - 1983 to 1995
- The economy grew due to more rapid technological
change. - Real GDP per hour expanded by 18.5
- Capital per hour increased by 11
- With no change in technology, the economy would
have expanded by only 3.7 (1/3 of 11)
35Growth Accounting and the Productivity Growth
Slowdown
36Growth Accounting
- Technological Change During the Productivity
Growth Slowdown - Technology was directed toward coping with two
major problems. - 1) Energy price shocks
- 2) The environment
37Growth Accounting
- Technological Change During the Productivity
Growth Slowdown - Energy Price Shocks
- 19731974 and 19791980
- Fuel inefficient methods of transportation and
production were scrapped at an increased rate - Technological change focused on saving energy
rather than enhancing productivity
38Growth Accounting
- Technological Change During the Productivity
Growth Slowdown - The Environment
- The 1970s saw an expansion of laws and resources
devoted to protecting the environment and
improving the quality of the workplace. - These benefits are not included in real GDP.