Title: Big Bang and Beyond
1Big Bang and Beyond
- Did someone monkeyed with the laws of nature ?
2Theories of the Origin of the Universe
- Theological Theories
- Greek Mythology (Chaos)
- Hinduism (Cosmic sleep of gods)
- Chinese creation myth (Pangu)
- Biblical account of the creation (God)
- Scientific Theories
- Continuous creation
- Big Bang Theory the commonly accepted theory
3(No Transcript)
4Big Bang
- Technically, there was no bang
- Technically, galaxies are not moving away from
each other - Reality space expands
- When there are more space between galaxies, they
move away from each other - Analogy dots on an expanding balloon
- Isaiah 4512
- I have stretched out the heavens...
- Its only ancient document that mentions an
expanding Universe
5Evidence for the Big Bang
- Theory predicts an expanding universe
- Confirm by Red Shift (Doppler effect) in spectrum
- Theory predicts cosmic background radiation
- Background radiation was discovered in 1964 by
Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, who later won the
Nobel Prize for this discovery
6Beyond the Big Bang
- Big Bang Theory explains how the Universe first
started but leaves many unanswered questions - Time, Space and Matter were created in the Big
Bang - Before the bang, there were no time, no space and
no matter - Physics has not solved the question Whats
before the Big Bang - If I hear a small bang, I will ask Who or what
caused it - So Who or what caused the Big Bang ?
- Other factors determine how the Universe will
develop - Amount of matter in the Universe
- Physical properties of the matter
- Strength of the fundamental forces
7Fundamental Forces in Physics
- Gravitational force
- Attractive force between objects with mass
- Weakest, long range
- Electromagnetic force
- Attractive and repulsive
- Long range, 1039 times stronger than gravity
- Nuclear Weak force
- Cause neutrons to decade into a protons
- Range lt10-17 m, 1028 times stronger than gravity
- Nuclear Strong force
- Hold the nucleus together
- Range lt10-15 m, 1041 times stronger than gravity
8Gravitational Force
- Law of Gravity
- M mass of one object
- m mass of second object
- G 6.67 x 10-11 Nm2/kg2
- r distance between the objects
9Electro-Magnetic Force
- Coulomb Law
- Strength of EM-force determines how strongly
electrons in an atom are held in orbit
proton
electron
10Nuclear Weak-force
- Repelling force that cause beta-decay
proton
neutron
anti-neutrino
electron (beta-particle)
The strength of the nuclear weak-force determines
how fast neutrons are converted into protons and
electrons
11Nuclear Strong-force
- Hold nucleus together by overcoming the repelling
protons in nucleus - Strength of the nuclear strong-force determines
how fast nuclear reactions will proceed
proton
neutron
neutron
proton
12Thinkering with the Force...
- Fact
- The fundamental forces in nature have strength
that is determined by a number of physical
constants - For example gravitational constant in the Law
of Gravity, Coulumb constant in the
Electro-magnetic force - Question what would happen to the Universe if
the values of these physical constant were
changed ? - Say, what would happen if the gravitational (or
some other) constant would be off a little bit ? - We would surely weight a bit more on EarthBUT...
- Physicists did NOT expect earth-shattering
consequences
13Precondition for Life
- Stars of the right type for sustaining life
supportable planets only can occur during a
certain range of ages for the universe. - stars of the right type only can form for a
narrow range of values of the gravitational
constant - Living cells consists of light and heavy elements
(Hydrogen, Carbon, Oxygen, and metals such as
Iron, Copper, ect) - To make both light and heavy elements, the
strengths of the fundamental forces must lie
within a very narrow range of values - Many many other preconditions exists
14Amazing Findings...
- Brandon Carter presented his ideas about the
anthropic principle in 1973 in Poland during
the 500th birthday of Copernicus - The anthropic principle states that
- All the seemingly arbitrary and unrelated
constants in physics have one strange thing in
common these are precisely the value you need
if you want to have a universe capable of
sustaining life - Astronomer Fred Hoyle once said
- A commonsense interpretation of the facts
suggests that a SUPERINTELLECT has MONKEYED with
physics . . . and that there are no blind forces
worth speaking about in nature. - And Fred Hoyle was an..Atheist
15The strength of the Gravitational force
- If gravitational force was made a bit stronger,
stars will be more massive and burn more
violently and unstable - More harmful radiation to life deadly to life
- If gravitational force was made a bit weaker,
stars are too light and do not become
super-novae - Element heavier than iron are only formed when
stars explode as a super-novae no life possible
without them
16The strength of the EM-force
- If the electro-magnetic force is slightly weaker
- Too weak to hold electrons in orbits about nuclei
- Universe will consists of loose protons and
electrons, no atoms, and thus no life will be
possible - If the electro-magnetic force is slightly
stronger - atom could not "share" an electron orbit with
other atoms - No chemical reactions possible and no life
proton
electron
17Strength of the Nuclear Weak-force
- If Nuclear Weak-force is made a bit stronger
- neutrons would decay more readily, and there
would be little to no neutrons left - Neutrons are necessary to form heavier elements
used in living cells no neutrons, no heavy
elements, no life. - If Nuclear Weak-force is made a bit weaker
- Plenty of neutrons will be available
- Stars can use neutrons to burn most or all of the
hydrogen into helium (and subsequently to heavy
elements) - But little or no hydrogen will be left no
hydrogen, no water, and no life
18Strength of the Nuclear Strong-force
- If Nuclear Strong-force is made a bit stronger
- Nuclear reactions will be very efficient (fast)
- Most or all hydrogen will be converted to Helium
and then on into Iron - No hydrogen, no water, and thus, no life
possible - If Nuclear Strong-force is made a bit weaker
- Force is too weak to overcome electro-magnetic
repulsion of protons in nuclei - multi-proton nuclei would not hold together
- No carbon or oxygen, no proteins, no water, and
thus no life possible
19Thats just the beginning...
- Many more amazing coincidences that make life
possible have been discovered - The composition of our sun is just right, the
distance of the Earth to the sun is just right,
the size of the Earth is just right, the orbit of
the Earth is just right, the size of our moon is
just right and even the giant planets (Jupiter)
are just right for life on Earth - Other amazing coincidences makes it possible
for the stars and galaxies to form
20A coincidence at nuclear scale
- The following is an account of a series of
amazing coincidences in nature that dazed an
atheist astronomer and many others - I have to take you into nuclear Physics
- Brace for the ride please ask questions if you
dont understand something
21Nuclear Reaction
- Electrons can only occupy a number of specific
orbits around the nucleus each orbit represents
a certain energy level - So also, nucleus of atoms can occupy a number of
specific energy levels - In a nuclear reaction, the Law of Conservation of
Energy must hold
Kinetic nuclear energy before Kinetic
nuclear energy after
22Nuclear Reaction 2
- When nuclei collide, they form a new nucleus
- If the energy level of the new nucleus is very
different from one of its natural energy state,
the new nucleus is unstable and will decompose
(radio-activity)
23Nuclear Resonance
- If sum total of kinetic and nuclear energy before
and after are very close to each other, the
nuclear reaction will proceed very rapidly - In such case, we say there is Nuclear Resonance
- Resonance between atomic nuclei depends on
- Structure of the nuclei involved
- Temperature under which the nuclear reaction
takes place - Resonance between atomic nuclei are extremely
rare in nature.
24Nuclear Reaction in Stars
- Matter are converted into energy in stars through
a number of nuclear reactions - The three primary nuclear reactions (after these,
the star is almost burned up) are - Proton-proton cycle
- Helium fusion
- Carbon cycle
25Proton-proton cycle
- The proton-proton cycle will burn Hydrogen into
Helium (first phase of star development) - When all Hydrogen are burned, phase 2 kicks in
26Helium Fusion
- After all the Hydrogen is converted to Helium,
the star converts Helium to. What ? - Here we have a major problem...
- When two Helium nuclei are fused into
Beryllium-8, the resulting Beryllium-8 isotope is
highly unstable - Beryllium-8 has a half life of 10-16 seconds !!!
Helium
Beryllium-8
Helium
lt 0.0000000000000001 sec
According to the physics of Beryllium-8, stars
cannot burn Helium
27A Stellar Mystery
- Dilemma
- According to the physical properties of
Beryllium-8, stars cannot burn beyond Helium - Yet, Helium is being converted in Carbon in stars
all the time - First proposed solution Triple collision
Helium
Carbon-12
Helium
Helium
Triple collisions are extremely rare and the
rarity cannot explain the abundance of carbon
28Ed Salpeters solution...
- Faced with the dilemma that stars convert Helium
into Carbon at great rate, and no plausible
explanation for this process, the astrophysicist
Ed Salpeter proposed the following solution in
1952
Helium
Helium
Beryllium-8
Helium
BUT Beryllium is extremely unstable
Carbon-12
29Fred Hoyles insight
- Fred Hoyle realized that the only way that
Salpeters solution can produce Carbon at the
rate that is happening in stars is
Helium
Helium
Beryllium-8
Helium
Nuclear resonance !!! (Very fast reaction)
Problem there is no known energy level of the
Carbon-12 nucleus that is near the sum total
energy values of He and Be
Carbon-12
30Fred Hoyles wild guess
- So Fred Hoyle hypothesized (guessed) that there
must be such a natural energy level of the
Carbon-12 nucleus - Hoyle calculated the temperature inside a large
star to be about 100 million degrees - and worked out how much kinetic energy this would
give to the particles rushing around in the
star's atmosphere. - Knowing the masses of both beryllium-8 and
Helium, his hypothesis predicted that there must
be an excited state at an energy of 7.6 million
electron volts in the nucleus Carbon-12 - I did tell you that nuclei resonance was rare
everyone was skeptical about Hoyles
prediction... - A team at Cal. Tech. led by Willy Fowler (later a
Nobel Prize winner) began the search for the
mysterious resonant state in carbon-12, and
discovered it - just 4 percent above Hoyle's
prediction !!!
31Yet another amazing coincidence...
- We are not out of the wood yet... Heavier
elements must be formed specifically - You want to form Oxygen (necessary for life !)
- But you want to keep some Carbon (also necessary
for life)
Carbon-12
Oxygen-16
Helium
32A missed resonance
- In order to have this nuclear reaction going
- You need a natural energy level of Oxygen-16
close to the sum total of the energy levels of
Carbon-12 and Helium - But not too close - if the level is too close,
most or all Carbon-12 will be converted, so you
want this energy level to be off a bit
Carbon-12
Oxygen-16
Helium
33Another coincidence
- Wellthey did find that resonance level of
Oxygen-16 and it did miss the resonance level to
slow the production of Oxygen-16 - These two coincidences caused atheist atronomer
Fred Hoyle to comment - If you wanted to produce carbon and oxygen in
roughly equal quantities by stellar
nucleosynthesis, these are the two basic levels
you would have to fix, and your fixing would have
to be just about where these levels are actually
found to be.... - A commonsense interpretation of the facts
suggests that a SUPERINTELLECT has MONKEYED with
physics . . . and that there are no blind forces
worth speaking about in nature
34Flatness-oldness problem
- The following incredibly precise tweaking of the
Universe is known as the Flatness-oldness problem - The amount of matter created in the Big Bang has
a profound impact on how the Universe will
develop - Matter attract and will pull the Universe back
together towards one point - There is a critical amount where the attraction
will halt the expansion and the Universe will
slow down and stop expanding - If the total mass in the Universe is less than
critical, the Universe will keep expanding - If the total mass in the Universe is more than
critical, the Universe will stop expanding and
contract (Big Crunch)
35Place your bet...
- Suppose X represents the critical mass of the
Universe, what do you think that the total of
mass of the Universe is ? - There are so many possible values to pick from
for the total mass of the Universe - An does it matter how much mass there is in the
Universe ?? (You will be amazed by the results)
0
X
36Some results from Theoretic Physics
37Interpretations of the results
- IF the density of the matter after 1 nsec from
the Big Bang is equal to 447,225,917,218,507,401,2
84,017 mg/cc, the Universe would have collapsed
by now. - IF the density of the matter after 1 nsec from
the Big Bang is equal to 447,225,917,218,507,401,2
84,015 mg/cc, the Universe expands so rapidly
that galaxies and stars cannot form. - To get the (flat) Universe in which we (probably)
live in, the density of the matter after 1 nsec
from the Big Bang must be equal to
447,225,917,218,507,401,284,016 mg/cc not one
gm more nor one gm less - No wonder than many scientists believe that, the
Universe was designed
38And there is much more...
- There are many more examples of coincidences in
nature without which life could not have
developed - Science has coined a term to describe these
strange coincidences Anthropic Principle (The
Universe is destined to support (human) life) - For more examples
- http//cheungpc.mathcs.emory.edu
39 (Not) The End (just
out of time)