Exploring The Differences In Democratic Electoral systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Exploring The Differences In Democratic Electoral systems

Description:

Favors a two party system ... Parties must receive certain % of the vote to enter legislature ... Russian Duma 1995 -40 parties fail to pass 5% threshold, 49.5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Robe415
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exploring The Differences In Democratic Electoral systems


1
Exploring The Differences In Democratic Electoral
systems
  • Institutional Variations, Outcomes, Implications
    and Future Possibilities

2
Why is comparing electoral systems so important?
  • Choice of an electoral system conditions the
    chances of success for parties and candidates
  • Affects voting behavior (turnout, who votes, who
    doesnt)
  • Affects whos represented in government
  • Changes in the electoral system can change the
    outcome

3
Electoral systems -3 major types
4
Type 1 Plurality system
  • Earliest electoral system developed and used
  • Sometimes simply referred to as first past the
    post (FPTP)
  • single member districts
  • winner takes all or first past the post
    candidate needs more votes than any other
    candidate to be declared the winner
  • Favors a two party system
  • Includes Argentina, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil,
    Canada, Chile, Czech Rep, India, Nepal,
    Philippines, Thailand, U.S. , U.K
  • Some form of Plurality used in 54 of the Worlds
    countries (presidential elections)

5
Plurality Systems Pros and Cons
  • Simplicity, cost effective?
  • Voters choices simple
  • Sense of accountability
  • Creates Stability/ more efficient
    government-less deadlock-no worries over
    maintaining a coalition
  • - Duvergers Law i.e. Plurality
  • encourages/favors a two party
  • system less voter choices, little minority party
    representation- thus less rep. for minorities and
    women
  • - Votes are wasted- minority parties receive
    votes but no seats/voice, parties/candidates can
    theoretically receive nearly half the vote-but no
    rep in gov
  • / unified opposition ?

6
Majority Systems
  • Variation on plurality system candidate is
    required to receive more than 50 of the vote in
    order to win
  • Sometimes 2nd or 3rd elections necessary
  • 3 commonly employed systemic methods to solve
    this problem
  • Majority Runoff
  • When no majority is obtained by the first ballot,
    a second election (runoff) is held between the
    two candidates who received the highest number of
    votes in the first round
  • Majority Plurality
  • No reduction in the number of candidates if
    majority is not achieved, instead the second
    election uses a plurality rule to determine the
    winner
  • Alternative Vote
  • No need for a second round or runoff instead of
    casting a single vote, voters are asked to rank
    candidates in order of preference. First
    preferences are tallied- if this produces no
    majority winner-than the candidate with the
    fewest first preference votes is eliminated and
    the second preference marks are redistributed or
    transferred to the other candidates accordingly.
    This process is continually repeated until it
    produces a majority winner. Ex Ireland for
    presidential, Australia for the HR

7
Pros and Cons Comparing majority electoral
systems
  • Ensures a government will operate closer to a
    mandate
  • AV less costly-avoids successive elections
  • -Transfers of votes can result in a winner who
    did not receive the most first place votes
    explain
  • -AV may disenfranchise poorer, less educated
    voters-difficult to understand/ may confuse
    voters-deterring them from participating
  • takes longer to establish a winner/leader/gover
    nment

8
Proportional Representation (PR) systems
  • multimember districts
  • percentage of votes won percentage of seats in
    the legislature
  • Thresholds (hurdles)
  • List system
  • Closed/ranked lists
  • Preferential votes on lists

9
(No Transcript)
10
PR Thresholds (hurdles) consequences
  • Set limitations on equal representation
  • Parties must receive certain of the vote to
    enter legislature
  • PR theoretically establishes more equality, but
    those in power will rarely follow a principal up
    to its full logical conclusion- bonus to stronger
    parties at expense of the weak
  • Small parties often excluded
  • Examples
  • Germany - 5 3 elected members
  • Turkey - 10
  • Russian Duma 1995 -40 parties fail to pass 5
    threshold, 49.5 of votes wasted

11
Pros and Cons PR
  • no votes wasted-representative seats
    distributed proportionally to votes-encourages
    multiparty participation
  • Because of this-higher voter turnout-people
    more likely to vote when their votes count
  • government voice more diverse
  • - rarely get a majority party- coalitions formed
    after the vote
  • - Gives excessive power to extreme voices
  • - Often create unstable governments

12
Takeaways/Key concepts
  • many variations in electoral systems
  • When using the exact same voter preferences, by
    changing the electoral system the outcome is
    dramatically affected
  • Incumbents and those in power before democratic
    transitions select the type of electoral system
    used -- almost always to their benefit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com