What We Know About Childrens Development Accounts: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

What We Know About Childrens Development Accounts:

Description:

Overview of SEED, including key lessons. Overview of state policy efforts ... make deposits into a SEED account instead of giving gifts for special occasions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: CeciliaC79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What We Know About Childrens Development Accounts:


1
What We Know About Childrens Development
Accounts
Lessons from the SEED Initiative
  • Bob Friedman and Carl Rist, CFED
  • AFN Webinar
  • August 27, 2009

2
Outline
  • Overview of SEED, including key lessons
  • Overview of state policy efforts in SEED and
    asset policy trends
  • Opportunities ahead

3
1. Overview of SEED with Key Lessons
4
SEED Vision
  • 1,000 at birth for every child.
  • Accounts used for home ownership,
    entrepreneurship, education, or retirement.
  • Universal system/institutionalized delivery.
  • Progressive savings matches (0-18 years).
  • Appropriate, cost-effective financial education
    at scale.
  • Reducing intergenerational as well as new child
    poverty.

5
The Power of Demonstration SEED
  • The goal of the Saving for Education,
    Entrepreneurship, and Downpayment (SEED) Policy
    and Practice Initiative
  • To develop, test, document, and impel
    progressive, matched savings accounts and
    financial education SEED accounts as a
    cost-effective life-long wealth-building tool,
    practice, policy and system.

6
SEED Initiative Partners
  • National Partners
  • Center for Social Development (Washington
    University, St. Louis)
  • University of Kansas School of Social Welfare
  • New America Foundation
  • Aspen Institute Initiative on Financial
    Security
  • RTI International
  • Funders
  • Ford Foundation
  • Charles and Helen Schwab Foundation
  • Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative
  • Citi Foundation
  • Ewing M. Kauffman Foundation
  • Charles Stewart Mott Foundation
  • MetLife Foundation
  • Lumina Foundation for Education
  • Rhoda and Richard Goldman Foundation
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund
  • Edwin Gould Foundation

7
Federal Policy (NAF, CFED)
State Policy (CFED, CSD)
Community Practice (CFED)
SEED Initiative
Market Development (CFED, IFS)
Research (CSD, KU,RTI)
Communications (NAF, CFED)
8
SEED Practice A Demonstration of CDAs
  • 11 Community Partners
  • Worked with one specific age cohort
  • Opened approx. 75 accounts with local bank
    partner
  • Provided up to 2,000/account in account
    incentives (initial deposit, 11 savings matches,
    benchmark incentives)
  • Delivered financial education
  • Provided support, encouragement and coaching
  • Diverse designs
  • SEED MI Experiment
  • Head Start-based
  • 500 accounts in treatment group across 7
    centers 500 comparison group across 7 other
    centers
  • Rigorous impact evaluation
  • Streamlined 529 Account Structure
  • SEED OK Experiment
  • Pure experiment among 2700 randomly selected
    newborns
  • Treatment group (approx. half) receive 1000
    initial deposit in OK 529 college savings plan
    plus savings matches, depending on income
  • Rigorous evaluation using three-wave survey
    design
  • No community-based intermediation

9
SEED Partners
SEED Partners
10
SEED Partners
11
SEED Partners
12
SEED Partners
13
Lessons from SEED
  • CDAs appeal broadly to Americans across political
    and geographic lines.
  • In a national poll, close to seven out of ten
    respondents (69) and more than three-quarters of
    parents (78) articulated initial support for the
    idea of CDAs.
  • This support holds at 78 for parents and grows
    to 72 among all respondents after being exposed
    to messages both for and against CDAs. 

14
Lessons from SEED
  • 2. Outreach and enrollment in SEED, as in many
    other saving policies, has been challenging, when
    it is not automatic.
  • All sites were able to recruit their targeted
    number of SEED enrollees, although many took much
    longer than expected and had to expand their
    target population.
  • Barriers to enrollment included institutional
    factors and individual factors.  

15
Lessons from SEED
  • 3. Families of all income levels have saved in
    SEED.
  • Among the 1,171 participants in the 12 community
    partner demonstrations of SEED
  • total accumulation after almost three years of
    savings and incentives ranged by program from
    885 to 2,626, with an average of 1,500,
  • the average quarterly net savings (excluding
    incentives) ranged by program from 9 to 69,
    with an overall average of 30.
  • 30 of parents in MI SEED and 57 of the families
    enrolled in the other community partners in SEED
    deposited in their accounts (despite high levels
    of poverty and limited financial knowledge). 

16
Lessons from SEED
  • 4. Families have used innovative strategies to
    save in SEED.
  • Research in SEED found that parents use
    innovative strategies to find and make new
    money for deposits into their childrens
    accounts.
  • Typical strategies included
  • encouraging children to earn deposits by doing
    household chores or other paid jobs
  • eating at restaurants or ordering food less often
  • spending less on movies or other recreation
  • using coupons
  • encouraging family members to make deposits into
    a SEED account instead of giving gifts for
    special occasions 

17
Lessons from SEED
  • 5. Saving is not easy, especially for
    lower-income families.
  • Economic barriers to asset accumulation were
    prevalent among families participating in SEED.
  • Almost half of SEED participants are from
    families with income below the federal poverty
    line.
  • Low-income families find it difficult to save
    because of a variety of factors, including
  • low incomes,
  • multiple children,
  • long-term goals competing with short-term needs,
  • predatory and excessive lending, and
  • inaccessible financial institutions.. 

18
Lessons from SEED
  • 6. SEED program and account features, or
    institutional characteristics, explain much
    about saving performance.
  • SEED account design and program arrangements
    appear to facilitate savings
  • Three specific SEED incentivesinitial deposit,
    cap on other incentives, and match limitappear
    to have distinct associations with savings and
    accumulation  

19
Lessons from SEED
  • 7. In addition to financial savings, CDAs appear
    to have positive attitudinal, behavioral, and
    social effects.
  • In-depth interviews with parents found perceived
    impacts on well-being, including
  • self-esteem,
  • self-efficacy,
  • hope for the future,
  • future orientation,
  • sense of security,
  • fiscal prudence, and
  • interaction with children about finances and
    college.

20
Lessons from SEED
  • 8. Community-based organizations can play
    positive roles in implementing CDAs.
  • Relationships with community-based agencies and
    staff appear to be important in overcoming
    misgivings about participation in SEED and play a
    key role in motivating program participation and
    making account deposits.
  • While CBOs may enhance the performance of a CDA
    policy, this also comes with added costs in staff
    time and other resources.  

21
Lessons from SEED
  • 9. Full participation in financial education will
    require involvement of schools.
  • Even with a range of incentives to encourage
    participation, none of the SEED community
    partners was able to achieve full participation
    in their financial education programs. 
  • The initial experience in SEEDespecially at the
    I Can Save SEED site in St. Louis that operated
    in a public school settingshows promise in
    integrating financial education into an existing
    curriculum at school, though this experience to
    date is limited.

22
Lessons from SEED
  • 10. There is potential for a national CDA policy.
  • Four consensus core values (based on the
    deliberations of the SEED Policy Council)
  • Universal
  • Lifelong
  • Progressive
  • Asset-oriented 

23
2. Overview of state policy efforts in SEED and
asset policy trends.
24
State Policy Action
25
By the numbers
  • 11 States currently match 529s
  • 5 States have introduced matched 529 legislation
  • 2 States have introduced more ideal CDA
    legislation
  • 4 States have created government task forces

26
Lessons for Policy Design
  • 1. If goal is universal savings/ownership, some
  • system of auto enroll is essential
  • 2. Even in auto-enroll system, some
    higher-touch
  • elements may be important particularly for
  • families with less experience in financial realm
  • 3. If goal is total accumulation, initial deposit
    may
  • be more important than matching funds
  • 4. However, if goal is participant savings, a
    high
  • match limit may be more effective

27
Lessons for Policy Design
  • 5. State policymakers should consider strategies
  • to help low-income families find new money to
  • save (e.g., conditional cash transfers, tax
  • credits, earning opportunities)
  • 6. Advocates keep expectations reasonable not
  • all families will save (or large amounts),
  • particularly in universal setting
  • 7.Structure and market program to encourage trust
  • ease of use, particularly among those with
  • little financial experience

28
Lessons for Policy Design
  • 8. Without inclusive, progressive design, CSAs
    may actually exacerbate the wealth gap
  • 9. In U.S. context, unrestricted accounts may be
    less desirable restricted, inaccessible accounts
    work well for participants (hard to withdraw
    funds, easier to save) for public entities
    (keeps public funds safe from unauthorized use)
  • 10. Financial education is important if for no
    other reason than to educate savers about how
    direct deposit works and that it is an essential
    tool for saving

29
Lessons for Messaging at the State Level
  • College affordability/access - good choice for
    frame
  • How middle-class families afford college
    brain drain are problems state policymakers
    feel they need to solve
  • 2007 Hart polling data Education is most
    important use of accounts for general public
    82 said education, compared with 11 for
    retirement, 4 for homeownership
  • 2009 Pew polling data 75 of respondents said
    a very effective step government could take to
    improve economic mobility is to make college more
    affordable
  • New potential ally in federal student aid
    reformers

30
Lessons for Strategy at the State Level
  • Make CSAs the solution to pressing problem
  • Task forces can buy you time, but no guarantee
    they will lead to more substantive policy
  • Start cheap or move incrementallythis is a new
    idea policymakers are reluctant to try new ideas
  • Buy some time until state budgets improve

31
State Policy Opportunities
  • 1. Think about broader assets opportunity
    agenda join with allies to protect the
    antipoverty programs youve already got
  • 2. Use new federal policy and rhetoric to push
    for state changes
  • 3. Lay the groundwork now for long-term
    investments

32
3. Opportunities Ahead
  • SEED OK experiment
  • Municipal CDA initiatives
  • Federal CDA opportunity
  • College savings initiative for at-risk kids
    (UNCF/KIPP)
  • Product development

33
Contact
  • Carl Rist Bob Friedman
  • CFED CFED
  • 202.466.5923 415-495-6701
  • crist_at_cfed.org bfriedman_at_cfed.org
  • www.cfed.org
  • See the SEED Website at seed.cfed.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com