Title: Modeling Sand Ripple Evolution Under Wave Boundary Layers
1Modeling Sand Ripple Evolution Under Wave
Boundary Layers
Allison M. PenkoUniversity of Florida
2 Acknowledgements
- Office of Naval Research and the Sand Ripple DRI
project - American Society of Engineering Education and the
National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
Research Fellowship - Dr. Don Slinn, Dr. Tian-Jian Hsu, and Dr. Dan
Hanes - Fellow grad students
- Family and friends
3 Motivation
- Sand ripples significantly affect the dynamics of
the nearshore - acoustic properties
- of seabed
- sediment transport
- beach erosion
- scour
- bottom friction
- near-bed turbulence
- BBL flow
4 Objective
- Adapt 3D Sheet Flow Mixture model (Slinn 2006)
- Demonstrate the model can produce and maintain
ripples - Compare model results with lab data
- Determine applicability of the model
- Show the effect of suspended/bed load transport
on ripple growth/decay
5 Mixture Approach
Separate Species Sand Particles Water
Mixture Theory Sand Water Combination
Sand-Water Mixture
Water
Viscosity f(C) Density f(C)
time
6 Comparing Approaches
7 Mixture Density
- mixture
- density
- ?s sand density
- 2.65 g/cm3
- ?f water density
- 1.0 g/cm3
- C volumetric
- concentration
- of sand
8 Mixture Viscosity
- mixture
- viscosity
- ?f water
- viscosity
- 0.0131 g/cm/s
-
- Cp maximum
- packing
- concentration
9 Governing Equations - Sediment
Sediment Continuity
advection
diffusion
settling
10 Governing Equations - Mixture
Mixture Momentum
where
11 Governing Equations - Mixture
Mixture Continuity
12 Particle Pressure
- Normal force between sand grains
- Represented with a bed stiffness coefficient
13 Bed Stiffness Coefficient
- Acts as a particle pressure at high concentration
- Opposes resultant forces
- Rigidity Function
- Forces ? Cn
- umix ? 0
14 Solution Strategy
- Discretization Method
- Control volume approach on a staggered grid
- One-sided differences
- Time advancement Methods
- Third-order Adams-Bashforth
- Pressure solver
- Projection method
15 Solution Strategy
Staggered Grid
16 Initial and Boundary Conditions
- Boundary Conditions
- x- and y-Directions periodic
- z-direction
Initial Conditions C f(x,y,z) ui 0
Bottom
Top
17 Steady-State Ripples (Nielsen, 1981)
where
18 Flow Simulation Parameters
19 Model Simulations
Oscillatory Flow
Example of Initial Bed State
d50 0.4 mm
Quasi-two-dimensional
20Ripple Amplitude Simulations
Initial Bed States (1) sinusoidal ripple with
varying heightsDomain Size 12 cm x 8
cm Flow Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
21Growing ripple ?o 1 cm
Slightly decaying ripple ?o 2 cm
Rapidly decaying ripple ?o 3 cm
22 Ripple Height Evolution
23 Ripple Shape
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
24 Bed and Suspended load fluxes
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
25 Sediment fluxes
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
26 Horizontally- and time-averaged sediment
fluxes
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
27 Ripple Height Simulation Results
28 Ripple Amplitude Flow Velocity Simulations
Initial Bed States (1) sinusoidal ripple with
similar heights and varying maximum
free-stream velocitiesDomain Size from 8-16
cm x 8-16 cm Flow Parameters Uo 20-120
cm/s T 2-4 s
29Low energy ?o 2.2 cm Uo20 cm/s
T2 s
Mid energy ?o 1.6 cm Uo60 cm/s
T2 s
High energy ?o 1.6 cm Uo120 cm/s
T4 s
30 Ripple Height Evolution
31 Ripple Amplitude Flow Velocity Simulation Results
32 Two-Ripple Wavelength Simulations
Initial Bed States A double-crested ripple and
(2) sinusoidal ripples Domain Size 12 cm x
8 cm Flow Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
33Double-crested ripple ?o 1.4
cm
Two ripples ?o 1.6 cm
34 Ripple Height Evolution
35 Two-Ripple Wavelength Simulation Results
36 One- and Three-Ripple Wavelength Simulations
Initial Bed States (1) and (3) sinusoidal
ripples Domain Size 24 cm x 8 cm Flow
Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
37One- ripple ?o 0.8 cm ?o 12 cm
38Three- ripple ?o 0.8 cm ?o 12 cm
39 Ripple Height Evolution
40 One- and Three-Ripple Wavelength Simulation
Results
41 Flatbed Simulation
Initial Bed State Flat bed with small
perturbation Domain Size 8 cm x 4 cm Flow
Parameters Uo 20 cm/s T 1 s
42(No Transcript)
43 Ripple Height Evolution
Flatbed
44 Flatbed Simulation Results
45 Bed and Suspended load fluxes
Instantaneous Load Fluxes
Cumulative Load Fluxes
46 Three-Dimensional Simulation
Initial Bed State (1) 2 cm sinusoidal ripple
Domain Size 12 cm x 6 cm x 8 cm Flow
Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
47(No Transcript)
48 Ripple Height Evolution
Three-dimensional ripple
49 Three-Dimensional Simulation Results
50 Ripple Height SimulationSummary
51 Ripple Length Simulation Summary
52 Conclusions Model Applicability
- Basic modeling approach is capable of producing
realistic ripple behavior and features - 2-D 3-D simulations produce different bed
responses - Computational time needs to be decreased
53 Conclusions Ripple Shape
- Transitions from sinusoidal ripple to more
peaked, steeper ripple shape - Ripple height comes within 75 of predicted
height for two-dimensional cases reaching a
steady-state - Ripple length comes within 99 of predicted
length for cases reaching a steady-state - Model shows a trend towards equilibrium when the
ripple is not initialized near the equilibrium
height or length
54 Conclusions Ripple Shape
- Steady-state ripple shape, amplitude, and
wavelength are independent of initial ripple
state - Ripples forming on a flat bed have wavelengths
about half as long as in equilibrium - Running the simulations until ripples are in a
steady-state is necessary for further model
investigations
55 Conclusions Ripple Morphology
- Predicts a steady-state
- Bed load transport dominant mechanism in ripple
growth and decay - Suspended sediment is considerable in in higher
energy simulations but does not necessarily cause
ripple growth or decay - Advective fluxes are the significant mechanism
driving sediment - Model has the potential to advance the present
knowledge of coastal sediment transport and
morphology
56Thank you for your time!Questions?
57 Future Work
- Compare concentration and velocity fields with
lab data - Ripple fields
- Add mean current
- Parallelize code
- Scour around objects
58 Bed and Suspended Load Definition
- Bed Material Packed bed, no motion
- Cbed gt 0.57 cm3sed/cm3
- Bedload Intergranular Forces
- 4.6 grain diameters thick (above immobile bed)
- Suspended load Fluid Drag
- gt 4.6 grain diameters above stable bed
- Threshold debatable but reasonably chosen
- Previous research
- Visual inspection of model output
59(No Transcript)
60 Flux Calculations