Turning statistics into knowledge: use and misuse of indicators and models

About This Presentation
Title:

Turning statistics into knowledge: use and misuse of indicators and models

Description:

Results of the trade model will feed poverty analysis. ... Modeling versus estimation of weights of different components (or subjective ... –

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: marceloo
Learn more at: https://www.wto.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Turning statistics into knowledge: use and misuse of indicators and models


1
Turning statistics into knowledge use and misuse
of indicators and models
  • Data Day
  • Geneva May 18th

2
  • Modeling Partial vs General equilibrium
  • The importance of estimation
  • Indices

3
  • Modeling Partial vs General equilibrium
  • The importance of estimation
  • Indices

4
Modeling Partial versus General equilibrium
  • Definitions
  • Partial equilibrium implies that we only consider
    a few markets at a time and we do not close the
    models by including all economic interactions
    across sectors (e.g., SMART, GSIM in WITS or
    TRITS at the World Bank).
  • In a general equilibrium setup all markets are
    simultaneously modeled and interact with each
    other (e.g., GTAP developed at Purdue University).

5
Why partial equilibrium?
  • Advantages
  • Minimal data requirement. We can take advantage
    of rich WITS datasets. Crucial if question is
    about
  • Bolivia or Uruguay and not the Rest of South
    America
  • Soya exports and not Other cereals
  • Results of the trade model will feed poverty
    analysis. Households produce corn or soya, not
    cereals. Heterogeneity of impacts may be lost
    in a more aggregate general equilibrium model.

6
Why partial equilibrium?
  • More Advantages
  • Allows analysis of Doha negotiations more
    accurately
  • In the WTO countries negotiate bound tariffs, not
    applied (tariff overhang in many regions)
  • Applied and bound tariffs are very different
    within HS 10 Cereals. General equilibrium
    approach will miss this.

7
Why partial equilibrium?
  • More Advantages
  • Transparency
  • Modeling is straightforward and results can be
    easily explain. No black box.
  • Easy to implement
  • Excel sheet/SMART/GSIM
  • Solves aggregation bias

8
Adding apples and oranges.
P
Pwta
PwTa
PwTf
Pw
Q
Apples
Oranges
Fruits
  • No welfare cost associated with Ta apples
    import demand is perfectly inelastic. No tariff
    on oranges. So no welfare cost associated with
    fruit protection.
  • Aggregation bias suggests welfare loss

9
Why partial equilibrium?
  • Disadvantages
  • One has information only on a pre-determined
    number of economic variables (partial model of
    the economy)
  • One may miss important feedbacks
  • E.g., Labor market constraints. (But if you know
    they are there you can model them)
  • Can be very sensitive to a few (badly estimated)
    elasticities.

10
  • Modeling Partial vs General equilibrium
  • The importance of estimation
  • Indices

11
The importance of estimation
  • Ex-post
  • One can estimate the impact of a certain policy
    reform on exports, trade creation, diversion, GDP
    growth, productivity and with a bit of modeling
    utility (e.g., gravity equation)
  • Ex-ante
  • One should estimate the critical parameters of
    the modeling exercise (elasticities, economies of
    scale, etc..). Otherwise
  • Harris (1984) versus Head and Ries (1999)
  • World Bank (2001) versus Hoekman et al (2004)
  • GEP(2001) versus common sense
  • Importance of comparing relative and not absolute
    results

12
But why do simulation results differ?
  • Scenarios are not the same
  • Full versus partial
  • Different base years (benchmarks)
  • Mixing with other reforms (fiscal policy, trade
    facilitation)
  • Data are not the same
  • GTAP data is standard, but PTAs, NTBs..
  • Parameters (elasticities) are not the same
  • Modeling assumptions differ
  • Perfect versus imperfect competition
  • Flexible versus rigid labor markets
  • Endogeneity of TFP to trade openness

13
  • Modeling Partial vs General equilibrium
  • The importance of estimation
  • Indices

14
Indices between analysis and narrative
  • According to statisticians what cannot be
    counted does not count, but do indicators try
    to count what cannot be counted?
  • Composite indices are good for
  • Narrative
  • And advocacy of particular reform/policy
  • Decision making process if based on policies
    rather than outcomes, and aggregated using a
    proper technique.

15
Indices
  • Problems
  • Modeling versus estimation of weights of
    different components (or subjective versus
    objective criteria)
  • Based on theory, not hand-waving (World Banks
    OTRI versus IMFs old TRI)
  • Rankings and the importance of measurement error
    (OTRI versus TRI or Doing Business)

16
Concluding remarks
  • Keep it simple and transparent
  • Dont trust your guts estimate everything you
    can!
  • Pay attention to measurement error
  • Compare relative policy shocks not absolute
    numbers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com