Pay for Performance Plans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Pay for Performance Plans

Description:

Pay-for-Knowledge. Base pay, or pay progression, is tied to job knowledge: 1. Increased knowledge-based systems. 2. Multi-skilled-based systems. 14. Irwin/McGraw-Hill ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1449
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: leswil
Category:
Tags: pay | performance | plans

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pay for Performance Plans


1
  • Pay for Performance Plans

2
Pay for performance plans signal a movement away
from entitlements. Pay will vary with some
measure of individual, team, or organizational
performance.
3
Purposes of Pay for Performance
  • Attain strategic goals
  • Reinforce organizational norms
  • Motivate performance
  • Recognize differential employee contributions

4
Performance Pay Obstacles
  • Difficulties in specifying and measuring job
    performance
  • Problems in identifying valued rewards
  • Difficulties in linking rewards to job performance

5
  • Base Pay Adjustments
  • General Increases
  • Merit Pay Plans
  • Lump-Sum Awards

6
Difficulties in Rewarding Performance with Base
Pay Increases
  • Economics
  • Lack of flexibility
  • Permanence
  • Individual focus

7
Individual Incentives
  • Under a system of individual incentives, all or a
    portion of an individuals pay is tied to their
    performance.

8
Pay-for-Performance Plans
  • Merit Pay Adjustments to Base Pay
  • Need better measures and enough money
  • Lump Sum Bonuses
  • Reduced costs because of lack of compounding.
  • Individual Spot Awards
  • exceptional performance on special projects or
    performance that exceeds expectations by a wide
    margin.
  • Individual Incentive Plans
  • Group Incentive Plans

9
Individual Incentive Plans
  • Incentive plans vary by
  • Method of rate denomination
  • Number of units of production per time period
  • Time period per unit of production
  • Relationship between production level and wages
  • Wages are a constant function of production
  • Wages vary as a function of production

10
Individual Incentives Plans
  • Straight Piecework System
  • Wage rate determination is based on units of
    production per time period, and wages vary
    directly as a function of production level
  • Standard Hour Plan
  • Rate based on completion of a task in some
    expected time period. Regardless of the time
    actually taken to complete the task, pay is
    geared to the standard time

11
Advantages
  • Raise productivity, reduce production cost
  • Less direct supervision required
  • Improve labor costs forecasts

12
Advantages
  • Raise productivity, reduce production cost
  • Less direct supervision required
  • Improve labor costs forecasts

13
Pay-for-Knowledge
  • Base pay, or pay progression, is tied to job
    knowledge
  • 1. Increased knowledge-based systems
  • 2. Multi-skilled-based systems

14
Recognition Plans
  • Celebrate Objectives
  • Reinforce Extraordinary Performers
  • Recognize Activities
  • Reinforce Demonstrated Desired Behaviors
  • Recognize Service
  • Recognize Needs of Employees

15
Group Incentives
  • Improve Organizational Performance
  • Organizational Measures
  • Measured Periodically

16
Group Incentive Plans
  • Balanced Scorecard Measures
  • (Organization, Division, Department, Workgroup)
  • Lead Customer and Employee Satisfaction,
    Market Share
  • Operational Productivity, Quality, Cycle Time
  • Lag Profit, Return on Net Assets, etc.
  • Pre-announced Performance-Reward Schedule
  • Formula Driven
  • Participation by Level, not Function

17
Gainsharing
  • Under gainsharing plans, employees earn bonuses
    tied to unit-wide performance as measured by a
    predetermined, gainsharing formula.

18
Advantages of Gainsharing Over Other P-F-P Options
  • It is based upon group, not individual
    performance.
  • It encourages teamwork.
  • It is based on macro-measures.
  • It results in pay-outs relatively close in time
    to performance.
  • It is based upon factors controllable by the
    group.
  • It usually does not encourage destructive
    competition among teams.
  • It promotes an employee / company partnership for
    improvement.

19
Criteria for Gainsharing Formula
  • Fair to company
  • Fair to employees
  • Understandable
  • Easy to administer
  • Flexibility
  • Helps to isolate problem areas

20
Small Group Incentives
  • Small group incentive systems are similar to
    gainsharing plans but in this case, the bonus
    employees receive is based on the performance of
    a small group instead of an entire department,
    division, or plant.

21
Profit-Sharing Plans
  • Employees receive an annual bonus or shares in
    the company based upon company-wide performance.
  • Employees are either paid in cash, or their
    earnings are deferred into a retirement plan.

22
Team Incentives
  • Enabling Involvement
  • Rewarding Contributions
  • Project Measures

23
Advantages and Disadvantages of Group Incentive
Plans
  • ADVANTAGES
  • Positive impact
  • Ease of measures
  • Cooperation valued
  • Teamwork
  • Participation in decision-making
  • DISADVANTAGES
  • Line of sight lessened
  • Increased turnover
  • Compensation at risk increased

24
Example of Group IncentivesGE Information
Systems
  • A team-based incentive with links to individual
    payouts
  • Team and individual performance goals are set
  • If the team hits its goals, the team members earn
    their incentive only if they hit their individual
    goals.
  • The team incentive is 12 to 15 of base pay and
    is paid monthly.

25
Example of Group IncentivesSaturn
  • Earnings-at-risk plan where base pay is 93 of
    market
  • Employees meet individual objectives to capture
    at-risk component
  • All team members must meet objectives for any to
    get at-risk money
  • A profit sharing component is based on corporate
    profits

26
The Choice Between Individual and Group Variable
Plans
  • Characteristics for decision
  • Performance measurement
  • Organizational adaptability
  • Organizational commitment

27
Characteristic Performance Measurement
  • Choose an individual plan when
  • Good measures of individual performance exist.
  • Task accomplishment not dependent on performance
    of others.
  • Choose a group plan when
  • Output is group collaborative effort.
  • Individual contributions to output cannot be
    assessed.

28
Characteristic Organizational Adaptability
  • Choose an individual plan when
  • Individual performance standards are stable.
  • Production methods and labor mix are relatively
    constant.
  • Choose a group plan when
  • Performance standards for individuals change to
    meet external environmental pressures on
    relatively constant organizational objectives.
  • Production methods and labor mix must adapt to
    meet changing pressures.

29
Characteristic Organizational Commitment
  • Choose an individual plan when
  • Commitment strongest to individuals profession
    or superior.
  • Supervisor viewed as unbiased and performance
    standards readily apparent.
  • Choose a group plan when
  • High commitment to organization built upon sound
    communication of organizational objectives and
    performance standards.

30
Long-Term Incentive Plans
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
Performance Plans (Performance Share and
Performance Unit)
Broad-Based Option Plans (BBOP)
31
Other Long-Term Incentive Plans
  • Premium Priced Stock Options
  • Long-term Vest Stock Options
  • Indexed Stock Options
  • External Standards LTI
  • Career Grants

32
Conditions for Effective Variable
Pay-for-Performance Plans
  • Plan is clearly communicated
  • Plan is understood
  • Rewards are easy to calculate
  • Employees participate in administering the plan
  • Employees believe they are being treated fairly
  • Employees believe they can trust the company and
    that they have security
  • Rewards are awarded as soon as possible after the
    desired performance.

33
The Serious Implications of Variable
Pay-for-Performance
  • When a substantial portion of pay is tied to
    performance, that portion becomes variable - can
    go up or down - based upon individual, group, or
    company performance. This change is significant.
  • The nature of authority relationships and status
    in the organization might change.
  • Employees will demand, and the operation of the
    systems themselves might require, increased
    sharing of information.
  • Finally, variable pay-for-performance systems
    will create heightened pressure for performance
    and cost containment within the organization.
    This pressure will come not just from managers,
    but from employees themselves.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com