Model for Prediction Across Scales MPAS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Model for Prediction Across Scales MPAS

Description:

Isotropy in Linear Advection Simulations. Initially symmetric tracer advected at V = 10 m/s ... Accuracy and Isotropy of Second Order Diffusion. Normalized ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: JoeK72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Model for Prediction Across Scales MPAS


1
Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS)
  • Joe Klemp, Bill Skamarock (NCAR)
  • Todd Ringler (Los Alamos National Laboratory)
  • John Thuburn (University of Exeter, UK)

2
Future Weather/Climate Atmospheric Dynamic Core
  • Problems with lat-lon coordinate for global
    models
  • Pole singularities require special filtering
  • Polar filters do not scale well on massively
    parallel computers
  • Highly anisotropic grid cells at high latitudes
  • Consideration of alternative spatial
    discretizations

Priority Requirements
  • Efficient on existing and proposed supercomputer
    architectures
  • Scales well on massively parallel computers
  • Well suited for cloud (nonhydrostatic) to global
    scales
  • Capability for local grid refinement and
    regional domains
  • Conserves at least mass and scalar quantities

3
Why a Hexagonal Grid?
to circumvent the pole problem !
Grids designed to remove the pole singularity
icosahedral grid (hexagons)
cubed sphere
icosahedral grid (triangles)
  • Finite-volume formulation
  • Hexagonal grid is most isotropic (wave
    propagation).
  • Pentagons are easier to handle than corners of
    cube.
  • Hexagonal grid permits larger explicit time steps

4
Isotropy in Linear Advection Simulations
t 70,000 s, ?t 200 s, ?x 5 km
5
Accuracy and Isotropy of Second Order Diffusion

Normalized second order Laplacian
6
Why a C-Grid?
Since the 1960s, virtually all nonhydrostatic
cloud and mesoscale models have used a C-grid.
1-D wave equation
Linear gravity-wave dispersion
C-grid staggering
A-grid staggering
C grid
A grid
The C-grid provides twice the resolution of the A
grid, and avoids the parasitic mode
7
C-Grid - SWL Linear Stability Limits
Wave Propagation CFL limit (rel)
Advection CFL limit (rel)
Equivalent Grid Size
Rectangular Grid
Triangular Grid
Hexagonal Grid
8
Hexagonal C-Grid ProblemNon-Stationary
Geostrophic Mode
Traditional Coriolis velocity evaluation
9
Hexagonal C-Grid ProblemNon-Stationary
Geostrophic Mode
New Coriolis velocity evaluation (Thuburn, JCP)
10
Generalization for Irregular Hexagons
In discrete analogue of vorticity equation
(?t-f?a), the divergence ?a on the Delaunay
triangulation must be identical to the divergence
?A on the Voronoi hexagons used in the height
equation (ht-H?A)
where
divergence ?A in hexagon A
divergence ?a in triangle ABC
Construct tangential velocities from weighted sum
of (10) normal velocities on edges of adjacent
hexagons.
All weights w je depend only local area ratios
RAa, etc.
11
Shallow Water Test Case 2 Steady Zonal Flow
(Todd Ringler, LANL)
12
Shallow Water Test Case 2 Steady Zonal Flow
(Todd Ringler, LANL)
13
Shallow-Water Test Case 5 Flow over an Isolated
Mountain
Potential vorticity conserved to roundoff. Total
energy conserved to time-truncation error.
40962 cells, dx 120 km 2nd order
differencing RK4 time differencing
(Todd Ringler, LANL)
14
Limited-Area Cloud Model on Hexagonal C-Grid
Splitting Supercell at 2 hours
Finite-Volume Fluxes on Hexagonal C-Grid
  • Research Progress
  • Constructed a 3-D limited-area hexagonal-grid
    cloud model based on WRF/ARW numerics to evaluate
    performance.
  • Documented that hexagonal-grid cloud simulations
    are at least as accurate and computationally more
    efficient than those on a conventional
    rectangular grid.

1 km Hexagonal Grid Simulation
15
3-D Supercell Simulation 500 m Horizontal Grid

Rectangular Grid
Hexagonal Grid
Vertical velocity contours at 1, 5, and 10 km
(c.i. 3 m/s)
30 m/s vertical velocity surface shaded in
red Rainwater surfaces shaded as transparent
shells Perturbation surface temperature shaded on
baseplane
16
Selective Grid Refinement
Adjustment of grid cells to specified density
function
(Michael Duda, MMM)
  • Lili Ju (Univ. South Carolina)
  • Max Gunzberger (FSU)
  • Todd Ringler (LANL)

17
Selective Mesh Refinement Based on Terrain Height

spherical centroidal voronoi tessellation
(Michael Duda, MMM)
18
Summary
  • We have solved the non-stationary
    geostrophic-mode problem for the irregular
    hexagonal C grid (for any Voronoi grid).
  • The global hexagonal C-grid SW solver
  • Accuracy similar to other state-of-the-art
    solvers.
  • Conserves PV to machine roundoff.
  • Conserves total energy to time-truncation error.
  • Robust - explicit filtering not needed in SW test
    cases 2 and 5, and it is stable for long
    integrations.
  • Unstructured grid permits selective grid
    refinement
  • The regional hexagonal C-grid cloud model
  • Accuracy similar to state-of-the-art rectangular
    grid models.
  • Slightly greater efficiency compared to
    rectangular grid models.
  • Future Nonhydrostatic global hexagonal C-grid
    solver.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com