Title: Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation Experts
1Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation
Experts
- Presented to the
- North Carolina Association of District Court
Judges - by
- T. Randolph Whitt, CPA, ABV
- Kelly A. Schmid, CPA, CVA, ABV
- Crisp Hughes Evans, LLP
- April 10, 2003
2AGENDA
- Evaluating a Valuation Expert
- Evaluating a Valuation Report
- Valuation Methodologies
- Valuation for Equitable Distribution - Active v.
Passive
3What Must be Valued?
- Pension and Retirement benefits - 50-20.1
- Business interests operating as
- C Corp
- S Corp
- General Partnership
- Limited Partnership
- Limited Liability Partnership
- Sole Proprietorship
- Other real and personal property
4Who are Valuators?
- Valuation Experts
- Credentialed experts (ASA, ABV, CVA, CFA, CBA,
AVA) - Educated in valuation theory
- Adhere to published business valuation standards
which address financial analysis, industry
analysis, economic analysis, report writing in
addition to business valuation theory. - Undergo examination, education and peer review of
valuation reports to obtain designation. - Accountants
- Core competencies of financial analysis and
understanding of business operations - May or may not understand business valuation
theory
5Who are Valuators?
- Valuation Experts
- Economists
- Core competency of understanding of economic
theory - May or may not understand business valuation
theory - Industry Experts
- Core competency of understanding their industry
- Usually have no knowledge of business valuation
theory - Investment Bankers/Business Brokers
- Core competency of understanding the structure of
a business transaction - May or may not understand business valuation
theory
6Evaluating an Expert
- Education - in general and in business valuation
- Qualifications (designations) and experience
- Knowledge of business valuation theory
- Should not be an advocate for the client only an
advocate of his opinion
7Evaluating an Experts Report
- A well prepared valuation report will present the
experts knowledge of - Industry
- National and Local Economies
- Subject Company
- Standard of Value
- Cost, Income and Market Approaches
- Discounts and Premiums
8Evaluating an Experts Report
- Subjective Areas of Valuation Reports
- Adjustments to the Balance Sheet and/or Income
Statement - Selection of Estimated Future Income Stream
- Calculation of Discount or Capitalization Rate
- Risk factors
- Growth rate
- Selection of Valuation Methodology
- Selection of Guideline Companies or Transactions
in the Market Approach - Application of Discounts and Premiums
9Definition of Value
- Fair Market Value
- Revenue Ruling 59-60 - . . the price at which
the property would change hands between a willing
buyer and a willing seller when the former is not
under any compulsion to buy and the latter is not
under any compulsion to sell, both parties having
reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. - Is not equivalent to purchase price, replacement
value, book value or the amount received in a
sale of similar property.
10Definition of Value
- Fair Market Value
- International Glossary of Business Valuation
Terms Fair Market Value -the price, expressed
in terms of cash equivalents, at which property
would change hands between a hypothetical willing
and able buyer and a hypothetical willing and
able seller, acting at arms length in an open and
unrestricted market, where neither is under
compulsion to buy or sell and when both have
reasonable knowledge of the facts. - Business valuation organizations that adopted the
International Glossary of Business Valuation
Terms include the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, American Society of
Appraisers, National Association of Certified
Valuation Analysts, Canadian Institute of
Chartered Business Valuators, and the Institute
of Business Appraisers.
11Valuation of Closely Held Business Interests
- Definition
- Shares are owned by a relatively limited number
of stockholders, often held by one family. - Shares not actively traded (usually)
12Valuation of Closely Held Business Interests
- Valuation factors to consider (Rev Rul 59-60)
- Nature of the business and the history of the
enterprise from its inception. - Economic outlook in general and the condition and
outlook of the specific industry in particular. - Book value of the stock and the financial
condition of the business. - Earning capacity of the company.
- Dividend-paying capacity.
13Valuation of Closely Held Business Interests
- Valuation factors to consider (continued)
- Whether or not the enterprise has goodwill or
other intangible value. - Sales of the stock and the size of the block of
stock to be valued. - Market price of stocks of corporations engaged in
the same or a similar line of business having
their stocks actively traded in a free and open
market, either on an exchange or over-the-counter
14Valuation Approaches
- 3 Approaches
- Asset
- Income
- Market
- All approaches must be considered, but various
factors will influence which approach will be
relied upon to value company.
15Valuation Approaches
- Asset Approach
- Estimate the value of a business by valuing the
tangible and intangible assets of the enterprise - Adjusted Net Assets Method
- Excess Earnings Method
16Valuation Approaches
- Income Approach
- Estimate the value of a business based on its
future earnings stream - Discounting Projecting all expected future
economic benefits and discounting each benefit
back to a present value at a discount rate that
represents the return on investment for that
investment time. - Capitalization Dividing a single historical or
projected economic benefit by a capitalization
rate that represents the discount rate less the
expected long-term growth rate.
17Valuation Approaches
- Market Approach
- Estimate the value of a business by direct
comparison to comparable guideline companies and
similar investment that have been sold. - Guideline publicly traded company Relating
market value multiples for public company stocks
to the subject company. - Guideline merger and acquisition Relating value
multiples from sales of entire companies to the
subject company. - Prior transactions, offers and buy-sell agreements
18Asset Approach
- Adjusted Net Assets Method
- Valuation analyst restates all of the assets and
liabilities of the subject company from their
historical cost basis to fair market value. - The fair market value of the assets minus the
fair market value of the liabilities equals the
fair market value of the business owners equity. - Value indication is typically that of 100 percent
of the equity, on a marketable, controlling
ownership interest basis.
19Asset Approach
- Adjusted Net Assets Method-Advantages
- Easy to understand
- Especially relevant in tangible asset intensive
business if valuing controlling ownership - Liquidation value may exceed going-concern value
20Asset Approach
- Adjusted Net Assets Method-Disadvantages
- Expensive and difficult to get reliable
market-derived data for valuation of many assets
and liabilities - Valuation of intangibles and contingent items may
be considered speculative - Of questionable relevance in many going-concern
premise valuations, especially minority interests
21Asset Approach
- Excess Earnings Method
- Method is embodied in Revenue Ruling 68-609
- A derivation of this method is often used to
value professional practices - A normalized level of economic earnings is
estimated by adjusting the professionals
salary to comparable market salaries - Value indication derived from this method is on a
marketable, controlling ownership interest basis
22Asset Approach
- Excess Earnings Method-Advantages
- Seemingly simplistic
- Widely used in family law courts, especially for
professional practices and small service
businesses
23Asset Approach
- Excess Earnings Method-Disadvantages
- Wide disagreement on implementation
- No empirical basis available for developing or
supporting capitalization rate applicable to
excess earnings - Does not provide mechanics for incorporating
expected growth - Not widely used by financial community
- IRS position (per RR68-609) is use only if no
better method is available
24Income Approach
- Income Statement Analysis and Normalization
- Purpose is to better understand and interpret the
earning power of the subject company - Adjustments generally fall into three categories
- Differences in accounting practices
- Nonrecurring events, discontinued operations, or
other aspects of past operations that may not
represent future earning power - Discretionary items (management perquisites,
bonuses, etc.) Only done for valuations of
controlling ownership interests
25Income Approach
- Project future economic income
- Free Cash flow Earnings before interest and
taxes (EBIT) Depreciation - Capital
Expenditures - Change in Working Capital
Deferred Taxes - Accounting earnings net income, net operating
income, earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) - Payouts dividends, partnership withdrawals, S
Corp distributions
26Income Approach
- Selection of projected earnings stream
- If debt is included in what is being valued, the
income stream to be used is Earnings Before
Interest and Taxes (EBIT) or Net Cash Flow to
Overall Invested Capital, which ignore capital
structure and tax position - A weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
discount rate is used - Resulting value is referred to as Market Value
of Invested Capital
27Income Approach
- Selection of projected earnings stream (cont)
- If debt is not included in what is being valued,
the income stream to be used is Net Income or Net
Cash Flow to Equity - A cost of equity discount rate is used
- Resulting value is referred to as Market Value
of Equity.
28Income Approach
- Discount and Capitalization Rates
- The expected rate of return that would be
required to attract an investor to invest in the
subject company - Instead of investing in available alternative
investments that are comparable in terms of risk
and other investment characteristics - The discount or capitalization rate is the cost
of capital for that particular investment.
29Income Approach
- Discount Rate
- Must be appropriate for the definition of
economic income in the numerator - Components
- Risk free rate (U.S. Treasury obligations)
- Premium for risk (additional rate of return
expected for investing in non-Treasury securities)
30Income Approach
- Capitalization Rate
- Must be appropriate for the definition of
economic income in the numerator - Components
- Risk free rate (U.S. Treasury obligations)
- Premium for risk (additional rate of return
expected for investing in non-Treasury
securities) - - Projected sustainable average annual rate of
growth
31Discount and Capitalization Rate Example
32Income Approach
- Discount and Capitalization Rate
- Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
- Blended costs of the companys capital structure
components, each weighted by the market value of
that component - If debt is being included in what is being
valued, a WACC will be applied to an earnings
stream which ignores capital structure (interest
expense)
33WACC - Example
34Income Approach
- Discount and Capitalization Rate
- Risk Premium
- Equities are riskier than debt and warrant a
higher expected return - Most estimates of equity risk premium rely on
historical market performance as an indicator of
future - Historically, small company stock have had higher
returns and more risk than large company stocks - Subject company may be riskier than the small
companies analyzed in the empirical data
35Income Approach
- Discount and Capitalization Rate
- Sources for Risk Premium data
- Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation, published
annually by Ibbotson Associates - Standard Poors Corporate Value Consulting Risk
Premium Report, published annually by Standard
Poors - Valuation analyst comparison of performance of
subject company to publicly traded guideline
companies and private company completed
transactions
36Income Approach
- Taxes and the Risk Premium
- Stock Market returns used in calculating the risk
premium are after corporate taxes - These are the returns realized by an investor.
- These returns are pre-investor taxes, after
business taxes - When applying discount rates calculated with this
data, cash flows should be calculated on the same
basis.
37Income Approach
- Discounted Economic Income Method
- Most appropriate for projected income streams
with - Predictable, but uneven changes
- Short- or intermediate-term supergrowth
- Changes that are erratic and unpredictable as to
timing - Also referred to as Discounted Cash Flow Method
(DCF)
38Income Approach
- Discounted Economic Income Method (cont)
- If control-type normalization adjustments are
made to economic benefit stream, resulting value
is on a controlling, marketable basis - Discount for lack of marketability applicable for
minority interest valuation, possibly for control
basis valuation (but would be considerably
smaller, if applicable) - Little or no difference in discount rate for
control v. minority valuation (an assumed capital
structure in a control valuation could change
WACC)
39Income Approach
- Discounted Economic Income Method-Advantages
- Theoretically most correct, captures present
value of all future realizable cash - Widely used in the financial markets for pricing
and decision making.
40Income Approach
- Discounted Economic Income Method-Disadvantages
- Requires projections of future economic benefits
may be controversial - Requires estimate of appropriate discount rate
(cost of capital) also subject to controversy - May be difficult to explain to an audience
without sufficient financial background
(certainly not this group!)
41Discounted Cash Flows Example
42Present Value Theory
- Another example of use of Present Value theory
- Pension valuations
- Value of benefit or payout is known
- What is the value of that benefit today?
- Example
43Present Value Theory
- Present Value Definition
- Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the Proposed
Rule on Employee Benefit Plans 6 C.F.R. Part 31,
3121(v) (1986) - Present value of a pension benefit in a defined
pension plan means the value as of a specified
date of an amount or series of amounts due
thereafter, where each amount is multiplied by
the probability that the conditions on which
payment of the amount is contingent will be
satisfied, and is discounted according to an
assumed rate of interest to reflect the time
value of money. The present value must be
determined as of the date the value is required
to be taken into account using actuarial
assumptions and methods that are reasonable as of
that date.
44Income Approach
- Capitalization Method
- Most appropriate for projected income streams
that are - Stable or evenly growing
- Erratic and unpredictable as to timing (if the
companys income is unstable and random as to
timing, the Discounted Earnings Method may not be
able to produce any more accurate a value
indication than the capitalization method)
45Income Approach
- Capitalization Method (cont)
- If control-type normalization adjustments are
made to economic benefit stream, resulting value
is on a controlling, marketable basis - Discount for lack of marketability applicable for
minority interest valuation, possibly for control
basis valuation (but would be considerably
smaller, if applicable) - Little or no difference in discount or
capitalization rate for control v. minority
valuation (an assumed capital structure in
control valuation could change WACC)
46Income Approach
- Capitalization Method-Advantages
- Widely used by investors (although not as much as
Discounted Future Earnings) - Does not require specific-period, long-term
forecasts - Simple to understand and explain
47Income Approach
- Capitalization Method-Disadvantages
- Oversimplification of discounting method
- Implicitly assumes that a variable capitalized
represents a reasonable base from which future
benefits will proceed - The measure of economic income to be capitalized
and the capitalization rate may be controversial - Difficult to use in start-up or high-growth
companies
48Capitalization of Earnings Example
49Market Approach
- Guideline Companies (publicly traded)
- Market Transactions (private companies)
- Prior transactions, offers and buy-sell
agreements - Rules of Thumb
50Market Approach
- Guideline Companies (publicly traded)
- EDGAR
- Hoovers online
- If controlling interest being valued, there may
be some control premium warranted - Discount for lack of marketability applicable if
minority valuation, possibly if control valuation
51Market Approach
- Guideline Companies-Advantages
- There are many guideline publicly traded
companies available for different industries - Market is regarded as final arbiter of value
- Prices of guideline publicly traded companies
available as of any effective valuation date - Excellent quantity and quality of data for each
company from SEC filings - Most investors and judges familiar with method
52Market Approach
- Guideline Companies-Advantages (cont)
- Inexpensive to acquire data with readily
available databases and software (although proper
data analysis is time consuming) - Extensive empirical data available to support
quantification of a discount for lack of
marketability if valuing minority interest - Especially relevant if subject company could go
public
53Market Approach
- Guideline Companies-Disadvantages
- Public companies not available in all industries
- Difficult to find adequately similar companies
- Most public companies are much larger than
private companies being valued - Many public companies have higher growth
potential, which may require a difficult
adjustment in the comparison
54Market Approach
- Guideline Companies-Disadvantages(cont)
- For small companies, factors driving value may be
different than for public companies - If valuing a controlling interest, adjustment for
control may be difficult and controversial
55Examples of Pricing Multiples
56Market Approach
- Market Transactions (private companies)
- Pratts Stats
- Done Deals
- BIZCOMPS
- Institute of Business Appraisers (IBA) database
- Good for control valuations
- If used for minority valuation, usually would
have to discount for both minority interest and
lack of marketability
57Market Approach
- Market Transactions-Advantages
- If valuing controlling interest, no premium for
control needed - Generally understood and accepted by courts
- If the acquired company was public before
acquisition, excellent comparative financial data
usually available
58Market Approach
- Market Transactions-Disadvantages
- Fewer comparative merger and acquisition
transactions than guideline publicly traded
companies are available - Data not readily accessible on a single database
- Not all databases included full terms of the deal
- Transactions are not on the same date as the
effective valuation date and may require
adjustments for differences in time
59Market Approach
- Market Transactions-Disadvantages(cont)
- If valuing minority interest, discounts for
minority ownership and/or lack of marketability
may be controversial and hard to quantify - If the acquired company was private before
acquisition, financial data are limited and may
not be possible to verify - Often includes synergistic or strategic value
therefore may not represent fair market value
60Market Approach
- Prior transactions, offers, buy-sell agreements
- Resulting value depends on whether they were
applicable to control or minority transactions - Must consider adjustments for differences in
time, if applicable
61Market Approach
- Prior transactions, offers, buy-sell
agreements-Advantages - If on an arms-length basis, may be the best
evidence of value - Accurate, detailed data often available
62Market Approach
- Prior transactions, offers, buy-sell
agreements-Disadvantages - May be difficult to establish arms-length
character - Removed in time from effective valuation date
may require adjustments for differences in time - In case of offers and incomplete contracts, may
be difficult to establish if it is a bona fide
offer from a qualified buyer
63Market Approach
- Rules of Thumb
- Universally relate to control value
- If using for minority value, need to consider
adjustments for minority and/or lack of
marketability
64Market Approach
- Rules of Thumb-Advantages
- Should be considered if they are widely
publicized in a particular industry - Usually simple to apply
- Should be used as a sanity check
65Market Approach
- Rules of Thumb-Disadvantages
- No empirical verification as to extent to which
market actually tends to follow them - Usually do not know details of transactions that
allegedly underlie the rule - For most industries, the various sources of rules
of thumb usually produce a very wide range of
values
66Premiums and Discounts
- Discount for Lack of Control (minority interest
discount) - An amount or percentage deducted from an equity
interest to reflect minority position or lack of
control - Can not be observed in the market
- Must be inferred from control premiums
67Premiums and Discounts
- Sources for Discount for Lack of Control
(minority interest discount) - Mergerstat Review
- Closed end mutual funds (for FLPs owning
marketable securities - Limited partnership secondary markets (for FLPs
owing real estate)
68Sample Mergerstat Data
69Premiums and Discounts
- Discount for Lack of Marketability
- An amount or percentage deducted from an equity
interest to reflect lack of marketability - The standard for marketability of minority
interests is public securities markets - cash in
three days - The discount necessary to generate a sufficient
increment of return to the holder of a minority
interest to induce him to make a particular
investment
70Premiums and Discounts
- Sources for Discounts for Lack of Marketability
- Restricted stock studies
- IPO studies
- Bid-ask spreads
71Restricted Stock Studies
72The Emory IPO Studies
73Valuation Issues in Equitable Distribution
- Valuation of
- Marital property
- Separate property
- Active v. passive
- Debts (marital and separate)
- Property composed of both separate and marital
elements - Changes in value of marital assets between date
of separation and date of distribution
74Valuation in Equitable Distribution
- Equitable Distribution
- North Carolina became an equitable distribution
state in 1981 - N.C. GS50-20 states that the court shall
determine what is the marital property and
divisible property and shall provide for an
equitable distribution of the marital property
and divisible property between the parties. . .
75Valuation in Equitable Distribution
- Equitable Distribution
- In assigning a value to the property, the court
will - Classify all property of the parties as separate,
marital, or divisible - Value the separate property and assign to
appropriate party - Value each item of marital property
- Consider active and passive components of value
in marital, separate and divisible property
76Valuation in Equitable Distribution
- Equitable Distribution (cont)
- Classify the debts of the parties as separate or
marital and value them - Apportion or distribute the marital debts in an
equitable manner - Distribute the marital and divisible property
equitably
77Valuation in Equitable Distribution
- Marital Property - GS50-20(b)(1)
- All real and personal property acquired by either
spouse or both spouses during the course of the
marriage and before the date of the separation of
the parties - It is presumed that all property acquired after
the date of marriage and before the date of
separation is marital property except property
which is separate property under subdivision 2 of
GS50-20.
78Valuation in Equitable Distribution
- Separate Property - GS50-20(b)(2)
- All real and personal property acquired by a
spouse before marriage or acquired by a spouse by
bequest, devise, descent, or gift during the
course of the marriage - The increase in value of separate property and
the income derived from separate property shall
be considered separate property.
79Valuation in Equitable Distribution
- Divisible Property - GS50-20(b)(4)
- All real and personal property as set forth
below - all appreciation and diminution in value of
marital property and divisible property of the
parties occurring after the date of separation
and prior to the date of distribution, except
that appreciation or diminution in value which is
the result of postseparation actions or
activities of a spouse - passive income from marital property received
after the date of separation
80Valuation in Equitable Distribution
- Divisible Property - GS50-20(b)(4)
- all property, property rights, or any portion
thereof received after the date of separation but
before the date of distribution that was acquired
as a result of the efforts of either spouse
during the marriage and before the date of
separation - increases in marital debt and financing charges
and interest related to marital debt
81Active v. Passive Issues
- An increase in value of separate property remains
separate property - Increases in value of separate property resulting
from contributions of time or money of one or
both spouses is active appreciation
82Active Appreciation
- Arises from financial or managerial
contributions of one of the spouses to separate
property during marriage. - Increases in value are marital property
- Allows the marital estate a fair return on its
investment of time and money
83Passive Appreciation
- Enhancement of the value of separate property
due solely to inflation,changing economic
conditions, or such other circumstances beyond
the control of either spouse - Burden of proof falls upon the party claiming the
appreciation was passive
84Active or Passive?
- Determining Factors
- Nature of the Property
- Impact of Market Conditions
- Spouses expertise in managing the asset
- Degree of management control over asset
- Appreciation resulting from third party efforts
- Influence of governments
85Active or Passive?
- Appreciation of Closely Held Corporations
- Often centers around the degree of management
control a spouse exercises over the asset (Smith
v. Smith) - Not always clear cut (Lawing v. Lawing)
86Active or Passive?
- How to determine?
- Court must determine value of the business at the
time of marriage, at separation, and near date of
trial or distribution. - Court must then determine what portion of the
increase is attributable to the efforts of the
parties during marriage. This increase is marital
property and subject to division. - Remainder is separate property.
87Active or Passive?
- How to determine?
- Court must also determine the appreciation or
diminution in value between the date of
separation and trial or distribution date. - If this appreciation or diminution is passive, it
is divisible property. - If this appreciation or diminution is active, it
is separate property. - Example problem in handout
88Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation
Experts
- Presented to the
- North Carolina Association of District Court
Judges - by
- T. Randolph Whitt, CPA, ABV
- Kelly A. Schmid, CPA, CVA, ABV
- Crisp Hughes Evans, LLP
- April 10, 2003