Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation Experts

1 / 88
About This Presentation
Title:

Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation Experts

Description:

Industry. National and Local Economies. Subject Company. Standard of Value ... companies not available in all industries. Difficult to find adequately similar ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:183
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 89
Provided by: Staf175
Learn more at: http://www.unc.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation Experts


1
Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation
Experts
  • Presented to the
  • North Carolina Association of District Court
    Judges
  • by
  • T. Randolph Whitt, CPA, ABV
  • Kelly A. Schmid, CPA, CVA, ABV
  • Crisp Hughes Evans, LLP
  • April 10, 2003

2
AGENDA
  • Evaluating a Valuation Expert
  • Evaluating a Valuation Report
  • Valuation Methodologies
  • Valuation for Equitable Distribution - Active v.
    Passive

3
What Must be Valued?
  • Pension and Retirement benefits - 50-20.1
  • Business interests operating as
  • C Corp
  • S Corp
  • General Partnership
  • Limited Partnership
  • Limited Liability Partnership
  • Sole Proprietorship
  • Other real and personal property

4
Who are Valuators?
  • Valuation Experts
  • Credentialed experts (ASA, ABV, CVA, CFA, CBA,
    AVA)
  • Educated in valuation theory
  • Adhere to published business valuation standards
    which address financial analysis, industry
    analysis, economic analysis, report writing in
    addition to business valuation theory.
  • Undergo examination, education and peer review of
    valuation reports to obtain designation.
  • Accountants
  • Core competencies of financial analysis and
    understanding of business operations
  • May or may not understand business valuation
    theory

5
Who are Valuators?
  • Valuation Experts
  • Economists
  • Core competency of understanding of economic
    theory
  • May or may not understand business valuation
    theory
  • Industry Experts
  • Core competency of understanding their industry
  • Usually have no knowledge of business valuation
    theory
  • Investment Bankers/Business Brokers
  • Core competency of understanding the structure of
    a business transaction
  • May or may not understand business valuation
    theory

6
Evaluating an Expert
  • Education - in general and in business valuation
  • Qualifications (designations) and experience
  • Knowledge of business valuation theory
  • Should not be an advocate for the client only an
    advocate of his opinion

7
Evaluating an Experts Report
  • A well prepared valuation report will present the
    experts knowledge of
  • Industry
  • National and Local Economies
  • Subject Company
  • Standard of Value
  • Cost, Income and Market Approaches
  • Discounts and Premiums

8
Evaluating an Experts Report
  • Subjective Areas of Valuation Reports
  • Adjustments to the Balance Sheet and/or Income
    Statement
  • Selection of Estimated Future Income Stream
  • Calculation of Discount or Capitalization Rate
  • Risk factors
  • Growth rate
  • Selection of Valuation Methodology
  • Selection of Guideline Companies or Transactions
    in the Market Approach
  • Application of Discounts and Premiums

9
Definition of Value
  • Fair Market Value
  • Revenue Ruling 59-60 - . . the price at which
    the property would change hands between a willing
    buyer and a willing seller when the former is not
    under any compulsion to buy and the latter is not
    under any compulsion to sell, both parties having
    reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts.
  • Is not equivalent to purchase price, replacement
    value, book value or the amount received in a
    sale of similar property.

10
Definition of Value
  • Fair Market Value
  • International Glossary of Business Valuation
    Terms Fair Market Value -the price, expressed
    in terms of cash equivalents, at which property
    would change hands between a hypothetical willing
    and able buyer and a hypothetical willing and
    able seller, acting at arms length in an open and
    unrestricted market, where neither is under
    compulsion to buy or sell and when both have
    reasonable knowledge of the facts.
  • Business valuation organizations that adopted the
    International Glossary of Business Valuation
    Terms include the American Institute of Certified
    Public Accountants, American Society of
    Appraisers, National Association of Certified
    Valuation Analysts, Canadian Institute of
    Chartered Business Valuators, and the Institute
    of Business Appraisers.

11
Valuation of Closely Held Business Interests
  • Definition
  • Shares are owned by a relatively limited number
    of stockholders, often held by one family.
  • Shares not actively traded (usually)

12
Valuation of Closely Held Business Interests
  • Valuation factors to consider (Rev Rul 59-60)
  • Nature of the business and the history of the
    enterprise from its inception.
  • Economic outlook in general and the condition and
    outlook of the specific industry in particular.
  • Book value of the stock and the financial
    condition of the business.
  • Earning capacity of the company.
  • Dividend-paying capacity.

13
Valuation of Closely Held Business Interests
  • Valuation factors to consider (continued)
  • Whether or not the enterprise has goodwill or
    other intangible value.
  • Sales of the stock and the size of the block of
    stock to be valued.
  • Market price of stocks of corporations engaged in
    the same or a similar line of business having
    their stocks actively traded in a free and open
    market, either on an exchange or over-the-counter

14
Valuation Approaches
  • 3 Approaches
  • Asset
  • Income
  • Market
  • All approaches must be considered, but various
    factors will influence which approach will be
    relied upon to value company.

15
Valuation Approaches
  • Asset Approach
  • Estimate the value of a business by valuing the
    tangible and intangible assets of the enterprise
  • Adjusted Net Assets Method
  • Excess Earnings Method

16
Valuation Approaches
  • Income Approach
  • Estimate the value of a business based on its
    future earnings stream
  • Discounting Projecting all expected future
    economic benefits and discounting each benefit
    back to a present value at a discount rate that
    represents the return on investment for that
    investment time.
  • Capitalization Dividing a single historical or
    projected economic benefit by a capitalization
    rate that represents the discount rate less the
    expected long-term growth rate.

17
Valuation Approaches
  • Market Approach
  • Estimate the value of a business by direct
    comparison to comparable guideline companies and
    similar investment that have been sold.
  • Guideline publicly traded company Relating
    market value multiples for public company stocks
    to the subject company.
  • Guideline merger and acquisition Relating value
    multiples from sales of entire companies to the
    subject company.
  • Prior transactions, offers and buy-sell agreements

18
Asset Approach
  • Adjusted Net Assets Method
  • Valuation analyst restates all of the assets and
    liabilities of the subject company from their
    historical cost basis to fair market value.
  • The fair market value of the assets minus the
    fair market value of the liabilities equals the
    fair market value of the business owners equity.
  • Value indication is typically that of 100 percent
    of the equity, on a marketable, controlling
    ownership interest basis.

19
Asset Approach
  • Adjusted Net Assets Method-Advantages
  • Easy to understand
  • Especially relevant in tangible asset intensive
    business if valuing controlling ownership
  • Liquidation value may exceed going-concern value

20
Asset Approach
  • Adjusted Net Assets Method-Disadvantages
  • Expensive and difficult to get reliable
    market-derived data for valuation of many assets
    and liabilities
  • Valuation of intangibles and contingent items may
    be considered speculative
  • Of questionable relevance in many going-concern
    premise valuations, especially minority interests

21
Asset Approach
  • Excess Earnings Method
  • Method is embodied in Revenue Ruling 68-609
  • A derivation of this method is often used to
    value professional practices
  • A normalized level of economic earnings is
    estimated by adjusting the professionals
    salary to comparable market salaries
  • Value indication derived from this method is on a
    marketable, controlling ownership interest basis

22
Asset Approach
  • Excess Earnings Method-Advantages
  • Seemingly simplistic
  • Widely used in family law courts, especially for
    professional practices and small service
    businesses

23
Asset Approach
  • Excess Earnings Method-Disadvantages
  • Wide disagreement on implementation
  • No empirical basis available for developing or
    supporting capitalization rate applicable to
    excess earnings
  • Does not provide mechanics for incorporating
    expected growth
  • Not widely used by financial community
  • IRS position (per RR68-609) is use only if no
    better method is available

24
Income Approach
  • Income Statement Analysis and Normalization
  • Purpose is to better understand and interpret the
    earning power of the subject company
  • Adjustments generally fall into three categories
  • Differences in accounting practices
  • Nonrecurring events, discontinued operations, or
    other aspects of past operations that may not
    represent future earning power
  • Discretionary items (management perquisites,
    bonuses, etc.) Only done for valuations of
    controlling ownership interests

25
Income Approach
  • Project future economic income
  • Free Cash flow Earnings before interest and
    taxes (EBIT) Depreciation - Capital
    Expenditures - Change in Working Capital
    Deferred Taxes
  • Accounting earnings net income, net operating
    income, earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)
  • Payouts dividends, partnership withdrawals, S
    Corp distributions

26
Income Approach
  • Selection of projected earnings stream
  • If debt is included in what is being valued, the
    income stream to be used is Earnings Before
    Interest and Taxes (EBIT) or Net Cash Flow to
    Overall Invested Capital, which ignore capital
    structure and tax position
  • A weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
    discount rate is used
  • Resulting value is referred to as Market Value
    of Invested Capital

27
Income Approach
  • Selection of projected earnings stream (cont)
  • If debt is not included in what is being valued,
    the income stream to be used is Net Income or Net
    Cash Flow to Equity
  • A cost of equity discount rate is used
  • Resulting value is referred to as Market Value
    of Equity.

28
Income Approach
  • Discount and Capitalization Rates
  • The expected rate of return that would be
    required to attract an investor to invest in the
    subject company
  • Instead of investing in available alternative
    investments that are comparable in terms of risk
    and other investment characteristics
  • The discount or capitalization rate is the cost
    of capital for that particular investment.

29
Income Approach
  • Discount Rate
  • Must be appropriate for the definition of
    economic income in the numerator
  • Components
  • Risk free rate (U.S. Treasury obligations)
  • Premium for risk (additional rate of return
    expected for investing in non-Treasury securities)

30
Income Approach
  • Capitalization Rate
  • Must be appropriate for the definition of
    economic income in the numerator
  • Components
  • Risk free rate (U.S. Treasury obligations)
  • Premium for risk (additional rate of return
    expected for investing in non-Treasury
    securities)
  • - Projected sustainable average annual rate of
    growth

31
Discount and Capitalization Rate Example
32
Income Approach
  • Discount and Capitalization Rate
  • Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
  • Blended costs of the companys capital structure
    components, each weighted by the market value of
    that component
  • If debt is being included in what is being
    valued, a WACC will be applied to an earnings
    stream which ignores capital structure (interest
    expense)

33
WACC - Example
34
Income Approach
  • Discount and Capitalization Rate
  • Risk Premium
  • Equities are riskier than debt and warrant a
    higher expected return
  • Most estimates of equity risk premium rely on
    historical market performance as an indicator of
    future
  • Historically, small company stock have had higher
    returns and more risk than large company stocks
  • Subject company may be riskier than the small
    companies analyzed in the empirical data

35
Income Approach
  • Discount and Capitalization Rate
  • Sources for Risk Premium data
  • Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation, published
    annually by Ibbotson Associates
  • Standard Poors Corporate Value Consulting Risk
    Premium Report, published annually by Standard
    Poors
  • Valuation analyst comparison of performance of
    subject company to publicly traded guideline
    companies and private company completed
    transactions

36
Income Approach
  • Taxes and the Risk Premium
  • Stock Market returns used in calculating the risk
    premium are after corporate taxes
  • These are the returns realized by an investor.
  • These returns are pre-investor taxes, after
    business taxes
  • When applying discount rates calculated with this
    data, cash flows should be calculated on the same
    basis.

37
Income Approach
  • Discounted Economic Income Method
  • Most appropriate for projected income streams
    with
  • Predictable, but uneven changes
  • Short- or intermediate-term supergrowth
  • Changes that are erratic and unpredictable as to
    timing
  • Also referred to as Discounted Cash Flow Method
    (DCF)

38
Income Approach
  • Discounted Economic Income Method (cont)
  • If control-type normalization adjustments are
    made to economic benefit stream, resulting value
    is on a controlling, marketable basis
  • Discount for lack of marketability applicable for
    minority interest valuation, possibly for control
    basis valuation (but would be considerably
    smaller, if applicable)
  • Little or no difference in discount rate for
    control v. minority valuation (an assumed capital
    structure in a control valuation could change
    WACC)

39
Income Approach
  • Discounted Economic Income Method-Advantages
  • Theoretically most correct, captures present
    value of all future realizable cash
  • Widely used in the financial markets for pricing
    and decision making.

40
Income Approach
  • Discounted Economic Income Method-Disadvantages
  • Requires projections of future economic benefits
    may be controversial
  • Requires estimate of appropriate discount rate
    (cost of capital) also subject to controversy
  • May be difficult to explain to an audience
    without sufficient financial background
    (certainly not this group!)

41
Discounted Cash Flows Example
42
Present Value Theory
  • Another example of use of Present Value theory
  • Pension valuations
  • Value of benefit or payout is known
  • What is the value of that benefit today?
  • Example

43
Present Value Theory
  • Present Value Definition
  • Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the Proposed
    Rule on Employee Benefit Plans 6 C.F.R. Part 31,
    3121(v) (1986)
  • Present value of a pension benefit in a defined
    pension plan means the value as of a specified
    date of an amount or series of amounts due
    thereafter, where each amount is multiplied by
    the probability that the conditions on which
    payment of the amount is contingent will be
    satisfied, and is discounted according to an
    assumed rate of interest to reflect the time
    value of money. The present value must be
    determined as of the date the value is required
    to be taken into account using actuarial
    assumptions and methods that are reasonable as of
    that date.

44
Income Approach
  • Capitalization Method
  • Most appropriate for projected income streams
    that are
  • Stable or evenly growing
  • Erratic and unpredictable as to timing (if the
    companys income is unstable and random as to
    timing, the Discounted Earnings Method may not be
    able to produce any more accurate a value
    indication than the capitalization method)

45
Income Approach
  • Capitalization Method (cont)
  • If control-type normalization adjustments are
    made to economic benefit stream, resulting value
    is on a controlling, marketable basis
  • Discount for lack of marketability applicable for
    minority interest valuation, possibly for control
    basis valuation (but would be considerably
    smaller, if applicable)
  • Little or no difference in discount or
    capitalization rate for control v. minority
    valuation (an assumed capital structure in
    control valuation could change WACC)

46
Income Approach
  • Capitalization Method-Advantages
  • Widely used by investors (although not as much as
    Discounted Future Earnings)
  • Does not require specific-period, long-term
    forecasts
  • Simple to understand and explain

47
Income Approach
  • Capitalization Method-Disadvantages
  • Oversimplification of discounting method
  • Implicitly assumes that a variable capitalized
    represents a reasonable base from which future
    benefits will proceed
  • The measure of economic income to be capitalized
    and the capitalization rate may be controversial
  • Difficult to use in start-up or high-growth
    companies

48
Capitalization of Earnings Example
49
Market Approach
  • Guideline Companies (publicly traded)
  • Market Transactions (private companies)
  • Prior transactions, offers and buy-sell
    agreements
  • Rules of Thumb

50
Market Approach
  • Guideline Companies (publicly traded)
  • EDGAR
  • Hoovers online
  • If controlling interest being valued, there may
    be some control premium warranted
  • Discount for lack of marketability applicable if
    minority valuation, possibly if control valuation

51
Market Approach
  • Guideline Companies-Advantages
  • There are many guideline publicly traded
    companies available for different industries
  • Market is regarded as final arbiter of value
  • Prices of guideline publicly traded companies
    available as of any effective valuation date
  • Excellent quantity and quality of data for each
    company from SEC filings
  • Most investors and judges familiar with method

52
Market Approach
  • Guideline Companies-Advantages (cont)
  • Inexpensive to acquire data with readily
    available databases and software (although proper
    data analysis is time consuming)
  • Extensive empirical data available to support
    quantification of a discount for lack of
    marketability if valuing minority interest
  • Especially relevant if subject company could go
    public

53
Market Approach
  • Guideline Companies-Disadvantages
  • Public companies not available in all industries
  • Difficult to find adequately similar companies
  • Most public companies are much larger than
    private companies being valued
  • Many public companies have higher growth
    potential, which may require a difficult
    adjustment in the comparison

54
Market Approach
  • Guideline Companies-Disadvantages(cont)
  • For small companies, factors driving value may be
    different than for public companies
  • If valuing a controlling interest, adjustment for
    control may be difficult and controversial

55
Examples of Pricing Multiples
56
Market Approach
  • Market Transactions (private companies)
  • Pratts Stats
  • Done Deals
  • BIZCOMPS
  • Institute of Business Appraisers (IBA) database
  • Good for control valuations
  • If used for minority valuation, usually would
    have to discount for both minority interest and
    lack of marketability

57
Market Approach
  • Market Transactions-Advantages
  • If valuing controlling interest, no premium for
    control needed
  • Generally understood and accepted by courts
  • If the acquired company was public before
    acquisition, excellent comparative financial data
    usually available

58
Market Approach
  • Market Transactions-Disadvantages
  • Fewer comparative merger and acquisition
    transactions than guideline publicly traded
    companies are available
  • Data not readily accessible on a single database
  • Not all databases included full terms of the deal
  • Transactions are not on the same date as the
    effective valuation date and may require
    adjustments for differences in time

59
Market Approach
  • Market Transactions-Disadvantages(cont)
  • If valuing minority interest, discounts for
    minority ownership and/or lack of marketability
    may be controversial and hard to quantify
  • If the acquired company was private before
    acquisition, financial data are limited and may
    not be possible to verify
  • Often includes synergistic or strategic value
    therefore may not represent fair market value

60
Market Approach
  • Prior transactions, offers, buy-sell agreements
  • Resulting value depends on whether they were
    applicable to control or minority transactions
  • Must consider adjustments for differences in
    time, if applicable

61
Market Approach
  • Prior transactions, offers, buy-sell
    agreements-Advantages
  • If on an arms-length basis, may be the best
    evidence of value
  • Accurate, detailed data often available

62
Market Approach
  • Prior transactions, offers, buy-sell
    agreements-Disadvantages
  • May be difficult to establish arms-length
    character
  • Removed in time from effective valuation date
    may require adjustments for differences in time
  • In case of offers and incomplete contracts, may
    be difficult to establish if it is a bona fide
    offer from a qualified buyer

63
Market Approach
  • Rules of Thumb
  • Universally relate to control value
  • If using for minority value, need to consider
    adjustments for minority and/or lack of
    marketability

64
Market Approach
  • Rules of Thumb-Advantages
  • Should be considered if they are widely
    publicized in a particular industry
  • Usually simple to apply
  • Should be used as a sanity check

65
Market Approach
  • Rules of Thumb-Disadvantages
  • No empirical verification as to extent to which
    market actually tends to follow them
  • Usually do not know details of transactions that
    allegedly underlie the rule
  • For most industries, the various sources of rules
    of thumb usually produce a very wide range of
    values

66
Premiums and Discounts
  • Discount for Lack of Control (minority interest
    discount)
  • An amount or percentage deducted from an equity
    interest to reflect minority position or lack of
    control
  • Can not be observed in the market
  • Must be inferred from control premiums

67
Premiums and Discounts
  • Sources for Discount for Lack of Control
    (minority interest discount)
  • Mergerstat Review
  • Closed end mutual funds (for FLPs owning
    marketable securities
  • Limited partnership secondary markets (for FLPs
    owing real estate)

68
Sample Mergerstat Data
69
Premiums and Discounts
  • Discount for Lack of Marketability
  • An amount or percentage deducted from an equity
    interest to reflect lack of marketability
  • The standard for marketability of minority
    interests is public securities markets - cash in
    three days
  • The discount necessary to generate a sufficient
    increment of return to the holder of a minority
    interest to induce him to make a particular
    investment

70
Premiums and Discounts
  • Sources for Discounts for Lack of Marketability
  • Restricted stock studies
  • IPO studies
  • Bid-ask spreads

71
Restricted Stock Studies
72
The Emory IPO Studies
73
Valuation Issues in Equitable Distribution
  • Valuation of
  • Marital property
  • Separate property
  • Active v. passive
  • Debts (marital and separate)
  • Property composed of both separate and marital
    elements
  • Changes in value of marital assets between date
    of separation and date of distribution

74
Valuation in Equitable Distribution
  • Equitable Distribution
  • North Carolina became an equitable distribution
    state in 1981
  • N.C. GS50-20 states that the court shall
    determine what is the marital property and
    divisible property and shall provide for an
    equitable distribution of the marital property
    and divisible property between the parties. . .

75
Valuation in Equitable Distribution
  • Equitable Distribution
  • In assigning a value to the property, the court
    will
  • Classify all property of the parties as separate,
    marital, or divisible
  • Value the separate property and assign to
    appropriate party
  • Value each item of marital property
  • Consider active and passive components of value
    in marital, separate and divisible property

76
Valuation in Equitable Distribution
  • Equitable Distribution (cont)
  • Classify the debts of the parties as separate or
    marital and value them
  • Apportion or distribute the marital debts in an
    equitable manner
  • Distribute the marital and divisible property
    equitably

77
Valuation in Equitable Distribution
  • Marital Property - GS50-20(b)(1)
  • All real and personal property acquired by either
    spouse or both spouses during the course of the
    marriage and before the date of the separation of
    the parties
  • It is presumed that all property acquired after
    the date of marriage and before the date of
    separation is marital property except property
    which is separate property under subdivision 2 of
    GS50-20.

78
Valuation in Equitable Distribution
  • Separate Property - GS50-20(b)(2)
  • All real and personal property acquired by a
    spouse before marriage or acquired by a spouse by
    bequest, devise, descent, or gift during the
    course of the marriage
  • The increase in value of separate property and
    the income derived from separate property shall
    be considered separate property.

79
Valuation in Equitable Distribution
  • Divisible Property - GS50-20(b)(4)
  • All real and personal property as set forth
    below
  • all appreciation and diminution in value of
    marital property and divisible property of the
    parties occurring after the date of separation
    and prior to the date of distribution, except
    that appreciation or diminution in value which is
    the result of postseparation actions or
    activities of a spouse
  • passive income from marital property received
    after the date of separation

80
Valuation in Equitable Distribution
  • Divisible Property - GS50-20(b)(4)
  • all property, property rights, or any portion
    thereof received after the date of separation but
    before the date of distribution that was acquired
    as a result of the efforts of either spouse
    during the marriage and before the date of
    separation
  • increases in marital debt and financing charges
    and interest related to marital debt

81
Active v. Passive Issues
  • An increase in value of separate property remains
    separate property
  • Increases in value of separate property resulting
    from contributions of time or money of one or
    both spouses is active appreciation

82
Active Appreciation
  • Arises from financial or managerial
    contributions of one of the spouses to separate
    property during marriage.
  • Increases in value are marital property
  • Allows the marital estate a fair return on its
    investment of time and money

83
Passive Appreciation
  • Enhancement of the value of separate property
    due solely to inflation,changing economic
    conditions, or such other circumstances beyond
    the control of either spouse
  • Burden of proof falls upon the party claiming the
    appreciation was passive

84
Active or Passive?
  • Determining Factors
  • Nature of the Property
  • Impact of Market Conditions
  • Spouses expertise in managing the asset
  • Degree of management control over asset
  • Appreciation resulting from third party efforts
  • Influence of governments

85
Active or Passive?
  • Appreciation of Closely Held Corporations
  • Often centers around the degree of management
    control a spouse exercises over the asset (Smith
    v. Smith)
  • Not always clear cut (Lawing v. Lawing)

86
Active or Passive?
  • How to determine?
  • Court must determine value of the business at the
    time of marriage, at separation, and near date of
    trial or distribution.
  • Court must then determine what portion of the
    increase is attributable to the efforts of the
    parties during marriage. This increase is marital
    property and subject to division.
  • Remainder is separate property.

87
Active or Passive?
  • How to determine?
  • Court must also determine the appreciation or
    diminution in value between the date of
    separation and trial or distribution date.
  • If this appreciation or diminution is passive, it
    is divisible property.
  • If this appreciation or diminution is active, it
    is separate property.
  • Example problem in handout

88
Valuation Methodologies and Evaluating Valuation
Experts
  • Presented to the
  • North Carolina Association of District Court
    Judges
  • by
  • T. Randolph Whitt, CPA, ABV
  • Kelly A. Schmid, CPA, CVA, ABV
  • Crisp Hughes Evans, LLP
  • April 10, 2003
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)