Whole Life Cost Saving - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Whole Life Cost Saving

Description:

System Integration (Commission, Alignment, Calibration) through Tele-Engineering ... In order of importance :-hydraulic, chilled water, seawater, any pipe or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: MDC4
Category:
Tags: cost | life | saving | whole

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Whole Life Cost Saving


1
Whole Life Cost Saving
  • Cut costs not ships

2
Presentation outline-
  • The problem
  • The background
  • Recommended themes
  • Opportunity
  • What to do next
  • Questions

3
Where does all the money go ?
4
Where can we look for savings-
Inspection Setting to work Trials
Ship build Equipments Components
Crew
Repairs Handling Support
Techniques Maintenance
5
Where should we not go-
  • Dont redesign whole ships or ship numbers.
  • Remember Naval manpower is a structure.
  • This is about technology, not procurement
    policy.
  • Risk money
  • The Treasury still rules ! (as do its rules).
    Spend to save, will be difficult.
  • Warships weapons are safety critical items
    software.
  • Remember the original share of WLC.

6
We have been looking !
Maritime Coherency Studies
Platform Characteristics
most maintenance spares
costs are effected by original
procurement decisions
Cost Effective
Combat System
Combat system
Modularisation
Procurement Options
Stern Flaps
Drudgery
countermeasures
Energy
General Optimised
Combat System
Management
Naval
Crewing studies
Infrastructure
Modularisation
studies
Base
Spares
Fuel
Dockyard
Technologies for
Podded
Operational
maintenance
Minimal NBCD crews
Drives
manpower
Damage control
for HV systems
Upkeep
Power system
earthing
Platform UPC
Combat
Aluminium for
shielding
System UPC
warship construction
Energy
Management
Underwater
studies
engineering
FSC Propulsion
Aux concepts
Collective
Cost Effective
Protection
Podded
Combat System
Combat system
Studies
Drives
Modularisation
Procurement Options
General Optimised
Crewing studies
7
Suggested themes-
  • We have done a re-examination of the best
    potential areas for savings
  • Based on both industry and MoD inputs
  • Extracted 6 areas from top 10, to make those most
    suited to CDE funded study
  • Reduce facility dependence, particularly docks
    and dockyards
  • Develop the ability to replace equipments by
    Plug and play
  • Reduce through life cost of fluid systems (in
    order -hydraulic, chilled water, seawater, any
    pipe or fluid system )
  • Better metal preservation (paint, stainless
    steel, composites, coatings ??)
  • Improved Configuration Control/Inventory
    Management via electronic remote sensing to
    improve maintenance preparation, in-service
    support and general spares / support costs
    through lack of equipment state knowledge
  • System Integration (Commission, Alignment,
    Calibration) through Tele-Engineering

8
Reduce facility dependence, particularly docks
and dockyards
  • This would examine how vessels could be designed
    to reduce their tradition dependence on fixed
    facilities.
  • In particular this would aim to facilitate
    support and maintenance in-theatre or in
    commercial facilities.
  • The specific area to minimise is dedicated docks,
    dockyards and the cost of sustaining the
    availability of these facilities and staff.
  • The work would develop and demonstrate technology
    solutions.

9
Develop the ability to replace equipments by
Plug and play,
  • The problems in the IT environment of short
    equipment lives and early obsolescence are well
    recognised. With the increasing speed of
    technology development in general marine systems
    and the increasing integration of computer
    control into all systems, this problem is
    spreading.
  • It is considered in an increasing COTS
    environment impossible to resist, and best to
    anticipate this.
  • This work would look at the differing expected
    lives of the various components of a ship. Armed
    with this the study would address would to make
    those needing update most easily quickly
    replaced.
  • This would address mounting, access, interfacing,
    services and function.
  • Design and technology options to ease these
    changes would be demonstrated.

10
Reduce through life cost of fluid systems
  • Fluid systems have been identified as bringing
    particularly high through life maintenance
    problems, particularly in their pipework and
    hoses.
  • This would identify and develop alternatives to
    fluid systems for cooling and energy
    distribution.
  • In order of importance -hydraulic, chilled
    water, seawater, any pipe or fluid system )
  • Where this was not possible the maintenance and
    replacement problems of fluid systems should be
    addressed to minimise their impact.
  • Such systems would be built and in demonstrations
    to show the feasibility of these alternative
    solutions

11
Better metal preservation (paint, stainless
steel, composites, coatings ??)
  • The aim is to reduce refit and maintenance
    periods length, scaffolding, access coating
    removal, inspection, cleaning back and
    replacement
  • There is a very high time and costs associated
    with inspecting, repairing, replacing or
    recoating ships and submarine hulls and both
    interior exterior structures
  • This has been identified as a significant driver
    in the length, complexity and cost of maintenance
    or refit periods.
  • What is sought is coating or materials that can
    eliminate the then to address the coating or base
    material at all during as much of a platforms
    life as possible.
  • The demonstration would need to show the
    compatibility of the materials with not only the
    marine environment but also all associated
    military requirements of fire, signature,
    explosion etc.

12
Improved Configuration Control / Inventory
Management via electronic remote sensing
  • Commercial vessel refit and maintenance is
    considered to be far quicker and efficient than
    military vessels due to a better knowledge of
    what is required in advance.
  • Much of this is due to the simplicity of these
    vessels and reduced equipment density. To
    compensate it is proposed that remote or
    automated equipment state monitoring for all
    items in every compartment of a warship would
    dramatically improve the position.
  • It is suggested this could be achieved by
    monitors optically, RF or via power supply
    interface.
  • Such a system would identify the contents of a
    compartment, condition of equipments and
    necessary maintenance.
  • The demonstration would address in a
    representative environment, the communication
    medium, software and embedded intelligence in
    components.

13
System Integration through Tele-Engineering
(Commission, Alignment, Calibration)
  • In complex weapon and IT systems such as warships
    the integration, setting to work, commissioning,
    alignment, calibration can take almost as long as
    the basic hull build period.
  • Similar time is also required after maintenance
    periods, the aim is to reduce both.
  • The technology and techniques sort are intended
    to demonstrate the ability to do this work remote
    from the vessel, either prior to equipment
    installation, or by for efficient stimulation and
    manipulation from remote specialist facilities.

14
What do we want-
  • Proposals for studies that will demonstrate a
    technology, which has the potential to save whole
    life costs
  • Budget available 400k
  • Projects to be funded 4 to 10
  • First proposal assessment will be in the third
    week of September
  • If we have a enough innovative proposals by this
    date we will not run a further assessment
    specific to this call. We will however assess any
    proposals received after this date through the
    normal CDE monthly cycle

15
What to do next
  • All proposal must be sent to the Centre for
    Defence Enterprise via the Portal
  • Please read the guidance on the Submitting a
    proposal section on the Centre for Defence
    Enterprise Website.
  • Important!
  • When submitting a a proposal please prefix your
    proposal title AND proposal description with
    Maritime Theme X
  • Where X is the theme number that your proposal
    relates to
  • See the example below for a proposal for Maritime
    theme 2, Developing the ability to replace
    equipments by Plug and play

16
Questions
  • For further guidance please visit the Centre for
    Defence Enterprise Website
  • Or contact the Centre for Defence Enterprise
  • Telephone 01235 438 445
  • Address Centre for Defence Enterprise, Start
    Electron, Fermi Avenue, Harwell Science
    and Innovation Campus, Harwell, Oxfordshire,
    OX11 0QR
  • Email science-enterprise_at_mod.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com