Title: Whole Life Cost Saving
1Whole Life Cost Saving
2Presentation outline-
- The problem
- The background
- Recommended themes
- Opportunity
- What to do next
- Questions
3Where does all the money go ?
4Where can we look for savings-
Inspection Setting to work Trials
Ship build Equipments Components
Crew
Repairs Handling Support
Techniques Maintenance
5Where should we not go-
- Dont redesign whole ships or ship numbers.
- Remember Naval manpower is a structure.
- This is about technology, not procurement
policy. - Risk money
- The Treasury still rules ! (as do its rules).
Spend to save, will be difficult. - Warships weapons are safety critical items
software. - Remember the original share of WLC.
6We have been looking !
Maritime Coherency Studies
Platform Characteristics
most maintenance spares
costs are effected by original
procurement decisions
Cost Effective
Combat System
Combat system
Modularisation
Procurement Options
Stern Flaps
Drudgery
countermeasures
Energy
General Optimised
Combat System
Management
Naval
Crewing studies
Infrastructure
Modularisation
studies
Base
Spares
Fuel
Dockyard
Technologies for
Podded
Operational
maintenance
Minimal NBCD crews
Drives
manpower
Damage control
for HV systems
Upkeep
Power system
earthing
Platform UPC
Combat
Aluminium for
shielding
System UPC
warship construction
Energy
Management
Underwater
studies
engineering
FSC Propulsion
Aux concepts
Collective
Cost Effective
Protection
Podded
Combat System
Combat system
Studies
Drives
Modularisation
Procurement Options
General Optimised
Crewing studies
7Suggested themes-
- We have done a re-examination of the best
potential areas for savings - Based on both industry and MoD inputs
- Extracted 6 areas from top 10, to make those most
suited to CDE funded study - Reduce facility dependence, particularly docks
and dockyards - Develop the ability to replace equipments by
Plug and play - Reduce through life cost of fluid systems (in
order -hydraulic, chilled water, seawater, any
pipe or fluid system ) - Better metal preservation (paint, stainless
steel, composites, coatings ??) - Improved Configuration Control/Inventory
Management via electronic remote sensing to
improve maintenance preparation, in-service
support and general spares / support costs
through lack of equipment state knowledge - System Integration (Commission, Alignment,
Calibration) through Tele-Engineering
8Reduce facility dependence, particularly docks
and dockyards
- This would examine how vessels could be designed
to reduce their tradition dependence on fixed
facilities. - In particular this would aim to facilitate
support and maintenance in-theatre or in
commercial facilities. - The specific area to minimise is dedicated docks,
dockyards and the cost of sustaining the
availability of these facilities and staff. - The work would develop and demonstrate technology
solutions.
9Develop the ability to replace equipments by
Plug and play,
- The problems in the IT environment of short
equipment lives and early obsolescence are well
recognised. With the increasing speed of
technology development in general marine systems
and the increasing integration of computer
control into all systems, this problem is
spreading. - It is considered in an increasing COTS
environment impossible to resist, and best to
anticipate this. - This work would look at the differing expected
lives of the various components of a ship. Armed
with this the study would address would to make
those needing update most easily quickly
replaced. - This would address mounting, access, interfacing,
services and function. - Design and technology options to ease these
changes would be demonstrated.
10Reduce through life cost of fluid systems
- Fluid systems have been identified as bringing
particularly high through life maintenance
problems, particularly in their pipework and
hoses. - This would identify and develop alternatives to
fluid systems for cooling and energy
distribution. - In order of importance -hydraulic, chilled
water, seawater, any pipe or fluid system ) - Where this was not possible the maintenance and
replacement problems of fluid systems should be
addressed to minimise their impact. - Such systems would be built and in demonstrations
to show the feasibility of these alternative
solutions
11Better metal preservation (paint, stainless
steel, composites, coatings ??)
- The aim is to reduce refit and maintenance
periods length, scaffolding, access coating
removal, inspection, cleaning back and
replacement - There is a very high time and costs associated
with inspecting, repairing, replacing or
recoating ships and submarine hulls and both
interior exterior structures - This has been identified as a significant driver
in the length, complexity and cost of maintenance
or refit periods. - What is sought is coating or materials that can
eliminate the then to address the coating or base
material at all during as much of a platforms
life as possible. - The demonstration would need to show the
compatibility of the materials with not only the
marine environment but also all associated
military requirements of fire, signature,
explosion etc.
12Improved Configuration Control / Inventory
Management via electronic remote sensing
- Commercial vessel refit and maintenance is
considered to be far quicker and efficient than
military vessels due to a better knowledge of
what is required in advance. - Much of this is due to the simplicity of these
vessels and reduced equipment density. To
compensate it is proposed that remote or
automated equipment state monitoring for all
items in every compartment of a warship would
dramatically improve the position. - It is suggested this could be achieved by
monitors optically, RF or via power supply
interface. - Such a system would identify the contents of a
compartment, condition of equipments and
necessary maintenance. - The demonstration would address in a
representative environment, the communication
medium, software and embedded intelligence in
components.
13System Integration through Tele-Engineering
(Commission, Alignment, Calibration)
- In complex weapon and IT systems such as warships
the integration, setting to work, commissioning,
alignment, calibration can take almost as long as
the basic hull build period. - Similar time is also required after maintenance
periods, the aim is to reduce both. - The technology and techniques sort are intended
to demonstrate the ability to do this work remote
from the vessel, either prior to equipment
installation, or by for efficient stimulation and
manipulation from remote specialist facilities.
14What do we want-
- Proposals for studies that will demonstrate a
technology, which has the potential to save whole
life costs - Budget available 400k
- Projects to be funded 4 to 10
- First proposal assessment will be in the third
week of September - If we have a enough innovative proposals by this
date we will not run a further assessment
specific to this call. We will however assess any
proposals received after this date through the
normal CDE monthly cycle
15What to do next
- All proposal must be sent to the Centre for
Defence Enterprise via the Portal - Please read the guidance on the Submitting a
proposal section on the Centre for Defence
Enterprise Website. - Important!
- When submitting a a proposal please prefix your
proposal title AND proposal description with
Maritime Theme X - Where X is the theme number that your proposal
relates to - See the example below for a proposal for Maritime
theme 2, Developing the ability to replace
equipments by Plug and play
16Questions
- For further guidance please visit the Centre for
Defence Enterprise Website - Or contact the Centre for Defence Enterprise
- Telephone 01235 438 445
- Address Centre for Defence Enterprise, Start
Electron, Fermi Avenue, Harwell Science
and Innovation Campus, Harwell, Oxfordshire,
OX11 0QR - Email science-enterprise_at_mod.uk