Kentucky Lock Gateway to the Ohio - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Kentucky Lock Gateway to the Ohio

Description:

... verifies and refines all of the hydraulic features and many of the basic ... Engineers analyzed the possibility of relocating Hwy 62 to a new bridge downstream. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: kathleen113
Category:
Tags: gateway | kentucky | lock | ohio

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kentucky Lock Gateway to the Ohio


1
Kentucky LockGateway to the Ohio
Use the left and right arrow keys to advance the
slide. Use your browsers BACK button to end
presentation.
2
Welcome to Kentucky Lock, the Gateway to the
Ohio on the Tennessee River.
  • Kentucky Lock is maintained and operated by the
    Nashville District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
  • This presentation has five parts
  • 1) Update on traffic levels
  • 2) Description of the new lock and the history of
    its development
  • 3) Nashville Districts accomplishments in Fiscal
    Year 1998
  • 4) Plans for Fiscal Year 1999
  • 5) Schedule for lock construction and impact on
    shipping.

3
Kentucky/Barkley Navigation System
4
This map shows the Kentucky and Barkley locks to
emphasize how much these two locks work as a
system.
  • Their waterways are connected both upstream and
    downstream of the Dams. While the lower
    Cumberland River presents navigational problems,
    the actual and anticipated traffic at Barkley
    Lock is a factor in any analysis for the new lock
    at Kentucky.

5
Proposed 1200 Lock Addition
Proposed Lock Operations Building
Existing 600 Lock
Proposed Island Access Ramp
Pedestrian/Bike Bridge
Kentucky Lake
Proposed Transmission Towers
RelocatedTransmissionTowers
Tennessee River
Proposed 2-Lane US 62/641
Proposed PL R.R.
6
New Lock Placement
7
  • The new locks upstream miter gates will be about
    100 feet downstream of the existing locks
    upstream miter gates, so much of the new lock
    will extend downstream of the existing lock.

8
Relocations
There are three major relocations that are a
significant part of the total project cost. The
first two are Highway 62 and the PL Railroad
which currently cross the lock and dam. The
current plan is to relocate them to a new bridge
downstream of the dam. This is a change from the
1992 Feasibility Report which proposed closing
Hwy 62 for a period of at least 4.5 years during
lock construction, then reopening it on its
existing alignment.
9
New Lock Placement
The third major relocation involves the seven
large TVA transmission towers just downstream
from the lock. In 1992, planners proposed
relocating all seven towers, but because of
design changes, the revised plan is to relocate
just the four upstream towers.
10
KY-BAR Lock System Traffic Comparison

Actual cargo levels of 43.5 million tons (in
1997) were not expected to occur until the year
2000. This is causing a bottleneck at the
existing lock. Also, the 1995 forecast did not
include about 6.5 million tons of product
associated with new steel mills in the Decatur,
Alabama, area.
This shows forecasted traffic levels for Kentucky
Lock (as developed in 1995) versus actual traffic
levels through the end of 1997. The left axis is
in millions of tons.
11
KY-BAR Lock System Traffic Comparison
Impact of bottleneck on shipping over the past
eight years
Delay times have steadily increased from a little
over three hours in 1991 to more than 6.5 hours
in 1997
12
KY Lock Economics
  • Cost - 533 M
  • Benefit/Cost ratio of 25
  • Forecast Traffic levels are probably going to
    increase and costs may decrease so BC will
    probably increase

13
KY Lock Economics
  • Since the 1992 Feasibility Study was approved,
    the Corps of Engineers has been working on the
    design of the project within the limits of
    funding provided by Congress
  • About 9 million was spent on this project prior
    to the beginning of Fiscal Year 1998
  • Design efforts in recent years have been focused
    on areas where costs could be reduced with
    minimum negative impact
  • In 1995, a Tier II Report identified 98 million
    dollars in savings from the 1992 Feasibility
    Studys estimated project cost of 598 million
  • Since 1995, engineers have refined the design in
    four major areas that will result in significant
    cost savings
  • These include the selection of a through-sill
    intake system and an interlaced lateral discharge
    system, the use of roller compacted concrete in
    the lock walls, and constructing the downstream
    guidewall "in the wet" versus constructing a
    cofferdam around it as proposed in the 1992
    Feasibility Study.

14
Lock Model
Engineers have used this model in the selection
and design of the intake, chamber, and discharge
systems. It will also be used to determine some
of the guidewall and guardwall features and the
upstream excavation plan. The total cost to
construct and run the lock model tests will be
about 1.2 million
Nashville planners know that the model has
allowed them to save more than 20 Million
dollars in consruction costs over some earlier
designs.
This photo was taken from the downstream side.
The length of the lock models chamber is about
50 feet. The existing locks chamber is not
included in the model but its upstream and
downstream approaches are included. What you see
is the new downstream guardwall and the
interlaced laterals.
  • 125 scale lock model at the Corps of Engineers
    Waterways Experiment Station in Vicksburg,
    Mississippi.
  • This model verifies and refines all of the
    hydraulic features and many of the basic geometry
    features of the new lock.

15
Lock Model Coordination
  • The lock model has proven a valuable tool for
    engineers as well as a vehicle to involve the
    navigation industry in the design process.
  • In July 1997, representatives from the
    navigation industry were invited to WES to view
    the model and provide input to the design.
  • Important design changes include selecting the
    interlaced lateral discharge system over a more
    expensive land-side channel system allowing
    tows to moor to the downstream guidewall during a
    lock discharge under most conditions - similar to
    how the existing lock operates.
  • Other changes that came out of that meeting were
    to the upstream and downstream guardwalls a
    floating pontoon section for the upstream
    guardwall is being planned. A decision was also
    made to shorten the upstream guidewall.

16
FY 98 Activities (4M)
  • Construction on Kentucky Lock began in August
    last year with a 4 million dollar appropriation.
  • Nashville District spent about 250 thousand
    dollars to begin the process of relocating the
    large TVA transmission towers.
  • An access road on the powerhouse island was built
    - necessary to construct a large pull-off
    structure.
  • The downstream guardwall agreed upon at WES was
    redesigned and testing of the lock model was
    completed.
  • Design of the upstream, floating guardwall was
    completed and tested in the lock model last fall.

17
FY 98 Activities (4M) cont.
  • Engineers analyzed the possibility of relocating
    Hwy 62 to a new bridge downstream. This analysis
    was prompted by both the Kentucky Highway
    Department and local businesses concerned about
    the proposed 4.5 year closure planned for the
    highway during lock construction.
  • Analysis showed that the construction of the new
    highway bridge would add about 15 million to the
    projects construction while the cost of closing
    the road for 4 ½ years was calculated to be 23
    million dollars. A detailed design for the
    railroad bridge was initiated.
  • Engineers are working on a new project cost
    estimate, to include all of the changes that have
    occurred since the 1995 Tier II report. These
    include the intake system, the discharge system,
    upstream and downstream guidewalls and
    guardwalls, roller compacted concrete in the lock
    walls, and the downstream highway bridge.
    Planners are also continuing to design the lock.
    There is an extensive geo-technical exploration
    program underway - about 80 holes were drilled
    last year.

18
Anticipated FY 98 Activities
  • This year the Nashville District will spend 12.6
    million dollars, 8.5M is included in the
    Congressional budget for FY-99 and the remainder
    will come from funds reprogrammed within the
    Corps' budget
  • One of the Corps top priorities this year is the
    completion of a 1100 scale navigation model at
    WES
  • This model will cover just the area of the
    project from the dam to about two miles
    downstream
  • The main purpose of the model is to assess the
    downbound navigation problems of the new lock and
    develop ways to minimize the problems.
  • Training dikes and right bank excavation plans
    are possible outcomes of the model
  • The model will also help to determine the length
    of the downstream guidewall and the location of
    the first pair of mooring cells.
  • A draft scope of work for the model was sent to
    the Navigation Industry for their input.
  • Engineers at the Nashville District are
    interested in what navigation customers think of
    the draft.

19
Anticipated FY 98 Activities (cont.)
  • Continued construction on relocation of TVA
    transmission towers
  • Continued design of lock, RR and Hwy bridges, and
    cofferdams

20
Future Milestones Based on Fast-track Schedule
  • Schedule based on unconstrained funding. Lower
    funding levels will lengthen completion date
  • 2001 Complete Transmission Towers. Start
    construction of cofferdams, RR and Hwy bridges
  • 2002 Start Lock Construction
  • 2008 Project Construction Complete
  • The milestones shown in this slide are for a
    schedule that assumes an aggressive funding level
    each year. With high funding levels, the new
    lock could be completed by 2008. With less
    aggressive funding levels, the locks completion
    will be pushed out according to the actual
    funding levels received.

21
KY Lock Construction Delay Impacts
  • Cost of Delay to Industry 1.04 Billion if
    delayed from 2008 to 2018
  • Based on Dec. 95 forecast

22
Construction Impacts to Navigation
  • RR and Highway bridges will be clear spans across
    the lock canal
  • Constructed off-site and floated in-place
  • Construction of D/S cofferdam
  • Close Kentucky Lock for a total of about 90 days.
    This non-continuous closure will be closely
    coordinated with shippers

23
Construction Impacts to Navigation
  • A final concern is the impact to tows using the
    existing lock during construction of the new
    lock.
  • Both the Railroad and Highway bridges will be
    clear truss spans across the canal below the
    lock.
  • These trusses should be floated into place,
    possibly during a normal lock outage minimizing
    the interruption of traffic.
  • Should this not be possible during a scheduled
    outage the impact to navigation would be in the
    order of one or two weeks.
  • Construction of the downstream cofferdam may
    present more of a problem.
  • Engineers guess that construction of this
    cofferdam will close the lock to navigation for a
    total of about 180 days. Planners dont expect
    this to be a continuous closure, possibly only
    two weeks at a time, and they will try to
    schedule it so that it minimizes the impact to
    shippers.
  • Efforts are being made to shorten this impact
    period. Engineers plan to investigate two means
    to lessen or eliminate these closures.
  • One method is to incorporate the downstream
    cofferdam into the middle lock wall thus mooring
    it away from the current navigation channel.
  • The second method under consideration is to
    float-in of some of the middle lock wall
    sections, eliminating the need for the section of
    cofferdam affecting existing navigation patterns.

24
The Nashville District appreciates your interest
in Kentucky Lock. Make plans now to attend the
groundbreaking ceremonies for the Kentucky Lock
Addition at 2 p.m. on October 15, 1999.
25
End of PresentationUse your browsers BACK
button to exit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com