Title: Assessing Campus Climate: Results of NGLTF 20002001 Study
1Template design and some language provided
by Rankin Associates, Consulting
2College of Agriculture Life SciencesClimate
AssessmentApril 2002
CALS Diversity Team
3- The project is designed to foster change in the
Land Grant University System. - Eight states worked together to develop and
implement a plan of action to address diversity
in their institutions. - Conduct an internal assessment of the current
climate. - In Arizona, the CALS Diversity Team and the CALS
Millennium Oversight Committee to distribute the
survey.
4Why conduct a climate assessment?
- To establish a baseline climate measurement
- To create a diverse, fair and hospitable
community
5Commitment
- The College of Agriculture Life Sciences (CALS)
is committed to creating an environment that is
characterized by equal access for all students,
faculty and staff regardless of
differences.where individuals are - not just tolerated..but valued.
6Assessment Process
- 1,070 surveys were distributed to all CALS
faculty, staff, administrators - 680 completed surveys were returned for a 64
response rate - 97 individuals offered additional comments
7Survey Respondents byPosition
8 Survey Respondents by Gender
Note Number of transgender respondents too
small to report
9Survey Respondents by Race/Ethnicity
Note Includes multi-racial and multi-ethnic
identities
10Survey Respondents byAge
11Survey Respondents by Sexual Identity
- Heterosexual 593
- Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgendered 25
- Uncertain 11
12Findings
13Good News!
- 21 participated in diversity training in the
past year - 75 believed the workplace climate welcomed
underrepresented groups - 66 believed management demonstrated commitment
to diversity - 75 indicated the campus climate overall was
accepting of groups listed - 88 had rarely heard insensitive or disparaging
remarks about various populations
14More Good News!!
- 50 believed the campus thoroughly addresses
issues related to ethnicity, race, physical
disability, gender, and English as a second
language - 50 agreed age, veteran status, socioeconomic
status, religion, sexual orientation, mental
disability, and gender identity were addressed
thoroughly.
15Even More Good News!!!
- 39 made adjustments in programming strategies as
a result of the increased diversity of clients in
Arizona. - The majority indicated they would feel
comfortable being a close friend of, sharing an
office with, and being supervised by people from
groups listed.
16Challenges
17CHALLENGES
- 132 or 19.4 participants personally experienced
harassment
18 CHALLENGESPersonally experienced harassmentby
position
19 CHALLENGESPersonally experienced
harassmentdue to
20CommentEach comment was made by a different
person and represents similar statements made by
5 or more people
- We with children at home are snubbed somewhat
because work is not our life. We do not put in
60-80 hours/week and therefore are not rewarded.
I work to support my family. They are much more
important than a paycheck. - - a male agent -
21Comment
I have seen workers (mostly female)
penalized/reprimanded for taking off time to deal
with sick children. There is no real
availability of flex scheduling in our immediate
unit. - a female paraprofessional/technician -
22 CHALLENGES Source of harassment
23Comment
- I was referred to as the token woman on our
units faculty by the unit head and other senior
faculty in front of all the other faculty. I
ignored the heads comment but corrected the
senior faculty member who subsequently made the
same remark. I have felt isolated and ignored in
faculty meetings (no one sits next to me my
raised hand is passed over). - - a campus female faculty member -
24CHALLENGES Form of Harassment
25Comment
- It seems to be fashionable among several
administrators and faculty to be anti-political
correctnessthese individuals make a point of
being candid about their generalizations and
stereotypes. One central administrator regularly
makes insensitive remarks and has never really
been seriously challenged on his behavior by his
superiors. This has a rippling effect through
the college. - - a white male administrator -
26 CHALLENGES Harassment occurred
27 CHALLENGES
- 143 or 21 personally observed harassment
28 CHALLENGES Observed harassment by position
29 CHALLENGES Observed harassment by gender
30 CHALLENGES Observed harassment by race
31Comment
- The tone of the conversation among colleagues
made me feel uncomfortable because it seemed to
imply that a person who does not look as though
s/he belongs to a particular ethnic group should
not claim that descent, or if they do they are in
some way dishonest. - - a Latina faculty member -
32CommentConversely
- CALS bends over backwards to hire not the most
qualified person but someone who will help with
the affirmative action mandates. Women are given
tenure and promotion in cases where men would not
receive it. Those of an ethnic background are
given nearly a free pass and are kept on because
of their birth not their performance. - - a male agent -
33 CHALLENGES Of the total respondents,21
observed harassment by sexual identity
34CALS MANAGEMENT
- 62 felt CALS leadership visibly fostered
diversity - 75 believed the workplace climate was welcoming
for clients from underrepresented groups - 66 believed management within their work units
demonstrated a commitment to diversity - 51 felt programming within CALS represented
contributions from underrepresented groups - 39 made adjustments in programming strategies as
a result of increased diversity of clients across
Arizona
35CALS EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES
- 80 feel comfortable being a close friend of,
sharing an office with, or being supervised by
people with the various groups listed - 73 - person with HIV or AIDS
- 71 - openly gay man
- 70 - openly lesbian woman
- 70 - person with a mental illness
- 57 - transgender man or woman
36Comment
- I dont believe race, gender, ethnicity and
sexual orientation are issues that generate a
great deal of problems within this college. The
real problems relate to what people do within the
system. Prejudice pertaining to ones field of
work or research orientation exists and has great
impact on many employees since this type of
prejudice impacts salary and eventually ones
retirement security. - - a campus faculty/specialist member -
37CALS EMPLOYEE ATTITUDESCALS adequately
addresses.
- Ethnicity 59
- Race 58
- Physical disability 57
- Gender 56
- English as a second language 52
- Age 49
- Veteran status 47
- Socioeconomic status 44
- Religion 43
- Sexual orientation 40
- Mental disability 37
- Gender identity 36
38CALS EMPLOYEE ATTITUDESUA campus climate is
- Friendly 45.1
- Welcoming 36.9
- Non-racist 35.9
- Respectful 34.0
- Cooperative 31.6
- Accessibility 31.5
- Non-sexist 30.6
- Competitive 29.3
- Communicative 29.0
- Non-homophobic 27.8
- Improving 27.2
- Concerned 26.6
39Summarizing the ChallengesWomen experienced or
observed harassment more often than men
40Summarizing the ChallengesA supervisor/administra
tor was themost common source
41Summarizing the Challenges
- Derogatory remarks were the
- most common occurrence
42Summarizing the ChallengesThe action most
commonly occurred in theon- and off-campus office
43Next Steps
44Respondents Suggestions toImprove CALS Climate
- Offer workshops and training for all employees
dealing with other cultures, diversity, race and
communication skills - Increase recruitment and retention of
administrators, faculty and staff from
underrepresented groups (broader than race,
ethnicity and gender) - Administrators should develop more visible and
vocal leadership on diversity issues - Focus more attention to physical and
psychological disability, gender identity, sexual
orientation, and the perception and treatment of
women, minority and bi-racial/multiracial
employees.
45Comment
- I do strongly believe that a diverse workforce,
whatever the category of diversity, makes for a
much more rewarding experience. - - Faculty -
-