Anatomy of a Canadian Outsourcing Deal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Anatomy of a Canadian Outsourcing Deal

Description:

Anatomy of a Canadian Outsourcing Deal (Client Side Tips and Strategies) June 15, 2005 ... to address and resolve (in a fashion that the party believes to be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: danac
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Anatomy of a Canadian Outsourcing Deal


1
  • Anatomy of a Canadian Outsourcing Deal
  • (Client Side Tips and Strategies)

3rd Annual CIO Outsourcing Summit Toronto,
Ontario Richard Corley (Blakes) Margaret Wiebe
(CWB)
June 15, 2005
2
Overview
  • Advancing the transaction by
  • Tailoring the RFP
  • Preparing the Draft Outsourcing Contract
  • Engaging with Service Providers
  • Down Selecting
  • Price Competitiveness Strategies
  • Preparing for Negotiations
  • Enhancing the Effectiveness of Negotiations

3
Tailoring the RFP (1)
  • Customer needs to have a clear picture of its key
    objectives and value drivers
  • Lack of internal coherence and a common vision is
    particularly damaging to mid-size sourcing
    projects
  • Senior management focus and support is critical
  • Customer needs to consider what can be done to
    make the opportunity attractive to competing
    service providers
  • Customer should try to view the opportunity from
    the perspective of the service providers

4
Tailoring the RFP (2)
  • Preparation by a service provider of an RFP
    response represents a substantial commitment of
    resources
  • Limit the number of service providers to those
    which are best qualified (to increase the value
    of the opportunity to the service providers)
  • An RFP which clearly communicates a coherent
    sourcing vision demonstrates to service providers
    that customer has done the required due
    diligence, is committed to the project and not
    merely testing the water

5
Outsourcing Contract (1)
  • Inclusion of an excessively one-sided draft
    contract in the RFP is likely to give rise to a
    number of problems in the context of a mid-sized
    transaction
  • Deter potential service providers from vigorously
    pursuing the sourcing opportunity
  • Delays in the negotiations resulting in missed
    deadlines, delayed implementation and loss of
    credibility with stakeholders, etc.
  • Additional process costs
  • Harm to the relationship (which may prevent the
    parties from arriving at an optimal outsourcing
    solution)

6
Outsourcing Contract (2)
  • Use of an initial draft contract that is
    reasonably balanced (but includes all customary
    protections of the customer) can expedite the
    negotiations and avoid the problems that result
    from use of a one-sided contract
  • Employ reasonable risk allocation principles that
    address risks of changes in a manner that fairly
    considers the source of the costs (e.g., customer
    bears unavoidable costs of new taxes for which
    the customer would inevitably have paid without
    the outsourcing)

7
Engaging with Service Providers (1)
  • Due diligence should have allowed customer to
    determine with reasonable accuracy the current
    base case, the optimized base case and to
    identify the areas in which benefits may be
    achieved as a result of outsourcing
  • Effectively share due diligence materials to
    improve service providers knowledge of the
    opportunity (and to help them to reduce amounts
    for contingencies, included in price)
  • Engage with service providers to understand keys
    to improving the value of the opportunity

8
Engaging with Service Providers (2)
  • Reconsider which functions should be retained or
    outsourced based on comparative advantages of
    customer and service providers
  • Explore alternative strategies based on clear
    understanding of comparative advantages
  • Consider short term / long term staffing
    requirements in terms of skill, customer control
    of strategy and cost implications
  • Explore alternative capital refresh models
  • Consider the tax efficiency of alternative
    structures and the potential for savings

9
Down Selecting (1)
  • The evaluation criteria should be established
    prior to issuing the RFP, and should be reflected
    in the RFP
  • Customer needs to consider the key factors that
    will drive the selection of the successful
    service provider, including
  • Objective factors such as price, service levels,
    response times, etc.
  • Subjective factors such as reputation, culture,
    quality of the response, location of facilities,
    depth of operational team, etc.

10
Down Selecting (2)
  • Customer must determine the weight to be assigned
    to each factor, and how to effectively quantify
    each factor
  • Subjective factors, such as culture, working
    relationship and information gathered from site
    visits with other customers frequently play an
    important role in the down select decision
  • It is critical that customer and service provider
    be able to work effectively together in a
    collaborative relationship in order for the
    outsourcing to succeed

11
Price Competitiveness Strategies (1)
  • Extracting meaningful cost savings from mid-sized
    transactions may be challenging for a number of
    reasons including
  • Limits on the ability to achieve scale savings
    due to the necessity for customer and service
    provider to retain personnel with specialized
    skills
  • The relatively higher ratio of overhead costs to
    savings
  • The relatively higher ratio of transaction costs
    to savings
  • Other sources of higher than expected prices can
    include the specification of service and service
    level requirements beyond those actually required
    by customer

12
Price Competitiveness Strategies (2)
  • Strategies which may be employed to enhance
    potential savings include
  • Expanding scope to increase the value of the
    transaction due to the synergies which may be
    realized through the performance by the services
    provider of additional complementary functions
  • Extending the duration of the transaction to
    provide the service provider with additional
    opportunities (and incentives) to make process
    improvement and to reap the benefits of such
    optimizations
  • Opportunities to perform additional related work
    (which may, for example, be offered on a right of
    first proposal basis)

13
Price Competitiveness Strategies (3)
  • However, changes to expand the scope or duration
    of the transaction will increase the importance
    of contractual safeguards, such as
  • Limitations on price increases over the term
  • Automatic price/performance price reductions (to
    reflect the expected saving resulting from
    technological advances)
  • Benchmarking mechanisms
  • Early termination rights
  • Other market pricing or repricing mechanisms
    (such as the use of market scans, most favored
    customer provisions, etc.)

14
Price Competitiveness Strategies (4)
  • Other strategies which may be employed to enhance
    potential savings include
  • Setting more realistic service and service level
    requirements (for example, to more accurately
    reflect current performance and user
    expectations)
  • Eliminating service levels that are not required
    (e.g., those that do not truly reflect
    operational needs)
  • Moving from custom to more generic services
    (which can be provided more efficiently in a
    shared service environment)
  • Working with the service provider to identify and
    exploit other opportunities for cost savings and
    the achievement of greater efficiencies

15
Price Competitiveness Strategies (5)
  • Controlling the cost of the administration of the
    outsourcing arrangement is another area which may
    provide some potential savings
  • The customer will typically want to retain the
    expertise required to develop its strategic
    direction and to effectively manage the delivery
    of the outsourced services but should avoid
    duplicating functions performed by the service
    provider

16
Preparing for Negotiations (1)
  • Customer should try to reduce the number of
    issues arising from the procurement by starting
    with a reasonably balanced contract
  • The RFP should ask service providers to identify
    in an issues list significant concerns with draft
    contract
  • The parties counsel should try to resolve and
    clarify issues prior to the full team negotiating
    meetings
  • The parties should agree to rules of engagement
    and governance protocols for the negotiations at
    the outset

17
Preparing for Negotiations (2)
  • As part of the preparation for the negotiations
    the parties should
  • Agree generally as to the make up of negotiating
    team and ensure that members of the negotiating
    team are dedicated, and are available to
    participate throughout the negotiations
  • Arrange to have subject matter experts available
    to participate in the negotiating meetings as
    required
  • Prepare a list of principal issues to be
    negotiated during the meetings and, prior to the
    negotiations, each party is to clarify its views
    on each issue
  • Empower their negotiating teams to negotiate
    reasonable solutions to the issues

18
Negotiation Governance
  • The governance rules for the negotiation should
    include the following
  • the negotiations are to be interest-based, and
    are to avoid the adoption of positional
    approaches
  • the negotiating team should be empowered to
    address and resolve (in a fashion that the party
    believes to be reasonable) all issues, but the
    negotiating team is not to negotiate to a
    deadlock (rather the negotiating teams are to
    clearly identify the interests which each party
    believes should govern with respect to each
    unresolved matter)
  • Unresolved issues (and interests) should then be
    escalated to a senior executive steering
    committee for resolution

19
Negotiation Strategies
  • Use issues list to identify issues, facilitate an
    exchange of views about such issues, prioritize
    issues and facilitate resolution
  • Impose per issue time limitations on initial
    discussions to facilitate an efficient canvas of
    all outstanding issues
  • To avoid the need for escalation, the parties
    should try to develop creative options to reframe
    the discussion and break the logjam
  • As issues are resolved, the Parties should
    jointly revise the draft contract to reflect the
    agreed resolution

20
  • Questions?

richard.corley_at_blakes.com margaret_wiebe_at_cwb.ca
June 15, 2005
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com